國小學童運用動態幾何軟體學習三角形面積成效之研究

The Effect of Elementary Students to Learn the Triangular Area Measurement in the Geometer's Sketchpad

10.30165/JHSS.200801.0009

戴錦秀(Chin-Hsiu Tai)；柳賢(Shian Leou)

G.S.P輔助教學 ； 動態幾何軟體 ； 國小學童 ； G.S.P assistant teaching method ； dynamic geometric software ； elementary pupils

人文與社會學報

2卷1期（2008 / 01 / 01）

205 - 235

繁體中文

本研究主要目的在於比較「G.S.P.輔助」和「傳統講述式」兩種教學法，對國小五年級學童在三角形面積的學習成就之差異，及G.S.P.輔助教學是否因此提升學童的學習態度和學習興趣。 研究方法為實驗研究法，採等組前測－後測設計。研究樣本為屏東縣某國小五年級二班共51位學生，任選一班（26位）為實驗組，另一班（25位）為控制組，實驗組實施G.S.P.輔助教學，控制組實施傳統講述式教學。本實驗教學為六節課，每節40分鐘。經實驗結果，發現如下： 1.在三角形面積學習成就方面，實驗組學生平均數顯著優於控制組。 2.針對六次形成性評量結果，發現除了第二次外，其餘五次的平均分數，實驗組比控制組高，且兩組均正向發展。 3.G.S.P.輔助教學發現對數學學習態度與學習興趣有明顯的助益。

The purpose for this study is to compare the effect of ”the G.S.P group” which received the computer assisted instruction with ”the traditionally instruction group” to learn triangular area courses, and whether the G. S. P. assistant teaching method can promote pupils' attitudes and interests of learning or not. The approach facilitated in this study was the Experimental research method, with pretest and posttest for parallel groups. All the 51 examined pupils were random chosen from the two classes in 5th grade of a certain elementary school in Pingtung, one class (26 persons) assigned as the experimental group and the others (25 persons) as the control group. While the former learned the G.S.P activities, the latter exercised randomly through the traditionally descriptive teaching method .The experimental taught 6 times and each time was taken 40 minutes, it showed: 1. In the aspect of learning triangular area measurement, the average scores of the experimental group were significantly better than that of the control group. 2. While formative evaluations of all those six learning results were noted, it indicated that all the average scores except the second one of the experimental group were better than that of the control group. Nevertheless both of the groups were making progress. 3. The results of this research indicated that the G.S.P. assistant teaching method can significantly help to promote pupils' attitudes and interests of learning.

1. Jackiw, N. (1991).Geometer's Sketchpad. (computer program). Berkeley, CA: Key Curriculum Press.
2. 教育部(1998)。國民教學階段九年一貫課程總綱要。台北：教育部。
3. Chipman, S. F.(Ed.),Segal, J. W.(Ed.),Glaser, R.(Ed.)(1985).Thinking and Learning Skills.New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum ssociates.
4. Corle, C. G.(1960).A study of the quantitative values of fifth and sixth grade pupils.Arithmetic Teacher,7,333-340.
5. Dede, C. J.(1987).Empowering environments, hypermedia and microworlds.Computing Teacher,1987(November),20-24.
6. Freudenthal, H.(Ed.)(1958).Report on methods of initiation into geometry.Groningen:J.B.Wolters.
7. Kaput, J. J.(1992).Representation and problem solving : Methodological issues related to modeling.Teaching and Learning Mathematical Problem Solving: Multiple Research Perspectives,Hilisdale, NJ:
8. Resnick, L. B.(1983).Mathematics and science Learning : A new conception.Science,220,477-478.
9. Resnick, L. B.(Ed.),Klopfer, L. E.(Ed.)(1989).Toward the thinking curriculum: Current cognitive research.Alexandria VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
10. van Hiele, P. M.(1986).Structure and insight: A theory of mathematics education.Orlando, FL:Academic Press.
11. 台灣省國民學校教師研習會編印(1998)。國民小學數學科新課程概念（高年級）。
12. 全任重(1996)。圓規、直尺與Cabri-geometre。數學傳播，20(1)，3-14。
13. 林保平(1996)。動態幾何軟體在教學上的應用。八十四學年度輔導區地方教育輔導活動教師研討會活動論文集
14. 林保平(1997)。八五年度國科會研究計劃報告八五年度國科會研究計劃報告,台北市立師院。
15. 林星秀(2001)。國立高雄師範大學數學研究所。
16. 張春興(1991)。現代心理學。台北市:東華書局。
17. 郭文金(1999)。國立高雄師範大學數學研究所。
18. 陳英娥(1992)。國立高雄師範大學數學研究所。
19. 游恆山編譯(1991)。心理學。台北市:五南圖書出版公司。
20. 溫世頌(1987)。教育心理學。台北市:三民書局。
21. 謝哲仁(2000)。電子試算表在高中數學教學之可行性研究。美和技術學院學報，18，118-128。
22. 譯寧君(1998)。國小兒童面積迷思概念分析研究。台北師院學報，11，573-602。

1. 陳嘉皇(2008)。國小面積資訊教材學習軌道設計與教學成效探討。高雄師大學報，25(3)，103-124。