题名

貨幣政策之預期衝擊對經濟成長的影響-馬可夫轉換模型之應用

并列篇名

The Effect of Expected Monetary Policy on Economic Growth-The Application of Markov Switching Model

DOI

10.30104/CYMR.200806.0002

作者

黃健銘(Chien-Ming Huang);蘇欣玫(Hsin-Mei Su);黃麗萍(Li-Ping Huang);鄭婉秀(Wan-Hsiu Cheng)

关键词

貨幣政策 ; 馬可夫轉換模型 ; 偏態T分配 ; 不對稱效果 ; Monetary policy ; Markov Switching Model ; Skewed T distribution ; Asymmetric effects

期刊名称

中原企管評論

卷期/出版年月

6卷1期(2008 / 06 / 01)

页次

31 - 52

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究探討美國、日本、台灣與南韓等四個國家貨幣政策及總體經濟指標對國家的經濟成長是否存在不同之差異影響,並分別利用常態分配及偏態T分配下之馬可夫轉換模型進行估計。實證結果顯示利用較一般化的偏態T分配之估計確實更能滿足樣本之特性及實證之有效性。再者,美國與日本處於低成長之機率較高,而台灣與南韓的經濟發展則多處於穩定狀態。在其餘總體經濟變數部分,日本、台灣與南韓的經濟成長率,和預期與非預期之貨幣政策存在正向顯著關係,且有效性皆大於預期的貨幣政策效果;而美國僅存在非預期的負向效果;其中,美國與台灣呈現出顯著的不對稱效果,但日本與南韓沒有顯著的差異。另外,政府調整重貼現率之宣示效果大於實質的意義,而通貨膨脹率及失業率與經濟成長率多成負向關係。綜論之,央行政策的實施對經濟成長率之影響,台灣與美國情形一致,而日本與南韓則較爲相似。

英文摘要

This paper investigates the relationship among economic growth rate and macroeconomic variables using Markov Switching Model with both normal and Skewed T distribution in the U.S., Japan, Taiwan and South Korea. The empirical results show that the data can be described well under generalized Skewed T distribution. Then, the probability of low economic growth rate is higher in the U.S. and Japan, and the economic growth rate is more stable in Taiwan and South Korea. As to the other macroeconomic variables, positive relationship between monetary policy and economic growth rate appears in Japan, Taiwan and South Korea, and the effect of unexpected monetary policy is more significant than expected ones. However, in the U.S., the negative relationship only exists between the unexpected monetary polity and the growth rate. Among them, the asymmetric effects exist in the U.S. and Taiwan, but there are not significant difference between expected and unexpected effects in Japan and South Korea. Further, the declare effect of adjusting discount rate by the government is significantly than the real effect. The relationship between economic growth rate and inflation or unemployment rate are negative. In conclusion, the implementation of the Central Bank policy influences on economic growth rate, Taiwan keeps the same situation as the U.S., comparatively similar to Japan and South Korea.

主题分类 社會科學 > 經濟學
社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. Azariadis, C.,B. D. Smith(1996).Private Information. Money, and Growth: indeterminacy, Fluctuations, and the Mundell-Tobin Effect.Journal of Economic Growth,1(3),309-332.
  2. Barro, R. J.(1978).Unanticipated Money Output, and the Price Level in the United States.Journal of Political Economy,86,549-580.
  3. Barro, R. J.(1977).Unanticipated Money Growth and Unemployment in the United States.American Economic Review,67,101-115.
  4. Barro, R. J.,Rush, M.,Stanley Fisher, (ed.)(1980).Rational Expectations and Economic Policy.Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.
  5. Chu, J.,Ratti, R. A.(1997).Effects of unanticipated monetary policy on aggregate Japanese output: the role of positive and negative shocks.Canadian Journal of Economics,30,722-741.
  6. Cover, J. P.(1992).Asymmetric Effects of Positive and Negative Money Supply Shocks.Quarterly Journal of Econometrics,1261-1282.
  7. DeLong, J. B.,Summers, L. H.(1988).How Does Macroeconomic Policy Affect Output?.Brookings Papers on Economic Activity,2,433-480.
  8. Florio, A.,Milano, P. D.(2004).The Asymmetric Effects of Monetary Policy.Journal of Economic Surveys,18(3),409-426.
  9. Garcia, R.,H. Schaller(2002).Are the Effects of Monetary Policy Asymmetric?.Economic Inquiry,40(1),102-119.
  10. Hamilton, J. D.(1989).A New Approach to the Economic Analysis of Nonstationary Time Series and the Business Cycle.Econometrica,57,357-384.
  11. Hansen, B. E.(1994).Autoregressive Conditional Density Estimation.International Economic Review,35,705-730.
  12. Karras, G.(1996).Are the Output Effects of Monetary Policy Asymmetric? Evidence-from a Sample of European Countries.Oxford Bulletin Economics and Statistics,58,267-278.
  13. Karras, G.(1996).Why Are the Effects of Money-Supply Shocks Asymmetric Convex Aggregate Supply or Pushing on a String.Journal of Macroeconomics,18(4),605-619.
  14. Morgan. D. P.(1993).Asymmetric Effects of Monetary Policy.Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Review,78,21-33.
  15. Quandt, R. E.(1972).A new approach to estimating switching regressions.Journal of the American Statistical Association,67,306-310.
  16. Rhee, W.,Rich, R. W.(1995).Inflation and the Asymmetric Effects of Money of Output Fluctuations.Journal of Macroeconomics,17,683-702.