道德政策理論之應用：台灣寵物業管理政策之個案研究

The Application of Morality Policy Theory: The Case Study of Taiwan Pet Industry Regulatory Policy

10.29865/PAP.201206.0004

吳宗憲(Chuang-Hsien Wu)

公益理論 ； 俘虜理論 ； 道德政策 ； 道德政策理論 ； 寵物業管理政策 ； Public Interest Theory ； Capture Theory ； Morality Policy ； Morality Policy Theory ； Pet Industry Regulatory Policy

行政暨政策學報

54期（2012 / 06 / 01）

121 - 164

繁體中文

道德政策議題，在已開發國家中扮演越來越重要的角色。因為自認「道德」的一方，常將自身的價值觀強加到其他人身上，視對方為「罪惡政治」，而引起對方公開或私下的抵制，這是形成政策無效率的重要原因之一。台灣的政治發展在歷經早期轉型正義、憲政架構等國家結構議題，以及當代的治理效率改革之後，已逐漸邁向後工業世紀，在此類道德政策議題頻繁出現之時，道德政策研究卻付之闕如，亟需學界補強。本文透過「寵物業管理政策」運作的實證個案，顯示台灣公共行政學界慣常用來分析公共政策議題之理論，並不適合用來分析此政策的運作，而西方政治學界近年所建構的「道德政策理論」，則更能窺見政策運作的全貌。也因此，未來我政策學界及實務界除必須更關注「道德政策」議題外，並且需跳脫傳統政策思考的模式，引入「道德政策理論」的分析，才能更有效分析或解決政策問題。

Morality policy issues play a more and more important role in developed countries. The major reason of policy inefficiency in these countries is that the members of ”morality party” impose their value on the members of other parties which are recognized as ”politics of sin”; as a result, it causes the opposite parties' boycott in public or in private.Taiwan has gradually entered postindustrial era after went through transactional justice, constitutional framework reform issues in the early age, and contemporary governance reform issues. With these morality policy issues appearing frequently, there is a need of academic researches in this field.Through the empirical case study of pet industry regulatory policy, we find these theories Taiwan public administration academic community usually use are inappropriate for this kind of policy. However, the ”morality policy theory” built by western politics academic community recently seems more appropriate for this policy.That is to say, our policy academic and practice communities have to concentrate more on ”morality policy issues” in the future. Besides, we have to escape out of traditional policy model, and introduce ”morality policy theory” perspective, so that we can analysis or resolve policy problem more efficiency.

