题名

氣候變遷相關政策民意支持的多元面貌

并列篇名

Patterns of Public Support for Policies Related to Climate Change

DOI

10.6195/cjcr.2015.28.07

作者

徐美苓(Mei-Ling Hsu);施琮仁(Tsung-Jen Shih)

关键词

公眾參與 ; 風險傳播 ; 氣候變遷 ; 電話調查 ; 環境信念 ; public engagement ; risk communication ; climate change ; telephone survey ; environmental belief

期刊名称

中華傳播學刊

卷期/出版年月

28期(2015 / 12 / 01)

页次

239 - 278

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究探討民眾對氣候變遷議題相關政策支持度及其影響因素。針對台灣成年人的電訪發現,除徵收能源稅及發展核電的支持度不過半外,其他政策則有八到九成五的支持度。支持發展核電的民意受政治光譜影響,但不同的框架語言對政治傾向中立者有顯著的支持度差異。進一步迴歸分析結果則顯示,影響各政策支持度的預測因子有不同的組合,意涵氣候變遷相關政策民意的多元面貌。本研究最後針對政策支持度型態提出解釋及未來研究及實務建議。

英文摘要

This study examined the level of public support for various policies related to climate change as well as the underlying factors shaping public attitudes toward climate change. The results of a nationally representative sample of 1,007 people indicated that Taiwanese people supported four of the six policies investigated in this study. In contrast to imposing an energy tax and developing a nuclear power plant, which were accepted by less than 50% of the respondents, all other policies attained high acceptance ratings (80% ~ 95%). Public support for developing a nuclear power plant was swayed by people’s political orientation. However, reframing the nuclear power issue was more effective for people who were politically independent than for those with a specific political orientation. Further regression analysis revealed that the factors predicting various policy issues differed, indicating that people have varying attitudes toward climate change policies. According to the findings of this study, the differential patterns of policy support are explained, and recommendations are proposed for both research and practical purposes.

