融入能源議題於自然科學課程以促進國中生的能源素養

Fostering Junior High School Students' Energy Literacy Through Integrating the Energy Issue into Science Curriculum

10.6555/JEER.18.2.039

陳仕燁(Shih-Yeh Chen)；劉湘瑤(Shiang-Yao Liu)

太陽能 ； 能源素養 ； 節能減碳 ； 論證 ； 自然科學課程 ； solar energy ； energy literacy ； energy saving & carbon reduction ； argumentation ； science curriculum

環境教育研究

18卷2期（2023 / 07 / 01）

39 - 72

繁體中文;英文

自然科學領域課程綱要將「能源的開發與利用」列入學習內容架構，能源素養的培養亦為近年國內外重要的教育課題。本研究嘗試於九年級科學課程中融入能源議題，探討教學前、後學生能源素養的改變。教學活動分為三個階段：電池結構解說、雙人議題論證、小組決策行動，除了強化能源科學知識的學習外，另運用即時反饋系統，使學生在能源議題的討論中建構論點，並在小組成員互動的歷程中，提出節能的行動方案。本教學研究採用已發展的電腦化測驗，評量學生在教學前、後於「能源知識」、「能源議題及資訊」、「公民責任及永續社會」與「節能減碳生活型態」四個構面上的表現，以評估此教學設計是否可提升學生的能源素養。研究結果顯示，學生於四個構面的學習均有顯著之提升，為進一步了解學生於各構面的變化情形，各構面經編碼後，亦發現學生於環境知識、論證推理、關懷態度與節能行為四個編碼類別與其次項目中，均呈現正向之改變。藉由列舉能源議題及資訊與節能減碳生活型態兩構面之前、後測結果，並對應學生於論證活動與小組行動中之課程記錄，可更進一步瞭解教學策略對於學生能源素養改變的影響。雖知識和行為面向在教學後具有高度之提升，惟於「能源議題及資訊」構面尚未達理想標準，教師應適時於課程中融入能源議題進行教學以提升能源素養，使學生能以理性的判斷與實際之行動解決真實世界之問題。

The topic of "Energy Exploitation and Use" has been included in the new Science Curriculum Standards. In recent years, energy literacy is also an important educational agenda all over the world. This study aimed to develop an instruction for 9th graders that energy resources and environmental issues are incorporated into an existing science unit. Students' energy literacy was assessed to evaluate the influence of this instruction. Three components of the instruction were applied in which students are not only equipped with scientific concepts to deal with energy issues but also inspired to propose action plans for energy conservation. The instant response system was adopted to allow students to present their individual stances and reasons and communicate with other peers. Sixty-six students completed a computer-based test for energy literacy before and after the instruction. The energy literacy assessment included energy concepts, reasoning in energy issues, civic responsibility for a sustainable society, and low-carbon lifestyle dimensions. Results indicated that students have a significant improvement on the assessment, especially with the large effect sizes on the dimensions related to knowledge and behavior. However, students' written responses to essay questions showed that there is a need to improve their competence to discern information and support their claims with reasoned warrants with evidence. This study recommended that incorporating issues into science teaching could equip students with rational judgment and authentic action.

