環境風險的認知與溝通：以全球暖化議題的情境公眾為例

Perception and Communication of Environmental Risk: A Case Study of Situational Publics Regarding Global Warming

10.6195/cjcr.2012.22.07

楊意菁(Yie-Jing Yang)；徐美苓(Mei-Ling Hsu)

公眾情境理論 ； 公眾溝通 ； 全球暖化 ； 風險認知 ； 環境風險 ； situational theory of publics ； public communication ； global warming ； risk perception ； environmental risk

中華傳播學刊

22期（2012 / 12 / 01）

169 - 209

繁體中文

本研究以公關公眾情境理論探討台灣公眾對全球暖化議題認知、資訊尋求以及政策支持等問題，並採用線上問卷調查訪問了1,130位年輕受訪者。研究結果發現，受訪者對於全球暖化議題皆有相當高程度的問題認知，但同時也認為全球暖化問題難以解決。根據複迴歸分析發現，問題限制認知與問題涉入除了可以影響主動資訊尋求，也與問題認知一起扮演政策支持的重要變項。本研究最後也針對不同情境公眾，提出了全球暖化風險溝通的傳播策略。

Based on the situational theory of publics, this study explores the relationships among public recognition problems, information processing, and policy support. An Internet survey was conducted on 1,130 young Taiwanese adults in August 2009. The results showed that the majority of the interviewees could be categorized as constrained behavior publics (i.e., high problem recognition and high constraint recognition). The results of multiple regressions indicated that problem recognition can only predict passive information processing, not active information seeking. The variables of problem recognition and problem involvement can predict active information seeking. In addition, people who are categorized as high problem involvement and low constraint recognition are more supportive of global warming-related policies. The study concludes with suggestions for future studies and risk communication strategies regarding global warming issues.

