台灣網路霸凌專法之必要性探討：以美國與加拿大專法為探討起點

The Necessity of Making an Anti-Cyber-Bulling Act: The American and Canadian Cases

10.29865/PAP.202212_(75).0004

張蓉君(Jung-Chun Chang)

網路規範 ； 言論自由 ； 網路霸凌專法 ； 倫理學 ； internet regulations ； freedom of speech ； anti-cyber-bullying act ； ethics

行政暨政策學報

75期（2022 / 12 / 01）

103 - 132

繁體中文

網路霸凌問題在台灣存在許久，是否訂定專法至今未有定案，本研究參照奉言論自由為最不容侵犯的美國與加拿大訂立專法經驗，探討網路霸凌專法與憲法保障言論自由的辯證，論述台灣如何以及為何要設立網路霸凌專法。本研究認為基於法律的保護他人原則、倫理學的目的論、道義論和折衷論觀點，設立網路霸凌專法與憲法保障言論自由不相悖。此外，設立專法可以採取緊急處份或簡易庭方式，先行刪除網路霸凌內容，保護受害者，再進行後續的審判。法律應該是與社會現況結合，跟上傳播科技的快速發展，而不是固守當前的做法，讓網路霸凌繼續發生。

The problem caused by cyber-bulling has existed in Taiwan for a long time, no consensus has been reached regarding the necessity of enacting an anti-cyber-bulling act to solve the problem. This study reviews the American and Canadian laws which deal with the social disturbance caused by cyber-bulling. The two countries' cases involve the dialectic between freedom of speech and the anti-cyber-bulling acts. The American and Canadian's experiences of dealing with cyber-bulling also pinpoint the necessity of making laws to decrease the cases of cyber-bulling. Thus, this researcher believes that making a law to deal with cyber-bulling does not limit the freedom of speech. Besides, from the perspectives of deontology or teleology, it is an ethical decision to make a law of anti-cyber-bulling. After the law is enacted, the cyber-bulling speeches can be judged by a summary court and be restricted to protect the victims. Overall, the legislative works should recognize the potential harms of the rapid spreading bulling speeches in the Internet websites and make a special law to deal with this problem.

