PREFACE--Stance Phenomena in Chinese: Diachronic, Discourse and Processing Perspectives

10.6519/TJL.2010.8(2).i

Foong-Ha Yap；Caesar Suen Lun

Taiwan Journal of Linguistics

8卷2期（2010 / 09 / 01）

1 - 12

英文

1. Yeung, Kawaii Ka-Wai(2006).On the status of the complementizer waa6 in Cantonese.Taiwan Journal of Linguistics,4(1),1-48.
   連結：
2. Cai, Xiao-Chun(2010).Chinese University of Hong Kong.
3. Chan, Marjorie K.M.(1996).Gender-marked speech in Cantonese: the case of sentence-final particles je and jek.Studies in the Linguistic Sciences,26(1/2),1-38.
4. Cheung, Antonio Ki-Shun(2006).University of Hong Kong.
5. Chor, Winnie Oi-Wan(2010).University of Sydney.
6. Chor, Winnie Oi-Wan.To appear. From non-subjective to subjective to inter-subjective –a pathway of semantic change in grammaticalization: the case of faan in Cantonese.Grammar in cross-linguistic perspectives: the syntax, semantics and pragmatics of Japanese, Chinese and English
7. Chui, Ka-Wai(1994).Grammaticalization of the saying verb waa in Cantonese.Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics,5,1-12.
8. Clayman, Steven E.,Heritage, John C.(2002).The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air.New York:Cambridge University Press.
9. Clayman, Steven E.,Heritage, John C.(2002).Questioning presidents: journalistic deference and adversarialness in the press conferences of U.S. presidents Eisenhower and Reagan.Journal of Communication,52(4),749-775.
10. Englebretson, Robert(2003).Searching for Structure: the Problem of Complementation in Colloquial Indonesian Conversation.Amsterdam:John Benjamins.
11. Englebretson, Robert (ed.)(2007).Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction.Amsterdamn:John Benjamins.
12. Fischer, Kerstin(2005).Approaches to Discourse Particles.Amsterdam:Elsevier.
13. Fung, Rosanna Suk-Yee(2000).The Ohio State University.
14. Goffman, Erving(1981).Forms of talk.Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press.
15. Hasegawa, Yoko(2006).Embedded soliloquy and affective stances in Japanese.Emotive Communication in Japanese
16. Hawkins, John A.(1994).A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
17. Higashiizumi, Yuko(2006).From a Subordinate Clause to an Independent Clause.Tokyo:Hituzi Syobo Publishing.
18. Horie, Kaoru,Shimura, Miya,Pardeshi, Prashant(2006).Overt anaphoric expressions, empathy, and the uchi-soto distinction: A contrastive perspective.Emotivec Communication in Japanese
19. Jiang, Hao-Wen(2010).Appearances are not skin deep: a preliminary study of de yangzhiin Chinese.1st International Symposium on Chinese Language and Discourse,Los Angeles:
20. Kwok, Helen(1984).Sentence Particles in Cantonese.Hong Kong:Centre of Asian Studies, University of Hong Kong.
21. Langacker, Ronald W.(1991).Foundations of Cognitive Grammar Vol. 2.Stanford, Calif.:Stanford University Press.
22. Law, Sam-Po(1990).Boston University.
23. Lee-Wong, Song-Mei(1998).Face support – Chinese particles as mitigators: a study of ba, a/ya and ne.Pragmatics,8(3),387-404.
24. Leung, Chung-Sum(1992).Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
25. Leung, Wai-Mun(2006).University of Hong Kong.
26. Li, Cherry Ing(1999).Utterance-Final Particles in Taiwanese: A Discourse-Pragmatic Analysis.Taipei:The Crane Publishing Corporation.
27. Lin, Jonah T.H.(2005).Graduate Institute of Linguistics, National Tsing Hua University.
28. Lu, Louis Wei-Lun,Su, Lily I-wen(2009).Lu, Louis Wei-Lun & Lily I-wen Su. 2009. Speech in interaction: Mandarin particle le as a marker of intersubjectivity. Manuscript, National Taiwan University, Taipei..
29. Lu, Wen-Ying(2005).Urbana-Champaign,University of Illinois.
30. Luke, Kang-Kwong(1990).Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation.Amsterdam:John Benjamins.
31. Matthews, Stephen(1998).Evidentiality and mirativity in Cantonese: wo3, wo4, wo5!.Proceedings of the International Symposium on Chinese Languages and Linguistics
