题名

洪災防治之效益-以基隆河整治爲例

并列篇名

Flood Control Benefits: A Case Study of the Keelung River Basin

DOI

10.29629/TEFP.200810.0002

作者

楊重信(Chung-Hsin Yang)

关键词

洪災防治 ; 特徵租金 ; 消費者剩餘 ; 益本比 ; Flood control ; Hedonic rent ; Consumer surplus ; Benefit-cost ratio

期刊名称

臺灣經濟預測與政策

卷期/出版年月

39卷1期(2008 / 10 / 01)

页次

33 - 67

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本文應用二階段特徵租金法估計基隆河整治後,原洪災機率超過0.5%之地區全面降至0.5%時之家戶總消費者剩餘,並計算基隆河整治計畫之益本比。本研究發現基隆河整治計畫完成後,洪災機率由目前水準全面降至0.5%之總消費者剩餘為每年98.66億元;假設各淹水區房屋之平均餘命爲30年,每年總消費者剩餘維持不變,折現率為0.025、0.05、0.075、0.1四種情況,則基隆河整治總效益之現值分別爲2,082.25億元、1,532.92億元、1,176.82億元、937.47億元,益本比分別爲2.87、2.12、1.62、1.29。

英文摘要

This paper employs a two-stage hedonic rent approach to estimate the benefits of flood control in the Keelung River Basin and to calculate the benefit-cost ratio of the Keelung River flood control project. The major findings of this study include: (1) The annual total benefit of reducing flooding probability from current levels to 0.5%, in terms of consumer surplus, is NT$ 9,866 million. (2) Assuming that the average life expectancy of houses in the flooding areas is 30 years, the annual consumer's surplus estimated stays the same, and the discounting rates are 0.025, 0.05, 0.075, and 0.1, respectively. Then, the estimated total benefits of the Keelung River flood control project are NT$ 208,225 million, NT$ 153,292 million, NT$ 117,682 million, and NT$ 93,747 million, respectively. The estimated benefit-cost ratios are 2.87, 2.12, 1.62, and 1.29, respectively.

