收入對婚姻權力及婚姻暴力的影響

The Influence of Income on Marital Power and Marital Violence

楊連謙(Lien-Chien Yang)；董秀珠(Hsiu-Chu Tung)

收入 ； 婚姻暴力 ； 婚姻衝突 ； 婚姻權力 ； 精神分裂症 ； 精神病 ； income ； marital conflict ； marital power ； marital violence ； mental illness ； schizophrenia

中華輔導與諮商學報

35期（2013 / 04 / 01）

121 - 146

繁體中文

本研究探討夫妻的收入對婚姻暴力及權力的影響。研究者依夫妻之相對收入將70 對丈夫為施暴者的夫妻分為「夫收入高」（n = 25）、「收入相當」（n = 20）和「妻收入高」（n = 25）三組。研究者回溯參與者初次暴力發生前的衝突情景，用由事務、情感及資源三個權力維度組成的婚姻權力臨床量表評量其婚姻權力。研究者以統計方式比較這三組，描述其暴力特徵，並探討收入對婚姻權力的影響。統計結果可證實「在三個權力維度中，收入與資源權力最相關，且為正相關，而與情感權力相關性最低」的假設，並發現：（1）妻子的收入較高，尤其是貧窮與丈夫罹患精神病的夫妻，婚姻暴力較嚴重；（2）收入較高的妻子，婚姻權力也較大，但只有與資源維度是正相關；（3）「夫收入高」組的丈夫在三個權力維度上都是優勢，「妻收入高」組沒有任一維度為妻優勢；（4）「收入相當」的夫妻最平權；（5）不論妻子的收入高低，丈夫都情感權力優勢。本研究的發現可佐證「施權宰制」、「無權反撲」及「性別矯飾」等現象，並討論四個臨床處遇的要點：（1）處理婚姻權力結構的變動：揭露／面對舊結構、共構／適應新結構；（2）面對問題、修補關係；（3）喚醒女性關係權力潛能、教導男性獲得關係權力的能力；（4）更有意識地與配偶共同建構平權關係。

This study explores the influence of spousal income on marital violence and marital power. Seventy couples with husband-to-wife aggression were recruited from a psychiatric center and were divided into three groups based on spousal income: (a) husbands higher in income (n = 25), (b) equal in income (n = 20), and (c) wives higher in income (n = 25). The authors tracked participant's marital conflicts which occurred before the first violent episode, and measured couple's marital power by the Marital Power Clinical Rating Scale, consisting of matter, affection, and resources subscales. Results supported the hypothesis that, among three components of marital power, spousal income positively correlated with resources power the most, yet correlated with affection power the least. The results also revealed that: (a) couples with wives higher in income suffered severer marital violence, especially when the couples were poor or the husbands had mental illness (e.g., schizophrenia, anxiety disorder); (b) the more the wife's income, the greater the marital power, but only the resources power positively correlated with her income; (c) couples with husbands higher in income were husband-dominant in all the three marital power dimensions, yet couples with wives higher in income were wife-dominant in none of the marital power dimensions; (d) couples with equal in income were the most egalitarian ones; (e) no matter how high the wife's income was, her husband had greater affection power. The clinical implications were discussed in four areas: (a) help couples deal with the changes in marital power structure; (b) help couples confront their problems and mend their marital relations; (c) develop wives' relational power, and teach husbands to obtain relational power; and (d) help couples coconstruct egalitarian relations in a conscious manner.