主题分类 社會科學 > 傳播學
参考文献
  1. 媽媽核電監督聯盟(2012)。〈限制電力零成長,經濟衰退?〉。上網日期:2013 年9 月30 日, 取自http://momlovestaiwan.tw/content/nuclearPower/NuclearPowerList.aspx
  2. 蕭代基(2011.02.24)。〈低耗能產業結構才有競爭力〉,《經濟日報》,A4 版焦點。
  3. 李宗祐(2012.05.29)。〈高市搶先課碳稅環署批違法〉,《中國時報》,A10 版。
  4. 行政院環境保護署(2012.05.25)。《施政願景、策略、成果及展望》,上網日期:2013 年9 月30 日, 取自http://www.epa.gov.tw/ch/artshow.aspx?busin=2157&art=2008110513502803&path=12050
  5. 經濟部(2011)。〈我國能源政策思維與政策方向〉。上網日期:2013 年9 月30 日,取自http://twenergy.org.tw/NuclearSafe/
  6. 楊美玲(2013.05.23)。〈財長:時機不宜能源稅確定緩徵〉。《聯合晚報》,財經焦點版。
  7. Duffield, J. S.、譚偉恩(2013.08.20)。〈台灣能源安全的困境〉,《低碳生活部落格》。上網日期:2013 年9 月30 日,取自http://lowestc.blogspot.tw/2013/08/blog-post_20.html
  8. Pew Research Center. (2012.10.05). More say there is solid evidence of global warming. Retrieved September 30, 2013, from http://www.people-press.org/2012/10/15/more-say-there-is-solid-evidence-ofglobal-warming/
  9. Yale Project on Climate Change Communication [YPCCC]. (2013). Public support for climate & energy policies in April 2013. Retrieved September 30, 2013, from http://environment.yale.edu/climatecommunication/article/Climate-Policy-Support-April-2013#sthash.K8vf3nvB.dpuf
  10. Yale Project on Climate Change Communication [YPCCC]. (2012). Global warming's six Americas in September 2012. Retrieved September 30, 2013, from http://environment.yale.edu/climate-communication/files/Six-Americas-September-2012.pdf
  11. 再生能源發展條例(2009)。上網日期:2013 年9 月30 日,取自綠色能源產業資訊網http://www.taiwangreenenergy.org.tw/About/policy-more.aspx?id=746132CB8D31CD75
  12. 中央通訊社(2013.04.28)。〈高成炎:台灣應開發地熱能源〉。上網日期:2013 年9 月30 日, 取自http://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E9%AB%98%E6%88%90%E7%82%8E-%E5%8F%B0%E7%81%A3%E6%87%89%E9%96%8B%E7%99%BC%E5%9C%B0%E7%86%B1%E8%83%BD%E6%BA%90-073415471.html
  13. 內政部戶政司(2013)。《民國101 年12 月戶口統計資料分析》(編號:s00010112)。台北市:作者。上網日期:2013 年3 月30 日,取自:http://www.ris.gov.tw/zh_TW/346
  14. 林宗堯(2011.07.25)。〈核四論〉。上網日期:2013 年9 月30 日,取自http://e-info.org.tw/node/69036
  15. Ray. J., & Pugliese, A. (2011). Worldwide, blame for climate change falls on humans. Retrieved November 7, 2014, from http://www.gallup.com/poll/147242/worldwide-blame-climate-change-falls-humans.aspx
  16. 永續能源政策綱領(2008)。上網日期:2013 年9 月30 日,取自經濟部能源局能源產業溫室氣體減量資訊網http://verity.erl.itri.org.tw/EIGIC/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1&Itemid=3
  17. Pugliese, A., & Ray. J. (2011). Fewer Americans, Europeans view global warming as a threat. Retrieved November 7, 2014, from http://www.gallup.com/poll/147203/Fewer-Americans-Europeans-View-Global-Warming-Threat.aspx
  18. 王塗發(2011.02.24)。《「能源發展綱領政策」之環評意見》。上網日期:2013 年9 月30 日,取自http://www.tepu.org.tw/?p=3289
  19. Ajzen, I.(1988).Attitudes, personality, and behavior.Milton-Keynes, UK:Open University Press.
  20. American Association for Public Opinion Research(2006).Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys.Lenexa, KS:American Association for Public Opinion Research.
  21. Ansolabehere, S.,Konisky, D. M.(2009).Public attitudes toward construction of new power plants.Public Opinion Quarterly,73,566-577.
  22. Bandura, A.(1982).Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency.American Psychologist,37,747-755.
  23. Bord, R. J.,Fisher, A.,O'Connor, R. E.(1998).Public perceptions of global warming: United States and international perspectives.Climate Research,11,75-84.
  24. Bord, R. J.,O'Connor, R. E.,Fischer, A.(2000).In what sense does the public need to understand global climate change?.Public Understanding of Science,9,205-218.
