题名

視覺性的超越與語藝的複訪:數位時代視覺語藝的初探性研究

并列篇名

Beyond the Visuality and Revisit of Rhetoric: A Preliminary Study on Visual Rhetoric in the Digital Age

DOI

10.6195/cjcr.2014.26.04

作者

邱誌勇(Chih-Yung Chiu)

关键词

數位 ; 視覺性 ; 視覺語藝 ; 軟體 ; digital ; visuality ; visual rhetoric ; software

期刊名称

中華傳播學刊

卷期/出版年月

26期(2014 / 12 / 01)

页次

107 - 135

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

在數位時代中,視覺圖像與動態影像已產生明顯的質變,傳統符號學式分析取徑中強調的形式元素,已逐漸被更具抽象性的邏輯與資訊結構取代,藉由演算法運算與視覺化呈現來服膺社會的慣習。本文試圖將視覺語藝的論述焦點置放於數位時代中探究其本質與意義,並認為數位時代視覺語藝的本質不再僅是關乎勸服與言說策略的組構關係,人們在接收到數位視覺圖像之際,如何解構數位視覺圖像背後數據與軟體之規律與模式,才是關鍵命題。

英文摘要

In the age of digital distribution, visual graphics and moving images have generated significant change ontologically. Traditional semiotic approach that emphasizes on analyzing symbolic elements has gradually been replaced by an abstract quality of mathematical logic and information architecture that can make a fluid transition between different states of materiality. Through the process of algorithmic computing, symbolic codes are generated to be recognizable symbols, signs, or images based on traditional conventions. To the extent, this research attempts to place visual rhetoric into the digital era in order to explore the essence and significance of digital visual rhetoric. The research claims that the key element in mapping and our understanding for the spectator to perceive the digital visual image is to comprehend that the underlying concept and structure of those visualization projects are the archive and database, rather than just a fabric relationship between persuasive and speech strategies.

