题名

政黨選擇性暴露視角下大眾傳媒對台灣民眾政治信任的意義探究

并列篇名

Research on the Influence of Mass Media on the Political Trust of Taiwanese People from the Perspective of Partisan Selective Exposure

DOI

10.29865/PAP.202306_(76).0004

作者

申佳健(Jia-Jian Shen)

关键词

大眾傳媒 ; 政治信任感 ; 政黨選擇性暴露 ; 黨派色彩 ; mass media ; political trust ; partisan selective exposure ; partisan

期刊名称

行政暨政策學報

卷期/出版年月

76期(2023 / 06 / 01)

页次

101 - 130

内容语文

繁體中文;英文

中文摘要

政治信任感是政體正當性的來源,且對民眾的政治行爲有著重要影響,傳播媒介則是影響政治信任感的重要因素。在如今媒介充斥黨派色彩的環境下,本研究採用政黨選擇性暴露的理論視角,根據既往文獻和民眾認知將大眾傳媒就黨派色彩分爲泛藍、泛綠和其它三種,通過多元線性迴歸模型探究不同黨派色彩對民眾的不同對象的政治信任感的影響。研究發現泛藍陣營的報紙媒體對民眾就政治領導人和民主制度的政治信任感有顯著正向影響,泛綠陣營的電視媒體對民眾就政府和政治領導人的政治信任感有顯著負向影響。本研究對學界在政治信任感和傳播媒介的研究領域進行深化和擴展,也是對當前媒體環境變化的印證,並且通過對不同政治信任感的對象的區分和實證分析發現有必要在研究民眾的政治信任感的時候,進一步明確政治信任感的對象,提升政治信任感的研究的科學性和精確性。

英文摘要

Political trust is the source of the legitimacy of the regime, and has important influence on people' political behavior. More importantly, mass media play an important role as one of the influencing factors of political trust. In the context that Taiwan' tend to be more and more partisan and ideological in recent years, based on theoretical perspectives of selective exposure, this study differentiates partisan mass media into pan-blue and pan-green parties, and employs multiple linear regression model to explore the how different media's political trust affect people in different political objects and political trust. The study found that blue-colored newspapers had significant positive impacts on people's political trust in political leaders and the democratic system, while green-colored TV media negatively affected people's political trust in the government and political leaders. On the one hand, this research sheds light on the political trust research, on the other hand, it deepens and extends the area of research in mass media, and respond to the change of the current media environment. The findings bolstered by empirical analysis also found that it is necessary to further define the objects of political trust when studying people's political trust, in order to make political trust research more scientific and accurate.