主题分类 社會科學 > 經濟學
参考文献
  1. Babcock, M.,B. Mitchell(1980).Impact of Flood Hazard on Residential Property Values in Galt (Cambridge), Ontario.Water Resources Bulletin,16(3),532-537.
  2. Bateman, L.(1993).Evaluation of the Environment: A Survey of Revealed Preference Techniques.GEC Working Paper.
  3. Bialaszewski, D.,B. A. Newsome(1990).Adjusting Comparable Sales for Floodplain Location: The Case of Homewood, Alabama.The Appraisal Journal,58(1),114-118.
  4. Bin, O.,S. Polasky(2004).Effects of Flood Hazards on Property Values: Evidence Before and After Hurricane Floyd.Land Economics,80(4),490-500.
  5. Blackorby, C.,G. Lady,D. Nissen,R. R. Russell(1970).Homothetic Separability and Consumer Budgeting.Econometrica,38(3),468-472.
  6. Box, G. E. P.,D. R. Cox(1964).An Analysis of Transformations.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological),26(2),211-252.
  7. Brown, J. N.,H. S. Rosen(1982).On the Estimation of Structural Hedonic Price Models.Econometrica,50(3),765-768.
  8. Day , J. C.,J. R. Gilpin(1974).The Impact of Man-Made Lakes on Residential Property Values: A Case Study and Methodological Exploration.Water Resources Research,10(1),37-43.
  9. Donnelly, W. A.(1989).Hedonic Price Analysis of the Effect of a Floodplain on Property Values.Water Resources Bulletin,25(3),581-586.
  10. Driscoll, P.,B. Dietz,J. Alwang(1994).Welfare Analysis when Budget Constraints are Nonlinear: The Case of Flood Hazard Reduction.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,26(2),181-199.
  11. Epple, D.(1987).Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Estimating Demand and Supply Functions for Differentiated Products.The Journal of Political Economy,95(1),59-80.
  12. Foster, J. H.(1976).Flood Management: Who Benefits and Who Pays.Water Resources Bulletin,12(5),1029-1039.
  13. Griffith, R. S.(1994).University of Texas at Arlington.
  14. Hallstrom, D. G.,V. K. Smith(2005).Market Responses to Hurricanes.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,50(3),541-561.
  15. MacDonald, D. N.,J. C.Murdoch,H. L. White(1987).Uncertain Hazards, Insurance and Consumer Choice: Evidence from Housing Markets.Land Economics,63(4),361-371.
  16. Maddala, G. S.(1992).Introduction to Econometrics.New York:Maxwell Macmillan.
  17. Markandya, A.,P. Harou,L. G. Bellu,V. Cistulli(2002).Environmental Economics for Sustainable Growth.Cheltenham:Edward Elgar.
  18. Mendelsohn, R.(1985).Identifying Structural Equations with Single Market Data.The Review of Economics and Statistics,67(3),525-529.
  19. Miller, H. C.(1975).Coastal Flood Plain Management and the National Flood Insurance Program: A Case Study of Three Rhode Island Communities.Environment Comment.
  20. Montz, B. E.(1992).The Effects of Flooding on Residential Property Values in Three New Zealand Communities.Disasters,16(4),283-298.
  21. Muckleston, K.W.(1983).The Impact of Floodplain Regulations on Residential Land Values in Oregon.Water Resources Bulletin,19(1),1-7.
  22. North, J. H.,C. C. Griffin(1993).Water Source as a Housing Characteristic: Hedonic Property Valuation and Willingness to Pay for Water.Water Resources Research,29(7),1923-1929.
  23. Pearce, D. E.,A. Markandya(1989).Environmental Policy Benefits: Monetary Valuation.Paris:OECD.
  24. Phlips, L.(1974).Applied Consumption Analysis.Amsterdam:North-Holland.
  25. Rosen, S.(1974).Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition.Journal of Political Economy,82(1),34-55.
  26. Rosiers, F. D.,M. Theriault(1996).Rental Amenities and the Stability of Hedonic Prices: A Comparative Analysis of Five Market Segments.The Journal of Real Estate Research,12(1),17-36.
  27. Samuelson, P. A.(1947).Foundations of Economic Analysis.Cambridge, Massachusetts:Harvard University Press.
  28. Shilling, J. D.,C. F. Sirmans,J. D. Benjamin(1989).Flood Insurance, Wealth Redistribution, and Urban Property Values.Journal of Urban Economics,26(1),43-53.
  29. Skantz, T. R.,T. H. Strickland(1987).House Prices and a Flood Event: An Empirical Investigation of Market Efficiency.The Journal of Real Estate Research,2(2),75-83.
  30. Smith, K.(2001).Environmental Hazards: Assessing Risk and Reducing Disaster.New York:Routledge.
  31. Speyrer, J. F.,W. R. Ragas(1991).Housing Prices and Flood Risk: An Examination Using Spline Regression.Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics,4(4),395-407.
  32. Strotz, R. H.(1957).The Empirical Implications of a Utility Tree.Econometrica,25(2),269-280.
  33. Strotz, R. H.(1959).The Utility Tree: A Correction and Further Appraisal.Econometrica,27(3),482-488.
  34. Tobin, G. A.,B. E. Montz(1997).Natural Hazards: Explanation and Integration.New York:The Guilford Press.
  35. Tobin, G. A.,B. E. Montz(1994).The Flood Hazard and Dynamics of the Urban Residential Land Market.Journal of the American Water Resources Association,30(4),673-685.
  36. USDC(1994).Natural Disaster Survey Report, Silver Spring.Maryland:United States Department of Commerce.
  37. Weinberger, R. R.(2001).Commercial Property Values and Proximity to Light Rail: A Hedonic Price Application.Berkeley:University of California.
  38. Wu, Q.(1989).The Protection of China's Ancient Cities from Flood Damage.Disasters,13(3),193-227.
  39. Yusuf, A. A.,P. Koundouri(2005).Willingness to Pay for Water and Location Bias in Hedonic Price Analysis: Evidence from the Indonesian Housing Market.Environment and Development Economics,10(6),821-836.
  40. Zimmerman, R.(1979).The Effect of Flood Plain Location on Property Values: Three Towns in Northeastern New Jersey.Water Resources Bulletin,15(6),1653-1665.
  41. 颱風資料庫
  42. 內政部消防署(2008)。歷年天然災害損失統計年報。臺北:內政部消防署。
  43. 何信隆(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立臺北科技大學土木與防災技術研究所。
  44. 李鴻源(1998)。臺灣之水害防治。研考報導,43,17-26。
  45. 楊沛儒(2000)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所。
被引用次数
  1. 鄭斯文(2017)。都市排水街道流設施設計與抽水站操作優化模式建立與應用–以臺北市民生社區為例。國立臺灣大學土木工程學系學位論文。2017。1-133。