题名

偏差行為的社會益損評估量表之發展與衡鑑

并列篇名

Developing and Evaluating the Scale for Social Benefits and Losses of Deviant Behaviors

DOI

10.3966/172851862019050055004

作者

吳中勤(Chung-Chin Wu)

关键词

社會損失 ； 社會獲益 ； 偏差行為 ； Deviant behaviors ； social benefits ； social losses

期刊名称

中華輔導與諮商學報

卷期/出版年月

55期（2019 / 05 / 01）

页次

97 - 121

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

解釋偏差行為的三個主要的社會心理學理論－社會學習理論、一般化緊張理論與社會控制理論，在測量上較少重視個人對偏差行為的預期獲益與損失評估歷程。實徵研究也較少在測量中考量負增強對偏差行為的正向影響，以及個人偏差行為對重要他人感受的影響評估（即社會損失評估）。本研究根據社會學習理論與一般化緊張理論觀點，來建構社會獲益評估歷程的測量題項，分別捕捉到正增強與負增強對偏差行為的正向影響。同時，也根據社會控制理論的理論觀點，建構社會損失評估歷程的測量題項，捕捉到與重要他人的情感連結對偏差行為的抑制效果。本研究以八年級學生為對象，檢視偏差行為的社會益損評估量表的信、效度。研究發現：（1）二階四因素社會益損評估模式與觀察資料適配良好。（2）偏差行為的社會獲益評估歷程，包含「追求同儕認同」與「逃避負向生活事件」的獲益評估。（3）社會損失評估歷程，則包含「依附同儕」與「依附父母」的損失評估。（4）追求同儕認同與逃避負向生活事件是偏差行為的可能推力，但唯有依附父母的損失評估，能成為抑制偏差行為的拉力。根據研究結果，未來研究除可進一步複驗此量表的信、效度外，也可考慮納入其它理論變項，檢視不同模式適於解釋觀察資料的程度。教學實務上，教師可同時針對社會獲益與社會損失的評估焦點，實施多元教學活動，以期削弱偏差行為的推力，增強抑制偏差行為的心理拉力。
英文摘要