1. 呂玉瑕、伊慶春(2005)。社會變遷中的夫妻資源與家務分工：台灣七○年代與九○年代社會文化脈絡的比較。台灣社會學，10，41-94。
   連結：
2. 楊連謙、葉光輝、董秀珠(2011)。重型精神疾患丈夫為施暴者之婚姻處遇：施暴者之特徵及治療成效研究。中華心理衛生學刊，24(2)，311-34。
   連結：
3. 董秀珠、楊連謙(2004)。丈夫經濟弱勢夫妻權力歷程的性別文化影響。中華心理衛生學刊，17(1)，25-56。
   連結：
4. 潘淑滿(2003)。婚姻暴力的性別政治。女學學誌：婦女與性別研究，15，195-253。
   連結：
5. 簡文吟、伊慶春(2004)。共識與歧見：夫妻配對研究的重要性。台灣社會學，7，89-122。
   連結：
6. 行政院（1992）。中華民國職業標準分類。台北：行政院臺八一仁授一字第○七二四八號函。
7. 無名氏（2010）。兩成美國男人靠老婆養家。2010年1月21日，取自 http://www.bcc.com.tw/news/newsview.asp?cde=1053446
8. 陳素玲（2010年3月8日）。勞參率男創新低。聯合晚報，1版。
9. Babcock, J. C.,Waltz, J.,Jacobson, N. S.,Gottman, J. M.(1993).Power and violence: The relation between communication patterns, power discrepancies, and domestic violence.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,61,40-50.
10. Coleman, D. H.,Straus, M. A.(1986).Marital power, conflict, and violence in a nationally representative sample of American couples.Violence and Victims,1(2),141-157.
11. Crabtree, B. F.、Miller, W. L.、黃惠雯譯、童琬芬譯、梁文蓁譯、林兆衛譯(2007)。最新質性方法與研究＝Doing qualitative research。台北:韋伯文化。
12. Cromwell, R. E.,Olson, D. H.(1975).Power in Families.New York, NY:John Wiley.
13. Fox, G. L.,Blanton, P. W.(1995).Noncustodial fathers following divorce.Marriage and Fanily Review,1,257-282.
14. Giddens, A.、周素鳳譯(2001)。親密關係的轉變：現代社會的性、愛、慾。台北:巨流。
15. Gray-Little, B.,Burks, N.(1983).Power and satifaction in marriage: A review and critique.Psychological Bulletin,93,513-538.
16. Hotaling, G.,Sugarman, D.(1986).An analysis of risk markers in husband to wife violence: The current state of knowledge.Violence and Victims,1,101-124.
17. Levant, R. F.(1997).Gender equality and the new psychology of men.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy,24,439-444.
18. McDonald, G. W.(1980).Family power: The assessment of a decade of theory and research.Journal of Marriage and the Family,42(4),841-851.
19. Olson, D.,DeFrain, J.(2003).Marriage and families: Intimacy, diversity and strengths.New York, NY:McGraw Hill.
20. Potuchek, J. L.(1997).Who supports the family? Gender and breadwinning in dual-earner marriages.Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press.
21. Pyke, K. D.(1996).Class-based masculinities: The interdependence of gender, class, and interoersonal power.Gender and society,10(5),527-549.
22. Rodman, H.(1972).Marital power and the theory if resources on cultural context.Journal of Contemporary Family Studies,3,50-69.
23. Rosenbaum, A.,Leisring, P. A.(2003).Towards an understanding of partner abusive men.Journal of Comparative Family Studies,34(1),7-22.
24. Safilios-Rothschild, C.(1976).A macro-and micro-examination of family power and love: An exchange model.Journal of Marriage and the Family,37,355-362.
25. Straus, M. A.(1979).Measuring intra-family conflict violence: The conflict tactics scale.Journal of Marriage and the Family,41,75-88.
26. Straus, M. A.(Ed.),Gelles, R. J.(Ed.)(1990).Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families.New Brunswick, Canada:Transaction.
27. Tichenor, V. J.(1999).Status and income as gendered resources: The case of marital power.Journal of Marriage and the Family,61,638-650.
28. Umberson, D.,Anderson, K.,Glick, J.,Shapiro, A.(1998).Domestic violence, personal control, and gender.Journal of Marriage and the Family,60,442-452.
29. Xu, X.,Lai, S-C.(2002).Resoures, gender ideologies and marital power.Journal of Family Issues,23,209-245.
30. 呂玉瑕、伊慶春(1998)。社會變遷中婦女就業與家庭地位─以家務分工為例。中國家庭及其倫理研討會
31. 胡幼慧編(1996)。質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。台北:巨流。
32. 徐安琪(2001)。婚姻權力模式─城鄉差異及其影響因素。國立台灣大學社會學刊，29(2)，251-281。
33. 陳靜慧(2005)。蹺蹺板的兩端─家庭中的權力與決策。網路社會學通訊期刊，48
34. 黃淑如(2004)。處理精神病患與藥酒癮個案家庭暴力議題之現況與困境。台北市第五屆家庭暴力暨性侵害防治週：家庭暴力及性侵害防治工作網絡整合研討會
35. 楊連謙(2009)。嫉妒妄想：結構─策略取向婚姻治療的處理經驗。諮商與輔導，287，7-19。
36. 楊連謙、董秀珠(1997)。結構─策略取向家庭治療。台北:心理。
37. 楊連謙、董秀珠(2008)。主體實踐婚姻／家庭治療─在關係和脈絡中共構主體性。台北:心理。
38. 楊連謙、董秀珠、葉光輝(2006)。行政院衛生署計畫行政院衛生署計畫,台北:台北市立聯合醫院。
39. 楊連謙、董秀珠、葉光輝(2005)。精神科專科醫院治療婚姻暴力之經驗。北市醫學雜誌，2(8)，713-21。
40. 楊連謙、董秀珠、葉光輝(2006)。婚姻暴力與夫妻離合。北市醫學雜誌，3(5)，450-60。
41. 楊連謙、董秀珠、葉光輝(2004)。行政院衛生署計畫行政院衛生署計畫,台北:台北市立聯合醫院。

1. Yang, Lien-Chien,Tung, Hsiu-Chu,Lung, For-Wey(2013).Adherence Analysis of Couples with Violence Completing Marital Therapy.台灣精神醫學,27(4),295-305.