理論‧亞洲‧華語語系

Theory, Asia, Sinophone

10.29980/MCL.201212.0003

史書美(Shu-Mei Shih)

華語語系 ； 理論 ； 文學 ； 亞洲 ； 南洋 ； Sinophone ； Theory ； Literature ； Asia ； South Seas

中國現代文學

22期（2012 / 12 / 20）

39 - 58

繁體中文

本文審視主流論述中「西方與非西方」二分法的政治。更確切地說，本文審視「西方理論與亞洲現實」作為一種權力政治，如何協助帝國主義或國族主義壓迫語言的、族群的、以及文化的異質性。本文將華語語系視為一種文學成就與存在，透過挑戰族群、語言、與國籍之間的平衡互涉，介入並阻斷主流論述的二分法。

This article examines the politics of the majoritarian binary, ”The West and the Rest,” and more specifically, ”Western Theory, Asian Reality,” as a politics of power that serves specific interests ranging from imperialism and nationalism to the suppression of heterogeneity in languages, ethnicities, and cultures. The Sinophone is posited here as a presence, literary and otherwise, that interrupts this majoritarian binary by challenging the chain of equivalence among ethnicity, language, and nationality.

1. Chang、 Iris(2003).The Chinese in America: A Narrative History.New York:Penguin Books.
2. Chaves, Jonathan(1991).Forum: From the 1990 AAS Roundtable.Chinese Literature: Essays, Articles, Reviews,13,77-92.
3. Fusco, Serena(2006).The Ironies of Comparison: Comparative Literature and the Re-Production of Cultural Difference between East and West.Trans: Revue de literature generale et comparee,2
4. Huang, Philip(1991).The Paradigmatic Crisis in Chinese Studies.Modern China,17(3),299-341.
5. Huang, Philip(ed.)(1993)."Public Sphere"/"Civil Society".Modern China,19(2),216-240.
6. Kuhn, Philip(2008).Chinese Among Others: Emigration in Modern Times.Lanham, MD:Rowman and Littlefield.
7. Levenson, Joseph(1958).Confucian China and its Modern Fate.Berkeley:University of California Press.
8. Lionnet(ed.),Shih(ed.)(2011).The Creolization of Theory.Durham:Duke University Press.
9. Omi, Michael,Winant, Howard(1994).Racial Formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1990s.New York:Routledge.
10. Rabinow, Paul(ed.)(1984).The Foucault Reader.New York:Pantheon Books.
11. Said, Edward(1993).Culture and Imperialism.New York:Alfred A Knopf.
12. Sakai、 Naoki(2000).You Asian': On the Historical Role of the West and Asia Binary.South Atlantic Quarterly,99(4),789-817.
13. Shih, Shu-mei(2012).Is the Post in Postsocialism the Post in Posthumanism?.Social Text,30,27-50.
14. Takaki, Ronald(1998).Strangers from a Different Shore: A History of Asian American.Boston:Little, Brown, and Company.
15. Takeuchi、 Yoshimi,Calichman, Richard F.(trans.)(2005).Asia as Method.What is Modernity? Writings of Takeuchi Yoshimi,New York:
16. Takeuchi、 Yoshimi,Calichman, Richard F.(trans.)(2005).What is Modernity?.What is Modernity? Writings of Takeuchi Yoshimi,New York:
17. Takeuchi、 Yoshimi,Calichman, Richard F.(trans.)(2005).Ways of Introducing Culture.What is Modernity? Writings of Takeuchi Yoshimi,New York:
18. Tsu、 Jing(2005).Failure, Nationalism, and Literature: The Making of Modern Chinese Identity, 1895-1937.Stanford:Stanford University Press.
19. Yang、 Mayfair Mei-hui(2011).Postcoloniality and Religiosity in Modern China: The Disenchantments of Sovereignty.Theory, Culture and Society,28(2),3-44.
20. Zhang、 Longxi(1993).Out of the Culture Ghetto: Theory, Politics and the Study of Chinese Literature.Modern China,19(1),71-101.
21. 丁玲、張炯編(2001)。丁玲全集。石家莊:河北人民出版社。
22. 毛澤東、中共中央毛澤東選集出版委員會編(1968)。毛澤東選集。北京:北京人民出版社。
23. 郁達夫、浙江文藝出版社編(1991)。郁達夫小說全編。杭州:浙江文藝。
24. 張愛玲(1986)。傳奇。北京:人民文學出版社。
25. 許地山、楊牧編(1984)。許地山小說選。台北:洪範書局。
26. 黃錦樹(2006)。文與魂與體：論現代中國性。台北:麥田出版社。
27. 黃錦樹(2001)。由島至島。台北:麥田出版社。
28. 黃錦樹(1988)。馬華文學與中國性。台北:元尊出版社。

1. 許維賢(2013)。《新客》：從「華語語系」論新馬生產的首部電影。清華中文學報，9，5-45。
2. 許維賢(2013)。華語語系社群在新加坡─以梁智強和陳子謙的電影為例。中國現代文學，23，83-110。
3. 金惠俊(2019)。華語語系文學，世界華文文學，華人華文文學─中國大陸學界對華語語系文學（Sinophone literature）主張的肯定與批判。東華漢學，29，301-332。
4. 熊婷惠(2015)。華語（語系）電影？：以邱金海之《伴我行》思考華語語系邊界。中山人文學報，39，87-112。
5. 莊怡文(2015)。以「殖民地漢文」與「華語語系文學」概念重論日治時期臺灣古典文學相關問題（1895-1945）。中外文學，44(1)，105-130。