George Eliot's Middlemarch: Victorian and Modern Critical Receptions

10.6999/DHJCS.200302.0207

彭錦堂(Jin-Tang Peng)

George Eliot ； Middlemarch ； Critical Reception ； Victorian ； Modern

東華漢學

1期（2003 / 02 / 01）

207 - 228

英文

Cultural study today has far surpassed Leavis, who endorsed George Eliot's Middlemarch in a concept that Eliot might not have agreed with. Our critical interests in language, interpretation, and identity politics are much more in line with Eliot's concern about democracy, knowledge of reality and its representation. Today's socio-political studies of Middlemarch enhance our understanding of the book's historical construct by scrutinizing the Era of Reform in side and outside the text. Feminist criticisms, who generally go beyond earlier disappointment with Eliot, now reaffirm her progressive position. There are brilliant analyses arguing how Eliot follows, yet eventually transcends the dialectic between liberal and evangelical feminisms in her days. Yet a prevailing skepticism regarding narrative's referential possibility has also undermined sympathetic sensibility in many latter day critiques. Reading criticisms on the great works of the nineteenth-century realism these days, one no longer feels the reality the books invite us to experience. Before we make any new critical engagements, we must first get that feeling back. In comparison with post-structuralists, the earlier critics may seem naïve, but their sympathetic readings retain precisely that sense of reality that we are incapable of grasping. This article traces back through Middlemarch the critical heritage of to see how far we have come along. It compares Victorian reviews with modern criticism before the 1980's, when radical skepticism gradually gained currency.

1. (1983).Love and the Woman Question in Victorian Literature: The Art of Self-Postponement.England:Harvester; Totowa; Barnes.
2. Adam, Ian,(ed.)(1975).This Particular Web: Essays on Middlemarch.Toronto and Buffalo:University of Toronto Press.
3. Blake, Kathleen,(ed.)(1990).Approaches to Teaching Eliot's Middlemarch.New York:The MLA of America.
4. Bloom, Harold,(ed.)(1986).George Eliot: Modern Critical Reviews.New York:Chelsea.
5. Bonaparte, Felicia.(1975).Will and Destiny.New York:New York University Press.
6. Carroll, David,(ed.)(1971).George Eliot: The Critical Heritage.London:Routledge & Kegan Paul Limited Broadway House.
7. Coles, Robert.(1974).Irony in Mind's Life.Charlottesville:University Press of Virginia.
8. Cotton, Daniel.(1987).Foreword by Terry Eagleton.Minneapolis:University Press of Minnesota.
9. Eliot, George.(Ed.),W. J. Harvey.(1976).Eliot, George.|.New York:Penguin.
10. Emery, Laura Corner.(1976).George Eliot's Creative Conflict.Berkeley and Los Angeles:University Press of California.
11. George Eliot''s(1950)."Middlemarch" Notebooks: A Transcription. Ed. John Clark Pratt and Victor A. Neufeldt.Berkley:University Press of California.
12. Graver, Suzanne.,(Ed.)Anne C.(1984).Mill, Middlemarch, and Marriage Portraits of Marriage in Literature Hargrove and Maurine Magliocco.Macomb:West Illinois University Press.
13. Hertz, Neil.,(Ed.)N. Hertz(1985).The End of the Line: Essays on Psychoanalysis and the Sublime.New York:Columbia University Press.
14. Hochman, Baruch.,(Eds.)Blake, Kathleen,Gibaldi, Joseph(1995).Approaches to Teaching Eliot's Middlemarch.New York:M LA of A merica..
15. King, Jeannette.(1978).Tragedy in the Victorian Novel.Boston:Cambridge University Press.
16. Miller, J. Hillis.."Optic and Semiotic in Middlemarch" In Bloom.
17. Showalter, Elaine.(1980).The Greening of Sister George..Nineteenth-Century Fiction,35,292-311.
18. Thomas, Jeanie.(1987).Reading Middlemarch: Reclaiming the Middlemarch Distance.Ann Arbor:UMI Research Press.
19. Welsh, Alexander.(1985).George Eliot and Blackmail.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.