题名

風險認知與核電支持度關聯性之研究：以福島核能事故後台灣民眾對核電的認知與態度為例

并列篇名

A Study of the Relationship between Risk Perceptions and Attitude toward Nuclear Power: Taiwanese Understanding of, and Attitude toward Nuclear Power after the Fukushima Nuclear Accident

DOI

10.29865/PAP.201406_(58).0002

作者

梁世武(Shih-Wu Liang)

关键词

風險認知 ； 風險社會 ； 核電支持度 ； 核能安全 ； 福島核能事故 ； Support of nuclear power ； nuclear safety ； risk perception ； risk society ； Fukushima nuclear disaster

期刊名称

行政暨政策學報

卷期/出版年月

58期（2014 / 06 / 01）

页次

45 - 86

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

科技發展提升物質文明，也帶來風險，使人類進入風險社會。民眾對於科技的風險認知，會影響到對該科技的態度與行為。2011年日本福島核能事故後，台灣反核聲浪高漲，2013年政府宣佈不排斥以公投解決核四爭議，許多媒體也公布相關民調，引起許多討論。然而，民眾對於核能發電的支持度，主要是受到什麼因素影響呢？本研究嘗試建構風險認知多元迴歸模型解析台灣核電民意，結果顯示風險認知比使用人口變項具備更良好的解釋力。國內的核電民意調查，多半僅詢問民眾是否贊成使用核能發電，並從人口變項去進行分析討論。本研究則從風險認知理論著手，分析風險認知差異對核電支持度的影響。研究結果發現性別、政黨傾向等人口變項對核電支持度雖具一定解釋力（R^2=0.18），但風險認知的解釋力更為清楚直接（R^2=0.54）。在解釋民眾對核能發電的支持度時，除了核能安全外，還應考慮環境、災害、財務、社會、功能等5種風險認知構面，綜合6個構面而成的風險認知因素，是最主要影響民眾核電支持度的因素。
英文摘要

