题名

Reflections on the Research Commercialization Policy: Have Taiwanese University Scientists Shifted Their Interest from Basic to Applied Research?

并列篇名

研發成果商業化政策的反思:台灣教授對於基礎研究的興趣是否產生移轉?

DOI

10.29865/PAP.201506_(60).0004

作者

黃婉玲(Wan-Ling Huang)

关键词

研發成果商業化政策 ; 基礎科學研究 ; 應用科學研究 ; 研究興趣的移轉 ; 大學專利 ; Research commercialization policy ; basic scientific research ; applied scientific research ; shifts in research interest ; university patenting

期刊名称

行政暨政策學報

卷期/出版年月

60期(2015 / 06 / 01)

页次

137 - 173

内容语文

英文

中文摘要

本文旨在探討於研發成果商業化的政策系絡下,台灣大學教授的研究屬性,是否有從基礎科學研究移轉至應用科學研究的現象。本文針對474位台灣科學及工程領域的大學教授進行問卷調查,調查樣本包含2005年6月至2010年6月間曾申請過台灣專利,以及截至調查時間為止,從未申請過台灣專利的大學教授。研究結果顯示,與其博士論文的研究屬性相較,大學教授目前所執行的研究計畫,有較為偏向應用研究的趨勢;但此研究屬性的轉變幅度尚屬適度,並未全然忽視基礎研究。此外,本研究亦發現,於科學技術基本法通過施行前即取得博士學位及有業界工作經驗的大學教授,目前所執行之計畫較為偏向應用研究。

英文摘要

This study investigates the extent to which university scientists have shifted their interest from basic scientific research to application-oriented research within the context of research commercialization policies. Data employed in this study come from a 2013 national survey of 474 university scientists and engineers in Taiwan, including both respondents who filed a Taiwan patent between June 2005 and June 2010 and those who have never filed a Taiwan patent. Our analysis indicates that university scientists' research tends to change to become more application-oriented, while the change in their research orientation is modest. It is also found that university scientists who received a Ph.D. degree prior to the adoption of research commercialization policies and those who have industry experience are likely to conduct research with a higher degree of application-orientation.

