题名

Nominal Predicates in Mandarin Chinese

并列篇名

漢語的名詞謂語

DOI

10.6519/TJL.2007.5(2).4

作者

魏廷冀(Ting-Chi Wei)

关键词

名詞謂語 ; 偏正式 ; 修飾性謂語 ; 數量詞組 ; 無定名詞 ; nominal predicate ; modifier-modifiee ; modificational predication ; NumP ; indefinite

期刊名称

Taiwan Journal of Linguistics

卷期/出版年月

5卷2期(2007 / 12 / 01)

页次

85 - 130

内容语文

英文

中文摘要

本文重新檢視Tang (1998)的漢語「主要小句」分析,以期更能夠掌握漢語名詞謂語的實際運作。我們發現,漢語名詞謂語的結構可以是「光棍」名詞組或者是「非光棍」之投射;所有的名詞謂語皆呈現一種「修飾語-被修飾語」的偏正關係,並且與主語形成一種「修飾主謂關係」;整個主要小句的結構與一般句無異,是一種「非光棍」結構,而非Tang所主張的「光棍」結構。此外本文也支持,漢語有定/無定名詞組爲論元而非謂語之假設。

英文摘要

This article reconsiders Tang's (1998) analysis of Mandarin matrix small clauses (SC) in an attempt to get a heifer understanding of the structure of the Mandarin nominal predicate. It is found that the structures which the nominal predicate can take can be a bare NP or even not-so-bare projections. All the nominal predicates manifest a kind of modifier-modifiee pattern, which implements 'modificational predication' of the subject Thus, the matrix SC is structurally ”not-so-bare” rather than ”tare” Finally, the claim of Mandarin indefinite/definite DP as an argument, not a predicate is further strengthened in this work.