32. Matthews, Stephen,Yeung, Louisa Y.Y.(2001).Processing motivations for topicalization in Cantonese.Cognitive-Functional Linguistics in an East Asian Context,Tokyo:
33. Rhee, Seongha(2010).Rhee, Seongha. 2010. Silence as ellipsis: On the emergence of Korean markers of consensus. Manuscript, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Seoul, Korea..
34. Schiffrin, Deborah(1987).Discourse Markers.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
35. Shibasaki, Reijirou(2009).On the grammaticalization of unexpectedness in the languages of Japan.Current Issues in Linguistic Interfaces, Vol. 1,Seoul:
36. Simpson, Andrew,Wu, Zoe Xiu-Zhi(2002).IP-raising, tone sandhi and the creation of particles: Evidence for cyclic spell-out.Journal of East Asian Linguistics,11(1),1-45.
37. Suzuki, Satoko(ed.)(2006).Emotive Communication in Japanese.
38. Tang, Sze-Wing(2009)。粵語句末助詞「罷啦」及其框式結構。粵語跨學科研究：第十三屆國際粵方言研討會論文集，Hong Kong:
39. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs(2003).From Subjectification to intersubjectification.Motives for Language Change,Cambridge:
40. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs(1995).Subjectification in grammaticalization.Subjectivity and Subjectivisation,Cambridge:
41. Van den Berg, Marinus,Wu, Guo(2006).The Chinese Particle le: Discourse Construction and Pragmatic Marking in Chinese [Routledge Studies in Asian Linguistics].London:Routledge.
42. Wang, Jiao,Yap, Foong-Ha(2009)。A study of negator bu (不) as interrogative sentence final particle in Chinese。42nd International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics，Chiang Mai:
43. Wang, Yu-Fang,Katz, Aya,Chen, Chih-Hua(2003).Thinking as saying: shuo (‗say‘) in Taiwan Mandarin conversation and BBS talk.Language Sciences,25(5),457-488.
44. Wang, Yu-Fang,Tsai, Pi-Hua(2005).Hao in spoken Chinese discourse: Relevance and coherence.Journal of Pragmatics,42,215-243.
45. Wang, Yu-Fang,Tsai, Pi-Hua,Ling, Meng-Ying(2007).From emotional to emotive use: meiyou (‗no) as a discourse marker in Taiwan Mandarin conversation.Discourse Studies,9(5),677-701.
46. Wang, Yu-Fang,Tsai, Pi-Hua,Yang, Ya-Ting(2007).Objectivity, subjectivity and intersubjectivity: Evidence from qishi (‗actually‘) and shishishang (‗in fact‘) in spoken Chinese.Language Sciences,27,705-727.
47. Wu, Ruey-Jiuan Regina(2004).Stanace in Talk: A Conversation Analysis of Mandarin Final Particles.Amsterdam:John Benjamins.
48. Wu, Xiu-Zhi Zoe(2004).Grammaticalization and Language Change in Chinese: A Formal View [Routledge Studies in Asian Linguistics].London:RoutledgeCurzon.
49. Xing, Zhiqun Janet(2006).Mechanism of semantic change in Chinese.Studies in Language,30(3),461-483.
50. Xu, Hui-Ling,Matthews, Stephen.On the polyfunctionality and grammaticalization of the morpheme KAI in the Chaozhou dialect.Nominalization in Asian Languages: Diachronic and Typological Perspectives,Amsterdam:
51. Yap, Foong Ha,Matthews, Stephen(2008).The development of nominalizers in East Asian and Tibeto-Burman languages.Rethinking Grammaticalization: New Perspectives,Amsterdam:
52. Yap, Foong-Ha,Choi, Pik-ling,Cheung, Kam-Siu(2010).De-lexicalizing di3: How a Chinese locative noun has evolved into an attitudinal nominalizer.Formal Evidence in Grammaticalization Research,Amsterdam:
53. Yap, Foong-Ha,Wang, Jiao.From light noun to nominalizer: The grammaticalization of zhe and suo in Old and Middle Chinese.Nominalization in Asian Languages: Diachronic and Typological Perspectives,Amsterdam:
54. Yap, Foong-Ha,Wang, Jiao,Chor, Winnie Oi-Wan(2010)。From lexical verb ‗fear‘ to epistemic adverbial ‗perhaps, maybe, possibly‘: On the grammaticalization of Malay kut (< takut ‗fear‘), Mandarin kong3 pa4 (恐怕) and Cantonese tai2 pa3 (睇怕)。the 2010 Annual Research Forum of the Linguistic Society of Hong Kong
55. Yau, Shun-Chiu(1965).The University of Hong.
56. Yiu, Carine Yuk-Man(2001).Hong Kong,University of Science and Technology.