以「網路同儕教學」建構「網路學習社群」之行動研究

Action Research on Establishing an Online Learning Community via Online Peer-Teaching

10.6300/JNTNU.2003.48(1).06

王千倖(Chien-Hsing Wang)

行動研究 ； 合作學習 ； 網路學習 ； 網路學習社群 ； action research ； cooperative learning ； online learning ； online learning community

師大學報：科學教育類

48卷1期（2003 / 04 / 01）

119 - 141

繁體中文

本研究旨在探究（1）運用線上同儕教學建構網路學習社群的教育價值；（2）建構歷程中可能遭遇的問題；（3）成功建構的策略。本研究採質性教師行動研究之研究法，以「教學媒體」課程為研究情境，修習該課程的學生為研究參與者，聚焦於「網路同儕教學」活動。研究結果如下：首先，營造「網路學習社群」合作學習氣氛，需要積極主動的小組領導人物，且領導人物應能夠有效運用「群組討論」。此外，網路教師也應具備教導合作學習技巧的能力。再者，學習小組的分組應慎重考量學生的興趣與能力，以維繫學生的學習動機和積極參與。其次，建議以「教學存在」的分析架構為工具，幫助學生反思自己的貢獻和整個網路討論的歷程，以培養主動參與網路學習社群所需具備的技能和知識。此外，適當地要求學生統整網路討論內容，應可以促進知識建構。最後，若要促進網路學習社群的知性互動、提昇其效能，最好將網路同儕教學與同儕回饋分散於整個學習歷程的不同時間點，使學生有時間可以反思並且修改他們的作品。在此要再次強調，教師引導線上討論的技巧是提昇整體效能的要素。

The purpose of this study was to explore (1) the educational value of using online peer teaching to establish an online learning community; (2) the problems that might occur during the process of implementation; and (3) the strategies for successful implementation. The methodology used for this investigation was qualitative teacher action research. The research context was the existing course on Instructional Media: those taking the course were the participants in the study. The focus activity of this study was Online Peer Teaching. The lessons learned from the project are as follows.First, to create a climate for cooperative learning in an online learning community, it is necessary to have active leaders who can effectively use group discussion. Additionally, online teachers should be capable of teaching cooperative skills. Moreover, the capabilities and personal interests of individuals must be taken into serious consideration in the arrangement of groups, in order to maintain their motivation and active engagement.Second, to cultivate the skills and knowledge needed for active participation in an online learning community, it is suggested that the analysis framework of ”teaching presence” be used as a tool to help students self-reflect on their own contributions and the over-all online discussion. In addition, it is advisable to ask students to synthesize their online discussion in order to enhance knowledge construction.Finally, to enhance intellectual interaction and promote the efficacy of an online learning community, it is better to implement online peer-teaching and peer-evaluation in a distributive manner so that individuals have time to reflect on and revise their written work. Here again the teachers’ skill in terms of guiding online discussion is an important element in increasing the efficacy of online learning communities.

