题名

觀點取替故事同理心量表的發展

并列篇名

The Development of the Scale of Empathy on Perspective-Taking Stories

DOI

10.7082/CARGC.200403.0039

作者

趙梅如(Mei-Ru Chao);鍾思嘉(Shi-Kai Chung)

关键词

同理心 ; 認知性觀點取替同理心 ; 情感性觀點取替同理心 ; 表達性觀點取替同理心 ; 驗證性因素分析 ; Empathy ; emotional perspective-taking empathy ; cognitive perspective-taking empathy ; expressive perspective-taking empathy ; confirmatory factor analysis

期刊名称

中華輔導學報

卷期/出版年月

15期(2004 / 03 / 01)

页次

39 - 60

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究的目的在編製一份適合國內成人及大學生的觀點取替故事同理心量表,以提供研究與輔導應用。全量表含有認知性觀點取替同理心、情感性觀點取替同理心、表達性觀點取替同理心三個分量表,共16題,施測時間大約10(15分鐘。本研究以台灣地區2155位成年人及大學生為樣本進行信、效度考驗,結果顯示: 1. 在信度上,認知性觀點取替同理心、情感性觀點取替同理心、表達性觀點取替同理心三個分量表以及全量表之Cronbach α係數分別為.67, .73, .70 及.87,間隔四週之重測信度為.83,顯示此量表的內部一致性信度尚可。 2. 在效度上,以驗證性因素分析檢驗其概念建構,顯現量表的建構效度良好。

英文摘要

The objective of this study is to develop the scale of empathy on perspective- taking stories for reference applicable in research and counseling. This scale includes 16 questions and can be conducted within 10-15 minutes. This study is based on samples from 952 college students in Taiwan with reliability and validity tested. The results have shown: 1. the scale of empathy on perspective-taking stories has reached satisfactory level of internal consistency reliability, tested with Cronbach a coefficients .67, .73, .70 and .87 for cognitive, emotional, expressive perspective-taking empathy sub-scales and overall empathy scale respectively; test-retest reliability within four weeks was .83, 2. this scale have a clear factorial structure through confinnatory factor analysis.

主题分类 生物農學 > 生物農學綜合
社會科學 > 心理學
社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. Barrett-Lennard, G. T.(1981).The empathy cycle: Refinement of a nuclear concept.Journal of Counseling Psychology,28
  2. Batson, C. D.,Early, S.,Salvarani, G.(1997).Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus imagining how you would feel.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,23(7)
  3. Benack, S.(1984).Beyond formal operations:Late adolescent and adult cognitive development.
  4. Berndt, T. J.,Perry, T. B(1990).From childhood to adolescence : A transitional period.
  5. Buhrmester, D.(1990).Intimacy of friendship, interpersonal competence, and adjustment during preadolescence and adolescence.Child Development,61
  6. Burner, J. S.(1986).Actual minds, possible worlds.
  7. Carey, C. T.,Fox, E.,Spraggins, E. F.(1988).Replication of structure findings re garding the Interpersonal Reactivity Index.Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development,21
  8. Carkhuff, R. R.(1969).Helping and human relations. Vol. 1 & Vol. 2.
  9. Coverdale, C.(1991).Two development lines in self psychology: Selfobject empathy and interpretation.American Journal of Psychiatry,147(5)
  10. Davis, M. H.(1980).A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy.Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology,10(4)
  11. Egan, G.(1976).Interpersonal living. Monterey.
  12. Furman, W.,Buhrmester, D.(1992).Age and sex differences in perceptions of networks of personal relationships.Child Development,63
  13. Gurucharri, C.,Selman, R. L.(1982).The development of Interpersonal understanding during childhood, preadolescence, and adolescence: A longitudinal follow-up study.Child Development,53
  14. Hair, J. F. Jr.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R. L.,Black, W. C(1998).Multivariate data analysis.
  15. Hartup, W. W.(1992).Childhood social development: Contemporary perspectives.
  16. Hill, C. E.,Duan, C.(1996).The current state of empathy research.Journal of Counseling Psychology,43(3)
  17. Hill, S.(1982).Improving interpersonal competence..
  18. Hoffman, M. L.(1981).Is altruism part of human nature?.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,40
  19. Hoffman, M. L.(1993).Approaches to moral development: New research and emerging themes.
  20. Kernberg, O.(1994).Internal world and external reality: Object relations theory ap plied.
  21. Koch, M. M.(1991).Assessment of medical student empathy and their correlates.
  22. Kohut, H.(1982).Introspection, empathy, and the semicircle of mental health.International Journal of Psychoanalysis,63
  23. Locraft, C.,Teglasi, H.(1997).Teacher rated empathic behaviors and children's TAT stones.Journal of School Psychology,35(2)
  24. Nelson, J.,Aboud, F. E.(1985).The resolution of social conflict among friends.Child Development,56
  25. Pecukonis, E. V.(1990).A cognitive affective empathy training program as a function of ego development in aggressive adolescent females.Adolescence,25(7)
  26. Selman, R. L.(1976).Moral development and behavior: Theory, research, and social issues.
  27. Truax, C. B.,Carkhuff, R. R.(1967).Unraveling the patient-therapist interaction.Journal of Counseling Psychology,10
  28. Westen, D.(1991).Clinical assessment of object relations using the TAT.Journal of Personality Assessment,56
  29. Wong, K. C.(1994).Narrative thinking and advanced empathy.輔仁學誌(文學院),23
  30. Yeates, K. O.,Selman, R. L.(1989).Social competence in the schools: Toward an integrative developmental model for intervention.Developmental Review,9
  31. 吳裕益(2003)。線性結構公式模式基本概念及模式適合度之評鑑
被引用次数
  1. 蔡依玲、黃禎慧、陳婉真(2015)。心理助人工作者「同理失衡量表」之編製。輔導與諮商學報,37(2),57-71。
  2. 黃松元、郭美璋、張利中、江漢聲(2010)。大學生苦難覺察、個人宗教性、同理心與利他行爲之相關研究。學校衛生,56,1-20。
  3. 廖小雯、程景琳(2013)。「同理反應情境式量表」之編製與信效度檢驗。健康促進與衛生教育學報,40,69-95。
  4. 劉奕蘭(2012)。「青少年人際認知成熟量表」之發展研究。測驗學刊,59(1),49-74。
  5. 蘇淑文,劉瑞華,林耿樟(2018)。短式人際反應問卷之修訂:性侵加害人樣本之探究。輔導季刊,54(4),33-41。
  6. 葉美玉、徐瑩媺、呂雀芬、吳淑美(2018)。遊戲式學習於護理教育應用-同理心桌遊教學。護理雜誌,65(1),96-103。
  7. 張淑美、張利中、胡宜芳(2009)。大學生「覺察他人受苦」之生命教育課程與教學成效研究。課程與教學,12(3),57-77。
  8. 趙梅如、王世億(2013)。大學生同性友誼品質之內涵驗證及性別差異分析。教育心理學報,44(4),829-852。
  9. 鄭立婷,姚惠忠(2023)。體驗式案例教學對醫學大學生學習興趣、同理心及醫病溝通能力之探討。通識學刊:理念與實務,11(1),43-80。
  10. (2024)。以團隊導向學習提升軍校學生同理心之教學實踐研究。通識學刊:理念與實務,12(1),137-184。