督導雙方對諮商督導關係知覺之配對研究

A Dyad Study of the Supervisee's and Supervisor's Perceptions of Counseling Supervisory Relationship

10.7082/CJGC.201108.0079

張淑芬(Shu-Fen Chang)；廖鳳池(Fen-Tsu Laio)

諮商督導關係 ； 歷程研究 ； 配對研究 ； 重要事件 ； counseling supervisory relationship ； process research ； significant events ； dyad research

中華輔導與諮商學報

30期（2011 / 08 / 01）

79 - 102

繁體中文

本研究針對一個督導配對一學期之完整督導歷程進行研究，採歷程研究及配對研究設計，藉由分析受督導者與督導者對督導關係重要事件的觀點，以了解雙方知覺督導關係的內涵與異同。研究發現：(1)受督導者知覺的督導關係為：督導關係重要事件包括人際互動溝通、情感連結狀態，及專業介入衝擊三類。督導者知覺的督導關係為：督導關係重要事件包括人際影響狀態、情感密切和諧，及專業權力展現三類；以及(2)比較雙方對督導關係的觀點後發現，雙方知覺的一致性有不同程度的組合，形成知覺相似型、知覺相錯型、知覺相歧型，以及知覺獨立型等四種關係知覺類型，且各階段皆以知覺獨立型所佔比例最高。

The purposes of this study are to compare the perceptions of the supervisee and the supervisor on the counseling supervisory relationship by analyzing their viewpoints towards significant events in the supervision process. The researchers adopted process research paradigm and dyad research to collect data from one dyad for one semester. The major findings were: (1) The supervisee's perception: significant events were categorized into three categories, including interpersonal interaction, the state of emotional bond, and the impact of professional intervention. The supervisor's perception: significant events were categorized into three categories, including interpersonal influence state, harmonic bonds, and showing profession power. (2) Four patterns of relationship perceptions emerged from data analyses, including similar perceptions, respective perceptions, divergent perceptions, and independent perceptions, with independent perceptions prevailing at all phases.