  25. Boykoff, M. T.(2007).Flogging a dead norm? Newspaper coverage of anthropogenic climate change in the United States and United Kingdom from 2003 to 2006.Area,39,470-481.
  26. Brody, S. D.,Zahran, S.,Vedlitz, A.,Grover, H.(2008).Examining the relationship between physical vulnerability and public perceptions of global climate change in the United States.Environment and Behavior,40,72-95.
  27. Brulle, R. J.(2010).From environmental campaigns to advancing the public dialog: Environmental communication for civic engagement.Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture,4,82-98.
  28. Bulkeley, H.(2000).Common knowledge? Public understanding of climate change in Newcastle, Australia.Public Understanding of Science,9,313-333.
  29. Chauvin, B.,Hermand, D.,Mullet, E.(2008).New age beliefs and societal risk perception.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,38,2056-2071.
  30. DiMento, J. F.(Ed.),Doughman, P.(Ed.)(2007).Climate change: What it means for us, our children, and our grandchildren.New York:MIT Press.
  31. Dunlap, R,Riley, E.,Kent, D.,van Liere, K.(1978).The new environmental paradigm.The Journal of Environmental Education,21,21-26.
  32. Feldman, L.,Maibach, E. W.,Roser-Renouf, C.,Leiserowitz, A.(2012).Climate on cable: The nature and impact of global warming coverage on Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC.The International Journal of Press/Politics,17,3-31.
  33. Fink, A.,Kosecoff, J.(1985).How to conduct surveys: A step-by-step guide.Newbury Park, CA:SAGE.
  34. Friedman, S. M.(Ed.),Dunwoody, S.(Ed.),Rogers, C. L.(Ed.)(1999).Communicating uncertainty: Media coverage of new and controversial science.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
  35. Friedman, S. M.(Ed.),Dunwoody, S.(Ed.),Rogers, C. L.(Ed.)(1999).Communication uncertainty: Media coverage of new and controversial science.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
  36. Gamson, W. A.,Modigliani, A.(1989).Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach.The American Journal of Sociology,95,1-37.
  37. Hart, P. S.(2011).One or many? The influence of episodic and thematic climate change frames on policy preferences and individual behavior change.Science Communication,33,28-51.
  38. Hsu, M.(2013).Patterns and changes of framing anthropogenic climate change in Taiwanese news media (2006-2010).2013 IAMCR (International Association for Media and Communication Research) Conference,Dublin, Ireland:
  39. Hsu, M.,Yang, Y.(2013).Changes of public perceptions and actions concerning climate change in Taiwan.63th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association,London:
  40. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change=IPCC(2007).,未出版
  41. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change=IPCC(2013).Climate change 2013: The physical science basis.
  42. Irwin, A.,Wynne, B.(1996).Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  43. Kahlor, L.,Rosenthal, S.(2009).If we seek, do we learn? Predicting knowledge of global warming.Science Communication,30,380-414.
  44. Kotchen, M. J.,Reiling, S. D.(2000).Environmental attitudes, motivations, and contingent valuation of nonuse values: A case study involving endangered species.Ecological Economics,32,93-107.
  45. Lalonde, R.,Jackson, E. L.(2002).The new environmental paradigm scale: Has it outlived its usefulness?.The Journal of Environmental Education,33,28-36.
  46. Lavrakas, P. J.(1993).Telephone survey methods: Sampling, selection, and supervision.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
