模擬失敗為治理成功之母？FishBanks情境模擬教學應用於公共資源困境之啟示

Failure in Simulation Teaches Successful Governance? An Inspiration from Implementing FishBanks Situational Simulation Teaching on Learning about the Predicament of Governing the Commons

10.6555/JEER.15.2.121

蕭人瑄(Jen-Shiuan Shiau)；吳宗憲(Chuang-Hsien Wu)；王順美(Shun-Mei Wang)

FishBanks ； 共有資源治理 ； 情境模擬教學 ； 談判學 ； FishBanks ； governing the commons ； situational simulation teaching ； negotiation

環境教育研究

15卷2期（2019 / 12 / 01）

121 - 165

繁體中文

當前全球化下的環境治理困境已愈發嚴酷，其中最急迫且規模最大的議題之一，便是「共有資源的治理困境」，但過去環境治理教學卻在解決此類問題上有其侷限。本文提議將情境模擬教學作為解決此類困境的方法，在梳理了情境模擬教學的精神、執行步驟以及評估方法後，進一步使用FishBanks遊戲作為模擬的情境。研究發現，情境模擬的失敗反而造成共有資源治理的環境教育的成功，一方面，或許因為失敗的挫折，反而能夠加深參與成員深刻的印象，因此提升教學「遊戲化」、「問題導向學習」及透過「仿真」或「同構」促成體驗反省的效果。另一方面，在模擬失敗的過程中，理論研究者也能夠透過決策過程的歸納，蒐集到過去共有資源治理理論中，未涉獵到的有效治理共有資源的談判決策關鍵點。在建構更豐富的共有資源談判理論外，也能協助發展出更多環境教育中實際談判的決策情境。

In the face of globalization, the predicament of environmental governance has become worse. One of the most urgent and biggest issues is ＂the predicament of governing the commons＂. The environmental governance teaching implemented in the past has shown some limits on resolving such problem. This study proposes that the situational simulation teaching can possibly provide a way out. The study sorted out the meaning of the situational simulation teaching, the procedure of implementation as well as the evaluation methods. Afterwards, the FishBanks simulation game was used to create the scenario for the situational simulation teaching. It has been found that while the game ended up with the renewable resources depletion (the tragedy of the commons), it brought up a successful result in terms of teaching about governing the commons in environmental education field. This is because, on one hand, the frustration of failing the resources in the game might have deepened the participants' impression of the game experiences and further enhanced the learning efficiency through ＂gamification＂ and ＂problem-based learning＂ and encouraged reflection through ＂simulation＂ or ＂isomorphy＂; on the other hand, through induction, the researchers were able to investigate the process of failure simulation to see the critical points, which were not noticed in the past, of influencing the negotiation and decision-making in terms of effective governance of the commons. These findings can not only be used for enriching the construction of negotiation theories towards common resources, but also to developing more decision-making situations and creating more practical experiences for teaching and learning negotiation in environmental education field.