1. 陳冠利、劉湘瑤、陳柏熹、黃書涵(2015)。以情境式試題評量中學生能源素養。教育科學研究期刊，60(2)，167-196。doi: 10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(2).06
   連結：
2. Alghamdi, A. K. H., & El-Hassan, W. S. (2019). Saudi undergraduate students’ needs of pedagogical education for energy literacy. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(4), 521-537.
   連結：
3. Arvai, J. L., Campbell, V. E., Baird, A., & Rivers, L. (2004). Teaching students to make better decisions about the environment: Lessons from the decision sciences. The Journal of Environmental Education, 36(1), 33-44. doi:10.3200/joee.36.1.33-44 Białynicki-Birula, P., Makieła, K., & Mamica, Ł. (2022). Energy literacy and its determinants among students within the context of public intervention in Poland. Energies, 15(15), 5368. doi: 10.3390/en15155368
   連結：
4. Birdsall, S. (2010). Empowering students to act: Learning about, through and from the nature of action. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 26, 65-84. doi: 10.1017/S0814062600000835
   連結：
5. Bodzin, A. (2012). Investigating urban eighth-grade students’ knowledge of energy resources. International Journal of Science Education, 34(8), 1255-1275. doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.661483
   連結：
6. Bodzin, A. M., Fu, Q., Peffer, T. E., & Kulo, V. (2013). Developing energy literacy in US middle-level students using the geospatial curriculum approach. International Journal of Science Education, 35(9), 1561-1589. doi:10.1080/09500693.2013.769139
   連結：
7. Bybee, R. W. (2008). Scientific literacy, environmental issues, and PISA 2006: The 2008 Paul F-Brandwein lecture. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(6), 566-585. doi:10.1007/s
   連結：
8. Chawla, L., & Cushing, D. F. (2007). Education for strategic environmental behavior. Environmental Education Research, 13(4), 437-452. doi:10.1080/13504620701581539
   連結：
9. Chen, K. L., Huang, S. H., & Liu, S. Y. (2013). Devising a framework for energy education in Taiwan using the analytic hierarchy process. Energy Policy, 55, 396-403. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.025
   連結：
10. Chien, Y. T., & Chang, C. Y. (2015). Supporting socio-scientific argumentation in the classroom through automatic group formation based on students’ real-time responses. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Science education in East Asia: Pedagogical innovations and research-informed practices. Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-16390-1_22
    連結：
11. DeWaters, J., & Powers, S. (2008). Energy literacy among middle and high school youth. Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/4720280/
    連結：
12. DeWaters, J. E., & Powers, S. E. (2011a). Energy literacy of secondary students in New York State (USA): A measure of knowledge, affect, and behavior. Energy Policy, 39(3), 1699-1710. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.12.049
    連結：
13. DeWaters, J. E., & Powers, S. E. (2011b). Improving energy literacy among middle school youth with project-based learning pedagogies. Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6142961/
    連結：
14. Dittmer, L., Mugagga, F., Metternich, A., Schweizer-Ries, P., Asiimwe, G., & Riemer, M. (2018). “We can keep the fire burning”: building action competence through environmental justice education in Uganda and Germany. Local Environment, 23(2), 144-157. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2017.1391188
    連結：
15. Elo, S., & Kyngas, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107-115. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
    連結：
16. Gottlieb, D., Vigoda-Gadot, E., & Haim, A. (2013). Encouraging ecological behaviors among students by using the ecological footprint as an educational tool: A quasi-experimental design in a public high school in the city of Haifa. Environmental Education Research, 19(6), 844-863. doi:10.1080/13504622.2013.768602
    連結：
17. Harlen, W. (2001). The assessment of scientific literacy in the OECD/PISA project. Studies in Science Education, 36(1), 79-103. doi:10.1080/03057260108560168
    連結：
18. Hodson, D. (2010). Science education as a call to action. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 10(3), 197-206. doi:10.1080/14926156.2010.504478
    連結：
19. Holstermann, N., Grube, D., & Bögeholz, S. (2010). Hands-on activities and their influence on students’ interest. Research in Science Education, 40(5), 743-757. doi:10.1007/s11165-009-9142-0
    連結：
20. Hungerford, H. R. (2010). Epilogue. The Journal of Environmental Education, 41(1), 68-69. doi:10.1080/00958960903210049
    連結：
21. Jensen, B. B., & Schnack, K. (2006). The action competence approach in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 12(3-4), 471-486. doi:10.1080/13504620600943053
    連結：
22. Jin, H., Mehl, C. E., & Lan, D. H. (2015). Developing an analytical framework for argumentation on energy consumption issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(8), 1132-1162. doi:10.1002/tea.21237
    連結：
23. Karpudewan, M., & Roth, W.-M. (2016). Changes in primary students’ informal reasoning during an environment-related curriculum on socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(3), 401-419. doi:10.1007/s10763-016-9787-x
    連結：
24. Keller, L., Riede, M., Link, S., Hüfner, K., & Stötter, J. (2022). Can education save money, energy, and the climate?—assessing the potential impacts of climate change education on energy literacy and energy consumption in the light of the EU energy efficiency directive and the Austrian energy efficiency act. Energies, 15(3), 1118. doi: 10.3390/en15031118
    連結：
25. Kuhn, D., Shaw, V., & Felton, M. (1997). Effects of dyadic interaction on argumentive reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 15(3), 287-315. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1503_1
    連結：
26. Kuhn, D., Zillmer, N., Crowell, A., & Zavala, J. (2013). Developing norms of argumentation: Metacognitive, epistemological, and social dimensions of developing argumentive competence. Cognition and Instruction, 31(4), 456-496. doi:10.1080/07370008.2013.830618
    連結：
27. Lee, L. S., Lee, Y. F., Altschuld, J. W., & Pan, Y. J. (2015). Energy literacy: Evaluating knowledge, affect, and behavior of students in Taiwan. Energy Policy, 76, 98-106. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.11.012
    連結：