1. 黃俊儒、簡妙如(2010)。在科學與媒體的接壤中所開展之科學傳播研究：從科技社會公民的角色及需求出發。新聞學研究，105，127-166。
   連結：
2. Guggenheim, D. (Director). (2006). An inconvenient truth [Film]. U.S.: Paramount.
3. 吳榮華（2010）。〈哥本哈根會議及台灣之因應〉。上網日期：2010 年 9 月 20 日，取自 http://www.npf.org.tw/post/3/7031
4. Aldoory, L.(2001).Making health communications meaningful for women: Factors that influence involvement.Journal of Public Relation Research,13,163-185.
5. Aldoory, L.,Kim, J.-N.,Tindall, N.(2010).The influence of perceived shared risk in crisis communication: Elaborating the situational theory of publics.Public Relations Review,36,134-140.
6. Beck, U.(1992).Risk society: Towards a new modernity.New Delhi, India:Sage.
7. Berelson, B.(Ed.),Janowitz, M.(Ed.)(1966).Reader in public opinion and communication.New York:The Free Press.
8. Chang, Y.-C.(2000).College Park, MD,University of Maryland.
9. Dewey, J.(1954).The public and its problems.Chicago, IL:The Swallow Press.
10. DiMento, J. F. C.(Ed.),Doughman, P.(Ed.)(2007).Climate change: What it means for us, our children, and our grandchildren.Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press.
11. Frewer, L. J.(1999).Public risk perceptions and risk communication.Risk communication and public health,New York:
12. Grunig, J. E.(1983).Washington reporter publics of corporate public affairs programs.Journalism Quarterly,60,603-614.
13. Grunig, J. E.(2006).Furnishing the edifice: Ongoing research on public relations as a strategic management function.Journal of Public Relations Research,18,151-176.
14. Grunig, J. E.(1978).Defining publics in public relations: The case of a suburban hospital.Journalism Quarterly,55,109-118.
15. Grunig, J. E.(1983).Communication behaviors and attitudes of environmental publics: Two studies.Journalism Monographs,81,1-16.
16. Grunig, J. E.,Hunt, T.(1984).Managing public relations.New York:Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
17. Hallahan, K.(2001).The dynamics of issues activation and response: An issues process model.Public Relations Research,13,27-59.
18. Hallahan, K.(2000).Inactive publics: The forgotten publics in public relations.Public Relations Review,26,499-515.
19. Hamilton, P. K.(1992).Grunig's situational theory: A replication, application, and extension.Journal of Public Relations Research,4,123-149.
20. Kahlor, L. A.(2007).An augmented risk information seeking model: The case of global warming.Media Psychology,10,414-435.
21. Kahlor, L. A.,Rosenthal, S.(2009).If we seek, do we learn? Predicting knowledge of global warming.Science Communication,30,380-414.
22. Kim, J.-N.(2005).College Park, MD,University of Maryland.
23. Kim, J.-N.,Grunig, J. E.,Ni, L.(2010).Reconceptualizing the communicative action of publics: Acquisition, selection, and transmission of information in problematic situations.International Journal of Strategic Communication,4,126-154.
24. Kim, J.-N.,Li, C.,Sha, B.-L.(2008).Breaking down the stakeholder environment: Explicating approaches to the segmentation of publics for public relations research.Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly,85,751-768.
25. Kim, J.-N.,Ni, L.(2009).Creating a theory-driven strategic public relations procedure.12th Annual International Public Relations Research Conference,Miami, FL:
26. Kim, J.-N.,Shen, H.,Morgm, S.(2009).Predictors of bone marrow, organ, and egg donation applying the situational theory of problem solving.annual meeting of International Communication Association,Chicago, IL:
27. Lee, S.,Rodriguez, L.(2008).Four publics of anti-bioterrorism information campaigns: A test of the situational theory.Public Relations Review,34,60-62.
28. Leiserowitz, A. A.(2006).Climate change, risk perceptions and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values.Climatic Change,77,45-72.
29. Leiserowitz, A. A.(2005).American risk perceptions: Is climate change dangerous?.Risk Analysis,25,1433-1442.
30. Linder, S. H.(2006).Cashing-in on risk claims: On the for-profit inversion of signifiers for "global warming.".Social Semiotics,16,103-132.
31. Lorenzoni, I.,Nicholson-Cole, S.,Whitmarsh, L.(2007).Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications.Global Environmental Change,17,445-459.
32. Moriarty, P.,Kennedy, D.(2004).The web, the public, and the global warming debate.Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal,35,723-735.
33. Neff, R. A.,Chan, I. L.,Smith, K. C.(2009).Yesterday's dinner, tomorrow's weather, today's news? US newspaper coverage of food system contributions to climate change.Public Health Nutrition,12,1006-1014.
34. Nerlich, B.,Koteyko, N.,Brown, B.(2010).Theory and language of climate change communication.Climate Change,1,97-110.
35. Ockwell, D.,Whitmarsh, L.,O'Neill, S.(2009).Reorienting climate change communication for effective mitigation: Forcing people to be green or fostering grass-roots engagement?.Science Communication,30(3),305-327.
36. Palenchar, M. J.,Heath, R. L.(2007).Strategic risk communication: Adding value to society.Public Relations Review,33,120-129.
37. Renn, O.(2005).Risk perception and communication: Lessons for the food and food packaging.Food Additives and Contaminants,22,1061-1071.
38. Stephenson, L. B.,Crete, J.(2010).Studying political behavior: A comparison of Internet and telephone surveys.Journal of Public Opinion Research,23(1),24-55.
39. Taig, T.(1999).Risk communication in government and the private sector: Wider observations.Risk communication and public health,New York:
40. Tulloch, J.,Lupton, D.(2003).Risk and everyday life.London:Sage.
41. Werder, K. P.(2006).Responding to activism: An experimental analytic of public relations strategy influence on attributes of public.Journal of Public Relations Research,18,335-356.
42. White, R. M.,Hooke, W.(2004).Climate science, technology and politics: A tangled web.Technology in Society,26,375-384.
43. Yeager, D. S.,Larson, S. B.,Krosnick, J. A.,Tompson, T.(2011).Measuring Americans' issue priorities: A new version of the most important problem question reveals more concern about global warming and the environment.Public Opinion Quarterly,75,125-138.
44. 吳宜蓁(1998)。議題管理。台北市:正中書局。
45. 周桂田(2003)。全球在地化風險下之風險溝通與風險評估─以SARS為Case分析。2003台灣社會學年會，台灣，台北:
46. 孫秀蕙(1995)。公關理論中的「雙向對等性溝通模式」再省思。廣告學研究，5，185-201。
47. 徐美苓、楊意菁(2011)。台灣全球暖化風險溝通的常民認知。傳播與社會，15，71-104。
48. 張瓊懿譯、Gore, A.(2007)。不願面對的真相。台北市:商周。
49. 黃元鵬(2007)。昨天過後：全球暖化、氣候變遷與英國書市。全國新書資訊月刊，103，59-63。
50. 黃廷宜(2008)。高科技政策中的風險溝通─以中部科學工業園區后里園區為例。2008TASPAA夥伴關係與永續發展國際學術研討會，台灣，台中:
51. 顧忠華(2003)。風險、文性化與社會資本。2003台灣社會學年會，台灣，台北:
52. 顧忠華編(2001)。第二現代─風險社會的出路？。台北市:巨流。

1. 曾敏惠、吳杰穎(2017)。水患自主防災社區風險溝通模式之探究。災害防救科技與管理學刊，6(1)，1-22。
2. 陳映均、李松濤(2017)。社會性科學議題新聞的框架分析—以基因改造新聞為例。科學教育學刊，25(S)，439-462。
3. 鄧宗聖(2018)。全球暖化科普出版品中的視覺再現。教育資料與圖書館學，55(2)，171-225。
4. 傅文成(2018)。兩岸服貿協議民眾的媒體信任、政治信任、風險感知與行為意圖分析。中華傳播學刊，34，167-206。
5. 傅文成(2019)。年金改革議題的風險傳播：從公眾情境檢視認知、傳播行為與政策支持傾向。傳播研究與實踐，9(2)，171-199。
6. 洪立三(2022)。臺灣民眾對於氣候變遷看法的受眾分層。地理研究，76，121-138。
7. 李美華(2017)。台灣報業媒體網路平台氣候變遷風險溝通：2009 ~ 2016 年的歷時性分析。中華傳播學刊，32，45-90。
8. 林宗弘(2019)。數位貧窮與天災風險資訊來源：來自臺灣傳播調查的證據。新聞學研究，138，131-162。
9. 施琮仁(2017)。從雙路徑模型探討風險訊息的包裝與呈現對環境友善行為意圖的影響。傳播研究與實踐，7(1)，5-36。
10. (2022)。台灣亡國感？台灣民眾對香港反送中運動的媒體信任、風險感知、負面情感與行為意圖分析。傳播與社會學刊，61，161-195。