题名

稅制與遺贈決策之實證分析

并列篇名

AN EMPIRICAL STUDY ON ESTATE AND GIFT DECISIONS

作者

李家銘(Chia-Ming Li);陳國樑(Joe Chen);黃勢璋(Shih-Chang Huang)

关键词

遺產及贈與稅 ; 稅制改革 ; 生前贈與 ; 死後遺贈 ; Estate and gift tax ; Tax reform ; Inter vivos gift ; Bequest

期刊名称

臺灣經濟預測與政策

卷期/出版年月

49卷1期(2018 / 10 / 01)

页次

97 - 146

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

為檢視遺產及贈與稅制對於個人財產移轉決策之影響,本研究藉由臺灣2001-2014年的遺產及贈與稅申報資料,針對個人贈與意願、分年贈與次數以及年贈與金額,透過Probit模型、統計檢定及差異中差異(difference-indifference;DID)等計量方法,探討2009年遺贈稅制改革如何改變個人生前贈與或死後遺贈之決策。研究結果發現,稅制改革明顯影響個人生前贈與決策:對於被繼承人淨財富高於遺產稅免稅額者,稅制改革提高其生前贈與意願、分年贈與情形及年贈與金額;尤其當被繼承人的淨財富愈高,贈與意願與年贈與金額增加之效果就愈趨明顯。

英文摘要

In order to examine how the estate and tax system affects individuals' decisions on property transfers, this study uses Taiwanese estate and gift tax re- turns data from 2001 to 2014 to study individuals' willingness to make inter vivos property transfers, the number of annual gifts, and the amount of annual gifts. Results from the Probit regression, statistic test and difference-in-difference (DID) analysis suggest that the estate and gift tax reform in 2009 affects inter vivos property transfers siginificantly: in cases where decedents' net wealth is higher than the estate tax exemption, the tax reform increases individuals' willingness to make inter vivos property transfers, the number of annual gifts, and the amount of annual gifts; furthermore, the effect is increasing with respect to the level of net wealth.

主题分类 社會科學 > 經濟學
参考文献
  1. 胡世唐、吳世英(2012)。臺灣遺產稅短漏報的實證分析。經濟論文叢刊,40(3),389-420。
    連結:
  2. 孫克難、羅時萬(2012)。臺灣實施所得稅單一稅率制度之探討。經濟論文叢刊,40(3),325-367。
    連結:
  3. Bernheim, B. D.,Lemke, R. J.,Scholz, J. K.(2004).Do Estate and Gift Taxes Affects the Timing of Private Transfers?.Journal of Public Economics,88(12),2617-2634.
  4. Hochguertel, S. and H. Ohlsson (2000), “Inter Vivos Gifts: Compensatory or Equal Sharing?” Econometric Society World Congress, Seattle: The Econometric Society.
  5. Joulfaian, D.(2004).Gift Taxes and Lifetime Transfers: Time Series Evidence.Journal of Public Economics,88(9-10),1917-1929.
  6. Joulfaian, D.(2005).Choosing between Gifts and Bequests: How Taxes Affect the Timing ofWealth Transfers.Journal of Public Economics,89(11-12),2069-2091.
  7. Kopczuk, W.(2007).Bequest and Tax Planning: Evidence from Estate Tax Returns.The Quarterly Journal of Economics,122(4),1801-1854.
  8. Kopczuk, W.,Slemrod, J.(2000).NBER Working PaperNBER Working Paper,未出版
  9. Kopczuk, W.,Slemrod, J.(2003).Dying to Save Taxes Evidence from Estate Tax Returns on the Death Elasticity.The Review of Economics and Statistics,85(2),256-265.
  10. McGarry, K.(2000).Inter Vivos Gifts or Bequests? Estate Taxes and the Timing of Parental Giving.NBER Tax Policy and the Economy,14,93-112.
  11. Nunes, G. (2016), “Pros and Cons for the U.S. of Flat vs. Progressive Taxes,” Tough-Nickel, April 21, 2016.
  12. Piketty, T.,Saez, E.(2003).Income Inequality in the United States, 1913-1998.The Quarterly Journal of Economics,118(1),1-39.
  13. 朱敬一(2015)。提高遺贈稅 『回饋努力少獎勵機運』。今周刊,964,40-42。
  14. 朱澤民、陳國樑、王肇蘭、黃勢璋(2016)。財政部委託研究計畫財政部委託研究計畫,財政部=Ministry of Finance, Republic of China (Taiwan)。
  15. 陳國樑、黃勢璋(2016)。我國遺贈稅制的後續改革方向。經濟前瞻,168,53-59。
  16. 曾巨威 (2007)。曾巨威 (2007), 《「社會公義」 仍為遺贈稅改革應堅持的最後底線》, 臺北: 財團法人國家政策研究基金會。 (Zeng, J.-W. (2007), The Society Justice: Final Principal of the Estate and Gift Tax Reform, Taipei: National Policy Research Foundation.)。
  17. 楊陳旺(2009)。國立成功大學會計研究所=Department of Accounting and Graduate Institute of Finance, National Cheng Kung University。
  18. 楊葉承、陳玉政(2014)。遺產稅及贈與稅率調降對申報行為、 逃漏動機與稅收影響之研究—以財政部臺北國稅局資料為例。財稅研究,43(4),108-137。
被引用次数
  1. 蔡鳳凰,黃勢璋,陳國樑,周德宇,伍大開(2021)。退稅便利性與外籍旅客消費-臺北101內部資料分析。臺灣經濟預測與政策,52(1),83-117。
  2. 林祖嘉,李明軒(2022)。擁有房產、代間協助、與社會地位間關係之研究。住宅學報,31(1),1-29。
  3. (2024)。遺贈稅率及生前贈與-2009年及2017年兩次稅改分析。應用經濟論叢,115,1-46。