Social Learning Theory, General Strain Theory, and Social Control Theory are three sociopsychological theories, which proposed to account for deviant behaviors. Social Learning Theory argued that differential reinforcement of behaviors, definition in favor of crime, the imitation of criminal models, and attached to deviant peer are four key influential factors leading to deviant behaviors. Deviant behaviors could be positively and negatively encouraged to be prolonged. For instance, someone who initially smoks may be encourage for his/her brave, and it may be also thought that is the way keeping his/her friendship. How people define certain behaviors as good or bad may be decided by his or her propensity of committing criminality. Moreover, deviant peer may also provid a model for imitating their deviant behaviors. Further, people who attaches to deviant peer may also learn deviant motivation and definition. General Strain Theory argued that failure to achieve positively valued goals (e.g. did not get good grade), inconsistent between expectations and achievements, removal of positive stimuli (e.g. divorce), and appearance of negative stimuli (e.g. been bullied) are crucial for deviant behaviors. Both theories try to find out encouraged factors for deviant behaviors. Instead, Social Control Theory proposes that relationships among individuals, commitments, values, norms, and beliefs prevents someone from deviant behaviors. Therefore, if moral beliefs (what is this?) are internalized, people will voluntarily limit their intention to commit deviant behaviors. This theory tries to understand the possible factors to reduce the likelihood of deviant behaviors. However, measurement of these three theories were rarely investigated the processes of social benefits and losses for expected behavioral outcome. The positive effects of negative reinforcement to deviant behaviors and inhibition effects of deviant behaviors to others feeling (social losses) were rarely measured in related measurement in empirical studies. This study constructed social benefits evaluation items based on Social Learning Theory and General Strain Theory to respectively capture positive effects of positive and negative reinforcements on deviant behaviors. Meanwhile, items for measuring social losses, based on social control theory, were designed to capture inhibition effects of affective connections to important others on deviant behaviors. This study included eighth grader as participants to evaluate the reliability and validity of social benefits and losses scale. Results showed: (1) Model of two second-order factors consisting four factors fitted to the observations. (2) Social benefits evaluation processes included pursing peers' recognition and avoiding negative life events. (3) Social losses evaluation processes included losses evaluation for attached to peers and parents. (4) ＂Pursing peers' recognition＂ and ＂avoiding negative life events＂ were considered as driving force, and there was only ＂attached to parents＂ was considered as pull force for inhibiting deviant behaviors. Results clearly showed that in evaluation process of social benefits, adolescence may try to get recognition from peers by means of committing deviant behaviors. It was also possible that they tried to unpleasure and pressure accompanied by avoiding negative life events throughout engaging in deviant behaviors. As to social losses evaluation process, loss evaluation of attachment to peer and parents were clearly different. Adolescence who considered more about peers' thought were more likely to consider parents' negative feeling. According to the results, further researches could not only reexamine the reliability and validity of this scale, but also could incorporate other theoretical variables to examine the fitness to the data. In practical, teachers are encouraged to conduct various teaching activities based on evaluation foci of social benefits and social losses, to weaken the driving force of deviant behaviors and reinforce the pull force to inhibit deviant behaviors.
主题分类 社會科學 > 心理學
社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 吳中勤, C. C.(2015)。探究青少年憂鬱與偏差行為的歷時性的影響關係。教育理論與實踐學刊，32，71-104。
    連結：
  2. 許春金, C. J.,陳玉書, Y. S.,蔡田木, T. M.,呂豐足, F. Z.,洪千涵, C. H.,白鎮福, C. F.(2015)。103年犯罪狀況及其分析─2014犯罪趨勢關鍵報告。犯罪防治研究專刊，7，3-15。
    連結：
  3. 許春金, C. J.,謝文彥, W. Y.,蔡田木, T. M.,呂宜芬, Y. F.,游伊君, Y. C.(2016)。104年犯罪狀況及其分析—2015犯罪趨勢關鍵報告。犯罪防治研究專刊，11，4-20。
    連結：
  4. 董旭英, Y. Y.(2003)。一般化緊張理論的實證性檢驗。犯罪學期刊，6，103-128。
    連結：
  5. 潭子文, T. W.,張楓明, F. M.(2013)。依附關係、低自我控制與青少年偏差行為關聯性之研究。中華輔導與諮商學報，36，67-90。
    連結：
  6. 賴慧敏, H. M.,鄭博文, P. W.,陳清檳, C. P.(2017)。臺灣青少年憂鬱情緒與偏差行為之縱貫性研究。教育心理學報，48(3)，399-426。
    連結：
  7. Agnew, R.(1991).A longitudinal test of social control theory and delinquency.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency,28(2),126-156.
  8. Agnew, R.(2005).Why do criminals offend? A general theory of crime and delinquency.Los Angeles, CA:Roxbury Publishing Co..
  9. Agnew, R.(1992).Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency.Criminology,30(1),47-88.
  10. Agnew, R.,Brezina, T.,Wright, J. P.,Cullen, F. T.(2002).Strain, personality traits, and delinquency: Extending general strain theory.Criminology,40(1),43-72.
  11. Agnew, R.,White, H. R.(1992).An empirical test of general strain theory.Criminology,30(4),475-500.
  12. Akers, R. L.,Jensen, G. F.(2006).The empirical status of social learning theory of crime and deviance: The past, present, and future.Taking Stock: The Status of Criminological Theory,New Brunswick, NJ:
  13. Akers, R. L.,Krohn, M. D.,Lanzakaduce, L.,Radosevich, M.(1979).Social learning and deviant behavior: Specific test of a general-theory.American Sociological Review,44(4),636-655.
  14. Akers, R. L.,Sellers, C. S.(2009).Criminological theories: Introduction, evaluation, and application.New York, NY:Oxford.
