题名

淡水河流域洪災損失機率風險分析

并列篇名

A Probabilistic Flood Risk Analysis of Household Losses in the Danshuei River Basin

DOI

10.29629/TEFP.200707.0002

作者

蕭代基(Daigee Shaw);黃星翔(Hsing-Hsiang Huang);洪銘堅(Ming-Jame Horng);盧孟明(Mong-Ming Lu);羅以倫(Yi-Lun Lo)

关键词

機率風險分析 ; 洪災損失 ; Probabilistic risk analysis ; Flood damages

期刊名称

臺灣經濟預測與政策

卷期/出版年月

37卷3期(2007 / 07 / 01)

页次

31 - 53

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本文應用機率風險分析法,以淡水河流域的家戶為研究的範圍與對象,依序進行洪災的災害度分析、暴露量推估、易損性分析與損失推估,最後,以Monte Carlo模擬法產生家戶損失超越機率曲線,並計算在幾個假設的決策者之風險接受度下之最大可能損失(PML)與每年損失期望值(AAL)。決策者可以根據這些資訊得知其面臨的洪災損失風險,進一步依據其決策原則設定一個城市(或流域)可以承擔的洪災損失、洪災防護規模以及擬定適當的風險管理策略。

英文摘要

We employ a probabilistic flood risk analysis to estimate exceedance probability curves, average annual loss (AAL) and probable maximum loss (PML) of households in the Danshuei River Basin in Taipei. We first establish a set of scenario precipitations, utilize the SOBEK model to simulate flood hazards and vulnerabilities, and estimate economic losses for each flood. The aggregate and occurrence exceedance probability curves for household losses are simulated using a Monte Carlo simulation. The average annual loss and the probable maximum loss in the Danshuei River Basin estimated using the aggregate exceedance probability curve can be applied to flood risk management and planning.

主题分类 社會科學 > 經濟學
参考文献
  1. Dong, W(2001).London,Reactions Publishing Group.
  2. Freeman, A. M. I.(2003).Washington DC,Resources for the Future.
  3. Freeman, A. M. I.(1993).Washington DC,Resources for the Future.
  4. Grossi, P.,H. Kunreuther,D. Windeler,P. Grossi,H. Kunreuther(2005).An Introduction to Catastrophe Models and Insurance.Catastrophe Modeling: A New Approach to Managing Risk.
  5. Hicks, J. R.(1946).Value and Capital: An Inquiry into Some Fundamental Principles of Economic Theory.
  6. Kunreuther, H.(2001).Mitigation and Financial RiskManagement for Natural Hazards.The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance.
  7. Messner, F.,V. Meyer(2005).Flood Damage, Vulnerability and Risk Perception: Challenges for Flood Damage Research.UFZ Discussion Paper.
  8. National Research Council(2000).Risk Analysis and Uncertainty in Flood Damage Reduction Studies.
  9. O`Keefe, P.,K.Westgate,B. Wisner(1976).Nature.
  10. Parker, D. J.,C. H. Green,P. M. Thompson(1987).Urban Flood Protection Benefits: A Project Appraisal Guide.
  11. RMS Expects Economic Loss to Exceed $100 Billion form Hurricane Katrina and the Great New Orleans Flood
  12. Shaw, D.,C. Yeh,W. Jean,C. Loh,Y. Kuo(2007).A Probabilistic Seismic Risk Analysis of Building Losses in Taipei: An Application of HAZ-Taiwan with its Pre-Processor and Post-Processor.Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers,30(2)
  13. Shaw, D.,H. Huang,M. Ho(2005).Modeling Flood Loss and Risk Perception: The Case of Typhoon Nari in Taipei.The Fifth Annual IIASA-DPRI Meeting on Integrated Disaster Risk Management: Innovations in Science and Policy.
  14. Smith, D. I.(1994).Flood Damage Estimation: A Review of Urban State-Damage Curves and Loss Functions.Water SA.
  15. UNECLAC(2003).Handbook for Estimating the Socio-Economic and Environmental Effects of Disasters.Mexico:United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean.
  16. van der Veen, A.,C. Logtmeijer(2005).Economic Hotspots: Visualizing Vulnerability to Flooding.Natural Hazards.
  17. White, G. F.(1945).Human Adjustment to Floods: A Geographical Approach to the Flood Problem in the United States.
  18. Wind, H. G.,T. M. Nierop,C. J. de Blois,J. L. de Kok(1999).Analysis of Flood Damages from the 1993 and 1995Meuse Floods.Water Resources Research.
  19. 韋樸、許文科、張靜貞、蘇明道(2005)。財政部保險司93年度委託研究計畫
  20. 徐義人(1995)。應用水文學。臺北:大中國圖書公司。
  21. 盧孟明、陳佳正(2005)。豪大雨之頻率分析方法。氣象學報。
  22. 蕭代基(2003)。行政院國家科學委員會91年度專題研究計畫
  23. 蕭代基(2004)。行政院國家科學委員會92年度專題研究計畫
  24. 蕭代基、羅俊雄、葉錦勳、簡文郁、郭彥廉(2002)。行政院國家科學委員會90年度專題研究計畫
被引用次数
  1. 廖晉賢、張學聖(2013)。臺南市土地使用計畫之水災風險分析。都市與計劃,40(1),59-79。
  2. 楊惠萱,李欣輯(2010).A Household Loss Model for Debris Flow.社會與區域發展學報,2(2),29-52.
  3. 楊曉文、黃雅文、楊曉文、黃雅文(2015)。洪水保險風險衡量與動態財務模擬分析:以基隆河流域住宅洪災為例。臺大管理論叢,25(2),83-118。