五位台灣亂倫父親犯罪歷程之分析

Offence Pathways in Five Taiwanese Incestuous Offenders

10.7082/CARGC.200203.0001

陳若璋(Roda Chen)；施志鴻(Chin-Hung Shih)；劉志如(Chih-Ju Liu)

亂倫犯 ； 犯罪動機 ； 犯案歷程 ； 認知扭曲 ； 婚姻壓力 ； incest offenders ； offense motives ； offence process ； cognition distortion ； marital stress

中華輔導學報

11期（2002 / 03 / 01）

1 - 35

繁體中文

本論文嘗試檢視五位台灣亂倫父親在犯罪歷程的幾個重要層面，並金圖連結其案發前生活經驗、情緒、認知、情境與犯案之關係，且深究他們的犯罪動機及抑制犯罪之認知機制；此外，亦探討這些亂倫者是否呈現穩定的犯案步驟與歷程。 本論文使用深度訪談，並用質性研究的方法來分析五位亂倫者以上種種層面之資料，此五名亂倫者中，三名在監，二名假釋出獄，平均年齡42歲。研究結果發現：Wblf的犯罪歷程確實提供一瞭解犯罪歷程的架構，而這些亂倫犯案亦具有歷程脈絡；在近年生活情境中，婚姻壓力與犯案動機較明顯，而早期生活經驗和犯案的動機的關係較隱含；犯案時他們多有一明顯的促發事件；同時認知結構亦扮演了促發及持續犯案的重要角色。 本研究並依據以下五個部分：⒈犯案前的事件、壓力與認知；⒉與被害者的關係、看法；⒊犯案前的情境、情緒與認知；⒋犯案時之感受；⒌犯案後反應，將五個亂倫犯犯案的內在深層動機歸納成二種型態。本文最後並對此二種型態的治療策略及再犯評估有所建議。

This study explores several important dimensions of 5 Taiwanese incestuous fathers during their sexual offence process. The dimensions includes: the connections between past and current life context and motivations of offense; the characteristics of conflicts in their marital relationships; their cognitive distortions which used to overcome their internal inhibitions, their offense behaviors, and their reactions after their crime. Finally, this paper also try to classified 5 incest offenders into 2 types, according to their prior crime stress events, offense motives, their crime behaviors, their relationships with victims, and the reactions after crime. Suggestions are made for intervention strategies and prediction of recidivism rate.

