题名

媒體集團綜效偏差之研究

并列篇名

A Study on Synergy Bias of Media Conglomerates

DOI

10.6195/cjcr.2009.16.08

作者

陳炳宏(Ping-Hung Chen)

关键词

媒體集團 ; 媒體內容多元 ; 綜效策略 ; 綜效偏差 ; 衛星電視頻道 ; synergy ; synergy bias ; cable channel ; content diversity ; product placement

期刊名称

中華傳播學刊

卷期/出版年月

16期(2009 / 12 / 01)

页次

177 - 213

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

當集團化成為媒體發展的趨勢後,集團即可能要求旗下新聞媒體刊播企業相關之訊息,雖然這與置入性行銷稍不同,但仔細深究,這不僅影響新聞的選擇及内容多元化,並傷害新聞媒體的專業與自主,學者稱為綜效偏差(synergy bias)。本研究即試圖解析綜效偏差對新聞内容多元的影響。結果顯示,平均每小時新聞報導約有30秒屬於綜效偏差新聞,其中以夜間新聞為最多,平均每則達104秒,而内容則以集團的頻道家族的相關活動報導為最多。

英文摘要

Following the inescapable trend of conglomeration, growth-driven activities such as mergers and acquisitions in the media industry have been the major market strategies for media companies in recent years. However, even though synergy may result in profit-growth from economic perspectives, researchers in academia of journalism and communication should focus on those topics such as how synergy bias of media conglomerates affect the content production of their news media from the viewpoint of the role of news media in a democratic society. This study is devoted to exploring the following question: What are synergy biases in news reports caused by synergy strategies of media conglomerates? The study found that there was averagely 30 seconds of synergy bias news within one-hour news reports. Most of synergy bias news appeared in the time slot of the late night news. In addition, the most often appearing content of synergy bias news is television channel family's activities and programming.