主题分类 社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. Bush, V. 1945. Science: The Endless Frontier. Washington: US Government Printing Office.
  2. Merton, R. 1942. “The Normative Structure of Science.” In Merton, R. eds., The Sociology of Science. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 267-278.
  3. Abreu, M.,Grinevich, V.(2012).The Nature of Academic Entrepreneurship in the UK: Widening the Focus on Entrepreneurial Activities.Research Policy,42(2),408-422.
  4. Agrawal, A.,Henderson, R.(2002).Putting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MIT.Management Science,48(1),44-60.
  5. Alvarez, S.A.(ed.),Agarwal, R.(ed.),Sorenson, O.(ed.)(2005).Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research: Disciplinary Perspectives.New York, NY:Springer.
  6. Ambos, T. C.,Makela, K.,Birkinshaw, J.,D'Este, P.(2008).When Does University Research Get Commercialized? Creating Ambidexterity in Research Institutions.Journal of Management Studies,45(8),1424-1447.
  7. Arrow, K. J.(1962).Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention.The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors,Cambridge, MA:
  8. Azoulay, P.,Ding, W.,Stuart, T.(2009).The Impact of Academic Patenting on the Rate, Quality and Direction of (Public) Research Output.The Journal of Industrial Economics,57(4),637-676.
  9. Azoulay, P.,Ding, W.,Stuart, T.(2007).The Determinants of Faculty Patenting Behavior: Demographics or Opportunities?.Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,63(4),599-623.
  10. Baldini, N.(2006).The Act on Inventions at Public Research Institutions: Danish Universities' Patenting Activity.Scientometrics,69(2),387-407.
  11. Bercovitz, J.,Feldman, M.(2011).The Mechanisms of Collaboration in Inventive Teams: Composition, Social Networks, and Geography.Research Policy,40(1),81-93.
  12. Bercovitz, J.,Feldman, M.(2008).Academic Entrepreneurs: Organizational Change at the Individual Level.Organization Science,19(1),69-89.
  13. Blumenthal, D.,Campbell, E. G.,Gokhale, M.,Yucel, R.,Clarridge, B.,Hilgartner, S.(2006).Data Withholding in Genetics and the Other Life Sciences: Prevalences and Predictors.Academic Medicine,81(2),137-145.
  14. Breschi, S.,Lissoni, F.,Montobbio, F.(2008).University Patenting and Scientific Productivity: A Quantitative Study of Italian Academic Inventors.European Management Review,5(2),91-109.
  15. Buenstorf, G.(2009).Is Commercialization Good or Bad for Science? Individual-level Evidence from the Max Planck Society.Research Policy,38(2),281-292.
  16. Carayol, N.(2007).Academic Incentives, Research Organization and Patenting at a Large French University.Economics of Innovation & New Technology,16(2),119-138.
  17. Chang, Y.-C.,Chen, M.-H.,Hua, M.,Yang, P. Y.(2005).Industrializing Academic Knowledge in Taiwan.Research Technology Management,48(4),45-50.
  18. Chang, Y.-C.,Chen, M.-H.,Hua, M.,Yang, P. Y.(2006).Managing Academic Innovation in Taiwan: Towards a 'Scientific-economic' Framework.Technological Forecasting and Social Change,73(2),199-213.
  19. Chang, Y.-C.,Chen, M.-H.,Yang, P. Y.(2006).A study of Industrializing Academic Knowledge in Taiwan: Opportunities and Challenges for Entrepreneurial Universities.Sci-Tech Policy Review,1,2-11.
  20. Chang, Y.-C.,Chen, M.-N. .(2011).On Transformation of Public Sector Research: A Preliminary Post-STBL Assessment in Taiwan.Technological Forecasting and Social Change,78(3),498-513.
  21. Chang, Y.-C.,Yang, P. Y.(2008).The Impacts of Academic Patenting and Licensing on Knowledge Production and Diffusion: A Test of the Anti-commons Effect in Taiwan.R&D Management,38(3),321-334.
  22. Chang, Y.-C.,Yang, P. Y.,Chen, M.-H.(2009).The Determinants of Academic Research Commercial Performance: Towards an Organizational Ambidexterity Perspective.Research Policy,38(6),936-946.
  23. Colyvas, J.,Crow, M.,Gelijns, A.,Mazzoleni, R.,Nelson, R. R.,Rosenberg, N.(2002).How Do University Inventions Get into Practice?.Management Science,48(1),61-72.
  24. Dai, Y.,Popp, D.,Bretschneider, S.(2005).Institutions and Intellectual Property: The Influence of Institutional Forces on University Patenting.Journal of Policy Analysis and Management,24(3),579-598.
  25. Fabrizio, K. R.,Minin, A. Di(2008).Commercializing the Laboratory: Faculty Patenting and the Open Science Environment.Research Policy,37(5),914-931.
  26. Geuna, A.,Nesta, L. J. J.(2006).University Patenting and Its Effects on Academic Research: The Emerging European Evidence.Research Policy,35(6),790-807.
  27. Glenna, L. L.,Welsh, R.,Ervin, D.,Lacy, W. B.,Biscotti, D.(2011).Commercial Science, Scientists' Values, and University Biotechnology Research Agendas.Research Policy,40(7),957-968.
  28. Göktepe, D.(2008).Department of Design Sciences, Lund University.
  29. Grushcow, J. M.(2004).Measuring Secrecy: A Cost of the Patent System Revealed.The Journal of Legal Studies,33(1),59-84.
