個人知覺與團體脈絡之團體氣氛：多層次潛在變數分析應用

Application of Multilevel Latent Variable Models on Perceived and Contextual Group Climate

10.7082/CJGC.201204.0033

王郁琮(Lawrence Y. Wang)；陳尚綾(Shang-Ling Chen)；王麗斐(Li-Fei Wang)；林美珠(Mei-Ju Lin)

多階層驗證性因素分析 ； 團體氣氛 ； 團體諮商 ； group climate ； group counseling research ； multi-level confirmatory factor analysis

中華輔導與諮商學報

32期（2012 / 04 / 01）

33 - 55

繁體中文

本研究旨在採用適合團體多階層資料特性與團體氣氛變項屬性之多階層驗證性因素分析模式，探究團體氣氛量表簡式中文版（GCQ-S）在國內團體諮商情境中之個人層次與團體層次的因素結構。本研究整合國內三項研究之資料樣本，共得團體樣本數82組，團體成員744人，以符合多階層分析法對樣本數的規範。試題分析結果顯示GCQ-S中文版的第6題與第8題題項，不論在因素負荷量或變異量解釋百分比皆不理想，故在進行多層次驗證性因素分析時予以刪除。多階層因素分析結果進一步顯示，GCQ-S無論在個人或團體層次之因素結構皆支持MacKenzie（1983）的「投入、逃避與衝突」之三因素構念，另在競爭模型分析結果發現GCQ-S的多層次因素結構，最可能的模式是個體層次為斜交三因素模式、團體層次也為斜交三因素之「三三因素」模式；次佳者是個體層次為斜交三因素模式、團體層次則為斜交二因素之「三二因素」模式。本研究結果雖是有條件地支持MacKenzie的團體氣氛三因素理論，但卻是近年來國內外實徵研究中少數驗證團體氣氛三因素理論。研究者進一步依據研究結果對於團體諮商實務、量表應用與未來研究提出若干建議。

The purpose of this study was to investigate the factorial structure of the Group Climate Questionnaire-Short Form (GCQ-S) by using multilevel confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) taking into account the nested nature of group counseling data. For meeting the sample size requirement of multilevel analysis, an integrated data set was drawn from three independent studies resulting in a total of 82 groups and 744 members. Results from item analysis show that the sixth and the eighth items of the GCQ-S performed poorly with non-significant factor loadings and small amount of variance explained. Results from the multilevel CFA after excluding the sixth and eighth items indicated that MacKenzie's three-factor theory was supported both at the individual level and at the group level. Specifically, while constraining individual level data to be three correlated factors, group level data could be modeled by either three correlated factors or two correlated factors. Though both models provided satisfactory model fit, the three-three-factor model was superior to the three-two-factor model. This study was among the very few empirical studies that support MacKenzie's theory of group climate. The results of this investigation provided practical implications for group counseling research.