1. Anderson, T.,Rourke, L.,Garrison, D. R.,Archer, W.(2001).Assess teaching presence in a computer conferencing context.Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks,5(2),1-17.
2. Arhar, J. M.,Holly, M. L.,Kasten, W. C.(2001).Action research for teachers: Traveling the yellow brick road.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Merrill.
3. Barron, B. J. S.,Schwartz, D. L.,Vye, N. J.,Moore, A. Petrosino, A.,Zech, L.,Bransford, J. D.,the Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt.(1998).Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem-and project-based learning.The Journal of the Learning Science,7(3&4),271-311.
4. Bernard, R. M.,de Rubalcava, B. R.,St-Pierre, D.(2000).Collaborative online distance learning: Issues for future practice and research.Distance Education,21(2),260-277.
5. Brown, R. E.(2001).The process of community-building in distance learning classes.Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks,5(2),18-35.
6. Clark, R. E.(1998).Motivating Performance: Part 1-Diagnosing and Solving Motivation Problems.Performance Improvement,37(8),39-47.
7. Gersh, S. O.(2001).Technology's role in creating the shared learning environment.Multimedia Schools,8(5),48-51.
8. Hanna, D. E.,Glowacki-Dudka, M.,Conceição-Runlee, S.(2000).147 practical tips for teaching online groups: Essentials of web-based education.Madison, Wisconsin:Atwood.
9. Huba, M. E.,Freed, J. E.(2000).Learner-centered assessment on college campuses: Shifting the focus from teaching to learning.Boston:Allyn & Bacon.
10. Jonassen, D. H.(1996).Computers in the classroom: Mindtools for critical thinking.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
11. Jonassen, D. H.,Peck, K. L.,Wilson, B. G.(1999).Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.
12. Kochtanek, T. R.,Hein, K. K.(2000).Creating and nurturing distributed asynchronous learning environments.Online Information Review,24(4),280-293.
13. Lynch, M. M.(2002).The online educator: A guide to creating the virtual classroom.London:Routledge Falmer.
14. Maier, M. H.,Keenan, D.(1994).Teaching tools: Cooperative learning in economics.Economic Inquiry,32,358-561.
15. McNiff, J.(2002).Action research: Principles and practice.London:Routledge Falmer.
16. Palloff, R. M.,Pratt, K.(2001).Lessons from the cyberspace classroom: The realities of online teaching.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
17. Romiszowski, A. J.,B. H. Khan (Ed.)(1997).Web-Based Instruction.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Educational Technology.
18. Shrivastava, P.(1999).Management classes as online learning communities.Journal of Management Education,23(6),691-702.
19. Siegel, M. A.,Kirkley, S.,B. H. Khan (Ed.)(1997).Web-Based Instruction.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Educational Technology.
20. Tu, C.,Corry, M.(2001).A paradigm shift for online community research.Distance Education,22(2),245-263.
21. Walker, A. J.(1996).Cooperative learning in the college classroom.Family Relations,45,327-335.
22. Wang, C.(2002).Lessons from an action research on project-based learning in a web-based learning environment.Paper presented at the meeting of 2002 E-Learning: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate,Montreal, Canada:
23. Wang, F.,Bonk, C. J.(2001).A design framework for electronic cognitive apprenticeship.Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks,5(2),131-151.
24. Ziegahn, L.(2001)."Talk" about culture online: The potential for transformation.Distance Education,22(1),144-150.
25. 王千倖(1999)。超媒體在學習「班級經營」上的應用。國科會專案研究：NSC-86-2511-S-018-006-C。
26. 王千倖(2000)。「電腦與教學」課程教學設計探究。國科會專案研究：NSC-87-2511-S-018-022。
27. 王千倖(2001)。Web科技應用之教學行動研究。「新世紀的閱讀運動，新世紀的課程與教育科技發展，我國教改的過去、現在與未來」國際研討會，彰化市:
28. 挑戰2008：國家發展重點計畫(2002-2007)
29. 徐新逸(2001)。如何利用網路幫助孩子成爲研究高手：網路專題式學習與教學創新。台灣教育，607，25-34。
30. 曹晉穎(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台灣，淡江大學。

1. 陳明雅(2006)。網路合作式問題解決教學法與服裝設計系學生創造力表現之行動研究。人類發展與家庭學報，8，69-84。
2. 陳文和,洪敦賓,李欣靜,王元聖(2020)。運用學習社群方式探討大學生體育課滿意度及其影響因素。淡江體育學刊，23，13-24。
3. 陳彥廷(2012)。非同步網路數學教學案例討論之互動歷程研究。教育科學研究期刊，57(1)，79-111。
4. 董力華(2021)。COVID-19疫情影響下的通識課：網路合作學習經驗與實施成效探究。人文社會科學研究，15(4)，81-110。
5. 黃菱鈺、陳煜璋、吳佳純(2013)。社群網站之認知關鍵多數與資訊豐富度於學習滿意度之影響─以 facebook為例。Electronic Commerce Studies，11(3)，269-288。
6. 賴膺守、劉明宗、游寶達、張原豪(2008)。支援知識建立之網絡學習環境設計及其實施成效。課程與教學，11(1)，1-19。
7. 林翠雲(2011)。華語數位教材共同編寫設計與實施─以 Google 協作平台為共寫機制之實驗。中原華語文學報，7，109-133。
8. 羅希哲、楊宏仁、曾國鴻、陳沅、許紋華(2008)。高職應用科學教師運用知識管理平台促進教學專業之成長。科學教育學刊，16(1)，53-74。
9. 楊淑晴、林文川(2011)。應用wiki網路寫作系統發展大專英文寫作技巧之研究。課程與教學，14(2)，75-102。
10. 鄭淑慧、陳育亮(2010)。網路教學與社群學習在成人教育的應用-以混成式網路學習探討其行為意向。資訊管理學報，17(1)，177-196。
11. 鍾才元、陳伊菱(2016)。教師線上社群之成員組成特性與社群內提供及接受社會支持之相關因素：一個教師臉書社團之調查發現。教育傳播與科技研究，113，63-88。
12. (2008)。台中市國小高年級學童對校園閱讀線上認證系統滿意度之分析研究。社會科教育研究，13，103-124。
13. (2016)。活動理論觀點下國小師資生數學課程轉化的阻力與助力。教育學報，44(2)，51-79。
14. (2018)。運用社群媒體案例教學對 AAC 專業成長之現況調查－以大陸地區為例。東臺灣特殊教育學報，20，70-107。
15. (2022)。同儕互評可行嗎？同儕互評在儲訓校長班之信效度研究。教育與心理研究，45(1)，29-52。