論Michael Walzer自由多元社會的平等與德行

On Michael Walzer's Concepts of equality and civic virtue in liberal pluralistic society

韓台武(Tai-Wu Han)

複雜平等 ； 分配正義 ； 社會意義 ； 多元主義 ； 社會正義 ； Complex equality ； Distributive justice ； Social meaning ； Pluralism ； Social justice

嶺東通識教育研究學刊

7卷2期（2017 / 08 / 01）

51 - 73

繁體中文

在當代的政治哲學領域中，Michael Walzer是位相當重要的人物，本文的主要目的是整理與闡述當代政治思想家Walzer關於自由多元社會重構的政治哲學觀點。根據Walzer所言，自由主義多元論的推論並不是多元的真實面貌，自由多元社會政治秩序的危機，在於自由主義誤解了文化對人類的重要性。據此，本文將透過文獻分析的方式，探討諸如複雜平等、分配正義、厚與薄道德理論、社會意義、寬容等Walzer政治哲學的核心概念，試圖藉此重新詮釋平等與寬容的觀念。

In the field of contemporary political philosophy, Michael Walzer undoubtedly occupies a significant position. The primary purpose of this thesis is to explore and explicate contemporary political thinker Walzer's political philosophy perspective concerning one that realizes the reconstruction process of liberal pluralistic society. According to Walzer, the liberal multiculturalism s inference is not pluralistic society real face. The crisis of liberal pluralistic social political order, he considered that the liberalism misunderstood the significance of culture to human agency. Therefore, I will through the analysis of the Walzer s essays to discuss some key theoretical concepts of ＂complex equality distributive justice, thick and thin, social meaning, toleration in an attempt to reinterpret the concepts of equality and toleration.

1. Ball, T.(ed.),Farr, J.(ed.)(1989).Political Innovation and Conceptual Change.London:Rout legde.
2. Barbalet, J . M.(1988).Citizenship.Milton Keynes:Open University Press.
3. Clarke, P. B.(ed.),Linzey, A.(ed.)(1996).Dictionary of ethics, theology and society.London:Routledge.
4. Crick, B.(2000).Essays on citizenship.London:Continuum.
5. Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich,Nisbet, H.B.(trans.)(2003).The Elements of Phi losophy of Right.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
6. Kymlicka, Will,Norman, W.(1994).Return of the Citizen: A Survey of Recent Work on Citizenship Theory.NY:State University of New York Press.
7. Marshall, G.(1998).Essays on citizenship.Oxford:Oxford University.
8. Mendus, S.(Ed.),Edwards, D.(Ed.)(1987).On toleration.Oxford:Clarendon Press.
9. Miller, D,Walzer, Michael(1995).Pluralism, justice and equality.UK:Oxford University Press.
10. Miller, David(ed. )(2007).Thinking Politically: Essays in Political Theory.New Haven:Yale University Press.
11. Mouffe, Chantal(eds.)(1992).Dimensions of Radical Democracy : Pluralism, Citizenship and Community.London:Routlegde.
12. Paul, Ellen F.(ed.),Miller, Fred D., Jr.(ed.),Paul, Jeffrey(ed.)(1994).Cultural Pluralism and Moral Knowledge.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
13. Rawls, John(2005).A Theory of Justice.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
14. Roland, Dworkin(1983).To each his own.New York Review Books
15. Taylor, Charles(1985).Philosophy and the Human Sciences: Philosophical Papers 2.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
16. Walzer, M.(ed.)(1998).Toward a global civil society.Oxford:Berghahn.
17. Walzer, Michael(1997).On toleration.New Haven:Yale University.
18. Walzer, Michael(1983).Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality.New York:Basic Books.
19. Walzer, Michael(1970).Obligations : Essays on Disobedience, War, and Citizenship.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
20. Walzer, Michael(2005).Politics and Passion: Toward a More Egalitarian Liberalism.New Haven:Yale University Press.
21. Walzer, Michael(1994).Thick and Thin: Moral Argument at Home and Abroad.Notre Dame:University of Notre Dame Press.
22. Walzer, Michael(1995).Education, democratic citizenship and multiculturalism.Journal of philosophy of education,29(2),181-189.
23. Walzer, Michael(1987).Interpretation and Social Criticism.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
24. 江宜樺(2001)。自由民主的理路。台北:聯經。
25. 梁文韜(2004)。系絡、原則與社會正義：比較米勒及瓦瑟的多元主義正義論。歐美研究，35(11)，605-668。
26. 鄧正來(2001)。市民社會。台北:揚智。
27. 韓台武(2013)。如何建構具有共識的公平正義理念：羅爾斯的觀點。現代桃花源學刊，3，40-57。