主题分类 社會科學 > 傳播學
参考文献
  1. Manovich, L. (2005). Soft cinema: Navigating the database. Retrieved August 13, 2014, from http://www.softcinema.net
  2. Anderson, T.(1993).Defining and structuring art criticism for education.Studies in Art Education,34,199-208.
  3. Barrett, T.(2000).Criticizing art: Understanding the contemporary.Mountain View, CA:Mayfield.
  4. Barthes, R.,Heath, S.(Trans.)(1977).Image, music, text.New York:Hill and Wang.
  5. Block, F.(Ed.),Heibach, C.(Ed.),Wenz, K.(Ed.)(2004).The aesthetics of digital poetry.Ostfildern, Germany:Hatje Cantz.
  6. Bolter, J. D.,Gromala, D.(2003).Windows and mirrors: Interaction design, digital art, and the myth of transparency.Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press.
  7. Bonsiepe, G.(1967).Visual/verbal rhetoric.Dot Zero,2,37-42.
  8. Brinkmann, H.(1980).Mittelalterliche hermeneutik.Darmtadt, Germany:Wissenschaftl Buchgesellschaft.
  9. Brouwer, J.(Ed.),Mulder, A.(Ed.),Charlton, S.(Ed.)(2003).Making art of databases.Rotterdam, the Netherlands:V2_Publishing/NAi Publishers.
  10. Burnett, R.(1995).Cultures of vision: Images, media, and the imaginary.Bloomington, IN:Indiana University Press.
  11. Dondis, D. A.(1973).A primer of visual literacy.Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press.
  12. Elkins, J.(2003).Visual studies: A skeptical introduction.New York:Routledge.
  13. Fuller, M.(2003).Behind the blip: Essays on the culture of software.London:Autonomedia.
  14. Gombrich, E. H.(1982).The image and the eye: Further studies in the psychology of pictorial representation.London:Phaidon.
  15. Hill, C. A.(Ed.),Helmers, M.(Ed.)(2004).Defining visual rhetorics.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  16. Holtzman, S.(1997).Digital mosaics: The aesthetics of cyberspace.New York:Touchstone.
  17. Hubler, C.(Ed.)(2008).Media arts Zurich.Zurich, Switzerland:Scheidegger & Spiess.
  18. Jonas, H.(1954).The nobility of sight.Philosophy and Phenomenological Research,14,507-519.
  19. Lima, M.(2011).Visual complexity mapping patterns of information.New York:Princeton Architectural Press.
  20. Manovich, L.(2013).Software takes command.New York:Bloomsbury Academic.
  21. Manovich, L.(2001).The language of new media.Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press.
  22. Mitchell, W. J. T.(1994).Picture theory: Essays on verbal and visual representation.Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.
  23. Negroponte, N.(1995).Being digital.New York:Alfred A. Knopf.
  24. Panofsky, E.(1955).Meaning in the visual arts.Chicago, IL:The University of Chicago Press.
  25. Poggenpohl, S. H.(1998).Doubly damned.Visible Language,32,200-233.
  26. Ranciere, J.(2009).The future of the image.London:Verso.
  27. Rodowick, D. N.(2001).Reading the figural, or, philosophy after the new media.Durham, UK:Duke University Press.
  28. Rose, G.(2001).Visual methodologies.London:Sage.
  29. Schmitz, N.(2000).Bewegung als symbolische form. Die ikonologie und der kunstbegriff der modern.Uber bilder sprechen. Positionen und perspektiven der medienwissenschaft,Marburg, Germany:
  30. Sporre, D. J.(2000).Perceiving the arts: An introduction to the humanities.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
  31. Steyerl, H.(2009).In defense of the poor image.e-flux,10
  32. Sturken, M.,Cartwright, L.(2001).Practices of looking: An introduction to visual culture.New York:Oxford University Press.
  33. Vesna, V.(Ed.)(2007).Database aesthetics: Art in the age of information overflow.Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota Press.
  34. 吳莉君譯、Berger, J.(2005)。觀看的方式。台北市:麥田。
  35. 吳瓊編(2005)。視覺文化的奇觀:視覺文化總論。北京:中國人民大學出版社。
  36. 李文吉譯、Flusser, V.(1994)。攝影的哲學思考。台北市:遠流。
  37. 邱誌勇(2012)。幻化流形:後電影時代的數位活動影像。現代美術學報,23,101-123。
  38. 張惠譯、田麗娟譯、王春辰譯、Brett, D.(2006)。裝飾新思維:視覺藝術中的愉悅和意識形態。南京:江蘇美術。
  39. 陳芸芸譯、Lull, J.(2004)。全球化下的傳播與文化。台北市:韋伯。
  40. 陳芸芸譯、Mirzoeff, N.(2004)。視覺文化導論。台北市:韋伯。
  41. 陳懷恩(2008)。圖像學:視覺藝術的意義與解釋。台北市:如果。
  42. 黃冠華(2006)。觀看不見:凝視的概念。新聞學研究,87,131-167。
  43. 韓叢耀(2008)。圖像:一種後符號學的再發現。南京:南京大學出版社。
  44. 蘇文淑譯、福嶋亮大(2012)。當神話開始思考:網路社會的文化論。台北市:大藝。
被引用次数
  1. 李長潔(2020)。回家與旅行之間:過程語藝與手遊《旅行青蛙》。資訊社會研究,39,99-133。
  2. 李俊儀,李佳蓉(2019)。隱喻影像之視覺意象認知及其藝術教育意涵。教育研究與發展期刊,15(2),89-121。
  3. 邱誌勇(2020)。從數位轉向到美學運算:論數位世代科技藝術的新美學。藝術學研究,27,123-160。
  4. 王孝勇(2018)。逆反時光、探訪視覺:視覺語藝的古典脈絡與其示現。傳播研究與實踐,8(2),213-248。
  5. (2021)。看見不一樣的爺奶:照片作為祖孫代間溝通的橋梁。傳播與社會學刊,55,197-233。