题名

虛擬社群線上聊天行為模式之研究

并列篇名

A Research on the Online Chatting Behavior Model in the Virtual Community

DOI

10.29767/ECS.200406.0002

作者

余泰魁(Tai-Kuei Yu);鄭時宜(Shih-I Cheng)

关键词

虛擬社群 ; 結構方程式模型 ; 交叉效度 ; Virtual Community ; Structural Equation Model ; Cross Validity

期刊名称

Electronic Commerce Studies

卷期/出版年月

2卷2期(2004 / 06 / 30)

页次

117 - 135

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

隨著網路科技的普及,網路使用者的技術門檻需求大富降低,改變了傳統的人際關係溝通模式,形成許多新的網路社群。網路瀏灠者對某個網站或是討論看板的認同會隨著本身的投入程度和使用時間的增加而升高,當個人認為自己是隸屬於某個虛擬社群時,瀏灠者才會投入更多精力,也會產生較多的認同和期待。虛擬社群經營者必需滿足網友間的互動需求,才能使網友於社群間和他人溝通獲得更多滿足,並進而加深其參與程度。因此社群經營者要瞭解瀏灠者線上聊天行為的影響因素便成為一個經營網站的重要課題。本研究提出一個「虛擬社群線上聊天行」因果模式,以台南市東區網咖店為樣本進行問卷調查,有效問卷回收516份。研究並依亂數分類成二組樣本資料,以結構方程式模型來加以驗證,研究結果發現:瀏灠者對參與線上虛擬社群「行為」會受其對線上社群的「行為意向」、「行為控制知覺」的影響。而「行為意向」又受到「態度」與「認知」所影響。研究模式中各潛在依變項對整體模式的變異解釋力(R²)分別為:行為(0.881)、行為意向(0.386)、態度(0.691),顯示本研究所提的行為棤式為一可接受的模式。此外,在雙交叉驗證方面,以基準樣本為基礎模式時交叉效度指標(Cross validation index, CVI)為10.87,以校準樣本為基礎模式時夜叉效度指標為8.32,顯示研究二組樣本具有交叉效度,研究量表與研究模式之接受性均相當高。

英文摘要

With the popularity of the internet technology, the technical requirements necessary for the internet users are drastically declined. This changed the traditional communication model of interpersonal relationships and formulated a lot of internet communities. A virtual community has to satisfy the interaction among its browsers, fulfill their needs of communication with others in community, and furthermore deepen their degree of participation. How a virtual community attracts and keeps its browsers is worthwhile for us pondering. The study presents a casual model of “the online behavior model in the virtual community.” The questionnaires wee conducted at the internet cafes located in the east district of Tainun as sample. There were 516 valid copies of questionnaires returned and were divided into two groups according to random numbers. Through the construction and experiment of structural equation modeling, results found that the presented revised theory of planned behavior is an acceptable model in the related online virtual community. The browsers’ behavior to participate in the virtual community was directly and positively affected by the behavioral intention and perceived behavioral control. Analysis also showed that the cross validation index (CVI) read as 10.87. The cross validation index (CVI) read as 8.32. The two sets of samples have presented cross validity, the research questionnaire and model are highly acceptable.

