题名

台灣金融機構公司治理特性與違約風險之探討

并列篇名

The Relationship between Corporate Governance and Default Risk in Taiwan's Financial Institution

DOI

10.30139/JACG.200806.0002

作者

黃健銘(Chien-Ming Huang);簡郁蓉(Yu-Jung Chien);鄭婉秀(Wan-Hsiu Cheng)

关键词

公司治理特性 ; 違約風險 ; 混合迴歸 ; 監督機制 ; Corporate governance ; Default risk ; Pooled regression ; Monitoring mechanism

期刊名称

會計與公司治理

卷期/出版年月

5卷1期(2008 / 06 / 01)

页次

33 - 53

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究目的在於探討國內金融機構公司治理特性對違約風險的影響。對於公司治理特性將著重於經營績效與股權結構的分析,相關產業涵蓋銀行業、壽險業、證券業和產險業,違約風險的衡量採用KMV模型進行推估,樣本資料採用具橫斷面及時間序列資料特性的縱橫資料(panel data)進行混合迴歸(pooled regression)估計。另外考量國內銀行業近年弊案不斷,故針對銀行業進行子樣本實證分析,於模型中分別引入內外部監督變數予以探討。在全樣本實證結果方面,獲利指標、流動性和大股東持股比率皆與違約風險呈現負向顯著關係。而銀行業方面,獲利指標對銀行違約風險呈現不顯著結果,流動性與資本適足率則呈現負向的顯著關係。在股權結構方面,經理人持股和機構法人持股對違約風險呈現負向影響,監察人持股則為正向關係。

英文摘要

This paper aims to examine relationship between the variables of corporate governance and default risk. To the corporate governance characteristic, we lay stress the effects of both the performance and ownership structure. Industries include banking, insurance, securities, and life insurance. Firm's default risk is estimated by KMV model. The Regression models have been to analysis using a sample data of cross-section and time series. Specially, we add monitoring mechanism variables to analysis bank's default risk because they happen more fraud behavior or default event in recent years. Our results show that profitability, liquidity, and largest stockholder express negative significantly relationship with firm's default risk. In banking, liquidity is negative significantly relationship with default risk, but performance indicate hasn't significant. In firm's ownership structures, manager's ownership and institutions ownership are negative outcomes, but supervisor ownership are positive relationship.

