英文摘要
|
This paper aims to examine English- and Japanese-speaking adult learners' acquisition of Subjacency^1 and the Empty Category Principle^2 (ECP) (Chomsky 1981, 1986) in Chinese. The participants were forty intermediate foreign students of the Mandarin Training Center of National Taiwan Normal University: half were native English speakers and half Japanese. In addition, there were twenty native controls. Two tasks (i.e., a preference task and an ordering task) were designed on the basis of the following properties concerning Subjacency and the ECP: wh-island constraints, complex NP constraints, sentential subject constraints, that-trace effects and subject/object asymmetries, and superiority effects. The results show that, except for the superiority effect, neither group of L2 learners carried their L1 knowledge to acquire Subjacency and the ECP, suggesting that L1 influence is not significant. Furthermore, it was found that the Japanese speakers did not perform significantly better than the English speakers. This shows that Universal Grammar is still available, since our participants have reset their L1 parameters to proper L2 values. In addition, among these features our participants did less well on non-superiority, and the native controls rejected island violations more strongly than either group of L2 participants. Finally, Subjacency and the ECP were found equally easy for our participants to acquire.
|
参考文献
|
-
Bley-Vroman, R. W.,S. W. Felix,G. L. Ioup.(1988).The accessibility of universal grammar in adult language learning.Second Language Research,4(1),1-32.
-
Chen, C.-Y. Doris.(1991).Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign dissertation.Urbana:
-
Chen, C.-Y. Doris,H.-Y. Candy Huang.(2001).Is it easy for CSL learners to acquire Subjacency and the ECP.Paper presented at the International Association of Chinese Linguistics 10th Annual Conference with NACCL-13,U.S.A.:
-
Chen, J.(1986).Hong Kong,the Chinese University of Hong Kong.
-
Cheng, L. R.(1994).'Say' and 'See' as Complementizers in Taiwanese and Taiwan Mandarin.Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Mandarin Teaching.
-
Chomsky, N.(1981).Lectures on Government and Binding.Dordrecht:Foris.
-
Chomsky, N.(1986).Barriers.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
-
Clahsen, H.,P. Muysken.(1986).The availability of universal grammar to adult and child learners: A study of the acquisition of German word order.Second Language Research,2,93-119.
-
Epstein, S.,S. Flynn,G. Martohardjono.(1996).Explanation in theories of second language acquisition.Behavioral and Brain Science,19(4),677-758.
-
Felix, S. W.,S. Flynn (eds.),W. O`Neil(1988).Linguistic Theory in Second Language Acquisition.Dordrecht:Kluwer.
-
Flynn, S.(1987).A Parameter-Setting Model of L2 Acquisition.Dordrecht:D. Reidel.
-
Gass, S.,L. Selinker.(1992).Language Transfer in Language Learning.Amsterdam:John Benjamin.
-
Huang, C.-T. James.(1982).MIT dissertation.Cambridge:
-
Huang, H.-Y. Candy.(1999).Taipei,National Taiwan Normal University MA thesis.
-
Johnson, J.,E. Newport.(1991).Critical period effects on universal properties of language: The status of Subjacency in the acquisition of a second language.Cognition,39,215-258.
-
Katada, F.(1991).The LF representation of anaphors.Linguistic Inquiry,22(2),287-313.
-
Li, C. N.,S. A. Thompson.(1981).Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar.Berkeley and Los Angeles:University of California Press.
-
Li, X.,S. Flynn (eds.),G. Martohardjono,W. O`Neil(1998).The Generative Study of Second Language Acquisition.New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc..
-
Martohardjono, G.(1993).Cornell University dissertation.Ithaca:
-
Martohardjono, G.,S. Flynn (eds.),G. Martohardjono,W. O`Neil.(1998).The Generative Study of Second Language Acquisition.New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc..
-
Otsu, Y.(1985).MIT dissertation.Cambridge:
-
Saito, M.(1985).MIT dissertation.Cambridge:
-
Sarma, J.(1992).niv. of Connecticut dissertation.Connecticut:
-
Schachter, J.(1988).Second language acquisition and its relationship to universal grammar.Applied Linguistics,9,219-236.
-
Schachter, J.,Gass, S. M. (eds.),J. Schachter.(1989).Linguistic Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
-
Schachter, J.,V. Yip.(1990).Why does anyone object to subject extraction.Studies in Second Language Acquisition,12,379-392.
-
Uziel, S.(1993).Resetting universal grammar parameters: Evidence from second language acquisition of Subjacency and the Empty Category principle.Second Language Research,9(1),49-83.
-
Vainikka, A,M. Young-Scholten.(1991).Theorie des Lexikons 4: Universal Grammar in Second-Language Acquisition.Universitat Dusseldorf:The Lexlern Project.
-
White, L.(1989).Universal Grammar and Second Language Acquisition.Amsterdam:John Benjamin.
-
White, L.,A. Juffs.,S. Flynn (eds.),G. Martohardjono,W. O`Neil.(1998).The Generative Study of Second Language Acquisition.New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
-
White, L.,F. Genesee.(1996).How native is near-native? The Issue of ultimate attainment in adult language acquisition.Second Language Research,11,233-265.
-
White, L.,H. Goodluck (eds.),M. Rochemont(1992).Island Constraints.Dordrecht:Kluwer.
-
White, L.,S. Flynn (eds.),W. O`Neil(1988).Linguistic Theory in Second Language Acquisition.Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic.
-
Yoshinaga, N.(1996).University of Hawaii dissertation.Manoa:
|