题名

神韻前史:陸時雍《詩鏡》的杜詩批評與盛唐圖像

并列篇名

Pre-history of "Shenyun Theory": Lu Shiyong's Criticism of Du Fu and Great Tang Dynasty Poetry in His Shijing

DOI

10.30407/BDCL.201806_(29).0004

作者

陳英傑(Chen Ying-chieh)

关键词

陸時雍《詩鏡》 ; 杜甫詩 ; 盛唐詩 ; 神韻說 ; 明代復古派 ; Shijing by Lu Shiyong ; Du Fu's poetry ; Great Tang dynasty poetry ; Shenyun theory ; the Revivalist School in the Ming dynasty

期刊名称

政大中文學報

卷期/出版年月

29期(2018 / 06 / 01)

页次

81 - 126

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

明代復古派詩號稱宗法盛唐詩歌,實則特尊杜甫。晚明陸時雍《詩鏡》選杜最多,乍看承此潮流,卻特別標舉李白價值,甚至加上王維,構成三家并稱的鼎立之勢。這種觀念,對復古派詩學傳統造成極大的衝擊,同時帶來一種盛唐圖像的重構工程。本文旨在探究陸時雍藉由杜詩批評,重構出何種盛唐圖像,並詮釋箇中隱含的重要意義。為此,本文首先著墨於陸時雍杜詩批評的「雙重基準」,他由「意」與「力」的角度肯定杜詩的獨特價值,卻亦透過「情」與「韻」的角度批判杜詩悖離詩道。李白作為盛唐巔峰詩人,和杜詩最重大的歧異,尚在於前者的表現型態,擅以素淨、含蓄的語言釋放出更豐富的審美趣味,是為「不至而自至之妙」。陸時雍之所以特為王維爭地位,其實也是出於相類的詩學思索。為具體凸顯陸時雍對復古派的衝擊,本文進一步考察「漫興」、「細寫」,此二觀念實能突破復古派耽溺古人法度、追摹宏大格調的迷霧,積極重建詩的抒情性。最後,本文提出「神韻前史」的概念,試圖串連陸時雍大抵可歸入清初王士禛神韻說形成前的歷史系譜、潮流,卻也顯露出此說形成前相關詩學論述的複雜面貌。

英文摘要

Though claiming to model on the poetry in the Great Tang dynasty, the Revivalist School in the Ming dynasty in fact bestowes a disproportionate privilege upon Du Fu. In the anthology Shijing by Lu Shiyong in the late Ming dynasty, Du Fu's poetry occupies the highest percentage - which seems fairly correspondent to the literary trend at that time. The book, however, at the same time stresses the significance of Li Bai and even Wang Wei, forming a critical framework in which the contributions of all the three great poets are equally valued. Such a framework strikes a great blow against the tradition of Revivalist poetics and, simultaneously, triggers a project on the reconstruction of the image of the Great Tang dynasty. This article investigates the image thus reconstructed through Lu Shiyong's criticism of Du Fu's poetry, and also attempts at interpreting the significance implied in this reconstruction. It begins with a discussion on Lu Shiyong's double standard with which he carries out his criticism of Du Fu: on the one hand, he highly values Du's poetry from the perspective of "Yi" and "Li;" on the other hand, he also criticizes Du Fu of violating the spirit of poetry in terms of "Qing" and "Yun." In contrast to Du Fu, Li Bai as the leading poet of the Great Tang dynasty is highly skilled in evoking richer aesthetic fascination with a plain and concise idiom - what is called "Buzhi er zizhi zhimiao." It is due to the same poetic idea that Lu Shiyong particularly elevates the position of Wang Wei in the history of classical poetry. Finally, this article brings up the concept of a "pre-history of Shenyun theory." In doing so, it not only argues that Lu Shiyong in general may be categorized into a genealogy which prefigures Wang Shizhen's "Shenyun theory" raised at the beginning of the Qing dynasty, but also manifests the complexity of the poetic discourse precedent to the formation of the theory.

