题名

從R&D看臺灣經濟發展瓶頸

并列篇名

THE BOTTLENECK OF ECONOMIC GROWTH IN TAIWAN: FROMTHE R&D POINT OF VIEW

作者

李高朝(Kao-Chao Lee);馮君強(Chun-Chiang Feng)

关键词

研究與發展 ; 產業關聯 ; 外溢效果 ; R&D ; Industrial linkage ; Spillover effect

期刊名称

臺灣經濟預測與政策

卷期/出版年月

46卷2期(2016 / 03 / 01)

页次

87 - 118

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

十多年來,臺灣之實質工資幾無增加,這呈現了經濟成長動力漸失,尤其以正確的資料,Solow的計量方法C-D (Cobb-Douglas)函數分析所得的成長趨勢,便是如此。不過Solow計量分析,方法論上低估R&D對經濟成長之貢獻,本文再以C-D函數出發,進一步做理論的推導,可求得臺灣總體經濟之資本需求與勞動需求曲線,當技術進步時,資本投資、資本報酬、工資及就業將增加,同時出口之競爭力也將提升。因此推升消費、投資與出口。從此即可了解R&D為經濟成長之原動力的真諦。若再配合產業關聯理論,發現R&D有高度的外溢效果,它是一種軟體的公共投資。若能與硬體的公共投資,直接生產設備投資有好的配合,經濟將走向最佳的成長線。

英文摘要

The real wage in Taiwan has not increased for more than ten years. This indicates the economy had lost its growth momentum. For the empirical study, we use the Solow Model, which however tends to underestimate the contribution of R&Dto economic growth. Therefore we extend the theoretical analysis to derive the capital and labor demand curves of Taiwan. Increase in R&D inputs will lead to a rise in capital investments, capital returns, wage, and employment. Improvement in export competitiveness can be an indirect result as well. Consequently, it can raise consumption, investment, and export. To sum up, R&D is the main driving force of economic growth. Using input-output analysis,we found that R&D has a high spillover effect. Adequate combination of R&D inputs and infrastructure investment can push the economic growth towards the optimal path.

主题分类 社會科學 > 經濟學
参考文献
  1. Liang, C. Y.(2009).Industrial Structure Change and Measurement of Total Factor Productivity Growth: The Krugman-Kim-Lau-Young Hypothesis Revisited.Academia Economic Papers,37(3),305-338.
    連結:
  2. Schumpeter, J. (1942), Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, New York: Harper and Brothers
  3. Jorgenson, D.W. and C. Y. Liang (1996), “The Industry-Level Output Growth and Total Factor Productivity Changes in Taiwan, 1961–1993,” Working Paper, Chiang Ching-Kuo Foundation for International Scholarly Exchange
  4. Bernstein, J. I.,Nadiri, M. I.(1988).NBER Working PaperNBER Working Paper,未出版
  5. Chen, K. H.,Hsiao, H. M.,Yang, H. Y.(2010).Spillover Effects of Innovation: Taiwanese Evidence.Applied Economics,42(26),3417-3437.
  6. Chen, S. S.,Chen, Y. S.,Liang, W. L.,Wang, Y.(2013).R&D Spillover Effects and FirmPerformance Following R&D Increases.Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,48(05),1607-1634.
  7. Chyi, Y. L.,Lai, Y. M.,Liu, W. H.(2012).Knowledge Spillovers and Firm Performance in the High-Technology Industrial Cluster.Research Policy,41(3),556-564.
  8. Färe, R.,Grosskopf, S.,Lee, W. F.(2001).Productivity and Technical Change: The Case of Taiwan.Applied Economics,33(15),1911-1925.
  9. Feenstra, R. C.,Madani, D.,Yang, T. H.,Liang, C. Y.(1999).Testing Endogenous Growth in South Korea and Taiwan.Journal of Development Economics,60(2),317-341.
  10. Galbraith, J. K.(1988).Time and the New Industrial State.The American Economic Review,78(2),373-376.
  11. Grossman, G. M.,Helpman, E.(1993).NBER Working PaperNBER Working Paper,未出版
  12. Grossman, G.M.,Helpman, E.(1991).Trade, Knowledge Spillovers, and Growth.European Economic Review,35(2),517-526.
  13. Krüger, J. J.,Cantner, U.,Hanusch, H.(2000).Total Factor Productivity, the East Asian Miracle, and the World Production Frontier.Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv,136(1),111-136.
  14. Lewis, W. A.(1954).Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labor.The Manchester School,22(2),139-191.
  15. Liu, H. L.,Lin, H. Y.,Peng, S. K.(2010).The Spillover Effects of R&D onManufacturing Industry in Taiwan's Metropolitan Areas.The Annals of Regional Science,45(3),519-546.
  16. Lucas, R. E.(1988).On the Mechanics of Economic Development.Journal of Monetary Economics,22(1),3-42.
  17. Romer, P. M.(1990).Endogenous Technological Change.The Journal of Political Economy,98(5),S71-S102.
  18. Schwab, K.,Sala-i-Martín, X.(2013).The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014.Switzerland:World Economic Forum.
  19. Solow, R. M.(1963).Capital Theory and the Rate of Return.Amsterdam:North-Holland.
  20. Solow, R.M.(1957).Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function.The Review of Economics and Statistics,39(3),312-320.
  21. Zhang, H.,Liu, X.(2007).The R&D Interindustry Spillover Change in China: On the Analysis of 1997 and 2002 IO Tables of China.The 16th International Input-Output Conference,Istanbul:
  22. 行政院主計總處(2012)。多因素生產力趨勢分析報告。臺北:行政院主計總處。
  23. 行政院經濟建設委員會(1997)。經濟年報—發展科技島, 提升競爭力。臺北:行政院經濟建設委員會。
  24. 李高朝(2005)。實用產業關聯分析精義。臺北:行政院經濟建設委員會。
  25. 林慈(2011)。臺灣勞動生產力成長估測與因應對策。臺灣經濟論衡,9(4),42-71。
  26. 施建生(2005)。偉大經濟學家熊彼得。臺北:天下文化。
  27. 胡勝正、詹維玲(1999)。臺灣總生產力決定因素之研究。自由中國之工業,89(9),1-50。
  28. 孫震(2003)。臺灣經濟自由化的歷程。臺北:三民書局。
  29. 梁國樹(1962)。論資本係數。自由中國之工業,18(2),21-31。
  30. 葉萬安(2011)。從管制到開放:臺灣經濟自由化的艱辛歷程。臺北:天下文化。
  31. 劉子年(2011)。貨幣戰爭對臺灣貿易收支之影響。國立屏東商業技術學院學報,13,91-108。
  32. 齋藤優(1984)。日本技術立國論。臺北:行政院經濟建設委員會。