Minding Our Words: Audio Responsibilities in Endangered Languages Documentation and Archiving

10.6519/TJL.2008.6(2).3

David Nathan

Taiwan Journal of Linguistics

6卷2期（2008 / 12 / 01）

59 - 77

英文

Linguists are addressing the predicted the loss of many of the world's languages through an emerging discipline called Language Documentation, which focuses not on theory but on data, and how the data is acquired, represented, presented, and preserved. For most endangered languages, which are not written, much of this data is audio, and unlike many corpora it is likely to be local, particular, opportunistic, and uneven. New questions are raised, such as: what audio data counts as a record of a language that is likely to disappear? how can coverage and quality be measured? for what purposes and by whom will the data be used? For those of us documenting languages, there are four key audio-related issues: audio quality, its accompanying symbolic data, the usage of data for practical purposes such as language revitalisation, and the need for enhanced sensitivities and protocol in audio access and distribution. Language Documentation has benefited from the knowledge and experience of other disciplines, but perhaps it is now sufficiently experienced to offer some useful advice to others. This paper surveys these issues, and also describes the funding, teaching, archiving and publishing activities of the Endangered Languages Project at SOAS.

1. Austin, Peter,Grenoble, Lenore.(2006).Paper presented at GURT 2006 (Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics).Washington:
2. Bird, Steven,Simons, Gary.(2003).Seven dimensions of portability for language documentation and description.Language,79,557-582.
3. Csató. Éva Á.,Nathan, David.,Peter K. Austin (ed.)(2007).Language Documentation and Description.London:SOAS.
4. Dobrin, Lise,Austin, Peter,Nathan, David.,Peter Austin,Oliver Bond,David Nathan (eds)(2007).Dying to be counted: commodification of endangered languages in documentary linguistics.Proceedings of the Conference on Language Documentation and Linguistic Theory
5. Gippert, Jost,Himmelmann, Nikolaus,Mosel, Ulrike (eds.)(2006).Essentials of language documentation (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs, 178).Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter.
6. Grinevald, Colette.,Austin, Peter (ed.)(2003).Language Documentation and Description.London:SOAS.
7. Himmelmann, Nikolaus.,Jost Gippert (eds.)(2006).Language documentation: What is it and what is it good for.
8. Johnson, Heidi,Dwyer, Arienne.(2002).Customizing the IMDI Metadata Schema for Endangered Languages.Proceedings of LREC.
9. Krauss, M.(1992).The world`s languages in crisis.Language,68,6-10.
10. The Third meeting of the Digital Endangered Languages and Music Archive Network (DELAMAN III), Austin
11. Nathan, David.,Jost Gippert (eds.)(2006).Thick interfaces: Mobilizing language documentation with multimedia.
12. Nathan, David,Austin, Peter.,Peter Austin (ed)(2005).Language Description and Documentation.London:SOAS.
13. Nathan, David,Fang Meili.,Tjeerd de Graff,Nicholas Ostler,Reinier Salverda (eds)(2008).Proceedings of FEL XII: Endangered Languages and Language Learning.Bath: FEL & Leeuwarden: The Fryske Academy:
14. Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS)
15. Thieberger, Nicholas.,Peter Austin (ed)(2004).Language documentation and description.London:SOAS.
16. Wittenburg, Peter,Mosel, Ulrike,Dwyer, Arienne.(2002).Methods of Language Documentation in the DOBES Program.Proceedings of LREC 2002.