順序效應及圖形扭曲對管理績效判斷的影響－以平衡計分卡為例

The Influence of Order Effect and Graphic Distortion on the Judgment of Management Performance: Using the Balanced Scorecard as an Example

10.30139/JACG.200806.0004

張允文(Yeun-Wen Chang)；張菁萍(Ching-Ping Chang)；廖述東(Shu-Tung Liao)

平衡計分卡 ； 圖形扭曲 ； 順序效應 ； 共同性衡量指標偏誤 ； Balanced Scorecard ； Graphic distortion ； Order effect ； Common measures bias

會計與公司治理

5卷1期（2008 / 06 / 01）

81 - 112

繁體中文

平衡計分卡近年來不論是在實務界或學術界均受到相當地重視，然而，過去研究卻發現使用平衡計分卡的過程中，存有共同性衡量指標判斷偏誤(Lipe and Salterio 2000; Banker et al. 2004; Libby et al. 2004)。本研究除了依循此一研究脈絡外，也探討圖形扭曲與順序效應對進行績效評估時，是否會有判斷偏誤的發生。採用實驗設計法，對會計研究所學生、EMBA學生與從事金融保險相關產業人士，總共360位受測者進行實驗，研究結果發現：(1)圖形扭曲對於受測者在財務指標績效評估之判斷，具有放大的效果；(2)以圖形呈現方式的資訊，會增加受測者發生時近效應之機率；(3)在圖形扭曲與不扭曲的情境下，受測者產生共同性衡量指標判斷偏誤的原因，可能是受到時近效應的影響所造成。

The issue of balanced scorecard has been received attention in practice and academy for recent years. However, past studies found that judgment of subjects have common measures bias when they use the balanced scorecard (Lipe and Salterio 2000; Banker et al. 2004; Libby et al. 2004). This study adopts graphic distortion and order effect to examine whether subjects' judgment have the same common measures bias. The subjects of this study include the graduate school of accounting students, EMBA students and related financial insurance managers. Results of this study are including: (1) In graphic distortion's experiments of financial measures evaluations, subjects have magnified effect. (2) Subjects' judgment has order effect when using graphic to present the information of management performance. (3) Under the condition of graphic distortion and non-distortion, the reason of subjects to evoke common measures bias maybe results from order effect.