主题分类 社會科學 > 財金及會計學
社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. 王健聰、闕河士(2005)。台灣與大陸企業資本結構決定因素比較之研究。輔仁管理評論,12(1),93-120。
    連結:
  2. 呂麒麟、洪嘉聲、范麗雪、陳淑貞(2005)。金融機構所有權結構、公司特性與逾放比率之研究。會計與公司治理,2(1),61-79。
    連結:
  3. 林有志、李誠謙(2005)。員工紅利資訊內涵。文大商管學報,10(1),29-52。
    連結:
  4. 陳振遠、李文智、陳魁元、王朝仕(2005)。應用Ohlson會計評價模型探究公司治理之價值攸關性-以台灣上市公司電子業為例。台大管理論叢,15(2),123-142。
    連結:
  5. 陳曉蓉(2003)。台灣銀行業公司治理機制與風險承擔行為之關係。風險管理學報,5(3),363-391。
    連結:
  6. 菅瑞昌(2003)。關係銀行、公司治理與銀行風險承擔行為之研究。風險管理學報,5(3),393-410。
    連結:
  7. Altman, E. I.(1968).Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy.Journal of Finance,23,578-609.
  8. Altman, E. I.,G. Macro,F. Varetto.(1994).Corporate distress diagnosis: comparisons using linear discriminant analysis and neural networks (the Italian Experience).Journal of Banking and Finance,18,505-529.
  9. Bettis, R. A.(1981).Performance differences in related and unrelated diversified firms.Strategic Management Journal,2,379-394.
  10. Black, F.,M. Scholes.(1973).The pricing of options and corporate liabilities.Journal of Political Economy,81,637-659.
  11. Coats, P. K.,L. F. Fant.(1993).Recognizing financial distress patterns using a neural network tool.Financial Management,22,142-155.
  12. Fitzroy, F. R.,K. Kraft.(1987).Cooperation, productivity, and profit sharing.Quarterly Journal of Economics,102,23-36.
  13. Friend, I.,L. H. P. Lang.(1988).An empirical test of the impact of managerial self-interest on corporate capital structure.Journal of Finance,43,271-281.
  14. Gianluca, O.,M. M. Dacorogna,T. Jung.(2003).Credit risk models-do they deliver their promises? A quantitative assessment.Economic Notes,32,177-195.
  15. Gorton, G.,R. Rosen.(1995).Corporate control, portfolio choice, and the decline of banking.Journal of Finance,50,1377-1420.
  16. Grant, R. M.(1987).Multinationality and performance among British manufacturing companies.Journal of International Business Studies,18,79-89.
  17. Jensen, M. C.,R. S. Ruback.(1983).The market for corporate control: the scientific evidence.Journal of Financial Economics,11,5-50.
  18. Jensen, M.,W. Meckling.(1976).Theory of the firm: managerial behavior agency costs and ownership structure.Journal of Financial Economics,3,305-360.
  19. Kester, W. C.(1986).Capital and ownership structure: a comparison of united states and japanese manufacturing corporations.Finance Management,15,5-16.
  20. Klapper, L. F.,I. Love.(2004).Corporate governance, investor protection and performance in emerging markets.Journal of Corporate Finance,10,703-728.
  21. Merton, R. C.(1974).On the pricing of corporate debt: the risk structure of interest rates.Journal of Finance,29,449-470.
  22. Ohlson, J. A.(1980).Financial ratios and the probabilistic prediction of bankruptcy.Journal of Accounting Research,18,109-131.
  23. Saunders, A.,E. Strock,N. G. Travlos.(1990).Ownership structure, deregulation, and bank risk taking.Journal of Finance,45,643-654.
  24. Seifert B.,H. Gonenc,J. Wright.(2005).The international evidence on performance and equity ownership by insiders, blockholders, and institutions.Journal of Multinational Financial Management,15,171-191.
  25. Xu, X.,Y. Wang.(1999).Ownership structure and corporate governance in Chinese stock companies.China Economic Review,10,75-98.
  26. 沈中華、吳孟紋(2002)。銀行治理、銀行失敗與銀行績效:以台灣為例。亞太經濟管理評論,6(1),27-46。
  27. 張大成(2003)。企業危機預測模型在臺灣的應用與比較。臺灣銀行季刊,54(4),147-163。
  28. 張仲岳(1999)。員工紅利及董監酬勞對股價影響之研究。1999當代會計理論與實務研討會
  29. 陳木在、陳錦村(2001)。商業銀行風險管理。新陸書局。
  30. 陳若暉、王信惠(2007)。金控公司自我擴張型合併之研究:期間模型實證分析。公平交易季刊,15(2),95-127。
  31. 歐陽豪、許溪南、廖瑞芹、曹惠婷(2004)。股權結構、獨立董事與公司價值創造之實證分析-以台灣上市電子業為例。2004科技整合管理國際研討會
  32. 鄭伶如(2006)。不良債權與經營績效關係性之研究-以臺灣銀行業為例。聖約翰學報,23,189-202。
被引用次数
  1. 曾昭玲、林育良(2013)。臺灣上市上櫃銀行關係人往來因素影響逾期放款之研究。台灣金融財務季刊,14(1),1-29。
  2. 賴競民、劉嘉薇(2014)。中國大陸居民委員會與村民委員會選舉動員模式之比較:上海市與福建省個案。東亞研究,45(1),1-44。
  3. 葉依諭,翁慈青,王祥宏(2020)。家族企業與政治關係對負債資金成本的影響。台灣管理學刊,20(2),45-75。
  4. (2013)。臺灣上市上櫃銀行關係人往來因素影響逾期放款之研究。台灣金融財務季刊,14(1),1-29。
  5. (2018).Regulatory Competition and the World Bank's Doing Business Reports: Taiwan's Liberalization of the Minimum Capital Requirement for Incorporation as an Example.National Taiwan University law review,13(2),239-276.