督導關係量表之編製與信、效度建構

Development and Validation of a Supervisory Relationship Scale

吳秀碧(Sophie Woo)

受督者 ； 量表編製 ； 督導 ； 督導關係 ； developing inventory ； supervision ； supervisee ； supervisory relationship

中華輔導與諮商學報

38期（2013 / 12 / 01）

117 - 148

繁體中文

The purpose of this study was to develop a valid and reliable measure of supervisory relationship from the perspective of supervisees. Qualitative data obtained from a previous study and information generated from a review of the literature were used to construct a 78 item self-report questionnaire measure. After an evaluation by six professionals who used a constructive model to analyze the content validity of the scale, 4 items were combined into 2 and 24 items with CVI lower than .80 were deleted, resulting in a 52-item original version of Supervisory Relationship Scale (SRS). The scale was administered to 198 counseling supervisees with diverse background characteristics on gender, training level, affiliated universities, institutions, and geographical areas. The principal components analysis identified seven components for the construct of SRS. Due to having only one single item, the seventh component was removed. Finally the SRS was comprised of six components and 51 items in total. The components were labeled: ”Safe Supervisory Environment and Personal Characteristics”, ”Trustworthy Supervision and Professional Traits”, ”Supervision Intervention Facilitating Cognitive Development”, ”Formative Feedback and Role Modeling”, ”Helping Awareness and Situated Intervening”, and ”Supervisor Self Disclosure” . The amount of variance in SRS explained by the six factors was 61.715%. The results of the analyses for the scale's concurrent validity, internal consistency and split-half reliability were favorable. The SRS demonstrated good concurrent validity (γ=.871, p＜.001), high internal consistency (α=.978), and good split­half reliability (γxx=.959). On the basis of the findings of the study, the applications of this instrument for counselor and supervisor training and for future research are forwarded.

The purpose of this study was to develop a valid and reliable measure of supervisory relationship from the perspective of supervisees. Qualitative data obtained from a previous study and information generated from a review of the literature were used to construct a 78 item self-report questionnaire measure. After an evaluation by six professionals who used a constructive model to analyze the content validity of the scale, 4 items were combined into 2 and 24 items with CVI lower than .80 were deleted, resulting in a 52-item original version of Supervisory Relationship Scale (SRS). The scale was administered to 198 counseling supervisees with diverse background characteristics on gender, training level, affiliated universities, institutions, and geographical areas. The principal components analysis identified seven components for the construct of SRS. Due to having only one single item, the seventh component was removed. Finally the SRS was comprised of six components and 51 items in total. The components were labeled: ”Safe Supervisory Environment and Personal Characteristics”, ”Trustworthy Supervision and Professional Traits”, ”Supervision Intervention Facilitating Cognitive Development”, ”Formative Feedback and Role Modeling”, ”Helping Awareness and Situated Intervening”, and ”Supervisor Self Disclosure” . The amount of variance in SRS explained by the six factors was 61.715%. The results of the analyses for the scale's concurrent validity, internal consistency and split-half reliability were favorable. The SRS demonstrated good concurrent validity (γ=.871, p＜.001), high internal consistency (α=.978), and good split­half reliability (γxx=.959). On the basis of the findings of the study, the applications of this instrument for counselor and supervisor training and for future research are forwarded.

