規模重要嗎？民間宗教型戒癮安置機構的組織運作差異

How Does Organizational Size Relate to Service Operation? The Differences among the Faith-based Addiction Treatment Institutions

10.29865/PAP.202212_(75).0003

韓意慈(Yih-Tsu Hahn)

公私部門關係 ； 組織規模 ； 物質濫用 ； 非營利組織 ； 社會服務 ； public-private relationship ； organizational size ； substance abuse ； nonprofit organization ； social service

行政暨政策學報

75期（2022 / 12 / 01）

69 - 102

繁體中文

我國社會服務部門包含了比例較高的中小型組織，因此組織規模在運作面的差異易被忽略。本研究藉由宗教型民間戒癮的單一主題服務，探討在相近的社會服務主題下，不同機構規模屬性所呈現的運作差異為何？規模的特性將如何關連到這些單位後續人力安排、資源樣態、服務內涵、及回應政策意願？本文採用質性研究方法，運用文獻檢閱及深度訪談探討六間機構，區分為國際型、中型及小型組織各兩間。研究發現：（一）中小型機構之人力較不穩定，國際型機構較為穩定且聘任戒癮更生人的比例較高；（二）中小型機構的財源較國際型機構更為複雜，不穩定性較高；（三）中小型機構的服務內涵具有較高的彈性，國際型則偏向一致性，利於發展長期的組織特色，較不利於因應環境的變動；（四）中型組織在與政府合作方面較能兼顧意願與能力；不同規模組織間的合作將利於發展新型態的服務以回應需求。由於藥酒癮人士長期反覆及多元需求的特性，本研究發現能回應政策及實務上的議題，以利於規劃多元與合作的服務型態。

Due to the social service sector including nonprofit organizations that are mostly small and medium in size, the impacts of organizational scale on the implementation side are easily disregarded in research. This study proposed exploring the differences in organizational size on service features in faith-based addiction treatment institutions. How do the characteristics of scale relate to these organizations' perspectives on manpower arrangements, securing resources, delivering services, and willingness to cooperate with the government? This study explored the experiences of six institutions based on qualitative research methods. The organizations are divided into three groups: large-sized (international), medium-sized, and small-sized groups, and concluded that: (1) Small and medium-sized institutions are relatively unstable in terms of service manpower, while international institutions are relatively stable and employ a higher proportion of rehabilitated persons; (2) The financial resources of small and medium-sized institutions are more complex and unstable compared to international institutions; (3) In terms of service content, small and medium-sized institutions have higher flexibility, while international organizations tend to be consistent which may interfere with their ability to respond to environmental concerns; (4) Medium-sized organizations are more likely to balance both willingness and ability to cooperate with the government. Large organizations may collaborate with small organizations to develop innovative services. Due to the long-term, repetitive and diverse needs of addiction treatment, this study claims to recognize the respective advantages of different organizational characteristics regarding the role of service delivery to benefit current policy and practical issues.

