嘉義縣市幼稚園教師學前融合教育專業知能與態度之研究

Kindergarten Teachers' Professional Knowledge and Attitudes toward Preschool Inclusive Education-An Example of Chiayi Area

10.6773/JRMS.200812.0011

吳樎椒(Su-Chiao Wu)；張宇樑(Yu-Liang Chang)；廖又儀(You-Yi Liao)

學前融合教育 ； 學前融合教育專業知能 ； 學前融合教育態度 ； 幼稚園教師 ； Preschool inclusive education ； Professional knowledge of inclusive education ； Attitudes towards preschool inclusive education ； Kindergarten teacher

測驗統計年刊

16期_下（2008 / 12 / 01）

93 - 123

繁體中文

本研究旨在探討嘉義縣市幼稚園教師學前融合教育專業知能與態度的現況、不同背景下之差異、以及二者間之關聯性及其預測力分析。研究對象為嘉義縣市266位公私立幼教師，以自編之學前融合教育專業知能問卷與學前融合教育態度問卷為主要研究工具，並將資料以統計套裝軟體進行獨立樣本t考驗、單因子變異數分析、皮爾遜積差相關、與迴歸等分析。研究發現為： 一、嘉義縣市幼稚園教師具有中等程度之學前融合教育專業知能。 二、嘉義縣市幼稚園教師其在融合教育態度上具有正向反應而且擁有較高之同意程度。 三、不同學歷、有無特教師資格、及有無特教專業背景之嘉義縣市幼教師其學前融合教育專業知能有顯著差異。 四、不同學歷、有無收托特殊需求幼兒經驗、有無特教師資格、及有無特教專業背景之嘉義縣市教師其學前融合教育態度有顯著差異。 五、嘉義縣市幼稚園教師其所擁有之學前融合教育專業知能與學前融合教育態度有顯著中度正相關。 六、嘉義縣市幼稚園教師之學前融合教育專業知能對其學前融合教育態度具有預測力。

The purpose of this study was to investigate the current status of kindergarten teacher's professional knowledge and attitudes towards preschool inclusive education in Chiayi area, as well as comparing scores/differences of kindergarten teachers associated with different background variables. This study also discussed the relationship between professional knowledge and attitudes towards preschool inclusive education the targeted kindergarten teachers possessed, so as to analyze whether their attitude ratings could predict their professional knowledge ratings or not. A survey method was employed in this study. The Professional Knowledge Questionnaire of Inclusive Education and the Attitude Questionnaire of Inclusive Education were administered with the background information questions for gathering the data. There were totally 266 kindergarten teachers in Chiayi area participated in this study. Statistical methods, such as t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson cross-product correlation, and stepwise multiple regression, were applied for data analyses. The research findings were reported as followings: 1. The professional knowledge towards preschool inclusive education these kindergarten teachers owned was at the average level. 2. These kindergarten teachers generally held positive attitudes towards preschool inclusion education, which were at the above average level. 3. There were significant differences in their professional knowledge of preschool inclusive education among their personal background variables, such as educational backgrounds, teacher qualifications of special education, and practical backgrounds related to special education. 4. There were significant differences in their attitude towards preschool inclusive education among their personal background variables, such as educational backgrounds, previous experiences of teaching children with special needs, teacher qualifications of special education, and practical backgrounds related to special education. 5. A significant positive relationship was found between their professional knowledge of and attitudes towards preschool inclusive education. 6. The professional knowledge of preschool inclusion education these teachers possessed could predict their attitudes towards preschool inclusive education.