Science and technology have enhanced the development of material civilization, but they also bring increased risks. After the 2011 Fukushima nuclear accident in Japan, antinuclear sentiment in Taiwan rose. In 2013, the Taiwanese Government announced that it might use a referendum to solve the fourth nuclear power plant dispute. This study constructed a multivariate risk perceptions regression model to resolve Taiwanese public opinion about nuclear power. The results exceeded explanations using only demographic variables. Most domestic nuclear power polls have only asked respondents if they favor nuclear power use. This study further analyzed differences in risk perception and support for nuclear power, and found that gender, political party preference, and other demographic variables had some explanatory power(R^2 = 0.18), but risk perception(R^2 = 0.54)explained nuclear power's support levels more clearly and directly. This study also suggested that the interpretation of public support for nuclear power, in addition to nuclear safety, had five dimensions of risk perception (including: the environment, disaster, financial, social, functional), integrated into nuclear power's six risk dimensions and effectively enhanced explanations for nuclear power's support.
主题分类 社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. 杜文苓(2011)。環境風險與科技決策：檢視中科四期環評爭議。東吳政治學報，29(2)，57-110。
    連結：
  2. 洪大為、呂錦婷(2004)。行動電話消費市場降低風險策略之研究。行銷評論，1(1)，53-74。
    連結：
  3. 洪鴻智(2005)。科技鄰避設施風險知覺之形成與投影：核二廠。人文社會科學集刊，17(3)，33-70。
    連結：
  4. 陳清淵、謝雨生(2011)。現代基因科技知識與基因科技風險態度之關係探討。調查研究－方法與應用，26，45-80。
    連結：
  5. 劉祥熹(2007)。從核四建廠風險認知觀點探討貢寮地區漁業經營對漁村經濟之影響。農業與經濟，38，119-159。
    連結：
  6. Yhdyskuntatutkimus Oy. 2008. Finnish Energy Attitude Survey. from http://www.sci.fi/~yhdys/eas_08/english/eas-eluku-1.htm. Retrieved April 11, 2013.
  7. European Atomic Forum. 2012. What people really think about nuclear energy. From http://www.foratom.org/jsmallfib_top/Publications/Opinion_Poll.pdf. Retrieved March 15, 2013.
  8. Nuclear Energy Institute. 2011. Perspective on Public Opinion. from http://www.nei.org/Master-Document-Folder/Publications-and-Brochures/Perspectives-On-Public-Opinion/Perspective-On-Public-Opinion-November-2011. Retrieved March 15, 2013.
  9. Nuclear Energy Institute. 2012. Perspective on Public Opinion. from http://www.nei.org/Master-Document-Folder/Publications-and-Brochures/Perspectives-On-Public-Opinion/Perspective-On-Public-Opinion-May-2012. Retrieved March 15, 2013.
  10. Skeat, Walter. 1910. 1910 New Catholic. from http://www.studylight.org/dic/ncd/. Retrieved May 1, 2013.
  11. Wallard, Henri, Bobby Duffy, and Peter Cornick. 2012. After Fukushima: Global opinion on energy policy. from http://www.ipsos.com/public-affairs/SocialResearchInstitute. Retrieved November 16, 2012
  12. Plapp T. 2001. “Perception and evaluation of natural risks: Interim report on first results of a survey in six districts. in Germany.” Risk Research and Insurance Management Working Paper, 1: 1-10.
  13. Giddens, A. 1999. The Reith Lectures: Risk. from BBC News Online: http://news.bbc.co.uk.reith_99. Retrieved December 25, 2012.
  14. Adam, Barbara(ed.),Beck, Ulrich(ed.),Van Loon, Joost(ed.)(2000).The Risk Society and Beyond: Critical Issues for Social Theory.London:Sage Publication.
  15. Anderson, A.,Petersen, A.,Wilkinson, C.,Allan, S.(2005).The Framing of Nanotechnologies in the British Newspaper Press.Science Communication,27(2),200-220.
  16. Beck, Ulrich(1986).Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne.Frankfurt/Main:
  17. Beck, Ulrich(1992).From Industrial Society to Risk Society: Questions of Survival, Social Structure and Ecological Enlightenment.Theory, Culture and Society,9(1),97-123.
  18. Beck, Ulrich(1992).Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity.London:Sage.
  19. Bolsen, T.,Cook, F. L.(2008).Public Opinion on Energy Policy: 1974-2006.Public Opinion Quarterly,72(2),364-388.
  20. Brown, Stephen L.(2010).Changes in Risk Perceptions Prospectively Predict Changes in Self-Reported Speeding.Risk Analysis,30(7),1092-1098.
  21. Burchell, G.(ed.),Gordon, C.(ed.),Miller, P.(ed.)(1991).The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality.London:Harvester Wheatsheaf.
  22. Chauvin, Bruno,Hermand, Danièle,Mullet, Etienne(2007).Risk Perception and Personality Facets.Risk Analysis,27(1),171-185.
  23. Corvellec, Hervé,Boholm, Ǻsa(2008).The risk/no-risk rhetoric of environmental impact assessments (EIA): the case of offshore wind farms in Sweden.Local Environment,13(7),627-640.
