陽剛特質與媒體職場的性別化實踐：以報社攝影記者的工作爲例

Constructing Masculinities at Work: A Case Study of the Photojournalists' Work in Taiwan

10.6195/cjcr.2008.13.03

孫志硯(Ken Chih-Yan Sun)

性別與工作 ； 陽剛特質研究 ； 情緒勞動 ； 勞動社會學 ； 性別與媒體 ； gender and work ； masculinities ； emotional labor

中華傳播學刊

13期（2008 / 06 / 01）

75 - 115

繁體中文

本文援引「王道式陽剛特質」的理論概念，論證性別如何深入攝影記者的實踐與互動，建構攝影記者的認同與文化。首先，脈絡化攝影記者的勞動現況後，本文論證攝影記者陽剛特質的建構，如何立基於主控他者的權力位置上。其次，藉由呈現鑲嵌於攝影記者人際互動中的陽剛特質，本文指出因為自身性別氣質無法打入此一人際網絡的男女攝影記者，如何錯失了各種資源，進而使得攝影記者勞動的高度陽剛面貌，變得更難以撼動。

In this article, I examine the process through which photojournalists in Taiwan construct masculinities in their daily practice. First, I highlight the ways in which conflicts and confrontations that photojournalists in Taiwan consistently face arise from the organization of their work. Next, by analyzing the accounts of Taiwanese photojournalists about work experiences, I demonstrate how these photojournalists manipulate and mobilize conflicts and confrontations in the labor process to establish their masculine identities and to bond with each other. In doing so, I illuminate how photojournalists strategize the dominant notions of masculinities to combat their inferior class status both within and outside newspaper agencies. In this vein, I argue that hegemonic notions of masculinities are central to understanding the work of photojournalists in Taiwan.