1. 王淑美(2018)。網路速度與新聞－轉變中的記者時間實踐及價值反思。中華傳播學刊，33，65-98。
   連結：
2. Alhabash, S.,McAlister, A. R.(2015).Redefining virality in less broad strokes: Predicting viral behavioral intentions from motivations and uses of Facebook and Twitter.New Media & Society,17(8),1317-1339.
3. Ardhianto, I. 2014. Cyberbullying in the social media capital of the world. from https://www.rappler.com/world/69592-cyberbullying-social-media-capital/. Retrieved March 26, 2022.
4. Asmolov, G. 2012. “The Hunt” movie: about rationality of Habermasian lifeworld. from http://www.globswarm.com/2012/12/16/the-hunt-movie-about-rationality-of-habermasian-lifeworld/. Retrieved March 26, 2022.
5. Belsey, B. 2019. Cyberbullying: An Emerging Threat To The “Always On” Generation. from https://billbelsey.com/?p=1827. Retrieved September 08, 2022.
6. Day, M. M.(1993).Habermasian Ideal Speech: Dreaming the (Im)possible Dream.School of Accounting & Finance Working Paper,13,1-37.
7. FindLaw. 2021. Cyberbullying law. from https://www.findlaw.com/criminal/criminal-charges/cyber-bullying.html. Retrieved August 30, 2022.
8. Fraser, I.,Bond-Fraser, L.,Korotkov, D.,Noonan, S.(2012).Cyberbullying and the Justice System.Alberta law review
9. Green, M.(2020).Speech Acts.Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
10. Harris, D. W.,McKinney, R.(2021).Speech-Act Theory: Social and Political Applications.The Routledge Handbook of Social and Political Philosophy of Language,London:
11. Henry, J.S.(2009).Beyond Free Speech: Novel Approaches to Hate on the Internet in the United States.Journal of Information and Communications Technology Law,18(2),235-251.
12. Hinduja, S., and J. W. Patchin. 2019. 2019 Cyberbullying Data. from https://cyberbullying.org/2019-cyberbullying-data. Retrieved August 28, 2022.
13. Hinduja, S., and J.W. Patchin. 2016. State Cyberbullying Laws- A Brief Review of State Cyberbullying Laws and Policies. from Cyberbullying Research Center, https://cyberbullying.org/Bullying-and-Cyberbullying-Laws.pdf. Retrieved March 26, 2022.
14. Hinduja, S, and J.W. Patchin. 2014. Cyberbullying: Identification, prevention, & Responses. from Cyberbullying Research Center, https://cyberbullying.org/Cyberbullying-Identification-Prevention-Response.pdf. Retrieved March 26, 2022.
15. Hudson, D. L.(2020).Essay: Cyberbullying and Freedom of Speech.New Mexico Law Review,50(2),287-300.
16. Jameson, S.(2008).Cyber Harassment: Striking a Balance between Free Speech and Privacy.CommLaw Conspectus: Journal of Communications Law and Technology Policy,17,231-266.
17. Johannesen, R.(1990).Ethics in Human Communication.Prospect Heights, IL:Waveland Press.
18. King, A.V.(2010).Constitutionality of Cyberbullying Laws: Keeping the Online Playground Safe for Both Teens and Free Speech.Vanderbilt Law Review,63(3),845-884.
19. Kivanç, J. 2016. Canada Needs to Catch Up to the Present with Cyberbullying Laws That Work. from: http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/canada-needs-to-catch-up-to-the-present-with-cyberbullying-laws-that-work. Retrieved March 26, 2022.
20. Kowalski, R. M.,Limber, S. P.,Agatston, P. W.(2008).Cyber bullying: Bullying in the digital age.MA:Blackwell Publishing.
21. Levin, A.(2010).The Cost of Free Speech: Pornography, hate speech and their challenge to liberalism.London:Basingstoke.
22. Lidsky, L.,Garcia, A.P.(2012).How Not to Criminalize Cyberbullying.Missouri Law Review,77(3),1-34.
23. Miller, V., and M. Griffin. 2016. Supreme Court of North Carolina Finds Cyberbullying Law Violates First Amendment. from https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court-of-north-carolina-finds-cyberbullying-law-violates-first-amendment/. Retrieved September 08, 2022.
24. Mogalakwe, M.(2006).The use of documentary research methods in social research.African Sociological Review,10(1),221-230.
25. Owen, G. T.(2014).Qualitative Methods in Higher Education Policy Analysis: Using Interviews and Document Analysis.The Qualitative Report,19(26),1-19.
26. Patchin, J.W. 2010. Most Cyberbullying Cases Aren’t Criminal. from Cyberbullying Research Center, http://cyberbullying.org/most-cyberbullying-cases-arent-criminal. Retrieved March 26, 2022.
27. Ruskin, B. 2015. Court strikes down anti-cyberbullying law created after Rehtaeh Parsons’s death. from http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/law-struck-cyberbullying-down-1.3360612. Retrieved March 26, 2022.
28. Sinekopova, G. V.(2006).Building the public sphere: Bases and biases.Journal of Communication,56,505-522.
29. Stopbullying.gov. 2021. What is cyberbullying. from https://www.stopbullying.gov/cyberbullying/what-is-it. Retrieved August 29, 2022.
30. Suler, J.(2004).The Online Disinhibition Effect.CyberPsychology & Behavior,7(3),321-326.
31. Taylor, J.(2020).A Better Act, More Bad Behaviour Online: Nova Scotia’s New Intimate Images and Cyber-protection Act Goes to Court.Canada Journal of Law and Technology,18(1),151-158.
32. Tucker, J. 2008. Free Speech and “Cyber-bullying”. from https://www.aclu.org/news/free-speech/free-speech-and-cyber-bullying Retrieved September 08, 2022.
33. Walrave, M.,Heriman, W.(2011).Cyberbullying: Predicting victimisation and perpetration.Children & Society,25(1),59-72.
34. Whittaker, E.,Kowalski, R. M.(2015).Cyberbullying via social media.Journal of School Violence,14(1),11-29.
35. Willard, N. E.(2007).Cyberbullying and cyberthreats: Responding to the challenge of online social aggression, threats, and distress.Champaign, Ill:Research Press.
36. Wingrove, J. 2014. Cyberbullying bill C-13 moves on despite Supreme Court decision. from https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/cyberbullying-bill-c-13-moves-on-despite-supreme-court-decision/article20885941/. Retrieved March 26, 2022.
37. Wright, R. G.(2020).Cyber Harassment and the Scope of Freedom of Speech.UC Davis Law Review,53,187-212.
38. Wykes, M.(2007).Constructing crime: Culture, stalking, celebrity and cyber.Crime Media Culture: An International Journal,3(2),158-174.
39. 尹華龍(2001)。國防管理學院法律研究所。
40. 吳佳穎，2014，〈台灣人愛用臉書滲透率冠全球〉，中央社，2 月 27 日：https://tw.stock.yahoo.com/news/台灣人愛用臉書-滲透率冠全球-111118286--finance.html，檢索日期：2022 年 11 月 9 日。
41. 兒童福利聯盟，2021，〈2021 台灣兒少網路社交焦慮與網路霸凌經驗調查報告〉，兒童福利聯盟：https://www.children.org.tw/publication_research/research_report/2267，檢索日期：2022 年 3 月 27 日。
42. 林靖堂，2015，〈藍委要立反霸凌專法 NCC 主委石世豪怒不遏止網路言論〉，NOWnews 今日新聞，4 月 30 日：https://tw.news.yahoo.com/藍委要立反霸凌專法-ncc 主委石世豪怒不遏止網路言論-044338785.html，檢索日期：2022 年 4 月 9 日。
43. 林潔玲，2015，〈網路新聞暫不加警語 NCC 反對訂專法〉，ETtoday，4 月 30 日：https://finance.ettoday.net/news/500232?redirect=1，檢索日期：2022 年 3 月 25 日。
44. 洪聖壹，2015，〈網路、社群管不到？反網路霸凌立法 NCC 回應得很無力〉，ETtoday，4 月 24 日：http://www.ettoday.net/news/20150424/497718.htm，檢索日期：2022 年 3月 25 日。
45. 胡幼偉（譯）,Hausman, C.(1995).良心危機：新聞倫理學的多元觀點.台北市:五南.
46. 許育典(2021)。校園霸凌防制準則 2020 年修法評釋。月旦法學，308，212-220。
47. 黃哲斌，2015，〈記者上網抄臉書？這樣抄才有學問〉，天下雜誌：https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5072970，檢索日期：2022 年 3 月 25 日。
48. 黃銘輝(2018)。網路霸凌法律規制的規範取向之研析。月旦法學雜誌，280，185-218。
49. 鄭郁欣（譯）,林佳誼（譯）,蔡貝侖（譯）,Sanders, K.(2008).探究新聞倫理.台北:韋伯.