年金改革、自利傾向及自我犧牲關聯之實證研究

An Empirical Study on the Relationships among Pension Reform, Self-Interest Propensity, and Self-Sacrifice

10.29865/PAP.202306_(76).0002

陳重安(Chung-An Chen)；董祥開(Hsiang-Kai Dong)；許成委(Cheng-Wei Xu)

年金改革 ； 自利傾向 ； 自我犧牲 ； 公共服務動機 ； pension reform ； self-interest propensity ； self-sacrifice ； public service motivation

行政暨政策學報

76期（2023 / 06 / 01）

43 - 69

繁體中文;英文

2018年的公務人員年金改革，可算是近年來國內爭議較大的制度變革。在推動年金改革的過程中，雖然經常可見民調顯示多數民眾支持年金改革，但似乎未見有人真正調查過現職公務人員，也因此對於這群「最直接的政策利害關係人」的了解相當有限。究竟我國的現職公務人員是如何看待本次年金改革的？他們有多支持、或有多反對年金改革？更重要的是，年金改革降低公務人員在退休時的保障，這是否會讓公務人員在工作時更想「為自己著想」？是否會如同公平理論所說，降低對工作的投入與對公共服務的熱忱？本研究針對台灣政經傳播研究中心2019年台灣文官調查的資料進行分析後發現，多數公務人員對於年金改革的溝通規劃、執行過程、與結果皆持較為負面的觀點，而這些看法也易轉換成「為自己著想」的傾向，降低自我犧牲的意願。

In Taiwan, the 2018 civil service pension reform was one of the most controversial public policies in recent years. During the policymaking process of the pension reform, despite the majority of the polls indicating universal support for the reform, little academic research has been conducted to understand how public employees think about the reform. How much did they support or object to the reform? More importantly, given the reduction of retirement protection, did the reform make public employees care more about themselves rather than public interests? Would they, according to the equity theory, reduce their efforts in serving the public? This study surveyed public employees in 2019 and found that most public employees indicated negative views on the communication, execution, and impacts of the pension reform. And such negative views increased the belief that "we need to think more for ourselves" and decreased the willingness to self-sacrifice.