主题分类 社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. 王中天, J.-T.(2010)。當社會信任遇見政治信任-對政治文化觀點的整合與檢驗。臺灣民主季刊,7(4),47-83。
    連結:
  2. 王中天, J.-T.,陳欽春, C.-C.(2014)。影響臺灣民眾對現任總統信任度的因素探討。臺灣民主季刊,11(2),1-38。
    連結:
  3. 吳親恩, C.-E.(2007)。台灣民眾的政治信任差異:政治人物、政府與民主體制三個面向的觀察。台灣政治學刊,11(1),147-200。
    連結:
  4. 盛治仁, Emile C. J.(2003)。台灣民眾民主價值及政治信任感研究-政黨輪替前後的比較。選舉研究,10(1),115-169。
    連結:
  5. 陳陸輝, L.-H.(2006)。政治信任的政治後果-以 2004 年立法委員選舉為例。臺灣民主季刊,3(2),39-62。
    連結:
  6. 陳陸輝, L.-H.(2002)。政治信任與台灣地區選民投票行爲。選舉研究,9(2),65-84。
    連結:
  7. 陳陸輝, L.-H.(2003)。政治信任、施政表現與民眾對台灣民主的展望。台灣政治學刊,7(2),149-188。
    連結:
  8. 陳陸輝, L.-H.(2012)。寧信地方,不信中央:政治信任的類型及其政治後果。社會科學論叢,6(1),15-57。
    連結:
  9. 陳憶寧, Y.-N. Katherine,羅文輝, V.-H.(2006)。媒介使用與政治資本。新聞學研究,88,83-134。
    連結:
  10. 彭芸, Bonnie(2002)。2001 年台灣選民的媒介行爲與政治信任。選舉研究,9(2),1-36。
    連結:
  11. 黃信豪, H.-H.(2014)。再探台灣民眾的政治信任-檢驗「批判性公民」解釋。臺灣民主季刊,11(1),153-193。
    連結:
  12. 黃慕也, M.-Y.,張世賢, S.-H.(2008)。政治媒介藉由政治效能、政治信任對投票行爲影響分析。臺灣民主季刊,5(1),45-85。
    連結:
  13. 劉嘉薇, J.-W.(2006)。大眾傳播媒介與大學生政治信任感關聯性之研究。東亞研究,37(1),161-196。
    連結:
  14. 劉嘉薇, J.-W.(2015)。民眾選擇性暴露、敵意媒體效果與政黨認同:以客家電視臺為例。東吳政治學報,33(2),187-250。
    連結:
  15. 劉嘉薇, J.-W.(2014)。民眾政黨認同、媒介選擇與紅衫軍政治運動參與。政治學報,58,101-126。
    連結:
  16. 蔡宗漢, T.-H.,林長志, C.-C.(2015)。潛在變數的測量及其影響:2013 年 TEDS 台灣民眾統獨立場的分析。選舉研究,22(1),71-107。
    連結:
  17. 鄭夙芬, S.-F.,陳陸輝, L.-H.,劉嘉薇, J.-W.(2008)。選舉事件與政治信任:以 2004 年總統選舉為例。問題與研究,47(3),29-50。
    連結:
  18. Avery, J. M.(2009).Videomalaise or virtuous circle? The influence of the news media on political trust.International Journal of Press/Politics,14(4),410-433.
  19. Bennett, S. E.,Rhine, S. L.,Flickinger, R. S.,Linda, B. L. M.(1999).Video-malaise revisited public trust in the media and government.The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics,4(3),8-23.
  20. Ben-Porath, E. N.,Shaker, L. K.(2010).News images, race, and attribution in the wake of hurricane katrina.Journal of Communication,60(3),466-490.
  21. Braima, M. A. M.(1999).An efficacy model of electoral campaigns: The 1996 presidential election.Annual Conference of Association for Journalism and Mass Communication,New Orleans, Louisiana:
  22. Campbell, A.,Gurin, G.,Miller, W. E.(1954).The voter decides.Greenwood Press.
  23. Citrin, J.(1974).Comment: The political relevance of trust in government.American Political Science Review,68(3),973-988.
  24. Cleveland, H.(Ed.),Lasswell, H. D.(Ed.)(1962).Ethics and bigness: Scientific, academic, religious, political and military.Harper and Brothers.
  25. Dimitri, K.(2019).Evaluating the news: (Mis)Perceptions of objectivity and credibility.Political Behavior,41(2),445-471.
  26. Easton, D.(1965).A systems analysis of political life.University of Chicago Press.
  27. Festinger, L.(1957).A theory of cognitive dissonance.Stanford University Press.
  28. Fischer, P.,Schulz-Hardt, S.,Frey, D.(2008).Selective exposure and information quantity: How different information quantities moderate decision makers’ preference for consistent and inconsistent information.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,94,231-244.
  29. Gadarian, S. K.(2014).Scary pictures: How terrorism imagery affects voter evaluations.Political Communication,31(2),282-302.
  30. Gamson, W. A.(1968).Power and discontent.The Dorsey Press.
  31. Graber, D. A.(1990).Seeing is remembering: How visuals contribute to learning from television news.Journal of Communication,40(3),134-156.
  32. Gvirsman, S. D.(2014).It’s not that we don’t know, it’s that we don’t care: Explaining why selective exposure polarizes attitudes.Mass Communication and Society,17,74-97.
  33. Hetherington, M. J.(2005).Why trust matters: Declining political trust and the demise of american liberalism.Princeton University Press.
  34. Iyengar, S.,Kinder, D. R.(1987).News that matters.The University of Chicago Press.
  35. Jamieson, K. H.(1992).Dirty politics.Oxford University Press.