1. 黃怡，2003，〈一種保護阿狗阿貓的法〉，台灣環境資訊協會：http://e-info.org.tw/review/huangyi/2001/re-huangyi0102701.htm，檢索日期：2003 年5 月30 日
2. 廖宗慶，2007，〈20 隻吉娃娃遭棄養2 隻活活餓死〉，TVBS新聞網：http://www.tvbs.com.tw/news/news_list.asp?no=lili20070314140815，檢索日期：2007 年3 月14 日
3. 台灣動物社會研究會，2006，〈「爽到你，艱苦到我和動物」──不當繁殖買賣無法無天，政府坐視不管，民間吐血抗議〉，台灣動物社會研究會：http://www.east.org.tw/that_content.php?s_id=4&m_id=14&id=99，檢索日期：2006 年8 月5 日
4. 蘋果日報，2009，〈雲屏宜三縣、贊成設紅燈區，《蘋果》普查25 縣市長10 縣市強烈反對〉，蘋果日報：http://tw.nextmedia.com/applenews/article/art_id/31705815/IssueID/20090613，檢索日期：2009 年6 月13 日
5. 徐沛然、王毅丰，2009，〈四千票之差、澎湖公投否決賭場興建〉，苦勞網：http://www.coolloud.org.tw/node/46888，檢索日期：2009 年9 月27 日
6. 農委會新聞稿，2004，〈9 月1 日動物保護月起跑，系列活動歡迎全民參與〉，農委會：http://wwwe.coa.gov.tw/show_news.php?cat=show_news&serial=9_diamond_20040902164738&print=1，檢索日期：2004 年9 月2 日
7. 台灣動物社會研究會，2006，〈「檢討寵物繁殖買賣業管理法令與政策」公聽會〉，台灣動物社會研究會：http://www.east.org.tw/that_content.php?s_id=4&m_id=21&id=101，檢索日期：2006 年6 月28 日
8. 楊湘鈞，2009，〈違法寵物店倒閉 貓狗沒人餵〉，聯合報，6 月7 日，第B2 版
9. 陳守國，2010，〈旗山繁殖場虐狗 網友陳情楊秋興〉，新浪新聞中心：http://news.sina.com.tw/article/20100119/2701219.html，檢索日期：2010 年1 月19 日
10. Bently, A.(1967).The Process of Government.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
11. Birch, A. H.(1973).The British System of Government.Boston:Allen and Unwin.
12. Buchanan, J. M.,Tollison, R. D.,Tollock, G.(1980).Toward a Theory of Rent-Seeking Society.TX:Texas A and M. Press.
13. Carmines, E. G.,Stimson, J. A.(1980).The Two Faces of Issue V.American Political Science Review,74,78-91.
14. Cocca, C. E.(2002).The Politics of Statutory Rape Laws: Adoption and Reinvention of Morality Policy in the States, 1971-1999.Polity,35(1),51-73.
15. Cowley, P.(1998).Conscience and Parliament.London:Frank Class.
16. Cowley, P.(ed.)(1998).Conscience and Parliament.London:Frank Cass.
17. Dahl, R. A.(1956).A Preface to Democratic Theory.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
18. Daynes, B. W.,Tatalovich, R.(1998).Moral Controversies in American Politics: Cases in Social Regulatory Policy.New York:M. E. Sharpe.
19. Downs, A.(1957).An Economic Theory of Democracy.New York:Harper and Row.
20. Edelman, M.(1964).The Symbolic Uses of Politics.Urbana:University of Illinois Press.
21. Eisenhardt, K. M.(1989).Building Theories from Case Study Research.The Academy of Management Review,14(4),532-550.
22. Eisenhardt, K. M.,Graebner, M. E.(2007).Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities and Challenges.Academy of Management Journal,50(1),25-32.
23. Emery, J. A.,Stiles, E. A.(1998).Playing the Symbolic policy Game: A Game Theoretic Analysis of the Communications Decency Act and the Flag Burning Bill/Amendment.The annual meeting of the American Political Science Association,Boston, MA:
24. Fairbanks, J. D.(1997).Religious Forces and Morality policies in the American States.Western Political Quarterly,30(3),411-417.
25. Fama, E. F.(1980).Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm.Journal of Political Economics,88(2),288-307.
26. Fama, E. F.,Jensen, M. C.(1983).Separation of Ownership and Control.Journal of Law and Economics,26(2),301-326.
27. Flyvbjerg, B.(2006).Five Misunderstandings About Case Study Research.Qualitative Inquiry,12(2),219-245.
28. Frederickson, H. C.(1990).Public Administration and Social Equity.Public Administration Review,49(2),95-100.
29. Freeman, J. L.(1955).The Political Press.New York:Doubleday.
30. Garner, R.(1993).Animals, politics and morality.New York:Manchester University Press.
31. Gintis, H.,Bowles, S.,Boyd, R.,Fehr, E.(2005).Moral Sentiments and Material Interests: Origins, Evidence, and Consequences.Moral Sentiments and Material Interest: The Foundations of Cooperation in Economic Life,Cambridge:
32. Glick, H. R.,Hutchinson, A.(1999).The Rising Agenda of Physician-Assisted Suicide: Explaining the Growth and Content of Morality Policy.Policy Studies Journal,27(4),750-765.
33. Gormley, W. T.(1986).Regulatory Issue Networks in a Federal System.Policy,18,595-620.
34. Graddy, E.(1991).Toward a General Theory of Occupational Regulation.Social Science Quarterly,72(4),676-695.
35. Graddy, E.(1991).Interest Groups or the Public Interest-Why Do We Regulate Health Occupations?.Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law,16(1),25-49.