  24. De Boer, Connie,Catsburg, Ineke(1988).The impact of nuclear accidents on attitudes toward nuclear energy.Public Opinion Quarterly,52(2),254-261.
  25. Denney, David(2005).Risk and Society.London:SAGE Publications Ltd.
  26. Denny, David、呂奕欣譯、鄭佩嵐譯(2009)。面對風險社會。台北:韋伯文化。
  27. Drottz-Sjöberg, Britt-Marie,Sjöberg, Lennart(1991).Adolescents' Attitudes to Nuclear Power and Radioactive Wastes.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,21(24),2007-2036.
  28. Finucane, ML.,Slovic, P.,Mertz, CK.,Flynn, J.,Satterfield, TA.(2000).Gender, race, and perceived risk: The "white male" effect.Health, Risk & Society,2(2),159-172.
  29. Fischhoff, B.,Watson, S. R.,Hope, C.(1984).Defining risk.Policy Sciences,17,123-139.
  30. Flynn J.,Slovic, P.,Mertz, CK.(1994).Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks.Risk Analysis,14(6),1101-1109.
  31. Foucault, M.(1965).Madness and civilization: A history of insanity in the age of reason.New York:Vintage Books.
  32. Foucault, M.(1972).The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse of language.New York:Vintage Books.
  33. Giddens, A.(1994).Beyond Left and Right: The Future of Radical Politics.Cambridge:Polity Press.
  34. Halpern-Felsher, B. L.,Millstein, S. G.,Ellen, J. M.,Adler, N. E.,Tschann, J. M.,Biehl, M.(2001).The role of behavioural experience in judging risks.Health Psychology,20,120-126.
  35. Holmberg, Sőren(ed.),Hedberg, Per(ed.)(2012).Studies in Swedish Energy Opinion.Göteborg:
  36. Horton, R. L.(1976).The Structure of Perceived Risk: Some Further Progress.Academy of Marketing Science. Journal,4(4),694-706.
  37. Hung, Hung-Chih,Wang, Tzu-Wen(2011).Determinants and Mapping of Collective Perceptions of Technological Risk：The Case of the Second Nuclear Power Plant in Taiwan.Risk Analysis,31(4),668-683.
  38. Jacoby, Jacob,Kaplan, Leon B.(1972).The Components of Perceived Risk.Proceedings of the Thrid Annual Conference of the Association for Consumer Research
  39. Jasanoff, Sheila(1990).The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers.Cambridge, MA.:Harvard University.
  40. Johnson, B. B.(2002).Gender and race in beliefs about outdoor air pollution.Risk Analysis,22(4),725-738.
  41. Kaiser, H. F.(1960).The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis.Education and Psychological Measurement,20,141-151.
  42. Kaiser, H. F.(1970).A Second Generation Little Jiffy.Psychometrika,35,401-415.
  43. Kivimäki, Mika,Kalimo, Raija(1993).Risk Perception Among Nuclear Power Plant Personnel: A Survey.Risk Analysis,13(4),421-424.
  44. Kivimäki, Mika,Kalimo, Raija,Salminen, Simo(1995).Perceived Nuclear Risk, Organizational Commitment, and Appraisals of Management: A Study of Nuclear Power Plant Personnel.Risk Analysis,15(3),391-396.
  45. Kleef, Ellen van,Fischer, Arnout R. H.,Khan, Moin,Frewer, Lynn J.(2010).Risk and Benefit Perceptions of Mobile Phone and Base Station Technology in Bangladesh.Risk Analysis,30(6),1002-1015.
  46. Liao, Shui-Yi,Tseng, Wei-Chun,Chen, Chi-Chung(2010).Eliciting public preference for nuclear energy against the backdrop of global warming.Energy Policy,38,7054-7069.
  47. Lim, Nena(2003).Consumers' Perceived Risk: Sources versus Consequences.Electronic Commerce Research and Application,2,216-228.
  48. Lima, M. L.(2004).On the influence of risk perception on mental health: Living near an incinerator.Journal of Environmental Psychology,24(1),71-84.
  49. Lima, M. L.,Barnett, Julie,Vala, Jorge(2005).Risk Perception and Technological Development at a Societal Level.Risk Analysis,25(5),1229-1239.
  50. Lindell, M. K.,Earle, T. C.(1983).How close is close enough: Public perceptions of the risks of industrial facilities.Risk Analysis,3,245-253.
  51. Lindell, M. K.,Hwang, SN.(2008).Households' perceived personal risk and responses in a multihazard environment.Risk Analysis,28(2),539-556.
  52. Lindell, M. K.,Perry, RW.(2000).Household adjustment to earthquake hazard: A review of research.Environment and Behavior,32(4),461-501.
  53. Loewenstein, G. F.,Weber, E. U.,Hsee, C. K.,Welch, E. S.(2001).Risk as Feelings.Psychological Bulletin,127,267-286.
  54. Luhmann, N.(1995).Die Soziologie des Riskos.Berlin:De Gruyter.
  55. Lupton, D.(1999).Risk.London:Routledge.
  56. Massumi, B.(ed.)(1993).The Politics Everyday Fear.Minneapolis:University of Minnesota.
  57. Murphy, P. E.,Enis, B. M.(1986).Classifying Products Strategically.Journal of Marketing,50(3),24-42.
