题名

明新科技大學管理學院推廣個案教學之研究

并列篇名

The Research of Case Method for College of Management in Minghsin University of Science and Technology

DOI

10.29688/MHJ.201102.0016

作者

詹慧雯(Huei-Wen Chang);林麗雪(Li-Hsueh Lin)

关键词

個案教學 ; 問卷調查 ; 探索性研究 ; 哈佛式個案教學 ; Case method ; Questionnaire ; Exploratory study ; Harvard's case method

期刊名称

明新學報

卷期/出版年月

37卷1期(2011 / 02 / 01)

页次

207 - 216

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究主要欲瞭解在本校管理學院是否適合推廣個案教學法,並且如何推廣個案教學法。因此,本文將以問卷調查法普查管理學院教師實施個案教學法概況,並且訪談有個案教學經驗的教師,期望從此次的探索性研究中找出在管理學院推廣個案教學的方法。經分析結果得到以下結論:一、管理學院的教師與學生均不是很瞭解哈佛式個案教學法。二、折衷式個案教學法是適合在管理學院推廣。三、本研究認為推廣個案教學法之可行方式為:舉辦個案教學法觀摩會、舉辦個案教學法之座談會以及鼓勵教師撰寫教學個案。四、個案教學法可以成為管理學院的教學特色。

英文摘要

The objective of this research is to understand that how well the professors knowing about case method, how they think about case method, and how to proceed to case method. This research is divided by two parts. One is the questionnaire study, 61samples. The other one is qualitative techniques, 11 samples. The samples of this research are the teachers in the College of Management. Four results are worth summarizing as follow: 1. The teachers do not understand the Harvard's case method very well. 2. Modified case method is suitable to be popularized in the College of Management. 3. If the college of management wants to promote case method in teaching, our suggestions are having seminar and forum of case study teaching, and encouraging teachers to write cases for teaching. 4. The Case method may become a distinguished teaching method in the College of Management of Minghsin University.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
基礎與應用科學 > 基礎與應用科學綜合
工程學 > 工程學綜合
社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. 李清潭(2009)。商管教育個案方法中教師策略的思維步驟。商管科技季刊,10(1),179-184。
    連結:
  2. 柯承恩(2009)。個案教學與知識建構。商管科技季刊,10(2),395-402。
    連結:
  3. Blumenthal, J.(1991).Use of the Case Method in MBA Education.Performance Improvement Quarterly,4(1),5-14.
  4. Carter, K.,Unklesbay, R.(1989).Cases in Teaching and Law.Curriculum Studies,21(6),527-536.
  5. Ertmer, P. A.,Newby, T. J.,MacDougall, M.(1996).Students' Responses and Approaches to Case-Based Instruction: The Role of Reflective Self-Requlation.American Educational Research Journal,33,719-752.
  6. Knirk, F. G.(1991).Case Materials: Research and Practice.Performance Improvement Quarterly,4(1),73-81.
  7. Kowalski, T. J.(1991).Case Studies on Educational Administration.NY:Longman Publishing Group.
  8. Lang,C.(1986).Case Method Teaching in the Community College.MA:Education Development Center.Inc..
  9. Shulman, J. H.(1992).Case Studies for Teacher Problem Solving.Teachers College Press.
  10. Silverman, R.,Welty, W. M.,Lyon, S.(1992).Case Studies for Teacher Problem Solving.NY:McGraw-Hill Book Company.
  11. 吳上榕(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台南,國立成功大學工業與資訊管理學系。
  12. 吳錦波、陳衍華(2006)。網誌應用於個案教學分析的探索性研究。資訊管理展望,8(2),65-84。
  13. 陳俊廷(2008)。個案教學之理論與推動實務。人事月刊,47(4),42-46。
被引用次数
  1. 胡嘉智(2013)。發展教育教學配套設計,探索學生學習經驗:實踐「個案教學」於大學部課程之教育行動研究。商管科技季刊,14(1),89-119。
  2. 施能傑(2012)。政府訓練機構運用個案教學法的執行分析:公務人員薦任升簡任官等訓練個案。東吳政治學報,30(4),1-49。