Linking and Nominal Omission

10.6519/TJL.2003.1(1).3

John Truscott

Taiwan Journal of Linguistics

1卷1期（2003 / 06 / 01）

69 - 95

英文

Most (and probably all) of the world's languages allow omission of a variety of nominal elements, ranging from solitary nouns to entire noun phrases. This omission occurs in a great many seemingly disparate contexts. The thesis of this article is that for a great assortment of such cases, in a wide variety of languages, a unified explanation can be given in terms of the notion of linking: Nominal omission is possible in the presence of an item that has the function of linking the nominal to an overt element in the sentence. The apparent logic of the linking-omission connection is that the link serves to point out the location of the missing item. The intimate connection between linking and nominal omission is demonstrated in a variety of constructions in a number of languages.

1. Abney, Steven P.(1987).MIT dissertation.Cambridge:
2. Adams, Marianne(1987).From Old French to the theory of pro-drop.Natural Language and Linguistic Theory,5,1-32.
3. Allan, Keith(1977).Classifiers.Language,53,285-311.
4. Benton, Richard A.(1968).Numeral and attributive classifiers in Trukese.Oceanic Linguistics,7,104-146.
5. Burling, Robbins(1970).Man`s Many Voices: Language in its Cultural Context.New York:Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
6. Capell, A.,Coate, H. H. J.(1984).Comparative Studies in Northern Kimberley Languages.Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University.
7. Carter, Robin M.(1976).Chipewyan classificatory verbs.International Journal of American Linguistics,42,24-30.
8. Chao, Yuen Ren(1968).A Grammar of Spoken Chinese.Berkeley:University of California Press.
9. Chung, Sandra,Claudia Brugman (ed.),Monica Macaulay(1984).Identifiability and null objects in Chamorro.Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society,Berkeley, CA:
10. Comrie, Bernard(1981).The Languages of the Soviet Union.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
11. Corbett, Greville G.(1991).Gender.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
12. Dardjowidjojo, Soenjono(1978).Sentence Patterns of Indonesian.Honolulu:University of Hawaii Press.
13. de Bray, R. G. A.(1980).Guide to the West Slavonic Languages.Columbus, OH:Slavica.
14. Denny, J. Peter,Salikoko S. Mufwene(ed.),Carol A. Walker,Sanford B. Steever(1976).What are noun classifiers good for?.Papers from the Twelfth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society,Chicago:
15. Dixon, R. M. W.(1980).The Languages of Australia.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
16. Elwell-Sutton, L. P.(1941).Colloquial Persian.London:Routledge and Kegan Paul.
17. Fries, Charles C.(1948).Some notes on the inflected genitive in present-day English.Language,14,244-246.
18. Ganathe, N. S. R.(1986).Learn Punjabi in 30 Days.Madras:Balaji.
19. Georgopoulos, Carol(1985).Variables in Palauan syntax.Natural Language and Linguistic Theory,3,59-94.
20. Haas, Mary R.(1948).Classificatory verbs in Muskogee.International Journal of American Linguistics,14,244-246.
21. Haas, Mary R.(1942).The use of numeral classifiers in Thai.Language,18,201-205.
22. Hoijer, Harry(1945).Classificatory verb stems in the Apachean languages.International Journal of American Linguistics,11,13-23.
23. Huang, C.-T. James(1984).On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns.Linguistic Inquiry,15,531-574.
24. Jacob, Judith M(1985).Notes on the numerals and numeral coefficients in Old, Middle and Modern Khmer.Lingua,15,143-162.
25. Jaeggli, Osvaldo,Safir, Kenneth J. (Eds.)(1989).The Null Subject Parameter.Dordrecht:Kluwer.
26. Josephs, Lewis S.(1975).Palauan Reference Grammar.Honolulu:The University Press of Hawaii.
27. Kidima, Lukowa(1987).Object agreement and topicality hierarchies in Kiyaka.Studies in African Linguistics,18,175-209.
28. Kiss, Katalin E.(1987).Configurationality in Hungarian.Dordrecht:Reidel.
29. Krauss, Michael E.(1968).Noun-classification systems in Athapaskan, Eyak, Tlingit, and Haida verbs.International Journal of American Linguistics,34,194-204.
30. Lopez, Cecilio(1965).Contributions to a comparative Philippine syntax.Lingua,15,3-16.
31. Lyons, John(1977).Semantics.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
32. McCloskey, James(1986).Inflection and coordination in Modern Irish.Natural Language and Linguistic Theory,4,245-281.
33. McCloskey, James,Kenneth Hale(1984).On the syntax of person-number inflection in Modern Irish.Natural Language and Linguistic Theory,1,487-534.
34. Platero, Paul(1982).Missing noun phrases and grammatical relations in Navajo.International Journal of American Linguistics,48,286-305.
35. Platzack, Christer(1987).The Scandinavian languages and the null-subject parameter.Natural Language and Linguistic Theory,5,377-401.
36. Ramos, Teresita V.(1971).Tagalog Structures.Honolulu:The University Press.
37. Rizzi, Luigi(1982).Issues in Italian Syntax.Dordrecht:Foris.
38. Sohn, Ho-min(1975).Woleaian Reference Grammar.Honolulu:University of Hawaii Press.
39. Srinivasachari, K.(1988).Learn Hindi in 30 Days.Madras:Balaji.
40. Strang, Barbara M.(1970).A History of English.London:Methuen.
41. Suarez, Jorge A.(1983).The Mesoamerican Indian Languages.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
42. Topping, Donald M.(1973).Chamorro Reference Grammar.Honolulu:University Press of Hawaii.
43. Truscott, John(2000).The unity of nominal linking devices.Proceedings of the National Science Council, ROC. Part C: Humanities and Social Sciences,10,142-155.
44. Underhill, Robert(1976).Turkish Grammar.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
45. Welmers, William E.(1973).African Language Structures.Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.
46. Yallop, Colin(1982).Australian Aboriginal Languages.London:Andre Deutsch.

1. John Truscott(2004).OCCULT LINKING IN ENGLISH.臺灣語言學期刊,2(1),69-101.