1. 陳重安, C.-A.,許成委, C.-W.(2016)。公共服務動機：回顧、反思與未來方向。公共行政學報，51，69-96。
   連結：
2. 彭台光, T.,高月慈, Y.-T.,林鉦棽, C.-C.(2006)。管理研究中的共同方法變異：問題本質、影響、測試和補救。管理學報，23(1)，77-98。
   連結：
3. 董祥開, H.-K.,簡粲綺, T.-C.,蘇姵文, P.-W.(2019)。公務人力高齡化現象下之人力資源管理對策。文官制度季刊，11(3)，71-103。
   連結：
4. Adams, J. S.(1965).Inequity in social exchange.Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,2,267-299.
5. Andersen, L. B.,Eriksson, T.,Kristensen, N.,Pedersen, L. H.(2012).Attracting public service motivated employees: How to design compensation packages.International Review of Administrative Sciences,78(4),615-641.
6. Bekkers, R.(2005).Participation in voluntary associations: Relations with resources, personality, and political values.Political Psychology,26(3),439-454.
7. Bellante, D.,Link, A. N.(1981).Are public sector workers more risk averse than private sector workers?.Industrial and Labor Relations Review,34(3),408-412.
8. Berkel, B.,Börsch-Supan, A.(2004).Pension reform in Germany: The impact on retirement decisions.FinanzArchiv/Public Finance Analysis,60(3),393-421.
9. Boeri, T.,Tabellini, G.(2012).Does information increase political support for pension reform?.Public Choice,150(1-2),327-362.
10. Bozeman, B.(2007).Public values and public interest: Counterbalancing economic individualism.Georgetown University Press.
11. Bozeman, B.,Kingsley, G.(1998).Risk culture in public and private organizations.Public Administration Review,58(2),109-118.
12. Butrica, B. A.,Johnson, R. W.,Zedlewski, S. R.(2009).Volunteer dynamics of older Americans.Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences,64(5),644-655.
13. Chen, C. A.(2018).A little is better than zero or pay enough or don’t pay at all? Evidence on the size of pay-for-performance across the sectors.Public Personnel Management,47(2),119-143.
14. Chen, C. A.,Bozeman, B.(2012).Organizational risk aversion: Comparing the public and nonprofit sectors.Public Management Review,14(3),377-402.
15. Chen, C. A.,Bozeman, B.,Berman, E.(2019).The grass is greener, but why? Evidence of employees’ perceived sector mismatch from the US, New Zealand, and Taiwan.International Public Management Journal,22(3),560-589.
16. Chen, C. A.,Chen, D. Y.,Xu, C.(2018).Applying self-determination theory to understand public employee’s motivation for a public service career: An east asian case (Taiwan).Public Performance & Management Review,41(2),365-389.
17. Chen, C. A.,Hsieh, C. W.(2015).Does pursuing external incentives compromise public service motivation? Comparing the effects of job security and high pay.Public Management Review,17(8),1190-1213.
18. Chen, Y. S.,Chang, C. H.(2013).Utilize structural equation modeling (SEM) to explore the influence of corporate environmental ethics: The mediation effect of green human capital.Quality & Quantity,47(1),79-95.
19. Chun, Y. H.,Rainey, H. G.(2005).Goal ambiguity in U.S. federal agencies.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,15(1),1-30.
20. Corduneanu, R.,Dudau, A.,Kominis, G.(2020).Crowding-in or crowding-out: The contribution of self-determination theory to public service motivation.Public Management Review,22(7),1070-1089.
21. Dong, H. K.(2017).Individual risk preference and sector choice: Are risk-averse individuals more likely to choose careers in the public sector?.Administration & Society,49(8),1121-1142.
22. Festinger, L.(1954).A theory of social comparison processes.Human Relations,7(2),117-140.
23. Frey, B. S.,Jegen, R.(2001).Motivation crowding theory.Journal of Economic Surveys,15(5),589-611.
24. Gagné, M.,Deci, E. L.(2005).Self-determination theory and work motivation.Journal of Organizational Behavior,26(4),331-362.
25. Georgellis, Y.,Iossa, E.,Tabvuma, V.(2011).Crowding out intrinsic motivation in the public sector.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,21(3),473-493.
26. Gorina, E.,Hoang, T.(2020).Pension reforms and public sector turnover.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,30(1),96-112.
27. Greiff, S.,Heene, M.(2017).Why psychological assessment needs to start worrying about model fit.European Journal of Psychological Assessment,33(5),313-317.
28. Gunzler, D.,Chen, T.,Wu, P.,Zhang, H.(2013).Introduction to mediation analysis with structural equation modeling.Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry,25(6),390-394.
29. Houston, D. J.(2011).Implications of occupational locus and focus for public service motivation: Attitudes toward work motives across nations.Public Administration Review,71(5),761-771.
30. Jurkiewicz, C. L.,Massey, T. K., Jr,Brown, R. G.(1998).Motivation in public and private organizations: A comparative study.Public Productivity & Management Review,21(3),230-250.