  58. Murray, K. B.,Schlacter, J. L.(1990).The Impact of Services versus Goods on Consumers' Assessment of Perceived Risk and Variability.Academy of Marketing Science.Journal,18(1),51-65.
  59. Mythen, Gabe(2004).Ulrich Beck: A Critical Introduction to the Risk Society.London:Pluto Press.
  60. National Research Council(1989).Improving Risk Communication.U.S.A.:National Research Council.
  61. Olofsson, Anna,Rashid, Saman(2011).The White (Male) Effect and Risk Perception: Can Equality Make a Difference?.Risk Analysis,31(6),1016-1032.
  62. Palmer CGS(2003).Risk perception: Another look at the "white male" effect.Health, Risk & Society,5(1),71-83.
  63. Peters, Hans Peter,Albrecht, Gabriele,Hennen, Leo,Stegelmann, Hans Ulrich(1990).'Chernobyl' and the nuclear power issue in West German public opinion.Journal of Environmental Psychology,10(2),121-134.
  64. Pew Research Center(2012).,未出版
  65. Rosa, Eugene A.,Dunlap, Riley E.(1994).Nuclear power: Three decades of public opinion.Public Opinion Quarterly,58(2),295-324.
  66. Rottenstreich, Y.,Hsee, C. K.(2001).Money, kisses, and electric shocks: An affective psychology of risk.Psychological Science,12,185-190.
  67. Satterfield, TA,Mertz, CK.,Slovic, P.(2004).Discrimination, vulnerability, and justice in the face of risk.Risk Analysis,24(1),115-129.
  68. Slovic, P.,Peters, Ellen(2006).Risk Perception and Affect.Current Directions in Psychological Science,15(6),322-325.
  69. Slovic, Paul(1999).Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics, and Science: Surveying the Risk-Assessment Battlefield.Risk Analysis,19(4),689-701.
  70. Slovic, Paul(1987).Perception of Risk.Science,236,280-285.
  71. Solomon, Lawrence S.,Tomaskovic-Devey, Donald,Risman, Barbara J.(1989).The gender gap and nuclear power: Attitudes in a politicized environment.Sex Roles,21(5/6),401-414.
  72. Strydom, P.(2003).Risk, Environment and Society.Buckingham:Open University Press.
  73. Uggla, Ylva(2008).Strategies to Create Risk Awareness and Legitmacy: The Swedish Climate Campaign.Journal of Risk Research,11(6),719-734.
  74. Van der Pligt, Joop(1985).Public attitudes to nuclear energy: salience and anxiety.Journal of Environmental Psychology,5(1),87-97.
  75. Visschers, Vivianne H. M.,Siegrist, Michael(2012).How a nuclear power plant accident influences acceptance of nuclear power: results of a longitudinal study before and after the Fukushima disaster.Risk Analysis,33(2),333-347.
  76. Vlek, C.,Stallen, P. J.(1981).Judging risks and benefits in the small and in the large.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,28,235-271.
  77. Weinstein, Neil D.,Nicolich, Mark(1993).Correct and Incorrect Interpretations of Correlations Between Risk Perceptions and Risk Behaviors.Health Psychology,12(3),235-245.
  78. Whitfield, S. C.,Rosa, E. A.,Dan, A.,Dietz, T.(2009).The future of nuclear power: Value orientations and risk perception.Risk Analysis,29(3),425-437.
  79. Willis, Henry H.,DeKay, Michael L.,Fischhoff, Baruch,Morgan, M. Granger(2005).Aggregate, Disaggregate, and Hybrid Analyses of Ecological Risk Perceptions.Risk Analysis,25(2),405-428.
  80. Wogalter, M. S.,Dejoy, D. M.,Laughery, K. R.(1999).Warnings and Risk Communication.Philadelphia, PA:Taylor and Francis.
  81. Wynee, Brian(2002).Risk Society, University, and Democratizing Science: Futures for STS.Taiwanese Journal for Studies of Science, Technology and Medicine,5,15-42.
  82. Zaltaman, G.,Burger, P. C.(1975).Marketing research fundamentals and dynamics.Taipei:Hwa-Tai Book Company.
  83. 牛惠之、郭華仁、騰沛倫、彭英泰、陳詩欣(2005)。基因改造產品－發展、爭議、管理與規範法。台北:行政院農業委員會動植物防疫檢驗局。
  84. 王樹源(1993)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺灣師範大學工業教育研究所。
  85. 周桂田(1998)。現代性與風險社會。臺灣社會學刊，21，89-129。
  86. 邱皓政(2010)。量化研究與統計分析：SPSS（PASW）資料分析範例解析。台北:五南。
  87. 曹書豪(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市立師範學院科學教育研究所。
  88. 梁世武、侯榮輝(2012)。國科會專題研究計畫國科會專題研究計畫,國科會。
  89. 陳志瑋、潘日南、梁世武(2010)。成人火災風險知覺之研究。台灣警察專科學校警專學報，4(7)，89-124。
  90. 陳定海(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北大學資源管理研究所碩士在職專班。
  91. 陳建州(2001)。博士論文(博士論文)。彰化師範大學工業教育學系。
  92. 黃清賢(1996)。危害分析與風險評估。台北:三民書局。
  93. 詹智翔(1999)。國立成功大學國際企業研究所。
  94. 蘇遠志(2001)。基因食物面面觀。科學知識，53，25-33。
被引用次数
  1. 許耿銘(2014)。城市氣候風險治理評估指標建構之初探。思與言：人文與社會科學雜誌，52(4)，203-258。
  2. 黃東益,張鐙文,李仲彬(2020)。解構影響臺灣民衆核電政策偏好之關鍵因素：一個整合性架構的初探。公共行政學報，58，1-54。
  3. 江俊宜(2018)。重新審視福島核災之後的台灣核能政治爭議：從「正當性」轉向「防止危害」。中國行政評論，24(3)，128-153。
  4. 梁世武(2015)。女性總比男性反對核能嗎？福島核災前後核能民意的性別差異研究。行政暨政策學報，61，1-50。
  5. 蕭怡靖(2020)。議題重要性的認知與對施政評價的影響。選舉研究，27(1)，1-37。
  6. 蕭怡靖,林聰吉(2021)。為什麼不喜歡國民黨與民進黨？探索臺灣民眾反政黨情緒的來源。政治科學論叢，89，89-120。
print cancel