1. 顏信輝、丁緯(2005)。架構效應與順序效應對股票投資判斷之影響。證券市場發展季刊，17(1)，41-78。
   連結：
2. Arunachalam, V.,B. K. W. Pei,P. J. Steinbart.(2002).Impression management with graphs: effects on choices.Journal of Information Systems,16,183-202.
3. Asare, S. K.(1992).The auditor's going-concern decision: interaction of task variables and the sequential processing of evidence.The Accounting Review,67,379-393.
4. Ashton, A. H.,R. H. Ashton.(1988).Sequential belief revision in auditing.The Accounting Review,63,623-641.
5. Banker, R. D.,H. Chang,M. J. Pizzini.(2004).The balanced scorecard: judgmental effects of performance measures linked to strategy.The Accounting Review,79,1-23.
6. Beattie, V.,M. J. Jones.(1992).The use and abuse of graphs in annual reports: theoretical framework and empirical study.Accounting and Business Research,22,291-303.
7. Bertin, J.(1983).The semiology of graphics.Madison, WI:University of Wisconsin Press.
8. Burgess, D. O.(2002).Graphical sleight of hand.Journal of Accountancy,193,45-51.
9. Coll, R. A.,J. H. Coll,G. Thakur.(1994).Graphs and tables: a four-factor experiment.Communications of the ACM,37,77-86.
10. Davis, J.(1984).Perspectives in psychology and law.New York:Wiley.
11. Dillard, J. F.,N. L. Kauffman,E. E. Spires.(1991).Evidence order and belief revision in management accounting decisions.Accounting, Organizations and Society,16,619-633.
12. Frigo, M. L.,P. G. Pustorino,G. W. Krull(2000).The balanced scorecard for community banks: translating strategy into action.Bank Accounting & Finance,13,17-24.
13. Hogarth, R. M.,H. J. Einhorn.(1992).Order effects in belief updating: the belief-adjustment model.Cognitive Psychology,24,1-55.
14. Ives, B.(1982).Graphical user interfaces for business information systems.MIS Quarterly,6,15-47.
15. Jarvenpaa, S. L.,G. W. Dickson.(1988).Graphics and managerial decision-making: research-based guidelines.Communications of the ACM,31,764-774.
16. Johnson, E. N.(1995).Effects of information order, group assistance, and experience on auditors' sequential belief revision.Journal of Economic Psychology,16,137-160.
17. Kaplan, R. S.,D. P. Norton.(1992).The balanced scorecard-measures that drive performance.Harvard Business Review,70,71-79.
18. Kosslyn, S. M.(1994).Elements of graph design.New York, NY:Freeman & Company.
19. Kosslyn, S. M.(1989).Understanding charts and graphs.Applied Cognitive Psychology,3,185-226.
20. LaSalle, R. E.(1997).Presentation order effects on accounting students' ethical judgments.Journal of Accounting Education,15,19-38.
21. Leivian, G. M.(1980).How to communicate financial data more efficiently.Management Accounting,62,31-34.
22. Libby, T.,S. E. Salterio,A. Webb.(2004).The balanced scorecard: the effects of assurance and process accountability on managerial judgment.The Accounting Review,79,1075-1094.
23. Lipe, M. G..,S. E. Salterio.(2000).The balanced scorecard: judgmental effects of common and unique performance measures.The Accounting Review,75,283-298.
24. Mackay, D. B.,A. Villarreal.(1987).Performance differences in the use of graphic and tabular displays of multivariate data.Decision Science,18,535-546.
25. Moser, D. V.(1989).The effects of output interference, availability, and accounting information on investors' predictive judgments.The Accounting Review,64,433-448.
26. Nisbett, R.,L. Ross.(1980).Human inference: strategies and shortcomings of human judgment.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
27. Pany, K.,P. M. J. Reckers.(1987).Within-vs. between-subjects experimental designs: a study of demand effects.Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory,7,39-53.
28. Pei, B. K. W.,P. M. J. Reckers,R. W. Wyndelts.(1992).Tax professionals belief revision: the effects of information presentation sequence, client preference, and domain experience.Decision Sciences,23,175-199.
29. Pei, B. K. W.,S. A. Reed,B. S. Koch.(1992).Auditor belief revision in a performance auditing setting: an application of the belief-adjustment model. Accounting.Organizations and Society,17,169-183.
30. Reckers, P. M. J.,J. J. Schultz(1993).The effects of fraud signals, evidence order, and group-assisted counsel on independent auditor judgment.Behavioral Research in Accounting,5,124-144.
31. Remus, W.(1987).A study of graphical and tabular displays and their interaction with environmental complexity.Management Science,33,1200-1204.
32. Silk, S.(1998).Automating the balance scorecard.Management Accounting,79,38-44.
33. Slovic, P.,D. MacPhillamy.(1974).Dimensional commensurability and cue utilization in comparative judgment.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,11,172-194.
34. Stevens, S. S.(1975).Psychophysics: introduction to its perceptual. Neural, and Social Prospects.New York, NY:John Wiley.
35. Tan, J. K. H.,I. Benbasat.(1993).The effectiveness of graphical presentation for information extraction: a cumulative experimental approach.Decision Sciences,24,167-191.
36. Tom, A.,S. Davis,A. Hibbets.(2001).Tri-cities community bank: a balanced scorecard case.Strategic Finance,83,54-59.
37. Trotman, K. T.,A. Wright.(2000).Order effects and recency: where do we go from here?.Accounting and Finance,40,169-182.
38. Tubbs, R. M.,W. F. Messier,W. R. Knechel.(1990).Recency effects in the auditor's belief-revision process.The Accounting Review,65,452-460.
39. Tufte, E. R.(1983).The visual display of quantitative information.Cheshire, CT:Graphic Press.
40. Tufte, E. R.(1990).Envisioning information.Cheshire, CT:Graphic Press.
41. 周夢柏(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。朝陽科技大學財務金融研究所。
42. 林佳靜(2000)。博士論文(博士論文)。實踐大學企業管理研究所。
43. 侯采雯(1998)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台灣大學會計研究所。
44. 張美月(1985)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。政治大學統計研究所。
45. 陳佳鳳(1998)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台灣大學會計學研究所。
46. 劉玉珍(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。世新大學經濟學系研究所。

1. 顏信輝、陳慧玲(2014)。道德意識、稀釋效果與順序效應對道德判斷之影響：以盈餘管理議題為例。管理與系統，21(2)，295-328。