  47. Lazo, J. K.,Kinnell, J. C.,Fisher, A.(2000).Expert and layperson perceptions of ecosystem risk.Risk Analysis,20,179-193.
  48. Linder, S. H.(2006).Cashing-in on risk claims: On the for-profit inversion of signifiers for "global warning".Social Semiotics,16,103-132.
  49. Marris, C.,Langford, I. H.,O'Riordan, T.(1998).A quantitative test of the cultural theory of risk perceptions: Comparison with the psychometric paradigm.Risk Analysis,18,635-647.
  50. Moriarity, P.,Kennedy, D.(2004).The web, the public, and the global warming debate.Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal,35,723-735.
  51. Nerlich, B.,Koteyko, N.,Brown, B.(2010).Theory and language of climate change communication.Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change,1,97-110.
  52. O'Connor, R. E.,Bord, R. J.,Fisher, A.(1999).Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change.Risk Analysis,19,461-471.
  53. O'Connor, R. E.,Bord, R. J.,Fisher, A.,Staneva, M.,Kozhouharova-Zhivkova, V.,Dobreva, S.(1999).Determinants of support for climate change policies in Bulgaria and the USA.Risk Decision and Policy,4,255-269.
  54. Ridout, T. N.,Crosse, A. C.,Appleton, A. M.(2008).News media use and Americans' perceptions of global threat.British Journal of Political Science,38,575-593.
  55. Schuldt, J. P.,Konrath, S. H.,Schwarz, N.(2011)."Global warming" or "climate change"? Whether the planet is warming depends on question wording.Public Opinion Quarterly,75,115-124.
  56. Siegrist, M.,Gutscher, H.,Earle, T. C.(2005).Perception of risk: The influence of general trust, and general confidence.Journal of Risk Research,8,145-156.
  57. Smith, N.,Joffe, H.(2012).How the public engages with global warming: A social representations approach.Public Understanding of Science,22,16-32.
  58. Smith, N.,Leiserowitz, A.(2014).The role of emotion in global warming policy support and opposition.Risk Analysis,34,937-948.
  59. Stamm, K. R.,Clark, F.,Eblacas, P. R.(2000).Mass communication and public understanding of environmental problems: The case of global warming.Public Understanding of Science,9,219-237.
  60. Weaver, A.(2007).OH,The Ohio State University.
  61. Zhao, X.(2009).Media use and global warming perceptions.Communication Research,36,698-723.
  62. 台灣電力公司(2013)。台電核能月刊,367
  63. 呂怡貞(2012)。台大公共論壇:台灣再生能源蘊藏量評估。科學人雜誌,144
  64. 林秀雲譯、Babbie, E.(2013)。社會科學研究方法。台北市:雙葉。
  65. 柯舜智(2011)。閱聽人對節能減碳議題的接收分析。2011中華傳播學會年會暨研討會,台灣,新竹:
  66. 徐美苓、楊意菁(2011)。科技風險與全球暖化報導品質分析。中華傳播學會研討會,台灣,新竹:
  67. 徐美苓、楊意菁(2011)。台灣全球暖化風險溝通的常民認知。傳播與社會,15,71-104。
  68. 經濟部能源局(2012)。能源統計年報
  69. 蕭代基、羅時芳、洪志銘(2010)。碳稅與碳交易:政府減碳管理的重要政策如何搭配?。永續產業發展雙月刊,49,36-42。
被引用次数
  1. Koyama, Naonori(2018).Does Official Development Assistance Promote Foreign Direct Investment? Evidence from Japan and China.Tamkang Journal of International Affairs,22(1),39-68.
  2. Lee, Chang-Chieh,Chen, Kuo-Hua(2018).Investigating Taiwan's Integrated Scenarios of Climate Change through Visualization Rhetoric in Science Communication.Tamkang Journal of International Affairs,22(1),1-38.
  3. 黃惠萍(2018)。第一人或第三人效應?探析全球暖化的二階自他認知差異與影響。新聞學研究,134,41-87。
  4. 李美華(2017)。台灣報業媒體網路平台氣候變遷風險溝通:2009 ~ 2016 年的歷時性分析。中華傳播學刊,32,45-90。
  5. 廖宜霈,林峰田(2022)。臺灣氣候變遷調適知識本體(CCAO)之建構與應用。都市與計劃,49(3),263-283。
  6. 林宗弘(2019)。數位貧窮與天災風險資訊來源:來自臺灣傳播調查的證據。新聞學研究,138,131-162。
  7. 施琮仁(2017)。從雙路徑模型探討風險訊息的包裝與呈現對環境友善行為意圖的影響。傳播研究與實踐,7(1),5-36。
  8. 蕭新煌,許耿銘,林宗弘(2023)。臺灣民眾的交通不平等、交通生活方式與減碳政策偏好。都市與計劃,50(4),498-526。
  9. 徐美苓(2017)。再生能源的公眾支持及使用意願:環境信念、行動及議題傳播模式初探。中華傳播學刊,32,9-44。
  10. 徐美苓(2021)。從公眾角度再思科技政策的媒體建構:以《電業法》修法為例。傳播研究與實踐,11(1),105-140。
  11. 徐美苓(2023)。臺灣能源轉型爭議論述的媒體建構:減碳、非核家園與空污防制的風險傳播多重難題。新聞學研究,154,1-54。