主题分类 基礎與應用科學 > 資訊科學
社會科學 > 經濟學
参考文献
  1. Ajzen, I.(1991).The Theory of Planned Behavior.Organization Behavior Human Decision Process,50,179-211.
  2. Ajzen, I.(1985).Action-control: From Congition to Behavior.Heidelberg:Springer.
  3. Ajzen, I.,B. L., Driver(1992).Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior to Leisure Choice.Journal of Leisure Research,3(1),207-240.
  4. Bagozzi, R. P.,Y. Yi(1988).On the evaluation for structural equation models.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,16,74-94.
  5. Bandalos, D. L.(1993).Factors influencing cross validation of confirmatory factor analysis models.Multivariate Behavioral Research,28(3),351-374.
  6. Baumgartner, H.,C. Homburg(1996).Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: a review.International Journal of Research in Marketing,13,139-161.
  7. Browne, M. W.,R. Cudeck(1989).Single sample cross validation indices for covariance structures.Multivariate Behavioral Research,24(4),445-455.
  8. Butler, P.,J. Peppard(1998).Consumer purchasing on the internet: processes and prospects.European Management Journal,16(5),600-610.
  9. Chau, Y. K.,J. H., Hu(2001).Information Technology Acceptance by Individual Professionals: A Model Comparison Approach.Decision Sciences,32(4),699-719.
  10. Chin, W.W.,P. Todd(1995).On the use, usefulness, and ease of use of structural equation modeling in MIS research: a note of caution.MIS Quarterly,19(2),237-246.
  11. Cudeck, R.,M. W., Browne(1983).Cross validation of covariance structures.Multivariate Behavioral Research,18,147-167.
  12. Cudeck, R.,S. J., Henly(1991).Model selection in covariance structures analysis and the "problem" of sample size: a clarification.Psychological Bulletin,109(3),512-519.
  13. Davis, F. D.,R. P., Bagozzi,P. R. Warshaw(1989).User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models.Management Science,35(8),982-1003.
  14. Ding, L.,Velicer, W.,L. Harlow(1995).Effect of estimation methods, number of indicators per factor and improper solutions on structural equation modeling fit indices.Structural Equation Modeling,2,119-143.
  15. Dishaw, M. T.,D. M. Strong(1999).Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs.Information and Management,36,9-21.
  16. Fenech, T.(1998).Using perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness to predict acceptance of the world wide web.Computer Networks and ISDN Systems,30,629-630.
  17. Fornell, C.,D. F., Larcker(1981).Evaluating structural equation models with unobervables and measurement error.Journal of Marketing Research,18,39-50.
  18. Ghosh, S.(1998).Making business sense of internet.Harvard Business Review,127-135.
  19. Hagel III, J.,A. G., Armstrong(1997).Net Gain: Expanding Markets Through Virtual Communities.Boston:Harvard Business School Press.
  20. Hairs, F.,R. E., Anderson,R. L., Tatham,W. C. Black(1998).Multivariate Data Analysis.New York:Macmillan.
  21. Henderson, R.,D. Rickwood,P. Roberts(1998).The beta test of an electronic supermarket.Interacting with Computers,10,385-399.
  22. Igbaria, M.,S., Parasuraman,J. J. Baroudi(1996).A motivational model of microcomputer usage.Journal of Management Information Systems,13(1),127-138.
  23. Igbaria, M.,T., Guimaraes,G. B. Davis(1995).Testing the determinants of microcomputer usages via a structural equation model.Journal of Management Information Systems,11(4),87-114.
  24. Jöreskog, K. G.,D. Sörbom(1996).LISREL: A Guide to the Program and Applications
  25. Kiobas, J. E.(1995).Beyond information quality: fitness for purprose and electronic information resource use.Journal of Information Science,21(2),95-114.
  26. Liao, S.,Y. P., Shao,H., Wang,A., Chen(1999).The adoption of virtual banking: an empirical study.International of Journal of Information Management,19,63-74.
  27. Lindroos, K.(1997).Use quality and the World Wide Web.Information and Software Technology,39,827-836.
  28. MacCallum, R. C., M.,Roznowski, M.,Mar, C.,J. V. Reith(1994).Alternative strateiges for cross-validation of covariance structure models.Multivariate Behavioral Research,29(1),1-32.
  29. Marsh, H. W.,J. R., Balla,R. P. McDonald(1988).Goodness-of-fit indices in confirmatory factor analysis: The Effect of Sample Size.Psychological Bulletin,103,391-410.
  30. Mathieson, K.(1991).Predicting user Intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior.Information System Research,2(3),173-191.
  31. McDonald R. P.,H. W., Marsh(1990).Choosing a multivariate model: noncentrality and goodness of fit.Psychological Bulletin,107,247-255.
  32. Moon, J. W.,Y. G. Kim(2001).Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context.Information and Management,38,217-230.
  33. Palmer, J. W.,D. A. Griffith(1998).An emerging model of web site design for marketing.Communications of the ACM,41(3),44-51.
  34. Romm, C.,N. Pliskin,R. Clarke(1997).Virtual communities and society: troward an integrative three phase model.International Journal of Information Management,17(4),261-270.
  35. Ryan, J.(1995).A use and gratification study of the internet social interaction site LambdaMOO: Talking with DINOS.Ball State University, Thesis for Master Degree.
  36. Taylor, S.,P. A. Todd.(1995).Decomposition and cross effects in the Theory of Planned Behavior: a Study of consumer adoption intentions.International Journal of Research in Marketing,12,137-155.
  37. Weller, H.(1988).Interactivity in microcomputer-based instruction: its essential components and how it can be enhanced.Educational Technology,28,23-27.
  38. 王國川(1997)。計畫行為理論成份量表之信、效度評估-以青少年搭機車帶安全帽之研究為例。國立中正大學學報,1,95-121。
  39. 蘇芬媛(1996)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立交通大學傳播研究所未出版碩士論文。
被引用次数
  1. 陳聖岳、陳景元、徐欽賢、徐茂洲(2012)。蹼泳運動賽會參與者行為傾向模式之研究─中介效果驗證。運動休閒管理學報,9(2),158-179。
  2. 黃德祥、洪福源(2015)。大學生上課使用智慧型手機行為及其對學生影響之探究。教育研究與發展期刊,11(4),109-126。
  3. 廖子賢(2015)。「行動虛擬社群」持續參與決策:前因模式與後果模式。電子商務學報,17(2),b1-54。
  4. 潘寶石、許朝俊、徐茂洲、包怡芬(2016)。以計畫行為理論分析臺東飛行傘運動觀光客之行為模式。運動研究,25(2),65-86。
  5. 譚彩鳳、蔡孟宗(2011)。高職生的網路休閒行為-以新北市能仁家商為例。美容科技學刊,8(4),5-40。
  6. 徐茂洲(2013)。綠島水域運動觀光客行為傾向模式中介效果驗證之研究。運動休閒管理學報,10(2),41-61。