1. 王文秀、徐西森、連廷嘉(2006)。我國大學校院與社會輔導機構諮商督導工作實施現況及其人員專業知覺之探討研究。中華輔導學報，19，1-40。
   連結：
2. 吳秀碧(2012)。受督者知覺有益學習的督導關係內涵之探究。中華輔導與諮商學報，33，87-118。
   連結：
3. 徐西森(2003)。諮商督導歷程中督導角色與督導焦點之分析研究－以區辨模式為架構。諮商輔導文粹，8，1-34。
   連結：
4. 徐西森(2005)。SAS 取向諮商督導能力評量表之編製研究。中華輔導學報，18，153-201。
   連結：
5. 張淑芬、廖鳳池(2007)。諮商督導結盟歷程之初探研究：以一對督導為例。輔導與諮商學報，29(1)，67-86。
   連結：
6. 鄭如安、廖鳳池(2005)。督導中重要事件內涵之分析研究。諮商輔導學報，12，35-70。
   連結：
7. Aiken, L. R.(1985).Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings.Educational and Psychological Measurement,45,131-142.
8. Aiken, L. R.(1982).Writing multiple-choice items to measure higher-order educational objectives.Educational and Psychological Measurement,42,803-806.
9. Allen, G. J.,Szollos, S. J.,Williams, B. E.(1986).Doctoral students' comparative evaluation of best and worst psychotherapy supervision.Professional Psychology: Research and Practice,17,91-99.
10. Bernard, J. M.,Goodyear, R. K.(2004).Fundamentals of clinical supervision.New York, NY:Allyn &Bacon.
11. Borders, L. D.,Bernard, J. M.,Dye, H. A.,Fong, M. L.,Henderson, P.,Nance, D. W.(1991).Curriculum guide for training counseling supervisors: Rationale, development, and implementation.Counselor Education and Supervision,31,58-80.
12. Bordin, E. S.(1983).A working alliance model of supervision.Counseling Psychologist,11,35-42.
13. Chen, E. C.,Bernstein, B. L.(2000).Relations of complementarity and supervisory issues to supervisory working alliance: A comparative analysis of two cased.Journal of Counseling Psychology,47,485-497.
14. Corrigan, J. D.,Dell, D. M.,Lewis, K. N.,Schmidt, L. D.(1980).Counseling as a social influence process: A review.Journal of Counseling Psychology,27,395-441.
15. Efstation, J. E.,Patton, M. J.,Kardash, G. M.(1990).Measuring the working alliance in counselor supervision.Journal of Counseling Psychology,37,322-329.
16. Falender, C. A.,Shafranske, E. P.(2005).Clinical supervision: A competency-based Approach.Washington, DC:American Psychological Association.
17. Fleming, I.(Ed.),Steen, I.(Ed.)(2004).Supervision and clinical psychology: Theory, practice and perspectives.Hove, England:Brunner-Routledge.
18. Geller, E.,Foley, G. M.(2009).Broadening the "ports of entry" for speech-language pathologists: A relational and reflective model for clinical supervision.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology,1(18),22-41.
19. Heppner, P. P.,Dixon, D. N.(1981).A review of the interpersonal influence process in counseling.Personnel and Guidance Journal,59,542-550.
20. Heppner, P. P.,Roehlke, H. J.(1984).Differences among supervisees at different levels of training: Implications for a developmental model of supervision.Journal of Counseling Psychology,31,76-90.
21. Holloway, E. L.(1995).Clinical supervision: A systems approach.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
22. Holloway, E. L.(Ed.),Carroll, M.(Ed.)(1999).Training counseling supervisors: Strategies, methods and techniques.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
23. Holloway, E. L.,Freund, R. D.,Gardner, S. L.,Nelson, M. L.,Walker, B. R.(1989).Relation of power and involvement to theoretical orientation in supervision: An analysis of discourse.Journal of Counseling Psychology,36,88-102.
24. Holloway, E. L.,Wolleat, P. L.(1994).Supervision: The pragmatics of empowerment.Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation,5(1),23-43.
25. Hutt, C. H.,Scott, J.,King, M.(1983).A phenomenological study of supervisee's positive and negative experiences in supervision.Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice,20,118-123.
26. Ladany, N.,Lehrman-Waterman, D.(1999).The content and frequency of supervisor self-disclosure and the relationship to supervisory working alliance and satisfaction with supervision.Counselor Education and Supervision,38,143-160.
27. Ladany, N.,Walker, J. A.,Melincoff, D. S.(2001).Supervisory style: Its relation to the supervisory working-alliance and supervisor self-disclosure.Counselor Education and Supervision,40,263-275.
28. Lambert, M. J.(1974).Supervisory and counseling process: A comparative study.Counselor Education and Supervision,14,54-60.
29. Lizzio, A.,Wilson, K.,Que, J.(2009).Relationship dimensions in the professional supervision of psychology graduates: Supervisee perceptions of process and outcome.Studies in Continuing Education,31(2),127-140.
30. Manathunga, C.(2007).Supervision as mentoring: The role of power and boundary crossing.Studies in Continuing Education,29(2),207-221.
