题名

導入數位學伴線上課業輔導關鍵成功因素之探討

并列篇名

The Key Successful Factors for after School's Online Tutoring

作者

帥嘉珍(Jia-Jane Shuai);周正浩(Jhengei-Hao Jhou)

关键词

數位學習 ; 教學品質 ; 決策實驗室分析法(DEMATEL) ; 網路程序分析法(ANP) ; e- Learning ; Teaching Quality

期刊名称

明新學報

卷期/出版年月

40卷1期(2014 / 02 / 01)

页次

141 - 161

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究主要目標在探討影響「數位學伴」施行的關鍵成功因素,以參與數位學伴線上課業輔導學童的老師為對象,利用決策實驗室法(DEMATEL)以及網路程序分析法(ANP),協助決策者評估及選擇施行策略。研究發現對教學品質有影響的構面因素彼此間具相互影響關係,調查結果顯示在所有因素中,小學伴的態度為影響數位學伴教學品質的最重要因素,其次為大學伴老師的人格特質及網路速度。本研究藉由DEMATEL以及ANP的應用,找出數位學伴施行策略準則的重要影響因素(教學設備、大學伴特質、小學伴特質、教學教材)與權重,提供決策單位了解構面之間的因果關係,進而選擇有效的數位學伴策略以提昇績效。

英文摘要

The main purpose of this study is to investigate how to find the critical success factors for e-tutors, who participate in the after school online tutoring project to elevate students' development. This paper proposes an effective solution based on a combined Analytic network process (ANP) and Decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) approach to help decision makers that need to evaluate and select e-tutor strategies. The empirical results show that factors from the existing analytical methodologies have significant interactive and self-feedback dynamics. Among the key factors, students' attitude is the most important one affecting online tutoring quality, followed by teachers' personality and internet speed. This study uses DEMATEL and ANP model to find the critical factors (equipment, teachers' personality, students' personality, network speed) and weights. This finding can offer an insight for decision maker to understand cause-effort relationships and to select effective e-tutor strategy to improve performance.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
基礎與應用科學 > 基礎與應用科學綜合
工程學 > 工程學綜合
社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. 教育部全球資訊網(2006)。數位學伴線上課業輔導服務計畫網。線上檢索日期: 2012 年 11 月,取自:http://www.dsg.fju.edu.tw/dsg/。
  2. Allport, G. W.(1992).Personality: a psychological interpretation.New York:Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  3. Chen, J.K.,Chen, I.S.(2010).Using a novel conjunctive MCDM approach based on DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP, and TOPSIS as an innovation support system for Taiwanese higher education.Expert Systems with Applications,37,1981-1990.
  4. Davis, F. D.,Bagozzi, R. P.,Warshaw, P. R.(1989).User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models.Management Science,3(8),982-1003.
  5. DeShields, O.W., Jr.,Kara, A.,Kaynak, E.(2005).Determinants of business student satisfaction and retention in higher education: Applying Herzberg's two-factor theory.The International Journal of Educational Management,19(2/3),128-139.
  6. Fontela, E.,Gabus, A.(1972).DEMATEL report no. 1DEMATEL report no. 1,Switzerland, Geneva:Battelle Geneva Research Centre.
  7. Hodges, M. E.,Russell, M. Sasnett(1993).Multimedia Computing: Case studies from MIT Project Athena.New York:Addison-Wesley.
  8. Huang, J.H.,Lin, Y.R.,Chuang, S.T.(2007).Elucidating user behavior of mobile learning: a perspective of the extended technology acceptance model.The Electronic Library,25(5),585-597.
  9. Isabel, N.C.,Laura, V.C.,María, R.Díazb(2013).E-learning and face to face mixed methodology: Evaluating effectiveness of e-learning and perceived satisfaction for a microeconomic course using the Moodle platform.Computers in Human Behavior,29,410-415.
  10. Jackson, C.(1993).Mentoring: choices for individuals and organizations.International Journal of Career Management,5(1),10-16.
  11. Lai, H.M.,Chen, C.P.(2011).Factors influencing secondary school teachers' adoption of teaching blogs.Computers & Education,56(4),948-960.
  12. Laros, F.J.M.,Steenkamp, J.E.M.(2005).Emotions in consumer behavior: A hierarchical approach.Journal of Business Research,58(10),1437-1445.
  13. Liaw, S.S.(2008).Investigating students' perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system.Computers & Education,51(2),864-873.
  14. Mayer, R. E.,Moreno, Roxana(2002).Aids to computer-based multimedia learning.Learning and Instruction,12,107-119.
  15. McCrae, R.R.,John, O. P.(1992).An introduction of the five-factor model and its application.Journal of Personality,60,175-215.
  16. Petrovich, A.(2004).Using self-efficacy theory in social workteaching.Journal of Socail Wrok Education,40(3),429-443.
  17. Roberts, B. W.,Caspi, A.,Moffitt, T. E.(2003).Work experiences and personality development in young adulthood.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,84(3),582.
  18. Saaty, T.L.(1996).Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process.Pittsburgh, PA:RWS Publications.
  19. Saaty, T.L.(1980).Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation.New York, NY:McGraw-Hill.
  20. Wu, W.W.(2008).Choosing knowledge management strategies by using a combined ANP and DEMATEL approach.Expert Systems with Applications,35,828-835.
  21. Wu, W.W.(2011).Mining significant factors affecting the adoption of SaaS using the rough set approach.The Journal of Systems and Software,84(3),435-441.
  22. Wu, W.W.,Lee, Y.T.(2007).Developing global managers' competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method.Expert Systems with Applications,32(2),499-507.
  23. 王尹伶(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。淡江大學教材科技學系。
  24. 吳鴻春(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。開南大學。
  25. 李月碧、何榮桂(2011)。透過網際網路縮減數位落差:以數位學伴為例。台灣教育期刊,670,2-11。
  26. 林春宏(1990)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。東海大學建築研究所。
  27. 林欽榮(1996)。組織行為。台北:前程企業管理公司。
  28. 洪明洲(1999)。網路教學。台北:華彩軟體。
  29. 紀岱玲、林我聰(2011)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立政治大學資訊管理研究所。
  30. 張新仁(2011)。實施補救教學之課程與教學設計。教育學刊,17,85-106。
  31. 許進富(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市立教育大學。
  32. 陳年興(2000)。網路教學與傳統教學之比較分析。遠距教育,15/16,153-136。
  33. 陳志寶(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立交通大學電資學院學程。
  34. 曾愉茵(2007)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。崑山科技大學資訊管理系。
  35. 潘麗琪(2005)。人格特質發展之探討。華醫社會人文學報,11,33-42。
  36. 戴進隆(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立雲林科技大學資訊管理研究所。
  37. 謝純慧(1997)。多媒體教材發展之探。育達學報,11,179-189。
被引用次数
  1. 陳登廷,李育齊(2023)。師資生參與偏鄉數位教學服務的學習經驗與成效相關研究-以北部一所大學為例。服務學習與社會連結學刊,6,25-49。