36. Haider-Markel, D. P.(1999).Morality Policy and Individual-Level Political Behavior: The Case of Legislative Voting on Lesbian and Gay Issues.Policy Studies Journal,27(4),735-749.
37. Haider-Markel, D. P.,Meier, K. J.(1996).The Politics of Gay and Lesbian Right: Expanding the Scope of the Conflict.Journal of Politics,58(2),332-350.
38. Hunter, J. D.(1991).Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America.New York:Basic Books.
39. Jasper, J. M.,Nelkin, D.(1992).The animal rights crusade: The growth of a moral protest.New York:The Free Press.
40. Jensen, M. C.,Mec, W. H.(1976).Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.Journal of Financial Economics,3(4),305-360.
41. Jun, J. S.(1986).Public Administration: Design and Problem Solving.New York:Publishing Company.
42. King, A.(ed.)(1978).The New American Political System.Washington, DC:American Enterprise Institute.
43. Kohlberg, L.(1984).The Philosophy of Moral Development.CA:Harper and Row.
44. Licari, M. J.(1997).University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
45. Lindblom, C.(1959).The Politics of Muddling through.Public Administration Review,19(2),79-88.
46. Lowi, T. J.(1979).The End of Liberalism: The Second Republic of the United States.New York:W. W. Norton.
47. McFarland, A.(1987).Interest Groups and the Theories of Power in American.British Journal of Political Science,17(2),129-147.
48. Meier, K. J.(1999).Drugs, Sex, Rock, and Roll: A Theory of Morality Politics.Policy Studies Journal,27(4),681-695.
49. Meier, K. J.(1994).The Politics of Sin.New York:M. W. Sharpe.
50. Meier, K. J.,McFarlane, D. R.(1993).Abortion Politics and Abortion Funding policy.Understanding the new politics of abortion,Newbury Park, Calif.:
51. Mooney, C. Z.(1999).The Politics of Morality Policy: Symposium Editor's Introduction.Policy Studies Journal,27(4),675-680.
52. Mooney, C. Z.(2001).The Public Clash of Private Values: The Politics of Moraility Policy.The Public Clash of Private Values,New York:
53. Mooney, C. Z. ,Schuldt, R.(2006).Does Morality Policy Exist? Testing a Basic Assumption.annual meeting of the American Political Science Association,Philadelphia, PA:
54. Mooney, C. Z.,Lee, M. H.(1995).Legislation Morality in the American States: The Case of Pre-Roe Abortion Regulation Rreform.American Journal of Political Science,39(3),599-627.
55. Mooney, C. Z.,Lee, M. H.(1999).Morality Policy Reinvention: State Death Penalties.The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,566,80-82.
56. Mooney, C. Z.,Lee, M. H.(1996).Why not swing? The diffusion of death penalty legislation in the American states since 1838.annual meeting of the American Political Science Association,San Francisco, CA:
57. Mooney, C. Z.,Lee, M. H.(2000).The Influence of Values on Consensus and Contentious Morality Policy: U.S. Death Penalty Reform, 1956-82.The Journal of Politics,62(1),223-239.
58. Mooney, C. Z.,Lee, M. H.(1997).Morality policy in distinctive political contexts: The determinants of death penalty reform in the US. States, 1956-1983.XVII World Congress of the International Political Science Association,Seoul, Korea:
59. Mooney, C. Z.,Lee, M. H.(1999).The Temporal Diffusion of Morality Policy: The Case of Death Penalty Legislation in the American States.Policy Studies Journal,27(4),766-780.
60. Niskanen, W. A., Jr.(1975).Bureaucrats and Politicians.Journal of Law and Economics,18(3),617-643.
61. Norrander, B.,Wilcox, C.(1999).Public Opinion and Policymaking in the States: The Case of Post-Roe Abortion Policy.Policy Studies Journal,27(4),707-722.
62. Olsen, M.(1965).The Logic of Collective Action.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
63. Peltzman, S.(1976).Toward a More General Theory of Regulation.Journal of Law and Economics,19,211-240.
64. Pierce, P. A.,Miller, D. E.(1999).Variations in the diffusion of state adoptions: How revenue dedication changes morality politics.Policy Studies Journal,27,696-706.
65. Reagan, M. D.(1987).Regulation: the Politics of policy.Boston:Little, Brown.