1. 成令方、吳嘉苓(2005)。科技的性別政治：理論和研究的回顧與前瞻。科技、醫療與社會，3，51-112。
   連結：
2. 孫志硯(2007)。論述、權力，與報業攝影記者職業性別隔離的維繫。新聞學研究，91，125-169。
   連結：
3. 黃淑玲(2003)。男子性與喝花酒文化：以Bourdieu 的性別支配理論為分析架構。台灣社會學，5，72-132。
   連結：
4. Alison, A.(1994).Nightwork: Sexuality, pleasure, and corporate masculinity in a Tokyo hostess club.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
5. Carrigan, T.,Connell, R. W.,Lee, J.(1985).Toward a new sociology of masculinity.Theory and Society,14(5),551-604.
6. Chen, A.(1999).Lives at the center of the periphery, lives at the periphery of the center: Chinese American masculinities and bargaining with hegemony.Gender & Society,13(5),584-607.
7. Chodorow, N.(1989).Feminism and psychoanalytical theory.New Haven:Yale University Press.
8. Chodorow, N.(1978).The reproduction of mothering: Psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender.Berkeley:University of California Press.
9. Collins, P. H.(2005).Black sexual politics: African Americans, gender, and the new racism.New York:Routledge.
10. Connell, R. W.(2005).Masculinities.Oxford:Blackwell.
11. Connell, R. W.(1987).Gender and power.Stanford:Stanford University Press.
12. Connell, R. W.,& Messerschmidt, J. W.(2005).Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept.Gender & Society,19(6),829-859.
13. Dellinger, K.,Christine, L. W.(2002).The locker room and the dorm room: The cultural context of sexual harassment in two magazine publishing organizations.Social Problems,49(2),242-257.
14. Fiske, J.(1994).Media matters: Everyday culture and political change.Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press.
15. Hochschild, A.(1983).The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
16. Hondagneu-Sotelo, P.,Messner, M.,H. Brod,M. Kaufman (Eds.)(1994).Theorizing masculinities.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
17. Leidner, R.(1993).Fast food, fast talk: Service work and routinization of everyday life.Berkeley:University of California Press.
18. Messner, M.(1993).“Changing men” and feminist politics in the United States.Theory & Society,22(5),723-737.
19. Messner, M.(1992).Power at play: Sports and the problem of masculinity.Boston, MA:Beacon Press.
20. Messner, M.(2000).Barbie girls vs. sea monsters: Children constructing gender.Gender & Society,14(6),765-784.
21. Padavic, I.,Reskin, B. F.(2002).Women and men at work.Thousand Oaks, CA:Pine Forge Press.
22. Pascoe, C. J.(2007).Dude, you are a fag: Masculinity and sexuality in high school.Berkeley:University of California Press.
23. Pierce, J.(1995).Gender trials: Emotional lives in contemporary law firms.Berkeley:University of California Press.
24. Pierce, J.,M. Kimmel,M. Messner (Eds.)(1998).Men's lives.Needham Heights, MA:Allyn and Bacon.
25. Pyke, K.(1996).Class-based masculinities: The interdependence of gender, class, and interpersonal power.Gender & Society,10(5),527-549.
26. Roos, P.,Reskin, B. F.,B. F. Reskin (Ed.)(1984).Sex segregation in the workplace: Trends, explanations, remedies.Washington D.C.:National Academy Press.
27. Rubin, G.,K. V. Hansen,I. J. Philison (Eds.)(1975).Women, class, and the feminist imagination.Philadelphia:Temple University Press.
28. Salzinger, L.(2003).Genders in production: Making workers in Mexico's global factories.Berkeley:University of California Press.
29. Skard, T.,Connection. R. R. Rush,D. A. Norwood (Eds.)(1989).Communications at the crossroads: The gender gap.New Jersey:Ablex Pub Corp.
30. van Zoonen, L.(1994).Feminist media studies.London:Sage.
31. Wajcman, J.(1999).Managing like a man: Women and men in corporate management.Cambridge:Polity Press.
32. Williams, C. L.(1995).Still a man's world: Men who do "women's" work.Berkeley:University of California Press.
33. Williams, C. L.(1989).Gender differences at work: Women and men in the non-traditional occupations.Berkeley:University of California Press.
34. Zinn, B. M.,Dill, B. T.,B. Zinn, P. Hondagneu-Sotelo,M. Messner (Eds.)(2000).Gender through the prism of difference.Needham Heights, MA, Allyn & Bacon.
35. 勿讓視覺文字化
36. 沈怡(1995)。從女性新聞到人性新聞——性別情境新聞處理與兩性新聞工作者待遇之比較以臺灣報業一般狀況與美國全國性報業、瑞典報業為例。台大新聞論叢，1(3)，126-153。
37. 中文報紙「新美學主義」：中文報紙的視覺困境與突破
38. 你吸毒嗎？
39. 賣花者言
40. 林芳玫(1996)。女性與媒體再現：女性主義與社會建構論的觀點。台北:巨流。
41. 追獵影像的群犬
42. 張錦華、劉容玫譯(2001)。女性主義媒介研究。台北:遠流。
43. 梁慶瑞(1991)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。輔仁大學大眾傳播研究所。
44. 新聞攝影的省思
45. 來一張照片，我們損失了什麼？
46. 黃義書(2004)。世新大學傳播研究所。
47. 活在沒有聲音、寂寞的一群記者：新聞攝影的定位與地位探討（一）
48. 廖郁毓(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。政治大學新聞研究所。
49. 臧國仁(1999)。新聞媒體與消息來源：媒體框架與真實建構之論述。台北:三民。
50. 臧國仁、鍾蔚文、楊怡珊(2001)。新聞工作者的社會智能——再論記者與消息來源之互動。新聞學研究，69，55-93。
51. 蕭蘋(2004)。新聞專業中的性別政治：媒體組織對女性記者及其報導的影響。新聞學研究，81，85-123。
52. 賴維真(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。中正大學勞工所。
53. 靜怡(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。政治大學新聞研究所。
54. 鍾宜杰(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。世新大學社會發展研究所。

1. 韓采燕(2012)。工程實驗室的陽剛化及穩定機制。科技、醫療與社會，14，169-226。
2. (2021)。「男人是這樣煉成的」：各生命階段直男同性友誼中的男子氣概建構初探。中華傳播學刊，39，231-268。
3. (2023)。打造「英雄」？刑事偵查人員的陽剛階序與實踐結構。臺灣社會學刊，73，1-49。