青年婚育態度與創新婚育政策主觀評價之研究

Youth Attitude and Their Subjective Evaluation on the Innovation of Marriage and Childbirth Policy

10.29865/PAP.201906_(68).0002

李俊達(Chun-Ta Lee)

結婚 ； 生育 ； 青年 ； 創新 ； 創新政策 ； marriage ； childbirth ； youth ； innovation ； innovation policy

行政暨政策學報

68期（2019 / 06 / 01）

49 - 80

繁體中文

近年來，許多國家積極研擬各項政策設計，希望達到促婚助生的效果。值得探討的是，創新的婚育政策是否能發揮政策效果，解決少子化的問題。本研究以實證調查資料進行統計分析，從差異分析的結果來看，臺灣青年在「婚育需要」上的態度，對多數的創新政策及現行政策的評價，存在顯著的差異。同時，具有婚育需要者的未婚青年，確實顯著地同意創新婚姻政策會帶來較好的預期結果，較有助於提高婚育意願。當未婚者的婚育態度越趨認為婚姻在人生過程中的重要性，則創新婚育政策將更能回應需要，未婚者對於創新政策的同意程度將越高。本研究建議，婚育態度可能是目前生育率難以提升的主要原因。未來有關創新婚育政策的規劃與設計，首要應設法改善未婚者的婚育態度，營造社會氛圍，讓民眾肯認婚育在人生過程中之重要性。

In recent years, many countries have been actively formulating various policies, in order to encourage marriage and childbirth. It is worthwhile to probe the effect of such innovative policies in alleviating the problem of fewer offspring. Via two sample t-test analysis based on empirical survey data, the study finds that Taiwanese young people's attitude towards ＂marriage and childbirth need＂ can lead to major difference in their evaluation of most innovative and existing policies. Unmarried youth with marriage and childbirth need tend to agree that innovative marriage policy can bring better effect and is conducive to boosting marriage and childbirth willingness. The stronger their belief in the importance of marriage/childbirth in life, the higher the capability of innovative marriage/childbirth policy in meeting their need and the higher their agreement with such policy. The study believes that the marriage/childbirth attitude of young people is the major factor blocking the increase of birthrate. Therefore, in the planning and design of innovative marriage/childbirth policy, the priority task is to improve the marriage/childbirth attitude of unmarried people, creating a social aura inducing people to recognize the importance of marriage/childbirth in life.

1. Boon, W.,Edler, J.(2018).Demand, Challenges, and Innovation: Making Sense of New Trends in Innovation Policy.Science and Public Policy,45(4),435-447.
2. Damanpour, F.,Schneider, M.(2009).Characteristics of Innovation and Innovation Adoption in Public Organizations: Assessing the Role of Managers.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,19(3),495-522.
3. Duncan, G. J.,Wilkerson, B.,England, P.(2006).Cleaning up Their Act: The Effect of Marriage and Cohabitation on Licit and Illicit Drug Use.Demography,43,691-710.
4. Edler, J.,Fagerberg, J.(2017).Innovation Policy: What, Why, and How.Oxford Review of Economic Policy,33(1),2-23.
5. Fishbein, M.,Ajzen, I.(1975).Beliefs, Attitude, Intentions and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research.Boston, MA:Addition-Wesley.
6. Flanagan, K.,Uyarra, E.(2016).Four Dangers in Innovation Policy Studies: And How to Avoid Them.Industry and Innovation,23,177-188.
7. Hall, Peter A.(1993).Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case Economic Policymaking in Britain.Comparative Politics,25(3),275-296.
8. Halvorsen, T.,Hauknes, J.,Miles, I.,Røste, R.(2005).,未出版
9. Heclo, H.(1974).Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden.New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
10. IRENA (International Renewable Energy Agency). 2013. Renewable Energy Innovation Policy: Success Criteria and Strategies. from https://www.irena.org/DocumentDownloads/Publications/Renewable_Energy_Innovation_Policy.pdf. Retrieved September 8, 2018.
11. Kotler, P.,Clark, R. N.(1987).Marketing for Health Care Organization.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice-Hall Inc.
12. Lesthaeghe, R.(1998).On Theory Development: Applications to the Study of Family Formation.Population and Development Review,24(1),1-14.
13. Luci-Greulich, A.,Thévenon, O.(2013).The Impact of Family Policies on Fertility Trends in Developed Countries.European Journal of Population,29,387-416.
14. Martin, B. R.(2016).R & D Policy Instruments: A Critical Review of What We Do and Don't Know.Industry and Innovation,23,157-176.
15. Moore, Mark H.,Hartley, J.(2008).Innovations in Governance.Public Management Review,10(1),3-20.
16. OECD. 2014. OECD Family Database, PF2.1 Key Characteristics of Parental Leave Systems. from http://www.oecd.org/social/soc/oecdfamilydatabase.htm#public_policy. Retrieved September 10, 2018.
17. Rogers, E. M.(1962).Diffusion of Innovations.New York:Free Press of Glencoe.
18. Sabatier, Paul A.(1988).An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-oriented Learning Theory.Policy Sciences,21(2-3),129-168.
19. Sabatier, Paul A.(1987).Knowledge, Policy Oriented Learning, and Policy Change: An Advocacy Coalition Framework.Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization,8(4),649-692.
20. Sabatier, Paul A.(ed.)(1999).Theories of the Policy Process.Boulder, CO:Westview Press.
21. Schwartz, A. 2015. People Aren't Having Babies in Denmark so They Made This Hilariously Provocative Ad. from https://www.businessinsider.com/do-it-for-denmark-ad-campaign-toencourage-pregnancy-2015-10. Retrieved September 10, 2018,
22. Smits, R.(ed.),Kuhlmann, S.(ed.),Shapira, P.(ed.)(2010).The Theory and Practice of Innovation Policy: An International Research Handbook.Cheltenham, UK:Edward Elgar.
23. Xie, Y.(1989).Structural Equation Models for Ordinal Variables.Sociological Methods and Research,17(4),325-352.
24. Xu, X.,Lai, S.C.(2004).Gender Ideologies, Martial Roles, and Marital Quality in Taiwan.Journal of Family Issues,25(3),318-355.
25. 內政部，2012，〈內政國際指標－主要國家男女初婚年齡〉，內政部：https://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/node.aspx?sn=6022，檢索日期 2018 年 9 月 10 日。
26. 王麗蓉,陳玉華(2014)。行政院性別平等處委託研究計畫行政院性別平等處委託研究計畫,未出版
27. 張翰璧,張晉芬(2013)。全球化效果的侷限：臺灣民眾對接納跨國移民的態度。臺灣社會學刊，52，131-167。
28. 陳信木,陳玉華,蕭乃沂(2012)。行政院研究發展考核委員會委託研究計畫行政院研究發展考核委員會委託研究計畫,未出版
29. 彭錦鵬,王麗容,劉坤億(2013)。內政部委託研究計畫內政部委託研究計畫,未出版
30. 彭錦鵬,陳玉華,劉坤億(2014)。內政部委託研究計畫內政部委託研究計畫,未出版
31. 黃淑婷(2017)。我國育兒經濟支持政策之檢討。人力規劃及發展研究報告第 17 輯，臺北:

1. 許碧純(2020)。東亞已開發國家的性別平等、家庭政策對生育之影響：對台灣的啟示。台灣公共衛生雜誌，39(2)，129-142。