M型組織與多中心結構之比較：以地方推動BOT為例

The Comparison between M-form Organizations and Polycentric Structures: A Study of BOT Promoted by Local Governments in Taiwan

10.29865/PAP.201006.0003

汪明生(Ming-Sheng Wang)；曾玉祥(Yu-Siang Zeng)

M型組織 ； 多中心 ； BOT ； M-form ； polycentricity ； BOT

行政暨政策學報

50期（2010 / 06 / 01）

81 - 105

繁體中文

公共建設執行的組織型式有集權型即U型、分權型即M型及多中心型，M型及多中心型各有優劣，M型及多中心型的績效比較，可彰顯地方推動BOT促進公共利益及兼顧公平、效率之本旨。 本文以地方推動BOT之觀點，選擇18種地方建設標的，假設可行性、需要性、融資易、低風險、報酬、廠商意願六項準則爲績效指標，融資易、低風險二項準則爲低交易成本指標，以德菲法徵詢學者專家意見，尋求一致性後，以集群分析將相對效率高、低之方案分群。結果顯示，醫院、停車場、靈骨塔、渡假旅館、遊樂區、勞工住宅、焚化爐等七項方案之績效高且交易成本低。 七項績效方案之財貨屬性爲可收費的混合財，相對效率高，交易成本低，適合以M型組織運作。多中心組織強調效率、公平、課責及適當性目標的評估，注重永續性，適合社區型地方建設，如地區醫院、社區活動中心、縣（市）民學苑、育幼院、運動公園、停車場、下水道設施等。 研究發現，「促參法」所稱民間機構隱含包括營利組織及非營利組織，M型組織爲營利組織，多中心組織爲非營利組織，M型組織適合經營混合財，多中心組織適合經營共營財。

The execution type of public facilities includes centralization which is also called U type, decentralization which is also called M type, and polycentric type. There are pros and cons between M type and polycentric type and the comparison of effects between M type and polycentric type can manifest that lower level government administration push BOT forward to promote public interests and the purpose of fairness and efficiency. This study focuses on the viewpoints of local government pushing BOT forward to choose 18 local construction projects to assume the six norms of feasibility, desirability, easily financing, low risk, returns, and manufactures' intentions as the performance index and two norms of easily financing, low risk are the low transaction costs index. After asking experts and scholars for opinions by Delphi Method and looking for consistence, the results are authenticated by cluster analysis. The findings show that 7 programs like hospitals, parking lots, Columbarium Pagodas, resort hotels, amusement parks, labor housing and incinerators have higher relative efficiency that have the consistent result authenticated by cluster analysis. The property of 7 performance programs is chargeable mixed goods with high relative efficiency and low transaction costs and therefore, it is suitable to be operated by M type organizations. Polycentric organizations emphasize efficiency, fairness, accountability and assessment of proper targets which focus on sustainability and are suitable for community-owned local infrastructure such as regional hospitals, community centers, extension classes for county (city) residents, infant-asylum, sports parks, parking lots, and sewer systems and so on. The study finds that ”Statute for Promoting Private Participation in Public infrastructure” which is called non-governmental institutions implied profit-making organizations and non-profit organizations. M type belongs to profit-making organizations while polycentric organization belongs to nonprofit organizations. M type is suitable for running mixed goods and polycentric organization is suitable for running cooperation goods.

