〈大一學生中文能力檢測計畫－第二階段〉執行成效析論

＂Freshmen Chinese Proficiency Test Program-the Second Stage＂- Analysis on the Executive Achievements

廖秀珍(Liao,Shiu-Chen)；張立平(Zhang,Li-Ping)；曾錦華(Zeng,Jin-Hua)；王聰明(Wang,Tsong-Ming)

中文 ； 能力檢測 ； 成效分析 ； Chinese ； proficiency test ； analysis of effectiveness

明新學報

43卷2期（2019 / 07 / 01）

133 - 152

繁體中文

本研究為明新科技大學105學年度執行大一學生中文能力檢測計畫的執行成果之分析研究。105學年度上、下學期舉行之大一學生「CWT全民中文能力檢定」（簡稱「CWT全民中檢」）中高等級測驗，在比較分析前、後測成績後，顯示無論是語文素養或寫作能力皆有明顯成長。語文素養測驗合格率由34%進步到60%，成長幾近一倍；寫作能力合格率由68%提升至81%，亦有令人可喜之表現。本文分七項指標進行成效分析:（一）檢測人數之計算，（二）參加同學之整體表現分析，（三）各學院整體表現分析，（四）語文素養測驗向度分析，（五）寫作能力測驗向度分析，（六）補救教學成效分析，（七）「語文素養答問表」及「寫作能力答問表」結果分析。全文就語文素養及寫作能力之各個面向，無論是整體表現或各院現況剖析，皆一一詳加說明。由測驗結果得知，語文素養中之修辭技巧、語文知識、文意判讀等三項，仍是目前大一學生亟待加強與提升的部分；而寫作能力之高下，取決於主題與選材兩者之間是否搭配得宜，因此緊扣題旨行文與提高選材能力，實為寫作訓練應當加強之處。至於遣詞用字力求精確、文意表達明白曉暢及修辭能力之自我精進，三者提升，必能大大改善寫作平淡無奇之現象，而展現另一番獨特之風貌。

After comparing the high-intermediate level tests of the CWT General Chinese Proficiency Test (abbreviated as GCPT) held in the upper and lower semesters of the 105th academic year, it shows that either the language literacy or writing ability has obvious growth. The passing rate of language literacy has been improved from 34% to 60%, almost doubled. and the rate of writing has risen from 68% to 81%, that is also a pleasing performance. We use seven indicators to carry out the analysis of effectiveness of this paper: (1) the calculation of the number of testees, (2) the analysis of overall performance of the students, (3) the analysis of overall performance of each college, (4) the analysis of dimension of the language literacy test, (5) the analysis of dimension of the writing ability test, (6) the analysis of effectiveness of the remedial teaching, (7) the analysis of results of the ＂language literacy Q&A table＂ and ＂writing ability Q&A table ＂. The whole paper has ordered and detailed description on the various dimensions of language literacy and writing ability, whether in the overall performance or in each college status analysis. From the results of the test we knew that rhetorical skills, language knowledge and literary interpretation, the three aspects of language literacy, are still the parts of the freshmen who need to be strengthened and promoted at present. And the degree of writing ability, depending on if there are appropriate match between the theme and the selection, therefore closely following the title to composition and improving the capacity of selection, in fact, are the writing training should be strengthened. As for wording words seeking accuracy, expressing meaning of the text clearly and smoothly and self- improving rhetorical ability, the promotion of all three will greatly improve the phenomenon of bland writing, and show another unique style.

1. 廖秀珍(2012)。「寫作病句」探析─以大一技職生寫作為例。明新學報，38(2)，101。
   連結：
2. 廖秀珍(2014)。「寫作病句中形成語義上用詞不當之因」探析─以大一技職生寫作為例。明新學報，40(2)，103。
   連結：
3. 廖秀珍(2013)。「寫作病句中形成語意不明之因」探析─以大一技職生寫作為例。明新學報，39(2)，102。
   連結：
4. 王力,呂叔湘,徐仲華(2006).字和詞.香港:商務印書館.
5. 朱自清(2012).語文雜話.北京:三聯書店.
6. 李崇建(2010).作文,就是寫故事.聯合文學出版社股份有限公司.
7. 周建,陳群(2011).語感培養模式.北京:外語教學與研究出版社.
8. 林曜松，＜表達能力的培養＞，國立台灣大學教學發展中心電子報 No.95，2010
9. 胡懷琛(2016).文章作法兩種.知識產權出版社有限責任公司.
10. 席曉青(2011).語篇分析：思維、策略與實踐.廈門:廈門大學出版社.
11. 袁行霈(1989).中國詩歌藝術研究.臺灣:五南圖書出版公司.
12. 張杰,蕭映(2009).寫作.北京:北京大學出版社.
13. 符淮青(2011).現代漢語詞彙.香港:商務印書館有限公司.
14. 湯瑪斯•佛里曼(2017).謝謝你遲到了.遠見天下文化出版股份有限公司.
15. 楊雪梅(2011).漢語近義詞語辨析.北京:北京大學出版社.
16. 劉洪妹(2015).寫作與語言藝術.北京大學出版社.
17. 劉潤清(2013).西方語言學流派.北京市:外語教學與研究出版社.
18. 衛乃興(2011).詞語學要義.上海:上海外語教育出版社.
19. 蕭瑞麟(2017).不用數字的研究.五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
20. 嚴長壽(2017).在世界地圖上找到自己.遠見天下文化出版股份有限公司.