主题分类 人文學 > 語言學
人文學 > 中國文學
人文學 > 藝術
参考文献
  1. (宋)葉夢得, Mengde,逯明昕(校注), Mingxin(2011).石林詩話校注.北京=Beijing:人民文學出版社=Renmin wenxue chubanshe.
  2. (宋)魏慶之(編), Qingzhi,王仲聞(點校), Zhongwen(2007).詩人玉屑.北京=Beijing:中華書局=Zhonghua shuju.
  3. (宋)嚴羽, Yu,張健(校箋), Jian(2012).滄浪詩話校箋.上海=Shanghai:上海古籍出版社=Shanghai guji chubanshe.
  4. (明)王世貞, Shizhen,羅仲鼎(校注), Zhongding(1992).藝苑卮言校注.濟南=Jinan:齊魯書社=Qilu shushe.
  5. (明)何良俊, Liangjun(1997).四友齋叢說.北京=Beijing:中華書局=Zhonghua shuju.
  6. (明)胡震亨, Zhenheng,周本淳(校訂), Benchun(1981).唐音癸籤.上海=Shanghai:上海古籍出版社=Shanghai guji chubanshe.
  7. (明)胡應麟, Yinglin(1979).詩藪.上海=Shanghai:上海古籍出版社=Shanghai guji chubanshe.
  8. (明)高棅(編), Bing(1988).唐詩品彙.上海=Shanghai:上海古籍出版社=Shanghai guji chubanshe.
  9. (明)許學夷, Xueyi,杜維沫(校點), Weimo(1998).詩源辯體.北京=Beijing:人民文學出版社=Renmin wenxue chubanshe.
  10. (明)陸時雍(選評), Shiyong,任文京(點校), Wenjing,趙東嵐(點校), Donglan(2010).詩鏡.保定=Baoding:河北大學出版社=Hebei daxue chubanshe.
  11. (明)謝榛, Zhen,李慶立(箋注), Qingli,孫慎之(箋注), Shenzhi(1987).詩家直說箋注.濟南=Jinan:齊魯書社=Qilu shushe.
  12. (唐)司空圖, Tu,郭紹虞(集解), Shaoyu(2001).詩品集解.北京=Beijing:人民文學出版社=Renmin wenxue chubanshe.
  13. (唐)李白, Bai,詹鍈(編), Ying(2010).李白全集校注彙釋集評.天津=Tianjin:百花文藝出版社=Baihua wenyi chubanshe.
  14. (唐)杜甫, Fu,(清)浦起龍(注), Qilong(2000).讀杜心解.北京=Beijing:中華書局=Zhonghua shuju.
  15. (唐)杜甫, Fu,蕭滌非(編), Difei(2015).杜甫全集校注.北京=Beijing:人民文學出版社=Renmin wenxue chubanshe.
  16. (梁)劉勰, Xie ,范文瀾(注), Wenlan(2001).文心雕龍注.北京=Beijing:人民文學出版社=Renmin wenxue chubanshe.
  17. (清)王士禛,袁世碩(編), Shishuo(2007).王士禛全集.濟南=Jinan:齊魯書社=Qilu shushe.
  18. (清)紀昀(編), Yun(2003).四庫全書總目.北京=Beijing:中華書局=Zhonghua shuju.
  19. (清)紀昀(編), Yun,(清)永瑢(編), Rong(1983).景印文淵閣四庫全書.臺北=Taipei:臺灣商務印書館=Taiwan shangwu yinshuguan.
  20. (清)紀昀(編), Yun,(清)永瑢(編), Rong(1983).景印文淵閣四庫全書.臺北=Taipei:臺灣商務印書館=Taiwan shangwu yinshuguan.
  21. (清)紀昀(編), Yun,(清)永瑢(編), Rong(1983).景印文淵閣四庫全書.臺北=Taipei:臺灣商務印書館=Taiwan shangwu yinshuguan.
  22. (清)張廷玉, Tingyu(1974).明史.北京=Beijing:中華書局=Zhonghua shuju.
  23. 《中國古籍善本書目》編輯委員會=Zhongguo guji shanben shumu bianji weiyuanhui(1998).中國古籍善本書目.上海=Shanghai:上海古籍出版社=Shanghai guji chubanshe.
  24. 《四庫禁燬書叢刊》編纂委員會(編)=Siku jinhuishu congkan bianzuan weiyuanhui(2000).四庫禁燬書叢刊.北京=Beijing:北京出版社=Beijing chubanshe.