1. Adams, P. R.,Quintero, M.,Killoran, J.,Striefel, S.,Frede, E.(1987).A review and synthesis of teacher competencies necessary for effective mainstreaming.
2. Avramidis, E.,Bayliss, P.,Burden, R.(2000).A survey into mainstream teachers` attitudes toward the inclusion of children with special educational needs in the ordinary school in one local education authority.Educational Psychology,20(2),191-211.
3. Bryan, G. C.(2002).Inclusive attitudes, strengths, and weaknesses of pre-service general educators enrolled in a curriculum infusion teacher preparation program.Teacher Education and Special Education,25(3),262-277.
4. Butler, F. C.(1978).The concept of competence: an operational definition.Educational Technology,18,7-18.
5. Chandler, P. A.(1998).A place for me: Including children with special needs in early care and education settings.Washington, DC:National Association for the Education of Young Children.
6. Cook, R. E.,Tessier, A.,Klein, M. D.(1992).Adaptive early childhood curricula for children in inclusive settings.New York:McMillan.
7. Ellis, E. S.,Rountree, B. S.,Larkin, M. J.(1993).Practicing master teacher perceptions of inclusion teacher competencies.
8. Hall, L. J.,McGregor, J. A.(2000).A follow-up study of the peer relationships of children with disabilities in an inclusive school.The Journal of Special Education,34(3),114-126.
9. Mayhew, J.(1994).Are preservice general educators being adequately prepared for inclusion?.
10. Mittler, P.(2000).Working towards inclusive education: Social contexts.London:David Fulton.
11. Siegel, J.,Jausovec, N.(1994).Improving teacher attitudes toward students with disabilities.
12. website of U.S. Department of Education
13. Varlier, G.,Vuran, S.(2006).The views of pre-school teachers about integration,6(2),578-585.
14. Westwood, P.(2002).Commonsense methods for children with special needs: Strategies for the regular classroom.London:Routledge.
15. 王天苗(2001)。運用教學支援建立融合教育的實施模式：以一公立幼稚園的經驗為例。特殊教育研究學刊，21，27-51。
16. 王天苗(2003)。學前融合教育實施的問題和對策－以台北國小附幼為例。特殊教育研究學刊，25，1-25。
17. 吳明隆(2006)。SPSS統計應用學習實務：問卷分析與應用統計。台北:知城。
18. 吳淑美(2004)。融合班的理念與實務。台北:心理。
19. 林少雀(2004)。台北，中國文化大學青少年兒童福利研究所。
20. 林春梅(2004)。台中，台中師範學院特殊教育與輔助科技研究所。
21. 林益興(2004)。台北，國立台北師範學院社會科教育所。
22. 林貴美、國立台北師範學院特殊教育學系主編(2001)。融合教育學術論文集。台北:國立台北師範學院特殊教育中心。
23. 林敬鯉(2000)。台北，中國文化大學兒童福利研究所。
24. 張春興(1999)。教育心理學：三化取向的理論與實踐。台北:東華書局。
25. 張美雲、蘇慧菁、曾慶媛、屏東科技大學主編(2004)。中台醫護學院幼保系準畢業生對學前融合教育之態度與專業知能之研究。2004多元托育服務學術研討會論文集，屏東:
26. 張翠娥(1999)。幼兒園融合教育方案實施探究。樹德科技學報，1(1)，15-33。
27. 師資培育法規集錦
28. 全國法規資料庫
29. 全國法規資料庫
30. 教育部(2005)。九十四年度特殊教育統計年報。台北:教育部。
31. 教育部統計處
32. 許碧勳(2003)。幼兒融合教育。台北:五南。
33. 陳良青(2003)。彰化，國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所。
34. 曾喜城(1986)。教師應該是專業嗎？。師友，241，30-31。
35. 游寶珠(2006)。台中，亞洲大學健康管理研究所。
36. 黃耀慧(2004)。台中，台中師範學院環境教育研究所。
37. 劉文瑤(2006)。台北，輔仁大學教育領導與發展研究所。
38. 劉玉蓮(2003)。台中，台中師範學院國民教育研究所。
39. 蔡明富(1998)。邁向融合：談融合教育下教師與家長所面臨之問題及其啟示。教師之友，39(2)，62-69。
40. 薛婷方(2003)。台東，國立臺東大學教育研究所。
41. 簡淑蓮(2004)。台東，國立臺東大學教育研究所。
42. 蘇昭昇(2003)。彰化，彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所。
43. 蘇燕華(2000)。台北，台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所。
44. 鐘梅菁(2000)。彰化，國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所。