1. 江瑞祥(2007)。公共建設執行之組織型式甄選。公共行政學報，22，149-161。
   連結：
2. 趙永茂(2007)。從地方治理論臺灣地方政治發展的基本問題。政治科學論叢，31，1-38。
   連結：
3. Aguinis, H.(2009).Performance Management.New Jersey:Pearson Education, Inc..
4. Alchian, A.(1950).Uncertainty, Evolution, and Economic Theory.Journal of Political Economy,58,211-221.
5. Andersson, K.,Ostrom, E.(2008).Analyzing Decentralized Resource Regimes from a Polycentric Perspective.Policy Sciences,41(1),71-93.
6. Atkinson, M.,Coleman, W.(1992).Policy Networks, Policy Communities and the Problems of Governance.Governance,5(2),154-180.
7. Bache, I.,Flinders, M.(2005).Multi-Level Governance.New York:Oxford University Press.
8. Chandler, A. D.(1990).Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
9. Conrad, J. M.(1999).Resource Economics.New York:Cambridge University Press.
10. Cooksey, R. W.(1996).Judgment Analysis: Theory, Methods, and Applications.New York:Academic Press.
11. Denkhaus, I.,Schneider, V.(1997).The Privatization of Infrastructures in Germany.Public Sector Reform: Rational, Trends and Problems,London:
12. Dugger, W. M.(1983).The Transaction Cost Analysis of Oliver E. Williamson: A new Synthesis?.Journal of Economics,17(1),219-234.
13. Finnerty, J. D.(1996).Project Financing: Asset-based Financial Engineering.New York:John Wiley & Sons, Inc..
14. Fornell, C.,Larcker, D. F.(1981).Evaluating Structural Equation Models with unobservable Variables and Measurement Error.Journal of Marketing Research,18(1),39-50.
15. Guerra-López, I.(2008).Performance Evalution: Proven Approaches for Improving Program and Organizational Performance.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
16. Hardin, G.(1968).The Tragedy of the Commons.Science,162,1243-1248.
17. Kaplan, M. F.(ed.),Schwartz, S.(ed.)(1975).Human Judgment and Decision Processes: Formal and Mathematical Approaches.New York:Academic Press.
18. Khan, M. F. K.,Parra, R. J.(2003).Financing Large Projects: Using Project Finance Techniques and Practices.New York:Pearson Education Asia Pte Ltd..
19. Martin, R.(1994).The Economics of Business Enterprise: An Introduction to Economic Organisation and the Theory of the Firm.New York:Harvester Wheatsheaf.
20. Mcginnis, M. D.(1999).Polycentric Governance and Development: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis.Ann Arbor:The University of Michigan Press.
21. Ménard, C.(2004).Institutional Dimensions of the Modern Corporation.Northampton:Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
22. Norman, M.,Stoker, B.(1991).Data Envelopment Analysis: the Assessment of Performance.New York:John Wiley & Sons.
23. Nunnally, J. C.(1978).Psychometric Theory.New York:McGraw-Hill.
24. Oates, W.(1972).Fiscal Federalism.New York:Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
25. Olson, M.(1965).The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
26. Ostrom, E.(1990).Governing The Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action.New York:Cambridge University Press.
27. Ostrom, E.,Schroeder, L.,Wynne, S.(1993).Institutional Incentives and Sustainable Development: Infrastructure Policies in Perspective.Boulder:Westview Press.
28. Ostrom, E,Ahn, T. K.(2003).Foundations of Social Capital.Northampton:Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc..
29. Pierre, J.,Peters, B. G.(2000).Governance, Politics and the State.New York, NY:St. Martin's.
30. Polanyi, M.(1951).The Logic of Liberty: Reflections and Rejoinders.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
31. Price, S.(1997).The Franchise Paradox: New Directions, Different Strategies.London:Wellington House.
32. Savas, E. S.(2000).Privatization and Public-Private Partnerships.New York:Chatham House Publishers.
33. Savas, E. S.(1982).Privatizing The Public Sector: How to Shrink Government.New Jersey:Chatam House Publishers, Inc..
34. Schmid, A. A.(2004).Conflict and Cooperation: Institutional and Behavioral Economics.Malden:Blackwell Publishing, Ltd..
35. Sen, A.(1996).Industrial Organization.New York:Oxford University Press.
36. Smith, A. J.(1999).Privatized Infrastructure: the Role of Government.London:Thomas Telford Publishing.
37. Sorensen, E.,Torfing, J.(2007).Theories of Democratic Network Governance.New York:Palgrave Macmillian.
38. Tiebout, C.(1956).The Pure Theory of Local Expenditures.Journal of Political Economy,64,416-424.
39. Tullock, G.(1967).The Welfare Costs of Tariffs, Monopolies, and Theft.Western Economic Journal,5,224-232.
40. Turoff, M.(1970).The Design of a Policy Delphi.Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2(2),149-171.
41. United Nations Industrial Development Organization=UNIDO(1996).Guidelines for Infrastructure Development Through Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) Projects.Vienna:UNIDO Publication.
42. Weisbrod, B. A.(1997).The Future of The Nonprofit Sector: Its Entwining with Private Enterprise and Government.Journal of Policy Analysis and Management,16(4),541-555.
43. Williamson, O. E.(1981).The Modern Corporation: Origins, Evolution, Attributes.Journal of Economic Literature,19,1537-1568.
44. Williamson, O. E.(1986).Economic Organization.New York:Free Press.
45. Williamson, O. E.(1991).Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structure Alternatives.Administrative Science Quarterly,36(2),269-296.
46. Williamson, O. E.(1975).Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (A Study in the Economics of Internal Organization).New York:Free Press.
47. 孔繁斌(2008)。公共性的再生產：多中心治理的合作機制建構。南京:江蘇人民出版社。
48. 林水波、李長晏(2005)。跨域治理。臺北:五南書局。
49. 林震岩(2007)。多變量分析：SPSS的操作與應用。台北:智勝文化公司。
50. 邱毅、邱鉅權(1991)。臺灣大企業的財務績效、組織創新與管理特質。臺灣經濟研究論叢，第七輯：管理經濟，台北:
51. 胡仲英(1999)。BOT理論與實務：兼論我國BOT政策之推動。台北:孫運璿學術基金會。
52. 張維迎(1999)。賽局理論愈信息經濟學。台北:茂昌圖書公司。
53. 陳秋政(2008)。跨部門治理之內涵與研究啟示。府際關係研究通訊，4，29-31。
54. 劉億如、王文宇、黃玉霖(1999)。BOT三贏策略。台北:商鼎財經顧問。

1. 劉峯銘、敬世龍、高瑞陽(2014)。公民客廳：後直轄市時期的社區活動中心再利用研究。興國學報，15，183-193。