1. 王仕圖(2007)。社區型非營利組織資源動員與整合：以社區發展協會為例。臺灣社會福利學刊，5(2)，103-137。
   連結：
2. 吳孟玲,林月雲(2002)。台灣自行車產業之組織死亡率分析－組織生態觀點。管理評論，21(3)，115-136。
   連結：
3. 官有垣,杜承嶸,康峰菁(2009)。非營利組織執行長的薪酬探討：以台灣社會福利相關類型的基金會爲例。公共行政學報，30，63-103。
   連結：
4. 林江亮,李岫穎(2008)。影響非營利組織綱站資訊揭露程度之研究。人文及社會科學集刊，20(3)，327-356。
   連結：
5. 韓意慈(2021)。社會支持網絡之再建構：民間宗教型戒癮安置服務內涵的質性分析。臺大社會工作學刊，44，45-84。
   連結：
6. Andrews, R.(2017).Organizational Size and Social Capital in the Public Sector: Does Decentralization Matter?.Review of Public Personnel Administration,37(1),40-58.
7. Brown, W. A.,Andersson, F.O.,Jo, S.(2016).Dimensions of Capacity in Nonprofit Human Service Organizations.Voluntas,27(6),2889-2912.
8. Davis, M. T.(2014).Religious and non-religious components in substance abuse treatment: A comparative analysis of faith-based and secular interventions.Journal of Social Work,14(3),243-259.
9. Dennis, M.,Scott, C. K.(2007).Managing addiction as a chronic condition.Addict Sci Clin Pract,4(1),45-55.
10. Dobrev, S. D.,Carroll, G. R.(2003).Size (and competition) among organizations: Modeling scale-based selection among automobile producers in four major countries, 1885-1981.Strategic Management Journal,24(6),541-558.
11. Faulk, L.,Willems, J.,Johnson, J. M.,Stewart, A. J.(2016).Network Connections and Competitively Awarded Funding: The impacts of board network structures and status interlocks on nonprofit organizations’ foundation grant acquisition.Public Management Review,18(10),1425-1455.
12. Hannan, M. T.,Freeman, J.(1989).Organizational Ecology.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
13. Igalla, M.,Edelenbos, J.,van Meerkerk, I.(2019).Institutionalization or interaction: Which organizational factors help community-based initiatives acquire government support?.Public Administrationm,99(4),803-831.
14. Kim, H. J.,Zakour, M.(2018).Exploring the Factors Associated With the Disaster Preparedness of Human Service Organizations Serving Persons With Disabilities.Human Service Organizations Management Leadership and Governance,42(1),19-32.
15. Knight, D. K.,Broome, K. M.,Simpson, D. D.,Flynn, P. M.(2008).Program structure and counselor-client contact in outpatient substance abuse treatment.Health Services Research,43(2),616-634.
16. Knudsen, H. K.(2009).Adolescent-only substance abuse treatment: Availability and adoption of components of quality.Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment,36(2),195-204.
17. Mosley, J. E.,Maronick, M. P.,Katz, H.(2012).How organizational characteristics affect the adaptive tactics used by human service nonprofit managers confronting financial uncertainty.Nonprofit Management and Leadership,22(3),281-303.
18. Nikolova, M.(2015).Government funding of private voluntary organizations: Is there a crowding-out effect?.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,44(3),487-509.
19. Roberts, A. R.,Bowblis, J. R.(2017).Who hires social workers? Structural and contextual determinants of social service staffing in nursing homes.Health & Social Work,42(1),15-23.
20. Trzcinski, E.,Sobeck, J. L.(2012).Predictors of Growth in Small and Mid-Sized Nonprofit Organizations in the Detroit Metropolitan Area.Administration in Social Work,36(5),499-519.
21. 行政院，2017，〈新世代反毒策略〉，行政院：https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/5A8A0CB5B41DA11E/47bbd6cf-5762-4a63-a308-b810e84712ce，檢索日期：2020 年 6 月 1 日。
22. 林美專(2017)。基督教福音戒治初探兼論沐恩之家戒治成效。「台灣成癮醫療臨床和研究訓練」學員研究成果報告
23. 法務部，2018，〈藥癮治療及社會復歸資源〉，反毒大本營：https://antidrug.moj.gov.tw/lp-38-1.html，檢索日期：2020 年 6 月 1 日。
24. 莫少珍（編）,李文茹（編）(2012).卻顧所來徑－台灣晨曦會福音戒毒的成長路.新北市:基督教晨曦會.
25. 莫少珍,李文茹(2014).雕鏤三十：臺灣晨曦會福音戒毒三十年成長路.新北市:基督教晨曦會.
26. 童伊迪(2014)。原住民族家庭暨婦女服務中心功能的省思：在地社會工作的觀點。部落、家庭與照顧：原住民族生活經驗，台北市:
27. 黃源協,莊俐昕(2018)。長期照顧夥伴關係的「應然」與「實然」之研究：對長期照顧十年計畫 2.0 的意涵。人文社會科學研究：教育類，12(4)，1-27。
28. 劉淑瓊(2019)。我們不一樣－論小型在地非營利組織承接政府社服委外的挑戰與機會。社區發展季刊，166，170-188。
29. 蔡佩真（編）(2016).物質濫用社會工作實務手冊.高雄市:巨流.
30. 衛生福利部，2022，〈強化社會安全網第二期計畫核定本〉，社會安全網：https://topics.mohw.gov.tw/SS/cp-4515-62472-204.html，檢索日期：2022 年 1 月 2 日。
31. 衛生福利部，2018，〈強化社會安全網計畫核定本〉，社會安全網：https://topics.mohw.gov.tw/SS/cp-4515-49398-204.html，檢索日期：2022 年 1 月 2 日。
32. 謝幸燕(2005)。藥商、醫院與醫師的處方決策：醫療制度與組織面之脈絡分析。臺灣社會學刊，34，59-114。

1. (2024)。論施用毒品犯罪之刑事轉向措施──以美國LEAD模式與DTAP模式為核心。刑事政策與犯罪防治研究專刊，38，1-66。