主题分类 人文學 > 語言學
参考文献
  1. Abney, Steve.(1987).MIT.
  2. Akmajian, A.(1970).MIT.
  3. Bowers, John.(1993).The syntax of predication.Linguistic Inquiry,24,591-656.
  4. Chao, Yuen-Ren.(1968).A grammar of spoken Chinese.Berkeley and Los Angeles:University of California Press.
  5. Cheng, Lisa L.-S.,Rint Sybesma.(1998).Yi-wan tang, yi-ge tang: Classifiers and massifiers.The Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies,28(3),385-412.
  6. Cheng, Lisa L.-S.,Rint Sybesma.(1999).Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP.Linguistic Inquiry,30(4),509-542.
  7. Chomsky, Noam.(1995).The minimalist program.Cambridge, Mass.:The MIT Press.
  8. Chomsky, Noam.,Kenneth Hale,Samuel Jay Keyser, (eds.)(1993).The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger.Cambridge, Mass.:The MIT Press.
  9. Croft, William.(1994).Semantic universals in classifier systems.Word,45,145-171.
  10. Davidson, Donald.,N. Rescher, (ed.)(1967).The logical of decision and action.Pittsburgh:University of Pittsburgh Press.
  11. Déchaine, Rose-Marie.(1993).University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
  12. Freeze, R.(1992).Existentials and other locatives.Language,68,553-596.
  13. Grimshaw, Jane.(1991).Extended projection.Ms., Brandeis University.
  14. Higginbotham, James.(1985).On semantics.Linguistic Inquiry,16,547-593.
  15. Higginbotham, James.,Eric J. Reuland,Alice G. B. ter Meulen, (eds.)(1987).The representation of (in)definite.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  16. Hornstein, Norbert,David Lightfoot.(1987).Predication and PRO.Language,63,23-52.
  17. Huang, C.-T. James.(1988).Shuo 'shi' he 'you' (On 'be' and 'have' in Chinese).The Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica,59(1),43-64.
  18. Iljic, Robert.(1994).Quantification in Mandarin Chinese: Two markers of plurality.Linguistics,32,91-116.
  19. Kitagawa, Yoshihisa.,William H. Eilfort,Paul D. Kroeber,Karen L. Peterson, (eds.)(1985).Papers from the General Session at the Twenty First Regional Meeting of Chicago Linguistics Society.Chicago:Chicago Linguistics Society.
  20. Kuroda, S.-Y.(1992).Japanese syntax and semantics: Collected papers.Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic.
  21. Laka, Itziar.(1992).On the syntax of negation.New York and London:Garland Publishing, Inc.
  22. Li, Yen-hui Audrey.(1998).Argument determiner phrases and number phrases.Linguistic Inquiry,29,693-702.
  23. Li, Yen-hui Audrey.,Yukinori Takubo, (ed.)(1999).Comparative syntax of Japanese, Korean, Chinese, and English.International Scientific Research program. Kyushu University.
  24. Longobardi, Giuseppe.(1994).Reference and proper names: A theory of N-movement in syntax and logical form.Linguistic Inquiry,25(4),609-665.
  25. Lü, Shuxiang.(1941).Key points in Chinese grammar.Beijing:Commercial Press.
  26. Lü, Shuxiang.(1980).800 words in modern Chinese.Beijing:Commercial Press.
  27. Nakayama, Mineharu.,Yukio Stsu (ed.)(1988).Mita Working Papers in Psycholinguistics.Tokyo:Mita Psycholinguistics Circle, Keio University.
  28. Paris, Marie-Claude.(1981).Problems of syntax and semantics in Chinese linguistics.Paris:College de France.
  29. Parsons, Terence.(1990).Events in the semantics of English: A study in subatomic semantics.Cambridge:The MIT Press.
  30. Rapoport, T.(1987).MIT.
  31. Ritter, Elizabeth.(1995).On the syntactic category of pronouns and agreement.Natural Language & Linguistic Theory,13,405-443.
  32. Rothstein, S.(1983).MIT.
  33. Rothstein, S.,A. Cardinaletti,T. Guasti (eds.)(1995).Small clauses and copular constructions.Small clauses, syntax and semantics,28
  34. Shi, Dingxu.(1994).The nature of Chinese emphatic sentences.Journal of East Asian Linguistics,3,81-100.
  35. Stowell, Tim.,Mark R. Baltin,Anthony S. Kroch, (eds.)(1989).Alternative conceptions of phrase structure.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  36. Stowell, Tim.,R. Freidin, (ed.)(1991).Principles and parameters in comparative grammar.Cambridge, Mass.:MIT Press.
  37. Stowell, Tim.,S. Rothstein, (ed.)(1991).The alignment of arguments in adjective phrases.Perspectives on phrase structure: Heads and licensing. Syntax and semantics,25
  38. Szabolcsi, Anna.,Ferenc Kiefer,Katalin Kiss, (eds.)(1994).Syntax and semantics 27: the syntactic structure of Hungarian.San Diego, Calif.:Academic Press.
  39. Szabolcsi, Anna.,I. Kenesei,Cs. Pleèh, (eds.)(1992).Approaches to Hungarian 4: the structure of Hungarian.Szeged:JATE.
  40. Szabolcsi, Anna.,Istvan Kenesei, (ed.)(1987).Functional categories in the noun phrase.Approaches to Hungarian,2,167-190.
  41. Tai, James,Lianqing Wang.(1990).A semantic study of the classifier tiao.Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association,25,35-56.
  42. Tang, Chih-Chen Jane.(1990).Cornell University.
  43. Tang, Sze-Wing.(2002).Economy principles and Chinese verbless sentence.Modern Foreign Languages,95,1-13.
  44. Tang, Sze-Wing.(2005).Paper presented at the Workshop on Theoretical East Asian Linguistics (TEAL-3).Harvard University.
  45. Tang, Sze-Wing.(2002).Some constraints on temporal predicative sentences in Chinese.Zhongguoyuwen,3(288),217-221.
  46. Tang, Sze-Wing.(2005).On the family of light categories in Chinese.Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Formal Linguistics,Changsha, China:
  47. Tang, Sze-Wing.(2001).The (non-)existence of gapping in Chinese and its implications for the theory of gapping.Journal of East Asian Linguistics,10,201-224.
  48. Tang, Sze-Wing.(1990).University of California, Irvine.
  49. Tang, Sze-Wing.,Gerhard Jäger,Anatoli Strigin,Chris Wilder,Niina Zhang, (eds.)(2000).Zur Tonbewegung des Vokals im gesprochenen und gesungenen einzelwort.ZAS Papers in Linguistics,22,159-172.
  50. Tang, Ting-Chi.(1979).Studies in Chinese syntax.Taipei:Student Book Company.
  51. Travis, Lisa.(1984).MIT.
  52. Travis, Lisa.(1988).The syntax of adverbs.McGill working papers in linguistics: special issue on comparative Germanic syntax.
  53. Wei, Ting-Chi.(2004).National Kaohsiung Normal University.
  54. Yue-Hashimoto, Anne.,John W.M. Verhaar, (ed.)(1969).The verb 'be' and its synonyms.Dordrecht:D. Reidel.
  55. Zhu, Dexi.(1982).Lectures on grammar.Beijing:Commercial Press.
被引用次数
  1. (2020).Plurality and definiteness in Chengdu Chinese.語言暨語言學,21(4),652-684.