主题分类 社會科學 > 傳播學
参考文献
  1. 林照真(2005)。置入性行銷:新聞與廣告倫理的雙重崩壞。中華傳播學刊,8,27-40。
    連結:
  2. (2002).Who's afraid of AOL Time Warner?.Economist,362(8257),54-55.
  3. An, S.,Jin, H. S.(2004).Interlocking of newspaper companies with financial institutions and leading advertisers.Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly,81(3),578-600.
  4. Ansoff, H. I.(1988).The new corporate strategy.New York:John Wiley & Sons.
  5. Ansoff, Igor, II.(1965).Corporate Strategy.New York:McGraw-Hill.
  6. Auletta, K.(1998).Synergy city.American Journalism Review,20(4),18-35.
  7. Baker, R.(1998).Murdoch's mean machine.Columbia Journalism Review,37(1),51-56.
  8. Baldwin, T. F.,McVoy, D. S.,Steinfield, C.(1996).Convergence: Integrating media, information & communication.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  9. Bucy, E. P.(2003).Media credibility reconsidered: Synergy effects between on-air and online news.Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly,80(2),247-264.
  10. Chan-Olmsted, S. M.,Chang, B. H.(2003).Diversification strategy of global media conglomerates: Examining its patterns and determinants.Journal of Media Economics,16(4),213-233.
  11. Chen, P. H.(2002).Who owns cable television? Media ownership concentration in Taiwan.The Journal of Media Economics,15(1),41-55.
  12. Davis, C.,Craft, S.(2000).New media synergy: Emergence of institutional conflict of interest.Journal of Mass Media Ethics,15(4),219-231.
  13. Dijkstra, M.,Buijtels, H. E. J. J. M.,van Raaij, W. F.(2003).Separate and joint effects of medium type on consumer responses: A comparison of television, print, and the internet.Journal of Business Research,58(2005),377-386.
  14. Editorial: Synergy crisis(1993).The Nation,257(1),339-340.
  15. Gershon, R. A.(1997).The transnational media corporation: global messages and free market competition.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  16. Granatstein, L.(2000).Synergy push: New "Newsweek" sales unit.Mediaweek,10(47),64.
  17. Hallin, D. C.,Iyenger, S. (Eds.),Reeves, R. (Eds.)(1997).Do the media govern? Politicians, voters, and reporters in America.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  18. Jaquet, J.(2002).The wage of synergy.The Nation,274(1),20.
  19. Jung, J.(2003).The bigger, the better? Measuring the financial health of media firms.The International Journal on Media Management,5(4),237-250.
  20. Jung, J.,Chan-Olmsted, S. M.(2005).Impacts of media conglomerates' dual diversification on financial performance.Journal of Media Economics,18(3),183-202.
  21. K. Dyson (Eds.),P. Humphreys (Eds.)(1990).The political economy of communications: International and European dimensions.NY:Routledge.
  22. Kirk, J.(2002).Chicago Tribune, magazine unlikely to work together despite merger.Knight Ridder Tribune Business News.
  23. Kolo, C.,Vogt, P.(2003).Strategies for growth in the media and communications industry: Does size really matter?.The International Journal on Media Management,5(4),251-261.
  24. Lafayette, J.(1998).Critical ABC news story on Disney dies.Electronic Media,17(43),1-2.
  25. McAllister, M. P.(1996).The commercialization of American culture: New advertising, control and democracy.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  26. McAllister, M. P.(2002).Television news plugola and the last episode of Seinfeld.Journal of Communication,52(2),383-401.
  27. McChesney, R. W.(2004).The problem of the media: U.S. communication politics in the 21st century.
  28. McManus, J.(1992).Serving the public and serving the market: A conflict of interest?.Journal of Mass Media Ethics,7,196-208.
  29. Meehan, E. R.,Pearson, R. E. (Eds.),Uricchio, W. (Eds.)(1991).The many lives of Batman: Critical approaches to a superhero and his media.New York, NY:Routledge.
  30. Meier, W. A.,Trappel, J.,D. McQuail (Eds.),K. Siune (Eds.)(1998).Media policy: Convergence, concentration & commerce.London:Sage.
  31. Naik, P. A.,Raman, K.(2003).Understanding the impact of synergy in multimedia communications.Journal of marketing research,40(4),375-388.
  32. Noll, A. M.(2002).The myth of convergence.The International Journal on Media Management,5(1),12-13.
  33. Ozanich, G. W.,Wirth, M.,A. Alexander (Eds.),J. Owers (Eds.),R. Carveth (Eds.)(1998).Media Economics: Theory and Practice.NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  34. Perrucci, D.(1998).Tribune Co. builds on its synergy.Mediaweek,8(15),22.
  35. Picard, R. G.(1989).Media economics: Concepts and issues.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  36. Rothenberg, R.(2000).The AOL/Time Warner marriage is a calculated bet on convergence.Advertising Age,71(3),32.
  37. Tucher, A.(1997).The real dangers of conglomerate control: A Columbia Journalism Review forum looks at the bead news about corporate synergy.Columbia Journalism Review,35(6),46-51.
  38. Turow, J.(1992).The organizational underpinnings of contemporary media conglomerates.Communication Research,19(6),682-704.
  39. Waterman, D.(2000).CBS-Viacom and the effect of media mergers: An economic perspective.Federal Communications Law Journal,52(3),531-550.
  40. Wicklein, J.(2001).More print/TV partnership.Columbia Journalism Review,39(6),11.
  41. Williams, D.(2002).Synergy bias: Conglomerate and promotion in the news.Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media,46(3),453-472.
  42. Wirth, M. O.,Bloch, H.(1995).Industrial Organization and Media Industry Analysis.Journal of Media Economics,8(2),15-26.
  43. 中華徵信所(1996)。1996/1997 年台灣地區集團企業研究。台北:中華徵信所。
  44. 王石番(1989)。傳播內容分析法:理論與實證。台北:幼獅。
  45. 吳思華(1996)。策略九說。台北:臉譜文化。
  46. 金溥聰(1996)。從選舉聲刺看台灣電視新聞的公正性。民意研究季刊,77-92。
  47. 柯慧貞(1998)。台北市有線電視市場集中化趨勢分析。1998傳播管理研討會:傳播管理新思潮會議實錄,高雄:
  48. 唐士哲譯(2005)。問題媒體:二十一世紀美國傳播政治。台北:巨流。
  49. 徐蘊康(2001)。中時、聯合兩大報系的吸金大法。商業周刊,698,108-109。
  50. 張裕亮、趙莒玲、張家琪、杜聖聰(2007)。新聞採訪與寫作。台北:三民書局。
  51. 陳炳宏(2001)。傳播產業研究。台北:五南。
  52. 陳炳宏(1999)。台灣有線電視產業集團化趨勢研究-以和信力霸企業集團爲例。廣播與電視,14,89-110。
  53. 馮建三譯(1994)。媒介經濟學。台北:遠流。
  54. 黃湘玲、林炳宏、陳炳宏(2002)。媒體集團建構新聞平台之初探性研究。「中華傳播學會2002年會暨論文研討會」論文,台灣,台北:
  55. 楊志弘(1994)。大陸傳播事業投資環境之研究-廣電部份。台北:行政院大陸委員會。
  56. 鄭功賢(2008)。米勒展讓聯合報系名利雙收。財訊月刊,319,158-159。
  57. 謝奇任譯、唐維敏譯、甘尚平譯(1997)。大匯流-整合媒介、資訊與傳播。台北:亞太圖書。
  58. 魏玓(2000)。傳播媒體的市場化、數位化與全球化。當代,151,4-13。
被引用次数
  1. 曾國峰(2019)。「反媒體壟斷法」草案演進與規範辨證。中華傳播學刊,35,3-41。
  2. 李雅靖(2016)。競合策略。中華傳播學刊,29,223-233。
  3. 張錦華(2013)。無獨有偶?比較美國2003年反鬆綁運動和臺灣2012年反壟斷運動的異同。傳播研究與實踐,3(2),27-63。
  4. (2017)。閱聽人「數位足跡」分析在新聞文本經營上的應用:以TS8新聞網處理「九月政爭」為例。傳播管理學刊,17(2),35-66。