  15. Aseltine, R. H.,Gore, S.,Gordon, J.(2000).Life stress, anger and anxiety, and delinquency: An empirical test of general strain theory.Journal of Health and Social Behavior,41(3),256-275.
  16. Bagozzi, R. P.,Yi, Y.(1988).On the evaluation of structural equation models.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,16(1),74-94.
  17. Burnett, S.,Bault, N.,Coricelli, G.,Blakemore, S. J.(2010).Adolescents' heightened riskseeking in a probabilistic gambling task.Cognitive Development,25(2),183-196.
  18. Cochran, J. K.,Maskaly, J.,Jones, S.,Sellers, C. S.(2017).Using structural equations to model Akers' social learning theory with data on intimate partner violence.Crime & Delinquency,63(1),39-60.
  19. Defoe, I. N.,Dubas, J. S.,Figner, B.,van Aken, M. A. G.(2015).A meta-analysis on age differences in risky decision making: Adolescents versus children and adults.Psychological Bulletin,141(1),48-84.
  20. Durkin, K. F.,Wolfe, T. W.,Clark, G. A.(2005).College students and binge drinking: An evaluation of social learning theory.Sociological Spectrum,25(3),255-272.
  21. Dyer, N. G.,Hanges, P. J.,Hall, R. J.(2005).Applying multilevel confirmatory factor analysis techniques to the study of leadership.The Leadership Quarterly,16(1),149-167.
  22. Elliot, A. J.,Murayama, K.,Pekrun, R.(2011).A 3×2 achievement goal model.Journal of Educational Psychology,103(3),632-648.
  23. Fornell, C.,Larcker, D. F.(1981).Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.Journal of Marketing Research,18(1),39-50.
  24. Hair, J. F., Jr.,Black, W. C.,Babin, B. J.,Anderson, R. E.(2009).Multivariate data analysis.New Jersey, EC:Pearson.
  25. Hancock, G. R.(Ed.),Mueller, R. O.(Ed.)(2013).Structural equation modeling: A second course.Charlotte, NC:Information Age Publishing.
  26. Heck, R. H.,Thomas, S. L.(2009).An introduction to multilevel modeling techniques.New York, NY:Routledge.
  27. Higgins, G. E.,Tewksbury, R.,Mustaine, E. E.(2007).Sports fan binge drinking: An examination using low self-control and peer association.Sociological Spectrum,27(4),389-404.
  28. Hirschi, T.(1969).Causes of Delinquency.Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.
  29. Hox, J. J.,Maas, C. J. M.(2001).The accuracy of multilevel structural equation modeling with pseudobalanced groups and small samples.Structural Equation Modeling,8(2),157-174.
  30. Hox, J. J.,Moerbeek, M.,van de Schoot, R.(2010).Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications.New York, NY:Routledge.
  31. Hu, L. T.,Bentler, P. M.(1999).Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,6(1),1-55.
  32. Jöreskog, K. G.,Sörbom, D.(1993).LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language.Chicago, IL:Scientific Software International.
  33. Kempf-Leonard, K.,Tracy, P. E.,Howell, J. C.(2001).Serious, violent, and chronic juvenile offenders: The relationship of delinquency career types to adult criminality.Justice Quarterly,18(3),449-478.
  34. Lilly, J. R.,Cullen, F. T.,Ball, R. A.(2007).Criminological theory: Context and consequences.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  35. Marsh, H. W.,Muthen, B.,Asparouhov, T.,Ludtke, O.,Robitzsch, A.,Morin, A. J. S.,Trautwein, U.(2009).Exploratory structural equation modeling, integrating CFA and EFA: Application to students' evaluations of university teaching.Structural Equation Modeling,16(3),439-476.
  36. Marsh, H. W.,Nagengast, B.,Morin, A. J. S.(2013).Measurement invariance of big-five factors over the life span: ESEM tests of gender, age, plasticity, maturity, and la dolce vita effects.Developmental Psychology,49(6),1194-1218.
  37. Mehta, P. D.,Neale, M. C.(2005).People are variables too: Multilevel structural equations modeling.Psychological Methods,10(3),259-284.
  38. Morin, A. J. S.,Asparouhov, T.(2018).Estimation of a hierarchical exploratory structural equation model (ESEM) using ESEM-within-CFA.Montreal, QC:Substantive Methodological Synergy Research Laboratory.
  39. Muthén, B. O.(1994).Multilevel covariance structure analysis.Sociological Methods & Research,22(3),376-398.
  40. Muthén, B. O.,Satorra, A.(1995).Complex sample data in structural equation modeling.Sociological Methodology,25,267-316.
  41. Pratt, T. C.,Cullen, F. T.,Sellers, C. S.,Winfree, L. T.,Madensen, T. D.,Daigle, L. E.,Gau, J. M.(2010).The empirical status of social learning theory: A meta-analysis.Justice Quarterly,27(6),765-802.
  42. Ward, B. W.,Gryczynski, J.(2009).Social learning theory and the effects of living arrangement on heavy alcohol use: Results from a national study of college students.Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs,70(3),364-372.
  43. Wheatley, R. K.,West, R. P.,Charlton, C. T.,Sanders, R. B.,Smith, T. G.,Taylor, M. J.(2009).Improving behavior through differential reinforcement: A praise note system for elementary school students.Education and Treatment of Children,32(4),551-571.
  44. Winfree, L. T.,Bäckstöm, T. V.,Mays, G. L.(1994).Social learning theory, self-reported delinquency, and youth gangs: A new twist on a general theory of crime and delinquency.Youth & Society,26(2),147-177.
  45. 許春金, C. J.,周文勇, W. Y.,蔡田木, T. M.(1996)。男性與女姓少年偏差行為成因差異之實證研究。犯罪學期刊，2，1-14。
  46. 許春金, C. J.,蔡田木, T. M.,鄭凱寶, K. P.(2012)。青少年早期偏差價值觀與偏差友伴接觸對犯罪變化影響研究。青少年犯罪防治研究期刊，4(2)，109-139。
  47. 衛生福利部（2014）：103年兒童及少年生活狀況調查報告—少年篇。取自https://www.sfaa.gov.tw/SFAA/Pages/ashx/File.ashx?FilePath=~/File/Attach/5961/File_169263.pdf [Ministry of Health and Welfare (2014). An investigation report of children and adolescent life coditions in 2014 – A chapter for adolescent . Retrieved from https://www.sfaa.gov.tw/SFAA/Pages/ashx/File.ashx?FilePath=~/File/Attach/5961/File_169263.pdf]
被引用次数
  1. 吳中勤(Chung-Chin Wu)(2023)。接觸偏差同儕對偏差行為影響的決策－動機內在歷程分析。教育研究集刊。(69:1)。83-125。 
print cancel