1. 邱皓政(2007)。脈絡變數的多層次潛在變數模式分析：口試評分者效應的多層次結構方程模式應用。中華心理學刊，49(4)，383-405。
   連結：
2. 黃芳銘、溫福星(2007)。模式化學習型學校：多層次驗證性因素分析取向。測驗學刊，54(1)，197-222。
   連結：
3. Bagozzi, R. P.,Yi, Y.(1988).On the evaluation of structural equation models.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,16,76-94.
4. Bollen, K. A.(1989).Structural equation modeling with latent variables.New York:John Wiley.
5. Brown, S. D.(ed.),Lent, R. W.(ed.)(2000).Handbook of counseling psychology.New York:John Wiley.
6. Byrne, B. M.(1998).Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Cohen, J.(1998).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral science.Hillsdale, NJ:Eribaum.
8. Cronbach, L. J.(1976).Research on classrooms and schools: Formulation of questions, designs, and analysis.Stanford, CA:Stanford Evaluation Consortium.
9. DeLucia-Waack, J. L.(ed.),Gerrity, D. A.(ed.),Kalodner, C. R.(ed.),Riva, M. T.(ed.)(2004).Handbook of group counseling and psychotherapy.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
10. Dies, R. R.(ed.),MacKenzie, K. R.(ed.)(1983).Advances in group psychotherapy: Integrating research and practice.Madison, CT:International University Press.
11. Ferron, J.,Dailey, R. F.,Yi, Q.(2002).Effects of misspecifying the first-level error structure in two level models of change.Multivariate Behavioral Research,37,379-403.
12. Ferron, J.,Hess, M. R.,Hogarty, K. Y.,Dedrick, R. F.,Kromrey, J. D.,Lang, T. R.,Niles, J.(2004).Hierarchical linear modeling: A review of methodological issues and applications.2004 annual meeting of American Educational Research Association,San Diego, CA.:
13. Fuhriman, A.,Drescher, S.,Burlingame, G.(1984).Conceptualizing small group process.Small Group Behavior,15,427-440.
14. Hancock, G. R.(ed.),Samuelsen, K. M.(ed.)(2008).Advanced in latent variable mixture models.Charlotte, NC:Information Age Publishing.
15. Hox, J. J.(ed.),Roberts, J. K.(ed.)(2011).Handbook of Advanced Multilevel Analysis.New York:Taylor and Francis.
16. Hox, J. J.,Maas, C. J. M.(2001).The accuracy of multilevel structural equation modeling with pseudobalanced groups and small samples.Structural Equation Modeling,8,157-174.
17. Johnson, J. E.,Burlingame, G. M.,Olsen, J. A.,Davies, D. R.,Gleave, R. L.(2005).Group climate, cohesion, alliance, and empathy in group psychotherapy: multilevel structural equation models.Journal of Counseling Psychology,52,310-321.
18. Johnson, J. E.,Pulsipher, D.,Ferrin, S. L.,Burlingame, G. M.,Davies, D. R.,Gleave, R.(2006).Measuring group process: A comparison of the GCQ and CCI.Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice,10(2),136-145.
19. Kaplan, D.(2000).Structural equation modeling: Foundations and extensions.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
20. Loehlin, J. C.(1992).Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Mok, M.(1995).Sample size requirements for 2-level designs in educational research.Sydney, Australia:Macquarie University.
22. Muthén, B.(1994).Multilevel covariance structure analysis.Multilevel Modeling, A Special Issue of Sociological Methods & Research,22,376-398.
23. Muthén, B.(1991).Multilevel factor analysis of class and student achievement components.Journal of Educational Measurement,28,338-354.
24. Muthén, L. K.,Muthén, B.(2007).Mplus User's Guide.Los Angeles, CA:Muthen & Muthen.
25. Pollack, B. N.(1998).Hierarchical linear modeling and the "unit of analysis" problem: A solution for analyzing responses of intact group members.Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practices,2(4),299-312.
26. Raudenbush, S. W.,Bryk, A. S.(2002).Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
27. 王郁琮、陳均姝、王麗斐、林美珠(2009)。團體投入氣氛之多階層驗證性因素分析。2009 年國際心理治療研究學會台灣分會成立暨第一屆地區性國際學術研討會：把心理治療研究變有趣：建構研究與實務的平台，南投:
28. 王麗斐、林美珠(2000)。團體治療性因素量表之發展與編製。中華輔導學報，9，1-24。
29. 余民寧(2006)。潛在變項模式：SIMPLIS 的應用。台北:高等教育。
30. 邱皓政(2006)。結構方程模式：LISREL 的理論、技術與應用。台北:雙葉。
31. 許原山(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台中，中國醫藥大學醫學研究所。
32. 陳正昌、程炳林、陳新豐、劉子鍵(2005)。多變量分析方法─統計軟體應用。台北:五南。
33. 陳均姝(2008)。博士論文(博士論文)。台北，國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系研究所。
34. 陳均姝、王郁琮、王麗斐(2007)。大學生成長團體與教育心理團體之治療性因素及其影響因素。2007年台灣統計方法學學會年會暨第四屆統計方法學學術研討會，台北:
35. 陳均姝、王麗斐、王郁琮(2009)。團體投入氣氛之成長模式分析。2009 年國際心理治療研究學會台灣分會成立暨第一屆地區性國際學術研討會：把心理治療研究變有趣：建構研究與實務的平台，南投:
36. 黃芳銘(2006)。結構方程模式：理論與應用。台北:五南。

1. 許育光(2016)。非結構式諮商團體不同歷程階段成員氣氛知覺與自我揭露因素之相關探究。中華輔導與諮商學報，45，95-122。
2. (2023)。臺灣大學生共依附諮商團體之團體氣氛與成效關聯性研究。教育心理學報，55(2)，345-371。