31. Kim, S.(2009).Revising Perry’s measurement scale of public service motivation.The American Review of Public Administration,39(2),149-163.
32. Kim, S.,Vandenabeele, W.,Wright, B. E.,Andersen, L. B.,Cerase, F. P.,Christensen, R. K.,Desmarais, C.,Koumenta, M.,Leisink, P.,Liu, B.,Palidauskaite, J.,Pedersen, L. H.,Perry, J. L.,Ritz, A.,Taylor, J.,Vivo, P. D.(2013).Investigating the structure and meaning of public service motivation across populations: Developing an international instrument and addressing issues of measurement invariance.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,23(1),79-102.
33. Lyons, S. T.,Duxbury, L. E.,Higgins, C. A.(2006).A comparison of the values and commitment of private sector, public sector, and parapublic sector employees.Public Administration Review,66(4),605-618.
34. Mussagulova, A.,Chen, C. A.,Dong, H. K.(2021).Confronting pension reform: Public employees’ psychological contract breach, negative perception, regret, and the moderating role of PSM.Review of Public Personnel Administration,42(4),641-648.
35. Mussagulova, A.,van der Wal, Z.,Chen, C. A.(2019).What is wrong with job security?.Public Administration and Development,39(3),121-132.
36. Ongaro, E.(Ed.),Van Thiel, S.(Ed.)(2018).The palgrave handbook of public administration and management in Europe.Springer.
37. Perry, J. L.(1996).Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,6(1),5-22.
38. Perry, J. L.,Engbers, T. A.,Jun, S. Y.(2009).Back to the future? Performance‐related pay, empirical research, and the perils of persistence.Public Administration Review,69(1),39-51.
39. Perry, J. L.,Wise, L. R.(1990).The motivational bases of public service.Public Administration Review,50(3),367-373.
40. Podsakoff, P. M.,MacKenzie, S. B.,Lee, J. Y.,Podsakoff, N. P.(2003).Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.Journal of Applied Psychology,88(5),879-903.
41. Rainey, H. G.(2014).Understanding and managing public organizations.Jossey-Bass.
42. Rainey, H. G.,Bozeman, B.(2000).Comparing public and private organizations: Empirical research and the power of the a priori.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,10(2),447-470.
43. Resh, W. G.,Pitts, D. W.(2013).No solutions, only trade‐offs? Evidence about goal conflict in street‐level bureaucracies.Public Administration Review,73(1),132-142.
44. Ryan, R. M.,Deci, E. L.(2000).Self-Determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.American Psychologist,55(1),68-78.
45. Sundén, A.(2006).The Swedish experience with pension reform.Oxford Review of Economic Policy,22(1),133-148.
46. Thom, M.(2017).The drivers of public sector pension reform across the US states.The American Review of Public Administration,47(4),431-442.
47. Van den Broeck, A.,Vansteenkiste, M.,De Witte, H.,Soenens, B.,Lens, W.(2010).Capturing autonomy, competence, and relatedness at work: Construction and initial validation of the work‐related basic need satisfaction scale.Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,83(4),981-1002.
48. Xu, C.(2022).Work motivation in the public service: A scale development based on the self-determination theory.SAGE Open,12(2),1-13.
49. Xu, C.,Chen, C. A.(2021).Revisiting motivations for a public service career (MPSC): The case of China.Public Personnel Management,50(4),463-484.
50. 陳頡（2018）。混到 65 歲再退！年金改革最大後遺症。資深巡佐：連巡邏都懶。TVBS 新聞網，7 月 13 日。https://news.tvbs.com.tw/politics/955169 [Chen, J. (2018). Hundao 65sui zaitui! Nianjin gaige zuida houyizheng. Zishen xunzuo: Lian xunluo dulan. TVBS News Net, July 13.]
51. 新聞傳播處（2016）。年金改革國是會議啟動，擴大蒐集各界意見。行政院，12 月 25 日。https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/9277F759E41CCD91/90d27d43-42a9-4751-96d8-d22e6c1c5bf1[Department of Information Services (2016). National conference on pension reform kicks off, collect more views from all sectors. Executive Yuan, December 25.]
52. 銓敘部（2016）。退撫基金精算報告書。公務人員退休撫卹基金管理委員會，7 月 21 日。https://www.fund.gov.tw/News.aspx?n=3307&sms=11798 [Ministry of Civil Service (2016). Pension fund actuarial report. Public Service Pension Fund Management Board, July 21.]
53. 銓敘部（2017）。公務人員年金改革內涵介紹（三讀通過版）。7 月 5 日。https://tinyurl.com/8vr2sb8 [Ministry of Civil Service (2017). Introduction to the connotation of public service pension reform (third reading). July 5.]
54. 總統府（2016）。總統府國家年金改革委員會設置要點。國家年金改革委員會，5 月 27。https://ension.president.gov.tw/cp.aspx?n=2F60A9E1DC45B25F&s=D199E77A355C56A9 [Office of the President (2016). Key points of the National Pension Reform Commission of the Presidential Office. National Pension Reform Committee, May 27.]