1. 翁令珍、廖鳳池(2005)。諮商督導歷程中人際行為與受督導者知覺之分析研究。教育心理學報，37(2)，99-122。
   連結：
2. 張淑芬、廖鳳池(2007)。諮商督導結盟歷程之初探研究：以一對督導為例。輔導與諮商學報，29(1)，67-86。
   連結：
3. 許雅惠、廖鳳池(2005)。不同階段個別諮商督導歷程中督導議題與督導策略之分析研究。輔導與諮商學報，27(1)，65-82。
   連結：
4. 許韶玲(2005)。諮商新手在督導過程隱藏未揭露的訊息。輔導季刊，41(3)，31-38。
   連結：
5. 許韶玲(2004)。受督導者於督導過程中的隱而未說現象之研究。教育心理學報，36(2)，109-125。
   連結：
6. 鄭如安、廖鳳池(2005)。督導中重要事件內涵之分析研究。國立高雄師範大學輔導研究所諮商輔導學報：高師輔導所刊，12，35-70。
   連結：
7. Bogdan, R. C.,Biklen, S. K.(1998).Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods.Boston:Allyn and Bacon.
8. Bordin, E. S.(1983).A working alliance based model of supervision.The Counseling Psychologist,11(1),35-42.
9. Efstation, J. F.,Patton, M. J.,Kardash, C. M.(1990).Measuring the working alliance in counselor supervision.Journal of Counseling Psychology,37(3),322-329.
10. Elliott, R.,Shapiro, D. A.(1992).Psychotherapy process research.London:Sage.
11. Gazzola, N.,Theriault, A.(2007).Super-(and not-so-super-)vision of counselors-in-training: Supervisee perspectives on broadening and narrowing processes.British Journal of Guidance and Counseling,35(2),189-204.
12. Greenberg, L. S.(1986).Change process research.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,54,4-9.
13. Hawkins, P.,Shohet, R.(2000).Supervision in the helping professions: An individual, group and organizational approach.Philadelphia, PA:Open University Press.
14. Heru, A. M.,Strong, D. R.,Price, M.,Recupero, P. R.(2004).Boundaries in psychotherapy supervision.American Journal of Psychotherapy,58(1),76-89.
15. Hill, C. E.,Corbett, M. M.(1993).A perspective on the history of process and outcome research in counseling psychology.Journal of Counseling Psychology,40(1),3-24.
16. Holloway, E. L.(1994).Overseeing the overseer: Contextualizing training in supervision.Journal of Counseling and Development,72,526-530.
17. Holloway, E. L.(1995).Clinical supervision: A Systems approach.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
18. Kaiser, T. L.(1992).Minnesota,University of Minnesota.
19. Kennard, B. D.,Stewart, S. M.,Gluck, M. R.(1987).The supervisory relationship: Variables contributing to positive verses negative experiences.Professional Psychology: Research and Practice,18(2),172-175.
20. Ladany, N.,Constantine, M. G.,Miller, K.,Erickson, C. D.,Muse-Burke, J. L.(2000).Supervisor countertransference: A qualitative investigation into its identification and description.Journal of Counseling Psychology,47(1),102-115.
21. Ladany, N.,Lehrman-Waterman, D. E.(1999).The content and frequency of supervisor self-disclosures and their relationship to supervisor style and the supervisory working alliance.Counselor Education and Supervision,38,143-160.
22. Ladany, N.,Walker, J. A.,Melincoff, D. S.(2001).Supervisory style: Its relation to the supervisory working alliance and supervisor self-disclosure.Counselor Education and Supervision,40,263-275.
23. Loganbill, C.,Hardy, E.,Delworth, U.(1982).Supervision: A conceptual model.The Counseling Psychologist,10(1),3-42.
24. Martin, J. S.,Goodyear, R. K.,Newton F. B.(1987).Clinical supervision: An intense case study.Professional Psychology: Research and Practice,18(3),225-235.
25. McNeill, B. W.,Worthen, V(1989).The parallel process in psychotherapy supervisio.Professional Psychotherapy: Research and Practice,20(5),329-333.
26. Nelson, M. L.,Friedlander, M. L.(2001).A close look at conflictual supervisory relationships: The trainee's perspective.Journal of Counseling Psychology,48(4),384-395.
27. Nigam, T.,Cameron, P. M.,Leverette, J. S.(1997).Impasses in the supervisory process: A resident's perspective.American Journal of Psychotherapy,51(2),252-272.
28. Olk, M. E.,Friedlander, M. L.(1992).Trainees' experiences of role conflict and role ambiguity in supervisory relationships.Journal of Counseling Psychology,39(3),389-397.
29. Patton, M. J.,Kivlighan, D. M., Jr.(1997).Relevance of the supervisory alliance to the counseling alliance and to treatment adherence in counselor training.Journal of Counseling Psychology,44,108-115.
30. Ramos-Sánchez, L.,Esnil, E.,Goodwin, A.,Riggs, S.,Touster, L. O.,Wright, L. K.,Ratanasiripong, P.,Rodolfa, E.(2002).Negative supervisory events: Effects on supervision satisfaction and supervisory alliance.Professional Psychology: Research and Practice,33(2),197-202.
31. Rice, L. N.(Ed.),Greenberg, L. S.(Ed.)(1984).Patterns of change.New York, NY:The Guilford Press.
32. Richman, J. B.(1991).University of Northern Colorado.
33. Stoltenberg, C.(1981).Approaching supervision from a developmental perspective: The counselor-complexity model.Journal of Counseling Psychology,28(1),59-65.
34. Stoltenberg, C. D.,Delworth, U.(1987).Supervising counselors and therapists: A developmental perspective.San Francisco:Jossey Bass.
35. Studer, J. R.(2005).Supervising school counselors-in-training: A guide for field supervisors.Professional School Counseling,8(4),353-360.
36. Thompson, L.,Walker, A. J.(1982).The dyad as the unit of analysis: Conceptual and methodological issues.Journal of Marriage and the Family,44,889-900.
37. Watkins, C. E. , Jr.(Ed.)(1997).Handbook of psychotherapy supervision.New York:John Wiley & Sons.
38. Watkins, C. E.(Ed.)(1997).Handbook of psychotherapy supervision.New York:John Wiley & Sons.
39. Webb, A.,Wheeler, S.(1998).How honest do counsellors dare to be in the supervisory relationship? An exploratory study.British Journal of Guidance and Counselling,26(4),509-524.
40. White, V. E.,Queener, J.(2003).Supervisor and supervisee attachments and social provisions related to the supervisory working alliance.Counselor Education and Supervision,42,203-218.
41. 施香如(2000)。督導者與諮商員在督導過程中的知覺差異研究。中華輔導學報，8，1-20。
42. 翁令珍(2006)。諮商督導重要事件中督導者介入與受督導者知覺之分析研究：區辨模式為架構。2006年中國輔導學會年會暨國際學術研討會，台北:
43. 張淑芬、廖鳳池(2007)。諮商督導中的權力與投入：系統取向督導模式（SAS）觀點。2007年中國輔導學會年會暨學術研討會，彰化:
44. 張淑芬、廖鳳池(2007)。初期諮商督導關係的共識與歧見：配對研究的發現。教師專業發展研討會，台中:
45. 許雅惠(2006)。博士論文(博士論文)。高雄，國立高雄師範大學輔導與諮商研究所。
46. 許韶玲(1999)。博士論文(博士論文)。彰化，國立彰化師範大學輔導研究所。

1. 籃瓊妙,連廷嘉(2021)。督導行為評估指標建構之探究。諮商心理與復健諮商學報，35，29-45。
2. 廖冠筑(2020)。從尋覓督導至督導關係結束。諮商與輔導，413，8-11。
3. 林育陞(2019)。督導制度對心理師的重要性。諮商與輔導，397，2-7。