The Role of Force in Mandarin Verbs of Cutting

漢語切類相關動詞之實證探究

10.6519/TJL.2015.13(2).1

蕭惠貞(S. Hui-Chen Hsiao)

切類動詞 ； 範疇 ； 力道 ； 動補結構分布 ； verbs of cutting ； categorization ； FORCE ； VC complementarity

Taiwan Journal of Linguistics

13卷2期（2015 / 06 / 01）

1 - 30

英文

本文探究切類相關動詞的語義內涵。主要的研究目標是探究語義特徵「力道」是否該納入在某些漢語切類動詞的語義本質上。研究內容包含十個常用「切」概念的動詞，如「切、削、剁、割、砍、剖、雕、劈、刻、剪」等，透過線上問卷實驗與語料庫分析，本研究結果顯示（1）母語者最常使用的四個分類依據，分別是「工具」、「(藝術)精細化」、「力道」、和「結果（一分為二）」；（2）「劈、砍、剁」三個動詞為母語者認為最常與語義元素「力道」相關的切類動詞；（3）語料庫的分析結果支持本研究關於「動補結構互補分佈」之假設。結果呈現動詞「砍」常與補語「斷」共現；另外，「剁」與「碎」常共現，而力道大的動詞「劈」則較常與補語「開」（一分為二）出現。本研究結果不但支持以使用基礎頻率為本的語言理論觀（BarlowandKemmer2000），且亦能對漢語動補的常用結合關係，提供不同的分析結果與建議。

This study explores the semantic meaning of verbs of cutting in Mandarin; it also investigates whether the semantic component FORCE should be included in the denotation for distinguishing the fine-grained meanings among Mandarin verbs, including ＂diāo, qiē, xuè(xiāo), duò, gē, kǎn, kē, jiǎn, pī and pǒ＂, broadly subsumed under the category of the CUT action events in English. To probe this issue, an on-line questionnaire was used along with a corpus-based analysis of cutting verbs with the following results. Firstly, the most commonly-used implicit categories that Mandarin native speakers use are INSTRUMENT, FORCE, DELICATENESS, and RESULT (SEPARATION). Secondly, based on the frequency of the participants' chosen words on FORCE-related items, kǎn (100%), duò (89%) and pī (86%) are the top three verbs used with respect to the semantic feature of FORCE. Lastly, the corpus analysis supports the hypothesis of V-C complementary distribution in native speakers' usage. The preliminary findings support the usage-based view of language (Barlow and Kemmer 2000) and can shed light on the cognitive constraint that implicitly and regularly appears in speakers' resultative compound usages.