  36. Jennings, M. K.,Niemi, R. G.(1981).Generations and politics: A panel study of young adults and their parents.Princeton University Press.
  37. Job, J.(2005).How is trust in government created? It begins at home, but ends in the parliament.Australian Review of Public Affairs,6(1),1-23.
  38. Kearney, M. W.(2019).Analyzing change in network polarization.New Media and Society,21(6),1380-1402.
  39. Kuklinski, J. H.,Quirk, P. J.,Jerit, J.,Schwieder, D.,Rich, R. F.(2000).Misinformation and the currency of democratic citizenship.The Journal of Politics,62(3),790-816.
  40. McCombs, M. E.,Shaw, D. L.(1972).The agenda-setting function of mass media.Public Opinion Quarterly,36,176-187.
  41. McLeod, J. M.(2000).Media and civic socialization of youth.Journal of Adolescent Health,27,45-51.
  42. Mishler, W.,Rose, R.(2001).What are the origins of political trust? Testing institutional and cultural theories in post-communist societies.Comparative Political Studies,34(1),30-62.
  43. Moy, P.,Scheufele, D. A.(2000).Media effects on political and social trust.Journalism of Mass Communication Quarterly,44(4),744-752.
  44. Muller, E. N.,Jukam, T. O.(1977).On the meaning of political support.American Political Science Review,71(4),1561-1595.
  45. Neuman, W. R.,Just, M. R.,Crigler, A. N.(1992).Common knowledge: News and the construction of political meaning.University of Chicago Press.
  46. Ridout, T. N.(2019).New directions in media and politics.Routledge.
  47. Ridout, Travis. N.(Ed.)(2017).The oxford handbook of political communication.Routledge.
  48. Robinson, M. J.(1976).Public affairs television and the growth of political malaise.American Political Science Review,70,409-432.
  49. Roloff, Michael E.(Ed.),Miller, Gerald R.(Ed.)(1980).Persuasion: New directions in theory and research.Sage Publications, Inc..
  50. Sears, D. O.,Freedman, J. L.(1967).Selective exposure to information: A critical review.Public Opinion Quarterly,31(2),194-213.
  51. Slater, M.D.(2007).Reinforcing spirals: The mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity.Communication Theory,17,281-303.
  52. Smith, G.,Searles, K.(2014).Who let the (attack) dogs out? New evidence for partisan media effects.Public Opinion Quarterly,78(1),71-99.
  53. Stevens, D.(2009).Elements of negativity: Volume and proportion in exposure to negative advertising.Political Behavior,31,429-454.
  54. Stroud, N. J.(2011).Niche news: The politics of news choice.Oxford University Press.
  55. Stroud, N. J.(2007).Media effects, selective exposure, and fahrenheit 9/11.Political Communication,24(4),415-432.
  56. Tsfati, Y.,Cappella, J. N.(2003).Do people watch what they do not trust? Exploring the association between news media skepticism and exposure.Communication Research,30(5),504-529.
  57. Valentino, N. A.,Beckmann, M. N.,Buhr, T. A.(2001).A spiral of cynicism for some: The contingent effects of campaign news frames on participation and confidence in government.Political Communication,18,347-367.
  58. Wilkins, K. G.(2000).The role of media in public disengagement from political life.Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media,44(4),569-580.
  59. Zaller, J. R.(1992).The nature and origins of mass opinion.Cambridge University Press.
  60. Zillmann, D.(Ed.),Bryant, J.(Ed.)(1985).Selective exposure to communication.Lawrence Erlbaum.
  61. 李丁讚, Ding-Tzann(2004)。市民社會與公共領域在台灣的發展。公共領域在台灣:困境與契機
  62. 夏春祥, C.-H.(2004)。尋找公共領域-論台灣社會中的新聞論述。公共領域在台灣:困境與契機
  63. 張卿卿, C.-C.(2002)。競選新聞框架與廣告訴求對選民政治效能與信賴感的影響。新聞學研究,69,135-166。
  64. 陳憶寧, Y.-N. Katherine(2001)。候選人負面新聞與新聞框架-憤世嫉俗與政治責任歸屬的影響。中華傳播學會 2001 年年會暨學術研討會,香港=Hongkong:
  65. 黃紀, C.(2020)。,國立政治大學選舉研究中心=Election Study Center, National Chengchi University。
  66. 黃紀, C.(2019)。,國立政治大學選舉研究中心=Election Study Center, National Chengchi University。
  67. 劉嘉薇, J.-W.(2018).臺灣民眾的媒體選擇與統獨立場.五南=Wu-Nan Book Inc.