  30. Guston, D. H.(ed.),Sarewitz, D.(ed.)(2006).Shaping Science and Technology Policy: The Next Generation of Research.Madison, WI:The University of Wisconsin Press.
  31. Heller, M. A.,Eisenberg, R. S.(1998).Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research.Science,280(5364),698-701.
  32. Huang, W.-L.,Feeney, M.,Welch, E.(2011).Organizational and Individual Determinants of Patent Production of Academic Scientists and Engineers in the United States.Science and Public Policy,38(6),463-479.
  33. Ismail, K.,Mason, C.,Cooper, S.,Omar, W. Z. W.,Majid, I. A.(2008).The Actors Involved and the Decision-making Process Used in the Exploitation of University Patents.International Journal of Business and Information,3(2),165-192.
  34. Jensen, R. A.,Thursby, J. G.,Thursby, M. C.(2003).Disclosure and Licensing of University Inventions: The Best We Can Do with the S**t We Get to Work with.International Journal of Industrial Organization,21(9),1271-1300.
  35. Kumar, M. N.(2010).Ethical Conflicts in Commercialization of University Research in the Post-Bayh-Dole Era.Ethics & Behavior,20(5),324-351.
  36. Larsen, M. T.(2011).The Implications of Academic Enterprise for Public Science: An Overview of the Empirical Evidence.Research Policy,40(1),6-19.
  37. Levin, S. G.,Stephan, P. E.(1991).Research Productivity over the Life Cycle: Evidence for Academic Scientists.The American Economic Review,81(1),114-132.
  38. Malerba, F.(ed.),Brusoni, S.(ed.)(2007).Perspectives on Innovation.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  39. Moutinho, P. S. F.,Fontes, M.,Godinho, M. M.(2007).Do Individual Factors Matter? A Survey of Scientists' Patenting in Portuguese Public Research Organisations.Scientometrics,70(2),355-377.
  40. Mowery, D. C.,Nelson, R. R.,Sampat, B. N.,Ziedonis, A. A.(2001).The Growth of Patenting and Licensing by U.S. Universities: An Assessment of the Effects of the Bayh- Dole Act of 1980.Research Policy,30(1),99-119.
  41. Mowery, D. C.,Sampat, B. N.,Ziedonis, A. A.(2002).Learning to Patent: Institutional Experience, Learning, and the Characteristics of U.S. University Patents after the Bayh- Dole Act, 1981-1992.Management Science,48(1),73-89.
  42. Mowery, D. C.,Ziedonis, A. A.(2002).Academic Patent Quality and Quantity before and after the Bayh-Dole Act in the United States.Research Policy,31(3),399-418.
  43. Murray, F.,Stern, S.(2007).Do Formal Intellectual Property Rights Hinder the Free Flow of Scientific Knowledge? An Empirical Test of the Anti-commons Hypothesis.Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,63(4),648-687.
  44. Nelson, R. R.(1959).The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research.Journal of Political Economy,67(3),297-306.
  45. Nelson, R. R.(2004).The Market Economy, and the Scientific Commons.Research Policy,33(3),455-471.
  46. Nulty, D. D.(2008).The Adequacy of Response Rates to Online and Paper Surveys: What Can Be Done?.Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,33(3),301-314.
  47. Renault, C. S.(2006).Academic Capitalism and University Incentives for Faculty Entrepreneurship.The Journal of Technology Transfer,31,227-239.
  48. Siegel, D. S.,Waldman, D. A.,Atwater, L. E.,Link, A. N.(2004).Toward a Model of the Effective Transfer of Scientific Knowledge from Academicians to Practitioners: Qualitative Evidence from the Commercialization of University Technologies.Journal of Engineering and Technology Management,21(1-2),115-142.
  49. Slaughter, S.,Archerd, C. J.,Campbell, T. I. D.(2004).Boundaries and Quandaries: How Professors Negotiate Market Relations.The Review of Higher Education,28(1),129-195.
  50. Stephan, P. E.,Gurmu, S.,Sumell, A. J.,Black, G.(2007).Who's Patenting in the University? Evidence from the Survey of Doctorate Recipients.Economics of Innovation and New Technology,16(2),71-99.
  51. Stokes, D. E.(1997).Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation.Washington, D.C.:Brookings Institution Press.
  52. Strandburg, K. J.(2005).Curiosity-driven Research and University Technology Transfer.University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Process, Design, and Intellectual Property,San Diego, CA:
  53. Thursby, J. G.,Thursby, M. C.(2002).Who Is Selling the Ivory Tower? Sources of Growth in University Licensing.Management Science,48(1),90-104.
  54. Thursby, M.,Thursby, J.,Gupta-Mukherjee, S.(2007).Are There Real Effects of Licensing on Academic Research? A life Cycle View.Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,63(4),577-598.
  55. Van Looy, B.,Callaert, J.,Debackere, K.(2006).Publication and Patent Behavior of Academic Researchers: Conflicting, Reinforcing or Merely Co-existing?.Research Policy,35(4),596-608.
  56. Walsh, J. P.,Huang, H.(2014).Local Context, Academic Entrepreneurship and Open Science: Publication Secrecy and Commercial Activity among Japanese and US Scientists.Research Policy,43(2),245-260.