1. Pye, Clifton. 1994. Breaking Concepts: Constraining Predicate Argument Structure. Unpublished manuscript. Department of Linguistics, Univ. of Kansas.
2. Ameka, Felix K.,Essegbey, James(2007).CUT and BREAK verbs and the causative/inchoative alternation in Ewe.Cognitive Linguistics,18(2),241-250.
3. Arsenijević, B.(ed.),Gehrke, B.(ed.),Marín, R.(ed.)(2013).Subatomic Semantics of Event Predicates.Dordrecht:Springer.
4. Barlow, Michael,Kemmer, Suzanne(2000).Usage-Based Models of Language.Stanford:CSLI Publications.
5. Bohnemeyer, Jürgen(2007).Morpholexical transparency and the argument structure of verbs of cutting and breaking.Cognitive Linguistics,18(2),153-177.
6. Chen, Jidong(2007).'He cut-break the rope': Encoding and categorizing cutting and breaking events in Mandarin.Cognitive Linguistics,18(2),273-285.
7. Chen, Liang,Guo, Jiansheng(2009).Motion events in Chinese novels: Evidence for an equipollently-framed language.Journal of Pragmatics,41,1749-1766.
8. Doron, E.(ed.),Hovav, M. Rappaport(ed.),Sichel, I.(ed.)(2010).Syntax, Lexical Semantics, and Event Structure.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
9. Doron, E.(ed.),Rappaport Hovav, M.(ed.),Sichel, I.(ed.)(2010).Syntax, Lexical Semantics, and Event Structure.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
10. Enfield, N.J.(2007).Lao separation verbs and the logic of linguistic event categorization.Cognitive Linguistics,18(2),287-296.
11. Essegbey, James(2007).CUT and BREAK verbs in Sranan.Cognitive Linguistics,18(2),231-239.
12. Gaby, Alice(2007).Describing cutting and breaking events in Kuuk Thaayorre.Cognitive Linguistics,18(2),263-272.
13. Gao, Hong(2001).The Physical Foundation of the Patterning of Physical Action Verbs: A Study of Chinese Verbs.Lund University Press.
14. Gao, Hong,Cheng, Chin-Chuan(2003).Verbs of contact by impact in English and their equivalents in Mandarin Chinese.Language and Linguistics,4(3),485-508.
15. Guerssel, M.,Hale, K.,Laughren, M.,Levin, B.,Eagle, J. W.(1985).A cross-linguistic study of transitivity alternations.Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS 21(2)), the Parasession on Causatives and Agentivity,Chicago, Illinois:
16. Jacobs, Roderick(ed.),Rosenbaum, Peter(ed.)(1967).Readings in English Transformational Grammar.Waltham, MA:Ginn.
17. Koenig, J.,Mauner, G.,Bienvenue, B.,Conklin, K.(2008).What with? The anatomy of a (proto)-role.Journal of Semantics,25(2),175-220.
18. Levin, Beth(1993).English Verb Classes and Alternations.Chicago:Chicago University Press.
19. Levin, Beth,Hovav, M. Rappaport(1995).Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
20. Levinson, Stephen C.(ed.),Enfield, N.J.(ed.)(2001).Manual for the field season 2001.Nijmegen:Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
21. Lüpke, Friederike(2007).'Smash it again, Sam': Verbs of cutting and breaking in Jalonke.Cognitive Linguistics,18(2),251-261.
22. Majid, Asifa,Boster, James,Bowerman, Melissa(2008).The cross-linguistic categorization of everyday events: A study of cutting and breaking.Cognition,109(2),235-250.
23. Majid, Asifa,Bowerman, Melissa,Van Staden, Miriam,Boster, James S.(2007).The semantic categories of cutting and breaking events: A cross-linguistic perspective.Cognitive Linguistics,18(2),133-152.
24. Majid, Asifa,Gullberg, M.,Van Staden, M.,Bowerman, Melissa(2007).How similar are semantic categories in closely related languages? A comparison of cutting and breaking in four Germanic languages.Cognitive Linguistics,18(2),179-194.
25. Næss, Åshild(2012).Cutting and breaking in Ä iwoo: Event integration and the complexity of lexical expressions.Cognitive Linguistics,23(2),395-420.
26. Narasimhan, Bhuvana(2007).Cutting, breaking, and tearing verbs in Hindi and Tamil.Cognitive Linguistics,18(2),195-206.
27. O'Connor, L.(2007).Chop, shred, snap apart': Verbs of cutting and breaking in Lowland Chontal.Cognitive Linguistics,18(2),219-230.
28. Rudzka-Ostyn, B.(ed.)(1988).Topics in Cognitive Linguistics.Philadelphia:John Benjamins.
29. Shopen, T.(ed.)(1985).Language Typology and Lexical Description: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
30. Strömqvist, S.(ed.),Verhoeven, L.(ed.)(2004).Relating Events in Narrative: Typological and Contextual Perspectives.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31. Tai, James H-Y.(2003).Cognitive relativism: Resultative construction in Chinese.Language and Linguistics,4(2),301-316.
32. Talmy, Leonard(2000).Toward a Cognitive Semantics.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
33. Taylor, John R.(2007).Semantic categories of cutting and breaking: Some final thoughts.Cognitive Linguistics,18(2),331-337.
34. Van Staden, Miriam(2007).Please open the fish: Verbs of separation in Tidore, a Papuan language of Eastern Indonesia.Cognitive Linguistics,18(2),297-306.