28. Lee, L. S., Lee, Y. F., Wu, M. J., & Pan, Y. J. (2019). A study of energy literacy among nursing students to examine implications on energy conservation efforts in Taiwan. Energy Policy, 135, 111005. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111005
    連結：
29. Lee, L. S., Lin, K. Y., Guu, Y. H., Chang, L. T., & Lai, C. C. (2013). The effect of hands-on ‘energy-saving house’ learning activities on elementary school students’ knowledge, attitudes, and behavior regarding energy saving and carbon-emissions reduction. Environmental Education Research, 19(5), 620-638. doi:10.1080/13504622.2012.727781
    連結：
30. Lee, Y. F., Nguyen, H. B. N., & Sung, H. T. (2022). Energy literacy of high school students in Vietnam and determinants of their energy-saving behavior. Environmental Education Research, 28(6), 907-924. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2022.2034752
    連結：
31. Lewis, J., & Leach, J. (2006). Discussion of Socio‐scientific Issues: The role of science knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 28(11), 1267-1287. doi: 10.1080/09500690500439348
    連結：
32. Lin, S. S. (2014). Science and non-science undergraduate students’ critical thinking and argumentation performance in reading a science news report. International Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, 12(5), 1023-1046. doi:10.1007/s10763-013-9451-7
    連結：
33. Liu, S. Y. (2016). Teaching environmental issues in science classroom: Status, opportunities, and strategies. In M.-H. Chiu (ed.), Science education research and practices in Taiwan (pp. 371-386). Singapore: Springer Science+Business Media. doi: 10.1007/978-981-287-472-6_19
    連結：
34. Mogensen, F. (1997). Critical thinking: a central element in developing action competence in health and environmental education. Health Education Research, 12(4), 429-436. doi: 10.1093/her/12.4.429
    連結：
35. Nussbaum, E. M., Sinatra, G. M., & Poliquin, A. (2008). Role of epistemic beliefs and scientific argumentation in science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 30(15), 1977-1999. doi:10.1080/09500690701545919 OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and equity in education, OECD Publishing, Paris. doi: 10.1787/9789264266490-en
    連結：
36. Patronis, T., Potari, D., & Spiliotopoulou, V. (1999). Students' argumentation in decision-making on a socio-scientific issue: Implications for teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 21(7), 745-754. doi: 10.1080/095006999290408
    連結：
37. Riemer, M., Voorhees, C., Dittmer, L., Alisat, S., Alam, N., Sayal, R., Bidisha, S. H., De Souza, A., Lynes, J., Metternich, A., Mugagga, F., Schweizer-Ries, P. (2016). The youth leading environmental change project: A mixed-method longitudinal study across six countries. Ecopsychology, 8(3), 174-187. doi:10.1089/eco.2016.0025
    連結：
38. Rudsberg, K., & Öhman, J. (2015). The role of knowledge in participatory and pluralistic approaches to ESE. Environmental Education Research, 21(7), 955-974. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2014.971717
    連結：
39. Sass, W., Boeve-de Pauw, J., Olsson, D., Gericke, N., De Maeyer, S., & Van Petegem, P. (2020). Redefining action competence: The case of sustainable development. The Journal of Environmental Education, 51(4), 292-305. doi: 10.1080/00958964.2020.1765132van den Broek, K. L. (2019). Household energy literacy: A critical review and a conceptual typology. Energy Research & Social Science, 57, 101256. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2019.101256
    連結：
40. Varela-Losada, M., Vega-Marcote, P., Pérez-Rodríguez, U., & Álvarez-Lires, M. (2016). Going to action? A literature review on educational proposals in formal Environmental Education. Environmental Education Research, 22(3), 390-421. doi:10.1080/13504622.2015.1101751
    連結：
41. Volk, T. L., & Cheak, M. J. (2003). The effects of an environmental education program on students, parents, and community. The Journal of Environmental Education, 34(4), 12-25. doi:10.1080/00958960309603483von Aufschnaiter, C., Erduran, S., Osborne, J., & Simon, S. (2008). Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies of how students' argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 101-131. doi: 10.1002/tea.20213
    連結：
42. Whitmarsh, L., Seyfang, G., & O’Neill, S. (2011). Public engagement with carbon and climate change: To what extent is the public ‘carbon capable’? Global Environmental Change, 21(1), 56-65. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.011
    連結：
43. Yacoubian, H. A. (2018). Scientific literacy for democratic decision-making. International Journal of Science Education, 40(3), 308-327. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2017.1420266
    連結：
44. Yang, J. C., Lin, Y. L., & Liu, Y.-C. (2017). Effects of locus of control on behavioral intention and learning performance of energy knowledge in game-based learning. Environmental Education Research, 23(6), 886-899. doi:10.1080/13504622.2016.1214865
    連結：
45. Yeh, S. C., Huang, J. Y., & Yu, H. C. (2017). Analysis of energy literacy and misconceptions of junior high students in Taiwan. Sustainability, 9(3), 423. doi:10.3390/su9030423
    連結：
46. Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35-62. doi:10.1002/tea.10008
    連結：
47. 教育部 (2017)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要―總綱。取自https://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/attach/87/pta_18543_581357_62438.pdf
48. 教育部 (2018)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校―自然科學領域。取自https://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/attach/63/pta_18538_240851_60502.pdf
49. 陳仕燁(2012)。電池原理與種類。取自 https://market.cloud.edu.tw/resources/web/1662220
50. 陳怡君、黃稜洋(2011)。節能減碳-省源($)一度讚。取自 http://www.esdtaiwan.edu.tw/UpLoad/%7B57FCC7B6-F721-4738-A5AF-C515596BB3C4%7D/content.html
51. 經濟部能源局(2017)。能源發展綱領。臺北市：經濟部能源局。
52. Chen, K. L., Liu, S. Y., & Chen, P. H. (2015). Assessing multidimensional energy literacy of secondary students using contextualized assessment. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 10(2), 201-218. doi:10.12973/ijese.2015.241a
53. Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning?. In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1-19). Oxford: Elsevier.
54. Lay, Y. F., Khoo, C. H., Treagust, D. F., & Chandrasegaran, A. L. (2013). Assessing secondary school students' understanding of the relevance of energy in their daily lives. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 8(1), 199-215.