66. Reidenbach, R. E.,Robin, D. P.(1990).Toward the development of a multidimensional scale for improving evaluations of business ethics.Journal of Business Ethics,9(8),639-653.
67. Rest J. R.(1979).Development in Judging Moral Issues.Minneapolis:University of Minneapolis Press.
68. Roh, J.,Berry, F. S.(2008).Modeling the Outcomes of State Abortion Funding Referenda: Morality or Redistributive Policy, or Both?.State Politics and Policy Quarterly,8(1),66-87.
69. Rosdil, D.(1991).The context of radical populism in U.S. cities: a comparative analysis.Journal of Urban Affairs,13(1),77-96.
70. Sharp, E. B.(2005).Morality Politics in American Cities.Lawrence:University Press of Kansas.
71. Siggelkow, N. AJ.(2007).Persusion with case studies.Academy of Management Journal,50(1),20-24.
72. Smith, K. B.(1997).Clean thoughts and dirty minds: the politics of porn.the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association,USA: Washington, DC:
73. Smith, K. B.(2002).Typologies, Taxonomies, and the Benefits of Policy Classification.Policy Studies Journal,30(3),379-395.
74. Smith, K. B.(1999).Clean thoughts and dirty minds: The politics of porn.Policy Studies Journal,27(4),723-734.
75. Smith, K. K.(1997).Storytelling, Sympathy, and Moral Judgment in American Abolitionism.the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association,USA: Washington, DC:
76. Stigler, G.(1971).The Theory of Economic Regulation.Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science,2(1),3-21.
77. Szymanski, Ann-Marie(1997).Dry Compulsions: Prohibition and the Creation of State-Level Enforcement Agencies.the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association,USA: Washington, DC:
78. Tatalovich, R. T.,Smith, A.,Bobic, M. P.(1994).Moral Conflict and the Policy Process.Policy Currents,4,1-7.
79. Tatalovich, R.(ed.),Daynes, B. W.(ed.)(1998).Moral Controversies in American Politics.New York:M. E. Sharpe.
80. Vergari, S.(2001).Morality Politics and the Implementation of Abstinence-Only Sex Education: A Case of Policy Comprise.The Public Clash of Private Values,New York:
81. Wald, K. D.,Button, J. W.,Barbara, A. R.(2001).Morality Politics v.s Political Economy: The Case of School-Based Health Centers.Social Science Quarterly,82(2),221-234.
82. Wamsley, G. L.(1990).Refounding Public Administration.Newbury Park, CA.:Sage.
83. Wilcox, C.(1992).God's Warriors.Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press.
84. Yin, R. K.(1984).Case Study Research: Design and Methods.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
85. 丁仁方(2006)。政府與企業。台北:空大。
86. 方福前(2000)。公共選擇理論：政治的經濟學。北京:中國人民大學出版社。
87. 吳宗憲(2009)。我國寵物業管制政策之初探。公民社會與人權發展學術研討會，台南:
88. 吳宗憲(2010)。道德性政策何以成為都市發展的燙手山芋？。2010城市國際化論壇，北京:
89. 吳宗憲(2010)。行政院農業委員會98年度委辦計劃行政院農業委員會98年度委辦計劃,台北:行政院農業委員會。
90. 吳宗憲(2010)。都會治理中的新課題：道德性政策的爭議。府際關係研究通訊，10，9-13。
91. 吳宗憲、黃建皓(2011)。是民眾的「道德」才造成流浪動物的悲歌？臺南市流浪動物政策的政治可行性分析。建國百年的公共管理思潮：趨勢與挑戰研討會，台南:
92. 吳芝儀譯、李奉儒譯、Patton, M. Q.(1995)。質的評鑑與研究。台北:桂冠出版社。
93. 宋鎮照(2007)。發展政治經濟學─理論與實踐。台北:五南出版社。
94. 李美賢(1996)。道德性政策之政治：以事件歷史法來探討美國各州死刑政策之立法。政治科學論叢，7，187-230。
95. 施芬如(2004)。面對動物安樂死的現實與道德。動物保護公共論壇論文集，台北:
96. 浩平譯、蕭羨一譯、Horn, M. J.(2003)。公共行政之政治經濟學：公部門的制度選擇。台北:商周。
97. 高安邦(2002)。政治經濟學。台北:五南出版社。
98. 張其祿(2001)。管制政策之交易成本途徑分析：以醫療管制為例。東海社會科學學報，21，57-74。
99. 張清溪(2000)。經濟學：理論與發展。台北:翰蘆圖書出版公司。
100. 陳若曦(2005)。丹大林場禁獵：台灣動物保護成績斐然。「源」雜誌，51，27-33。
101. 陳敦源(2002)。民主與官僚：新制度論的觀點。台北:韋伯文化國際出版有限公司。
102. 陳寶瑞(2008)。公共經濟學。台北:五南出版社。
103. 劉珈延(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立東華大學公共行政系。
104. 劉祥熹(2003)。職業證照管制之政經分析─以「土地登記專業代理人」為例。中國行政評論，12(4)，139-170。
105. 蕭全政(1994)。政治與經濟的整合。台北:桂冠圖書出版社。
106. 錢永祥譯、彭淮棟譯、陳真譯、Bekoff, M.Ed.(2002)。動物權與動物福利小百科。台北:桂冠圖書出版社。
107. 羅慎平譯、Dunleavy, Ratrick、O''leary, Brendan(1995)。國家論：自由民主政治學。台北:五南圖書。
108. 羅耀宗譯、Friedman, Milton、Friedman, Rose(2008)。選擇的自由。台北:經濟新潮社。

1. 胡慧君、吳宗憲(2016)。當「道德」遇上「審議」─ 2014流浪犬政策公民會議效果之研究。文官制度季刊，8(1)，77-114。
2. 連恆(2020)。運用語意TOPSIS分析動物收容中心之管理績效：以中部地區為例。國立虎尾科技大學學報，35(1)，119-126。
3. 羅皓群、高郁婷、王志弘(2017)。他者的主體化與選擇性賦權：台北市動物治理的發展與困局。國家發展研究，16(2)，1-42。
4. 吳宗憲(2014)。當政治遇上動物─多元政治意識形態下的動物保護觀點。應用倫理評論，56，23-44。
5. 吳宗憲(2014)。如何緩解道德爭議的不可治理性？－Q方法分析同伴動物保護政策爭議之經驗。中國行政評論，20(1)，211-252。
6. 吳宗憲(2018)。如何評估道德政策執行績效？以我國地方政府動物保護績效指標之建構為例。文官制度季刊，10(2)，85-114。
7. 蕭名凱、吳宗憲(2017)。我國動物保護行政組織診斷之研究─道德性政策理論的觀察。中國行政評論，23(2)，30-69。