陶淵明〈閑情賦〉寄託之意義商榷

Discussion of the meaning of Tao, Yuan-ming (Shen-Chin Fu) suggestion

林佳慧(Chia-Hui Lin)

〈閑情賦〉 ； 愛情 ； 比興 ； 寄託 ； 知音 ； 理想世界 ； (Shen-Chin Fu)(閑情賦) ； love ； bi-sin(比、興) ； suggestion ； confidants ； utopia

嶺東通識教育研究學刊

6卷4期（2016 / 08 / 01）

65 - 87

繁體中文

陶淵明〈閑情賦〉之主旨與寫作動機歷來聚訟紛紛，昭明太子蕭統在《陶淵明集．序》認為〈閑情賦〉乃陶淵明白璧之瑕；蘇東坡則一反「白璧微瑕」之論，而主張與《國風》、屈、宋無異。議者延續蕭統與東坡，分別有「愛情說」與「比興說」兩造爭論，各言之有理，相持不下。本文則試梳理二者之內涵脈絡，歸結廣義「寄託」之可能性，作淵明〈閑情〉，情歸何處之探討。以為「愛情說」與「比興說」，合之則兩美，今人觀〈閑情賦〉，無須視淵明為完人，而不許淵明有愛情之遐思；也不必視淵明必有凡情，而反對〈閑情賦〉可能有理想性的寄託―不論是理想政治的擁抱，或是知音的渴求。讓「愛情說」與「比興說」兩造並存於廣義「寄託說」之下，正好構成陶淵明情感之豐富與完整。

The theme and writing motivation of Tao, Yuan-ming (Shen-Chin Fu) have been studied for years, making various conclusions. In the preface of Tao Yaun-ming collection, Hsiao Tong, the Zhao-Ming crown prince, thinks that this work is the flaw of Tao. However, Su, Dong-pao objects Hsiao's point, and claims that he agrees with that of (Guo Feng), Qu and Song. The author will describe Hisao and Don-pao's arguments. which are love-related and bi, sin-related respectively, believing that they all get their points and can not tell which one is better and tries to recount the internal meanings of the contradiction, concluding that it is possible to generalize suggestion, on which this article is based to categorize Tao (Shen-Chin). The writer thinks that it will be perfect if two points converge. Nowadays, when reading (Shen-Chin Fu), readers don't have to consider that Yuan-ming is a man without defects and not allow him to hold reverie about love. Also, they don't have to think that he must have feelings and disapprove that it may suggest some ideas whether it is implying the ideal politics or eager to looking for confidants. It is making the controversy co-exist under the generalized suggestion that composes the abundance and integrity of Tao, Yuan-ming's emotions.

1. 王國維、徐調孚編(2007)。校注人間詞話。臺北:頂淵文化事業公司。
2. 王國維、謝維揚編、 房鑫亮編(2009)。王國維全集。杭州:浙江教育出版社出版。
3. 王應麟(1978)。困學紀聞。臺北:中國子學名著集成編印基金會。
4. 弘法大師(1976)。文鏡秘府論。臺北:河洛。
5. 朱熹、黎靖德編(1986)。朱子語類。臺北:文津。
6. 呂凌(2012)。從《閒情賦》看楚辭對陶淵明的影響。文史月刊
7. 周振甫(2006)。陶淵明和他的詩賦。南京:江蘇教育出版社。
8. 屈原、洪興祖(1999)。楚辭補注。臺北:大安出版社。
9. 俞正燮(1985)。癸巳存稿。北京:中華。
10. 袁行霈(1992)。陶淵明的《閑情賦》與辭賦中的愛情閑情主題。北京大學學報（哲學社會科學版），1992(5)
11. 袁行霈(2003)。陶淵明集箋注。北京:中華書局。
12. 黃明誠(2005)。魏晉風流的藝術精神─才性、情感與玄心。臺北:國立歷史博物館。
13. 楊家駱編(1970)。陶淵明詩文彙評。臺北:台灣中華書局。
14. 劉熙載(1964)。藝概。臺北:廣文書局。
15. 魯迅(1990)。且介亭雜文二集。臺北:風雲時代。
16. 魯迅、林毓生編輯、李歐梵編輯(1989)。魯迅全集。臺北:唐山。
17. 錢鍾書(1990)。管錐篇。臺北:書林。
18. 謝雲飛(1978)。文學與音律。臺北:東大圖書有限公司。
19. 鍾優民(1981)。陶淵明論集。長沙:湖南人民出版社。
20. 蘇珊玉(2014)。王國維「歐穆亞」說之於陶詩審美的可然性：管窺陶淵明之〈責子〉詩與〈閒情賦〉。第四屆文學藝術與創意研發學術研討會論文集，臺北:
21. 蘇軾(1986)。蘇東坡全集。北京:中國書店出版。
22. 龔自珍(1975)。龔定盦全集。臺北:河洛。