單一與多重媒體重複策略之傳播效果比較

Comparing Effects of Single and Multiple Media Repetition

10.6195/cjcr.2008.14.06

張郁敏(Yuh-Miin Chang)

多重媒體 ； 消息來源擴大理論 ； 媒體策略 ； 漸減 ； 廣告重複 ； multiple media ； source magnification theory ； media strategy ； wearout ； advertising repetition

中華傳播學刊

14期（2008 / 12 / 01）

231 - 265

繁體中文

本研究透過實驗室實驗法，探究在多次暴露下，多重與單一媒體重複在傳播效果上的差異。研究結果發現：(1)多重較單一媒體重複產生較高的注意力。而且，多重媒體動複沒有呈現注意力漸減現象，而單一媒體重複則明顯漸減。(2)多重與單一媒體重複的處理動機相當，但兩者並沒有如預期地呈現處理動機漸減的現象。(3)兩種媒體重複策略所產生的廣告態度相當，單一媒體重複在廣告態度上呈現漸減，但多重媒體重複卻無趨向存在。

This study compared the effectiveness between single and multiple media repetition through a set of lab experiments. The findings revealed several interesting results. First, multiple media repetition leads to significantly higher attention than the counterpart after four exposures of a message. Attention did not wear out from two to four exposures for the multiple media conditions but wore out significantly for the single medium conditions. Both repetition strategies yielded similar level of motivation to process after four exposures, and maintained similar level of motivation from two to four exposures. Finally, although two strategies generated similar attitude toward the advertisement after four exposures, single medium repetition significantly wore out from two to four exposures while the counterpart did not.

1. Berlyne, D. E.(1970).Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value.Perception and Psychophysics,8,279-286.
2. Blackwell, R. D.,Miniard, P. W.,Engel, J. F.(2001).Consumer behavior.Orlando, FL:Harcourt.
3. Breckler, S. J.(1984).Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,47(6),1191-1205.
4. Brock, T. C.,Albert, S. M.,Becker, L. A.(1970).Familiarity, utility, and supportiveness as determinants of information receptivity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,14,292-301.
5. Bucy, E. P.(2003).Media credibility reconsidered: Synergy effects between on-air and online news.Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly,80(2),247.
6. Cacioppo, J. T.,Petty, R. E.(1979).Effects of message repetition and position on cognitive response, recall, and persuasion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,37(1),97-109.
7. Calder, B. J.,Sternthal, B.(1980).Television commercial wearout: An information processing view.Journal of Marketing Research,17(2),173-186.
8. Celsi, R. L.,Olson, J. C.(1988).The role of involvement in attention and comprehension processes.Journal of Consumer Research,15(September),210-214.
9. Chang, Y.,Thorson, E.(2004).Television and web advertising synergies.Journal of Advertising,33(2),75-84.
10. Craig, C. S.,Sternthal, B.,Leavitt, C.(1976).Advertising wearout: An experimental analysis.Journal of Marketing Research,13(4),365-372.
11. Edell, J. A.,Keller, K. L.(1989).The information processing of coordinated media campaigns.Journal of Marketing Research,26(2),149-163.
12. Edell, J. A.,Keller, K. L.(1999).Analyzing media interactions: The effects of coordinated TV-print advertising campaigns.Cambridge, MA:Marketing Science Institute.
13. Grass, R. C.,Wallace, W.(1969).Satiation effects of TV commercials.Journal of Advertising Research,9(3),3-8.
14. Harkins, S. G.,Petty, R. E.(1987).Information utility and the multiple source effect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,52(2),260-268.
15. Harkins, S. G.,Petty, R. E.(1981).Effects of source magnification of cognitive effort on attitudes: An information-processing view.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,40(3),401-413.
16. Harkins, S. G.,Petty, R. E.(1981).The multiple source effect in persuasion: The effects of distraction.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,7(4),627-635.
17. John, O. P.,Benet-Martinez, V.,H. Reis,C. Judd (Eds.)(2000).Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology.Cambridge University Press.
18. Keller, K. L.,A. A. Mitchell (Ed.)(1993).Advertising exposure, memory, and choice.Hillsdale, N.J.:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Keller, K. L.,E. Thorson,J. Moore (Eds.)(1996).Integrated communication: Synergy of persuasive voices.Mahwah, N.J.:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. MacInnis, D. J.,Moorman, C.,Jaworski, B. J.(1991).Enhancing and measuring consumers` motivation, opportunity, and ability to process brand information from ads.Journal of Marketing,55(October),32-53.
21. McCullough, J. L.,Ostrom, T. M.(1974).Repetition of highly similar messages and attitude change.Journal of Applied Psychology,59(3),395-397.
22. Moenaert, R. K.,Souder, W. E.(1996).Context and antecedents of information utility at the R&D/marketing interface.Management Science,42(11),1592-1610.
23. Moore, D. J.,Mowen, J. C.,Reardon, R.(1994).Multiple sources in advertising appeals: When product endorsers are padi by the advertising sponsor.Journal of Academy of Marketing Science,22(3),234-243.
24. Moore, D. J.,Reardon, R.(1987).Source magnification: The role of multiple sources in the processing of advertising appeals.Journal of Marketing Research,24(November),412-417.
25. Moore, D. J.,Reardon, R.,Mowen, J. C.(1989).Source independence in multiple source advertising appeals: The confederate effect.Advances in Consumer Research,16,719-722.
26. Pechmann, C.,Stewart, D. W.(1988).Advertising repetition: A critical review of wearin and wearout.Current Issues and Research in Advertising,11(2),285-329.
27. Petty, R. E.,Cacioppo, J. T.(1979).Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,37,1915-1926.
28. Petty, R. E.,Ostrom, T. M.,Brock, T. C.(1981).Cognitive responses in persuasion.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Pieters, R. G. M.,Rosbergen, E.,Hartog, M.(1995).Visual attention to advertising: The impact of motivation and repetition.Groningen, Netherlands:University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
30. Pieters, R.,Rosbergen, E.,Wedel, M.(1999).Visual attention to repeated print advertising: A test of scanpath theory.Journal of Marketing Research,XXXVI(November),424-438.
31. Preston, I. L.(1970).A reinterpretation of the meaning of involvement in Krugman`s model of advertising communication.Journalism Quarterly,47(Summer),287-295.
32. Reeves, B.,Nass, C.(1996).The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like peal people and places.N.Y.:Cambridge University Press.
33. Stammerjohan, C.,Wood, C. M.,Chang, Y.,Thorson, E.(2005).An empirical investigation of the interaction between publicity, advertising, and previous brand attitudes and knowledge.Journal of Advertising,34(4),55-67.
34. Stewart, D. W.(1999).Advertising wearout: What and how you measure matters.Journal of Advertising Research,September/October,39-42.
35. 林清山(1993)。心理與教育統計學。台北:東華書局。

1. 林正士、周軒逸(2014)。總統大選電視辯論對於首投族之政治傳播效果：以2012 年台灣總統選舉為例。選舉研究，21(1)，47-87。
2. 邱玉蟬,李芳盈(2019)。傳播不平等與健康不平等：資訊來源對食安風險感知與預防行為的影響。中華傳播學刊，36，3-38。
3. 張郁敏(2012)。跨媒介新聞資訊處理模型：資訊來源擴大理論在新聞研究上的應用。新聞學研究，110，85-124。
4. (2013)。組織形象修護之效果：檢視危機歷史及危機回應策略之影響。傳播與社會學刊，26，169-210。