1. 宋如瑜, J.-Y.(2008)。反思性模擬教學—銜接理論與實踐的華語師資培育策略。中原華語語文學報，2，179-203。
   連結：
2. 洪振方, J.-F.,林裕仁, U.-L.,魏子婷, T.-T.(2010)。專精教師與生手教師經營論證教學的分析與比較。科學教育學刊，18(3)，205-227。
   連結：
3. 孫同文, T.-W.(2002)。公共行政理論與實務之發展：一個全球化的觀點。中國地方自治，55(3)，4-20。
   連結：
4. Asal, V.,Blake, E.(2006).Creating simulations for political science education.Journal of Political Science Education,2,1-18.
5. Bridge, D.(2013).The settlement game: A simulation teaching institutional theories of public law.PS: Political Science & Politics,46(4),813-817.
6. Carrell, M. R.,Heavrin, C.(2008).Negotiating essentials: Theory, skills, and practices.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson/Prentice Hall.
7. Cunningham, B.(1997).Experiential learning in public administration education.Journal of Public Administration Education,3(2),219-227.
8. Eisenhardt, K. M.,Graebner, M. E.(2007).Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges.Academy of Management Journal,50(1),25-32.
9. Elliott, M.,Hanke, R.(2003).Framing effect in toxic disputes: Cross-case analysis.Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts: Concepts and cases,Washington, DC:
10. Elliott, M.,Kaufman, S.,Gardner, R.,Burgess, G.(2002).Teaching conflict assessment and frame analysis through interactive web-based simulations.The International Journal of Conflict Manage,13(4),320-341.
11. Gardner, R.,Burgess, G.(2003).Analysis of Colorado growth conflict frames.Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts: Concepts and cases,Washington, DC:
12. Gladwin, C. H.(1989).Ethnographic decision tree modeling.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
13. Glasgow, S. M.(2014).Stimulating learning by simulating politics: Teaching simulation design in the undergraduate context.International Studies Perspectives,15,525-537.
14. Grummel, J. A.,College, M.(2003).Using simulation to teach decision-making within the policy process.PS: Political Science and Politics,36(4),787-789.
15. Hill, M.,Kavetski, D.,Clark, M.,Ye, M.,Arabi, M.,Lu, D.,Foglia, L.,Mehl, S.(2015).Practical use of computationally frugal model analysis methods.Groundwater,54(2),159-170.
16. Lantis, J. S.(1998).Simulations and experiential learning in the international relations classroom.International Negotiation,3(1),19.
17. Lewicki, R. J.,Saunders, D. M.,Minton, J. W.(1999).Essentials of negotiation.Chicago:Irwin.
18. Lewicki, R.,Kaufman, S.,Wiethoff, C.,Davis, C.(2003).Comparing water cases.Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts: Concepts and cases,Washington, DC:
19. Matallaoui, A.,Hanner, N.,Zarnekow, R.(2016).Introduction to gamification: Foundation and underlying theories.Gamification using game elements in serious contexts,New York:
20. Meadows, D. L.(2004).FishBanks, Ltd. game administrator’s manual (Version 8.02).Durham, NH:Laboratory for Interactive Learning.
21. Miles, M. B.,Huberman, M.(1994).Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook.Thousand Oaks:Sage Publications.
22. Ostrom, E.(1990).Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
23. Robyn, D.(1998).Teaching public management: The case for (and against) cases.International Journal of Public Administration,21(6-8),1141-1146.
24. Scheiner, C.,Haas, P.,Bretschneider, U.,Blohm, I.,Leimeister, J.(2016).Obstacles and challenges in the use of gamification for virtual idea communities.Gamification using game elements in serious contexts,New York:
25. Siegel, G. B.(1977).Gaming simulation in the teaching of public personnel administration.Public Personnel Management,6(4),236-249.
26. Siemon, D.,Eckardt, L.(2016).Gamification of teaching in higher education.Gamification using game elements in serious contexts,New York:
27. Siggelkow, N.(2007).Persuasion with case studies.Academy of Management Journal,50(1),20-24.
28. Simpson, A. W.,Kaussler, B.(2009).IR teaching reloaded: Using films and simulations in the teaching of international relations.International Studies Perspectives,10,413-427.
29. Starkey, B.,Boyer, M. A.,Wilkenfeld, J.(2005).Negotiating a complex world.Lanham, MD:Rowman & Littlefield.
30. Stieglitz, S.,Lattemann, C.,Robra-Bissantz, S.,Zarnekow, R.,Brockmann, T.(2016).Gamification using game elements in serious contexts,New York:
31. Trapp, J. N.,Peel, D. S.,Ward, C. E.(1995).Evaluating the effectiveness of role playing simulation and other methods in teaching managerial skills.Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Exercises,22,116-123.
32. Valli, L.(1997).Listening to other voices: A description of teacher reflection in the United States.Peabody Journal of Education,72(1),67-88.
33. Van der Heijden, K.(1996).Scenarios: the art of strategic conversation.New Jersey:John Wiley & Sons.
34. Watkins, M. D.(2007).Teaching students to shape the game: Negotiation architecture and the design of manageably dynamic simulations.Negotiation Journal,23(3),333-342.
35. Wiek, A.,Withycombe, L.,Redman, C. L.(2011).Key competencies in sustainability: A reference framework for academic program development.Sustainability Science,6,203-218.
36. Williamson, O. E.(1996).The mechanisms of governance.New York:Oxford University Press.
37. Yin, R. K.(1984).Case study research: Design and methods.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
38. 江明修, M.-H.(1993)。危機與重建：公共行政教育之省思。政治大學學報，66，21-45。
39. 孟憲愷, X.-K.(1996).微格教學基本教程.北京=Beijing:北京師範大學出版社=Beijing Normal University Publishing Group.
40. 高玉清, Y.-C.(2011)。從需求視角：完善《商務談判》課程模擬教學與實踐。吉林省經濟管理幹部學院學報，25(4)，120-122。
41. 張芬芬（譯）, F.-F.(trans.)Miles, M. B.,Huberman, M.(2005).質性研究資料分析.臺北=Taipei:雙葉書廊=Yeh Yeh Book Gollery.
42. 張瑞娟, R.-J.(2018)。公共管理類課程情境模擬教學模式的探索與實踐。內蒙古財經大學學報，16(3)，107-112。
43. 張鐵軍（譯）, T.-C.(trans.),Lewicki, R. J.,Saunders, D. M.,Minton, J. W.(2001).談判學.臺北=Taipei:華泰文化事業公司=Hwa Tai Publishing.
44. 陳志瑋, C.-W.(2013)。情境模擬教學之設計與運作：以行政學課程為例。T&D 飛訊，170，1-34。
45. 陸建豪（譯）, C.-H.(trans.),Van der Heijden, K.(1999).預演未來：數位時代組織的應變策略規劃.臺北=Taipei:商周出版=Business Weekly.
46. 黃丹力（譯）, D.-L.(trans.),Carrell, M. R.,Heavrin, C.(2010).談判新時代：談判要領之理論、技巧於實踐.臺北=Taipei:學富文化=Por-Ed Publising.
47. 楊恆達（譯）, H.-D.(trans.),Dolan, J. P.(1996).成功談判的秘訣.臺北=Taipei:業強出版=Yeh Chyang Publishing.
48. 劉雪明, X.-M.(2011)。情景模擬法在公共政策課程教學中的應用。教育評論，1，94-96。
49. 閻章薈, Z.-H.(2012)。公共管理專業情境模擬教學模式設計及應用。中國電力教育，20，37-38。
50. 鍾曉華=Zhong X. -H.(2016)。情景模擬法在「公共政策分析」課程中的應用研究。岳陽職業技術學院學報，31(3)，62-64。
51. 龔暄傑=Gong X.-J.(2014)。情景模擬教學法在法律談判課程中的應用。經濟法論壇，2，314-321。

1. 蕭人瑄,王順美,王喜青(2020)。有感的永續學習：模擬遊戲FishBanks Ltd.中經驗學習之探討。環境教育研究，16(1)，77-116。