1. Abel, G. G.,Osborn, C.,Anthony, D.,Gardos, P.(1992).Current treatments of paraphiliacs.Annual Reviews of Sex Research,3,255-290.
2. Addison, R. B.(1992).Doing qualitative research.London:Sage.
3. Baker, D.(1985).Father-daughter incest: A study of the father.Dissertation Abstracts International, B,46(3),951 .
4. Ballard, D. T.(1990).The Incest Perpetrator: A family member no one wants to treat.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
5. Barnard, G. W.(1989).The child molester: An integrated approach to evaluation and treatment.New York:Brunner/ Mazel.
6. Bennett, W.,Hess, K.(1994).Criminal Investigation.Minneapolis:West.
7. Bennett, W.,Hess, K.(1994).Criminal Investigation.Minneapolis:West.
8. Finkelhor, D.(1984).Child sexual abuse: New theory and research.New York:Free Press.
9. Finkelhor, D.(1984).Child sexual abuse: New theory and research.New York:Free Press.
10. Finkelhor, D.,Baron, L.(1986).A Sourcebook in child Sexual Abuse.Newbury Park, CA:Sage Publications.
11. Hall, G. C. N.,Hirschman, R.(1992).Sexual aggression against children: A conceptual perspective of etiology.Criminal Justice and Behavior,19,8-23.
12. Happel, R. M.,Auffrey, J. J.(1995).Sex offender assessment: Interrupting the dance of denial.American Journal of Forensic Psychology,13(2),5-22.
13. Hartley, C. C.(2001).Incest offenders' perceptions of their motives to sexually offend within their past and current life context.Journal of Interpersonal Violence,16(5),457-459.
14. Hartley, C. C.(1998).How incest offenders overcome internal inhibitions through the use of cognitions and cognitive distortions.Journal of Interpersonal Violence,13(1),25-40.
15. Heckhausen, H.(1991).Motivation and action.New York:Springer-Verlag.
16. Heckhausen, H.(1991).Motivation and action.New York:Springer-Verlag.
17. Herman, J.(1997).Trauma& Recovery.New York:Basic Books.
18. Herman, J.(1997).Trauma& Recovery.New York:Basic Books.
19. Hudson, S.,Ward, T.,McCormack, J. C.(1999).Offense pathways in sexual of fenders.Journal of Interpersonal Violence,14(8),779-799.
20. Langevin, R.,Handy, L.,Day, D.,Russon, A.(1985).Erotic Preference, Gender Identity and Aggression.Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
21. Madanes, C.(1990).Sex, love, and violence.New York:Norton & Company.
22. Madanes, C.(1990).Sex, love, and violence.New York:Norton & Company.
23. McKay, M. M.,Chapman, J. W.,Long, N. R.(1996).Causal attributions for criminal offending and sexual arousal: Comparison of child sex offenders with other offenders.British Journal of Clinical Psychology,35,63-75.
24. McTeer, W.(1972).The scope of motivation: Environment, physiological, mental, social.Belmont, CA:Wadsworth.
25. Miller, W. L.,Crabtree, B. F.(1992).Doing Qualitative Research.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
26. Miller, W. L.,Crabtree, B. F.(1992).Doing Qualitative Research.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
27. Miner, M. H.,Dwyer, S. M.(1997).The psychosocial development of sex offenders: differences between exhibitionists, child molesters, and incest offenders.International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology,41(1),36-44.
28. Nelson, C.,Milner, M.,Marques, J.,Russel, K.,Achterkirchen, J.(1989).Relapse Prevention: A cognitive - Behavioral model for treatment of the rapist and child molester.Journal of Social Work and Human Sexuality,7,125-143.
29. Pelto, V. L.(1981).Male incest offenders and nonoffenders: A comparison of early sexual history.San Diego:U. S. International University.
30. Pelto, V. L.(1981).Male incest offenders and nonoffenders: A comparison of early sexual history.San Diego:U. S. International University.
31. Phelan, P.(1995).Incest and its meaning: The perspectives of fathers and daughters.Child Abuse& Neglect,19,7-24.
32. Pithers, W. D.(1990).Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories and treatment of the offender.New York:Plenum.
33. Pithers, W. D.,Coming, G. F.(1995).The sex offender: Corrections, treatment and legal practice.New Jersey:Kingston.
34. Quinsey, V. L.,Lalumiere, M. L.,Rice, M. E.,Harris, G. T.(1995).Assessing dangerousness: Violence by sexual offender, batterers, and child abusers.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
35. Saunder, B.,McClure, S.,Murphy, S.(1986).Profile of incest perpetrators indicating treatability, Part I.Charleston, SC:Crime Victims Research and Treatment Center.
36. Saunder, B.,McClure, S.,Murphy, S.(1986).Profile of incest perpetrators indicating treatability, Part I.Charleston, SC:Crime Victims Research and Treatment Center.
37. Stermac, L. E.,Segal, Z. V.(1990).Handbook of Sexual assault: Issues, theories and treatment of the offender.New York:Plenum.
38. Strand, V.(1986).Parents in incest families: A study of differences.Dissertation Abstracts International, A,47(8),3191.
39. Ward, T.,Fon, C.,Hudson, S. M.,McCormack, J.(1998).A descriptive model dysfunctional cognitions in child molesters.Journal of Interpersonal Violence,13,129-155.
40. Ward, T.,Hudson, S. M.,Johnston, L.(1997).Cognitive distortions in sex offenders: An integrative review.Clinical Psychology Review,17,479-507.
41. Ward, T.,Hudson, S. M.,Marshall, W. L.(1995).Cognitive distortions and affective deficits in sex offenders: A cognitive deconstructionist interpretation.Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment,7,67-83.
42. Williams, L. M.,Finkelhor, D.(1992).The characteristics of incestuous fathers: Final report.Washington, DC:Clearinghouse on Child Abuse and Neglect Information.
43. Williams, L. M.,Finkelhor, D.(1992).The characteristics of incestuous fathers: Final report.Washington, DC:Clearinghouse on Child Abuse and Neglect Information.
44. Williams, L. M.,Finkelhor, D.(1990).Handbook of Sexual Assault: Issues, theories and treatment of the offender.New York:Plenum.
45. Wolf, S. C.(1984).Third International Conference on Victimology.Lisbon:
46. 財團法人中華兒童暨家庭扶助基金會(2000)。中華兒童家庭扶助基金會年報。台北:財團法人中華兒童暨家庭扶助基金會。
47. 財團法人中華兒童暨家庭扶助基金會(2000)。中華兒童家庭扶助基金會年報。台北:財團法人中華兒童暨家庭扶助基金會。
48. 陳若璋 Chen, Roda、劉志如 Liu, Chih-Ju(2001)。五類型性罪犯特質與預測因子探討。中華心理衛生學刊Formosa Journal of Mental Health，14(4)
49. 陳若璋、劉志如(2001)。五類型性罪犯特質與預測因子探討。中華心理衛生學刊Formosa Journal of Mental Health，14(4)
50. 黃富源 Huang, Fu-Yuan(1999)。性侵害加害人之特質與犯罪手法之研究。台北:內政部性侵害犯罪防治委員會。
51. 黃富源(1999)。性侵害加害人之特質與犯罪手法之研究。台北:內政部性侵害犯罪防治委員會。

1. 陳慧女、林明傑(2007)。臺灣近二十年來性侵害研究之脈絡與趨勢。臺大社會工作學刊，14，211-259。
2. 簡美華、管貴貞(2006)。變與不變之間：曾遭遇亂倫經驗的成年女性談母女關係。中華輔導學報，19，109-135。
3. 利翠珊,方愛珍(2022)。亂倫受害者經通報安置到返家之復原歷程初探。輔導與諮商學報，44(1)，69-100。
4. 梁淑娟(2019)。祖父孫女家內亂倫與婚姻治療經驗之探究研究。輔導與諮商學報，41(2)，25-56。
5. 葉致芬,郭麗安(2023)。性平事件行為人諮商輔導中的性別權力議題。輔導季刊，59(2)，45-60。
6. (2003)。我國性侵害防治工作之問題與改革－官方性侵害防治的組織設計。社會文化學報，16，41-68。