  25. 王夢鷗, Mengou(1998).文學概論.臺北=Taipei:藝文印書館=Yiwen yinshuguan.
  26. 呂正惠, Zhenghui(1989).抒情傳統與政治現實.臺北=Taipei:大安出版社=Daan chubanshe.
  27. 查清華, Qinghua(2006).明代唐詩接受史.上海=Shanghai:上海古籍出版社=Shanghai guji chubanshe.
  28. 洪業, Ye,曾祥波(譯), Xiangbo(2011).杜甫:中國最偉大的詩人.上海=Shanghai:上海古籍出版社=Shanghai guji chubanshe.
  29. 孫春青, Chunqing(2006).明代唐詩學.上海=Shanghai:上海古籍出版社=Shanghai guji chubanshe.
  30. 徐國能, Guoneng(2013)。元代詩法作品中的杜詩觀。文與哲,22
  31. 徐國能, Guoneng(2009).清代詩論與杜詩批評─以神韻、格調、肌理、性靈為論述中心.臺北=Taipei:里仁書局=Liren shuju.
  32. 袁震宇, Zhenyu,劉明今, Mingjin(1996).中國文學批評通史─明代卷.上海=Shanghai:上海古籍出版社=Shanghai guji chubanshe.
  33. 張健, Jian(1999).清代詩學研究.北京=Beijing:北京大學出版社=Beijing daxue chubanshe.
  34. 陳尚君, Shangjun(2000).陳尚君自選集.桂林=Guilin:廣西師範大學出版社=Guangxi shifan daxue chubanshe.
  35. 陳美朱, Meizhu(2015).明清唐詩選本之杜詩選評比較.臺北=Taipei:臺灣學生書局=Taiwan xuesheng shuju.
  36. 陳英傑, Yingjie(2018).明代復古派杜詩學研究.臺北=Taipei:臺灣學生書局=Taiwan xuesheng shuju.
  37. 陳國球, Guoqiu(2007).明代復古派唐詩論研究.北京 Beijing:北京大學出版社=Beijing daxue chubanshe.
  38. 黃景進, Jingjin(1980).王漁洋詩論之研究.臺北=Taipei:文史哲出版社=Wenshizhe chubanshe.
  39. 葉嘉瑩, Jiaying(2001).杜甫秋興八首集說.石家莊=Shijiazhuang:河北教育出版社=Hebei jiaoyu chubanshe.
  40. 葉維廉, Weilian(2011).與當代藝術家的對話:中國畫的生成.南京=Nanjing:南京大學出版社=Nanjing daxue chubanshe.
  41. 葉維廉, Weilian(1992).中國詩學.北京=Beijing:三聯書店=Sanlian shudian.
  42. 詹杭倫, Hanglun(2002).方回的唐宋律詩學.北京=Beijing:中華書局=Zhonghua shuju.
  43. 蔣寅, Yin(2009).金陵生文學史論集.瀋陽=Shenyang:遼海出版社=Liaohai chubanshe.
  44. 蔡英俊, Yingjun(2001).中國古典詩論中「語言」與「意義」的論題─「意在言外」的用言方式與「含蓄」的美典.臺北=Taipei:臺灣學生書局=Taiwan xuesheng shuju.
  45. 蔡瑜, Yu(1990).高棅詩學研究.臺北=Taipei:國立臺灣大學出版委員會=Guoli taiwan daxue chuban weiyuanhui.
  46. 鄭利華, Lihua(2015).前後七子研究.上海=Shanghai:上海古籍出版社=Shanghai guji chubanshe.
  47. 錢鍾書, Zhongshu(1998).談藝錄.臺北=Taipei:書林出版=Shulin chuban.
  48. 簡錦松, Jinsong(1989).明代文學批評研究.臺北=Taipei:臺灣學生書局=Taiwan xuesheng shuju.
  49. 顏崑陽, Kunyang(2017).詩比興系論.臺北=Taipei:聯經出版事業公司=Lianjing chuban shiye gongsi.
  50. 羅安伶, Anling(2005)。新北,輔仁大學中國文學系=Furen daxue zhongguo wenxue xi。
被引用次数
  1. 陳英傑,陳英傑(2020)。明代復古派詩學中的「摹擬」議題。臺大文史哲學報,94,77-120。
  2. 張俐盈(2019)。從重「情韻」到好「高大」:論陸時雍、沈德潛詩學承變關係。興大中文學報,45,95-119。
  3. 張俐盈(2022)。陸時雍《詩鏡》崇禎間刊本的文獻價值與詩學意義-以《四庫》本為比較基準。書目季刊,56(3),45-62。