31. Martin, J. S.,Goodyear, R. K.,Newton, F. B.(1987).Clinical supervision: An intensive case study.Professional Psychology: Research and Practice,18,225-235.
32. McCarthy, P.,Kulakowski, D.,Kenfield, J. A.(1994).Clinical supervision practices of licensed psychologists.Professional Psychology: Research and Practice,255,177-181.
33. McGlothlin, J. M.,Rainey, S.,Kindsvatter, A.(2005).Suicidal clients and supervisees: A model for considering supervisor roles.Counselor Education and Supervision,45,235-246.
34. McMahon, M.(Ed.),Patton, W.(Ed.)(2002).Supervision in the helping professions.Sydney, Australia:Prentice-Hall.
35. Miller, C. D.,Oetting, E. R.(1996).Students react supervision.Counselor Education and Supervision,6,73-74.
36. Nelson, G. L.(1978).Psychotherapy supervision from the trainee's point of view: A survey of preferences.Professional Psychology,9,539-550.
37. Palomo, M.,Beinart, H.,Cooper, M. J.(2010).Development and validation of the supervisory relationship questionnaire (SRQ) in UK trainee clinical psychologists.British Journal of Clinical Psychology,49,131-149.
38. Patton, M. J.,Kivlighan, D. M.(1997).Relevance of the supervisory alliance to the counseling alliance and to treatment adherence in counselor training.Journal of Counseling Psychology,44,108-115.
39. Pierce, R. M.,Schauble, P. G.(1970).Graduate training of facilitative counselors: The effects of individual supervision.Journal of Counseling Psychology,17,210-215.
40. Proctor, B.(1994).Supervision-competence, confidence, accountability.British Journal of Guidance and Counselling,22,309-318.
41. Rabinowitz, F. E.,Heppner, P. P.,Roehlke, H. J.(1986).A descriptive study of process and outcome variables of supervision over time.Journal of Counseling Psychology,33,292-300.
42. Ronnestad, M. H.,Skovholt, T. M.(1993).Supervision of beginning and advanced graduate students of counseling and psychotherapy.Journal of Counseling and Development,17,396-405.
43. Schultz, J. C.,Ososkie, J. H.,Fried, J. H.,Nelson, R. E.,Bardos, A. N.(2002).Clinical supervision in public rehabilitation counseling settings.Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin,45,213-222.
44. Shanfield, S. B.,Mohl, P. C.,Matthews, K. L.,Heatherly, V.(1992).Quantitative assessment of the behavior of psychotherapy supervisors.American Journal of Psychiatry,149,352-357.
45. Shulman, L.(Ed.),Safyer, A.(Ed.)(2005).Supervision in counseling: Interdisciplinary issues and research.New York, NY:The Haworth Press, Inc..
46. Stoltenberg, C. D.,Delworth, U.(1987).Supervising counsellors and therapists.San Francisco, SF:Jassey-Bass.
47. Strong, S. R.(1968).Counseling: An interpersonal influence process.Journal of Counseling Psychology,15,215-224.
48. Strong, S. R.,Hills, H. I.,Kilmartin, C. T.,DeVries, H.,Lanier, K.,Nelson, B.N.,Strickland, D.,Meyer, C. W.(1988).The dynamic relations among interpersonal behaviors: A test of complementary and anticomplementarity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,54,789-810.
49. Sumerel, M. B.,Borders, L. D.(1996).Addressing personal issues in supervision: Impact of counselors' experience level on various aspects of the supervisory relationship.Counselor Education and Supervision,35(4),268-286.
50. Usher, L. H.,Borders, L. D.(1993).Practicing counselors' preferences for supervisory style and supervisory emphasis.Counselor Education and Supervision,33,66-78.
51. Wallace, M. J. D.,Wilcoxon, S. A.,Satcher, J.(2011).Productive and Nonproductive Counselor Supervision: Best and Worst Experiences of Supervisees.The Alabama Counseling Association Journal,35(2),4-13.
52. Walsh, B. B.,Gillespie, C. K.,Greer, J. M.,Eanes, B. E.(2002).Influence of dyadic mutuality on counselor trainee willingness to self-disclosure clinical mistakes to supervisors.The Clinical Supervisor,21(2),83-98.
53. Ward, C. C.,House, R. M.(1998).Counseling supervision: A reflective model.Counselor Education and Supervision,38,33-45.
54. Watkins, C. E.(Ed.)(1997).Handbook of psychotherapy supervision.New York, NY:Wiley.
55. Worthen, V.,McNeill, B. W.(1996).A phenomenological investigation of "good" supervision events.Journal of Counseling Psychology,43,25-34.
56. 王文秀(1998)。諮商師被督導經驗對其諮商挫折之因應及其專業成長之影響。中華輔導學報，6，1-34。
57. 危芷芬譯、Anastasi, A.、Urbina, S.(2003)。心理測驗。台北:雙葉書廊。
58. 施香如(2000)。督導者與諮商師在督導過程中的知覺差異研究。中華輔導學報，8，1-20。
59. 張淑芬(2007)。博士論文(博士論文)。高雄，國立高雄師範大學輔導與諮商研究所。
60. 鄭麗芬(1997)。博士論文(博士論文)。彰化，國立彰化師範大學輔導學研究所。

1. 陳思帆,連廷嘉,徐西森(2023)。受督導者督導情境焦慮量表之編製研究。教育心理學報，54(3)，537-562。
2. 李明峰(2017)。台灣諮商督導研究主題與方法之分析─以2000～2015年為例。諮商心理與復健諮商學報，30，97-119。
3. 喬虹(2022)。探討諮商實習專業評鑑。輔導季刊，58(1)，83-90。
4. 刑志彬(2017)。多元文化架構下的督導實務回應與營建。輔導季刊，53(4)，52-60。