CHANGE OF IDEOLOGIES OF MACAO IN THE POST-HANDOVER PERIOD: A CORPUS-BASED DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF MACAO'S POLICY ADDRESSES

後回歸時期澳門意識形態的變遷：澳門施政報告的基於語料庫話語分析

10.6519/TJL.202001_18(1).0001

林雪儀(LAM SUT I)

Macao ； policy address ； discourse analysis ； ideologies ； corpus ； 澳門 ； 施政報告 ； 話語分析 ； 意識形態 ； 語料庫

Taiwan Journal of Linguistics

18卷1期（2020 / 01 / 01）

1 - 30

英文

Policy addresses are important governmental documents that convey the government's policies and publicize the government's work plan set for the coming year, and at the same time, carry important information about social and economic developments. This paper studies the policy addresses of Macao SAR in the post-handover period from 2000 to 2017. It aims at investigating how the linguistic configurations reflect the ideologies constructed by the government in the post-handover period. With a corpus-assisted methodology, this paper applies discourse analysis to the investigation of the policy addresses given by the two chief executives of the four different terms of the Macao SAR government. The analysis shows that the diction in the policy addresses reflects the changes in the development of Macao and in the relationship between the government and the audience in the investigated period. It is argued that a corpus-assisted investigation can reveal how discourse is shaped by social practice and how discourse is used to help construct ideologies.

施政報告為澳門重要的政府文件，用以展示政府來年的工作計劃，同時，亦傳遞關於社會及經濟發展的重要資訊。本文調查澳門主權回歸以後，特區政府由二零零零年至二零一七年間頒布的施政報告，旨在分析施政報告中的語言建構及其所反映政府於此時間所建構的社會意識形態。本文結合基於語料庫的研究方法，對特區政府成立以來，由兩名行政長官管治的四屆政府（合共十七年）的施政報告作話語分析。結果顯示施政報告的語言建構反映了在調查時期，澳門的社會發展變化，以及社會與政府的關係變化，以此說明基於語料庫的研究方法有助反映如何利用話語，於特定社會環境，建構特定社會意識形態。

1. Agnieszka, S.(2013).A critical discourse approach to the analysis of values in political discourse: The example of freedom in President Bush's State of the Union addresses (2001–2008).Discourse and Society,24(6),792-809.
2. Baker, P.(2006).Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis.London:Continuum.
3. Baker, P.(2009).The BE06 corpus of British English and recent language change.International Journal of Corpus Linguistics,14(3),312-337.
4. Baker, P.(2004)."Unnatural acts": discourses of homosexuality within the House of Lords debates on gay male law reform’.Journal of Sociolinguistics,8(1),88-106.
5. Baldry, A.(2000).Multimodality and multimediality in the distance learning age.Campobasso:Palladino.
6. Fairclough, N.,Wodak, R.(1997).Critical Discourse Analysis.Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction,London:
7. Gee, J. P.(2010).Introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method.London:Routledge.
8. Halliday, M.A.K.(1994).An Introduction to functional grammar.London:Arnold.
9. Hardt-Mautner, G.(1995).How does one become a good European: The British press and European integration.Discourse and Society,6(2),177-205.
10. Hardt-Mautner, G.(2000).Der britische Europa-Diskurs: Methodenreflexion und Fallstudien zur Berichterstattung in der Tagespresse.Wien:Passagen-Verlag.
11. Jaworski, A.,Coupland, N.(1999).Introduction: Perspectives on discourse analysis.The Discourse Reader,London:
12. Jones, R. H.(2012).Discourse Analysis: A resource book for students.Abingdon, Oxon:Routledge.
13. Koller, V.,Mautner, G.(2004).Computer applications in critical discourse analysis.Applying English Grammar: Corpus and Functional Approaches,London:
14. O’Halloran, K.,Coffin, C.(2004).Checking overinterpretation and underinterpretation: help from corpora in critical linguistics.Applying English Grammar: Corpus and Functional Approaches,London:
15. Oakes, M.(1998).Statistics for corpus linguistics.Edinburgh:Edinburgh University Press.
16. Orpin, D.(2005).Corpus linguistics and critical discourse analysis: Examining the ideology of sleaze.International Journal of Corpus Linguistics,10(1),37-61.
17. Paltridge, B.(2012).Discourse Analysis.London:Bloomsbury.
18. Qian,Tian(2014).A decade of change in China: A corpus-based discourse analysis of ten government work reports.Discourse, politics and media in contemporary China,Amsterdam:
19. Schiffrin, D.(1994).Approaches to discourse.Oxford:Blackwell.
20. Schiffrin, D.(ed.),Tannen, D.(ed.),Hailton, H.(ed.)(2003).The Handbook of discourse analysis.Oxford:Blackwell Publishers.
21. Scott, M.(1999).WordSmith tools help manual.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
22. Sotillo, S. M.,Wang-Gempp, J.(2004).Using corpus linguistics to investigate class, ideology, and discursive practices in online political discussions.Applied corpus linguistics: A multidimensional perspective,Amsterdam:
23. Stubbs, M.(2001).Words and phrases: Corpus studies of lexical semantics.Oxford:Blackwell.
24. Stubbs, M.(1996).Text and Corpus Analysis.London:Blackwell.
25. Wales, K.(1996).Personal pronouns in present-day English.Cambridge, Great Britain:Cambridge University Press.
26. Widdowson, H. G.(2000).On the limitations of linguistics applied.Applied Linguistics,21(1),3-25.
27. Williams, R.(1983).Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society.New York:Oxford University Press.
28. 于成鲲, C.(2004)。政府工作報告的文體特點。廣播電視大學學報（哲學社會科學版），128(1)，42-44。
29. 王加林, J.,李玉坤, Y.(2013)。回歸前後香港政府施政報告内容分析的對比研究。廣東外語外貿大學學報，24(4)，88-91。